Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparent Re-alignment of the Diamond Storage Ring M. Apollonio – Diamond Light Source Ltd ESLS – XXII Workshop, ESRF Grenoble, November 25 th /11/2014M.
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
Ultra Low Vertical Emittance at the Australian Light Source Mark Boland on behalf of Rohan Dowd 1.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring David L. Rubin December 22, 2011.
June 14th 2005 Accelerator Division Overview of ALBA D. Einfeld Vacuum Workshop Barcelona, 12 th -13 th September 2005 General 10 th September 2005.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
Studies on Lattice Calibration With Frequency Analysis of Betatron Motion R. Bartolini DIAMOND Light Source Ltd FMA workshop, Orsay, LURE, 1 st and 2 nd.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
An ultra-low emittance lattices for Iranian Light Source Facility storage ring Esmaeil Ahmadi On behalf of beam dynamics group Iranian Light Source Facility.
Emittance Tuning Simulations in the ILC Damping Rings James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
LET in the ILC DRs with Minimal Tuning Knobs and other assorted information James Jones Deepa Angal-Kalinin and Frank Jackson.
PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
CESR Test Accelerator Optics Correction and Tuning Tools David Sagan Cornell University.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Machine Operation and Studies at SSRF Wenzhi ZHANG Dec. 16, 2013 Spain.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
Diamond-II upgrade toward ultra-low emittance T. Pulampong University of Oxford Octoberfest October 2014 Royal Holloway, London.
Low emittance experience at Diamond R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd John Adams Institute, University of Oxford XI SuperB Workshop Frascati, 2 nd.
Damping rings, Linear Collider School Low vertical emittance tuning Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU Accelerator and Beam Physics group Beams Department CERN.
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Diamond Light Source Status and Future Challanges
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
Vertical Emittance at the Quantum Limit
Low Emittance Rings 2014 Workshop
Ben Cerio Office of Science, SULI Program 2006
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Recent Studies of Injection System at
Linear and Nonlinear Lattice Correction Via Betatron Phase
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Low Emittance Tuning in CESR TA
Machine Operation and Progresses in SSRF
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Low Emittance Tuning David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron Rohan Dowd Australian Synchrotron

Outline Overview of AS Facility Storage ring Lattice and Optics LOCO Method at AS Optics Corrections with LOCO Coupling control and emittance tuning results with LOCO Planned improvements

Our Facility First Light Source Facility in Australia 3rd Generation Light source 3 GeV electron storage ring, with linac and booster synchrotron. Currently 9 beamlines Room for 30+ beamlines Construction started: Mid-2004, Injector commissioning: Early 2006. First Light: 14 July 2006. User Operations Started: April 2007

Organisation Currently ~ 100 staff total Limited in-house development capability. Extensive use of contractors for large projects

Storage ring overview Double bend achromat 14 Unit cells Combined function dipoles Corrector and skew quad coils on sextupoles (SDAs). Horizontal emittance varied with dispersion. Individual magnet strength control

Storage Ring Parameters Lattice overview Storage Ring Parameters Energy 3 GeV Circumference 216 m RF Frequency 499.654 MHz Harmonic Number 360 Peak RF Voltage 3.0 MV Current 200 mA Critical Photon Energy 7.8 keV Betatron Tune (h/v) 13.3/5.2 Momentum Compaction 0.002 Natural Chromaticity (h/v) -28/-27 Radiation Damping (h/v/l) 3.4/4.6/2.8 ms Energy Spread 0.1 % Radiation Loss Per Turn 932 keV Horizontal Emittance 7-16 nm∙rad

Beam Diagnostics X-ray and optical diagnostic beamlines X-ray pinhole used for emittance measurements, but has inherent resolution limits Diagnostic straight with, kickers, scrapers, striplines, DCCT. 98 BPMs (micron resolution). Beam based alignment conducted regularly. 3.4 6.8 X-ray Diagnostic Beamline Optical Diagnostic Beamline

LOCO method LOCO – Linear Optics from Closed Orbits. Adjusts the linear optics (no sextupoles) in the model to fit the real machine data Model response matrix – Machine response matrix = Error Minimise by adjusting the model ‘fit parameters’

Response Matrix Used for orbit and optics corrections Gives the orbit change at each BPM for a given kick at each corrector

LOCO fit parameters Normally include BPM/Corrector gains and rolls Quadrupole strengths Skew Quadrupole strengths Also can include: Insertion device Kx/Ky Dipole focusing Misalignments x/y/z of any component Rotations of any component. Anything else you can think of…

LOCO inputs Orbit Response, Dispersion Measurement, BPM Noise

LOCO Outputs - gains and coupling

LOCO Outputs – Quadrupole Strengths Quadrupole strength changes used to fit the model to the machine can be inverted and then applied back to the machine in order to correct the machine for differences in quadrupole gains This can smooth out the beta functions of the machine.

LOCO Optics Corrections – Quadrupole errors Uncorrected beta functions Corrected beta functions

LOCO Optics Corrections Check the accuracy of the calibrated model by comparing Dispersion measurement against the model Beta functions also be checked against the calibrated model

Dispersion Modes We can allow dispersion to leak into the straights to reduce our emittance Calibrated model used to adjust the optics Current User mode is 0.1m dispersion. Emittance confirmed with X-ray pinhole measurements X-ray pinhole measurements using calibrated model source point parameters Dispersion [m] Measured Horizontal Emittance [nm] Vertical Emittance[pm] Measured Emittance Coupling [%] 19 21 0.11 0.1 14 0.10 0.24 10 7 0.07

LOCO emittance coupling Coupling of the lattice is measured by including ‘ghost’ skew quadrupoles into the model and allowing LOCO to adjust their strength. Model (with ghost skew quadrupoles) is calibrated to the machine. Fit parameters are: - BPM gains and rotations - Corrector gains and rotations - Quadrupole strengths - ‘Ghost’ Skew quadrupole components strengths in all quadrupole and sextupoles Coupling of lattice is calculated using AT function ‘calccoupling’ (beam envelope calculation). Result (with Natural ring coupling) = 13.4 pm.rads

Vertical Dispersion Contribution Measured vertical dispersion dominated by BPM coupling. Used calibrated model with BPM rotations set to zero to extract the vertical dispersion. Emittance contribution can then be calculated Result = 1.2 pm.rads

Coupling Adjustment Fit skew quadrupole components in the model only where there are real skew quadrupole magnets in our machine. Obtain strengths of skew quadrupoles used to calibrate model. Measure lifetime, Adjust LOCO weightings for Resp. matrix, Horizontal and vertical dispersion for lowest (Touscheck dominated) lifetime – should be lowest emittance.

Coupling Adjustment Measurements Three configurations used: - Natural Coupling: Skew quads set to zero - Reduced Coupling: Skew quads set to the negative of the LOCO fit results - Increased Coupling: Skew quads set to the positive of the LOCO fit results Vertical Dispersion remains mainly unchanged – skew quads are in low dispersion areas. Vertical orbit change from horizontal kick shows significant effect.

Coupling Adjustment measurements Method Increased Coupling (1%) Natural Coupling (0.1%) Reduced Coupling (0.01%) X-ray pinhole 68μm (23 pm??) 58μm 14 pm 52μm (9 pm??) Lifetime Measurement 12.0 ± 0.05 hours 6.16 ± 0.05 hours 2.45 ± 0.05 hours (6.3 decrease in ε) Beam envelope calc 89.5 pm 13.4 pm 1.2 pm Other Methods Tune crossing measurement 3.2% 0.32% 0.02% Vertical dispersion calc 1.55 pm 1.20 pm 1.18 pm Transverse coupling calc 0.62% (86.8 pm) 0.15% (21 pm) 0.012% (1.68 pm) Sum (dispersion + coupling) 88.3 pm 22.2 pm 2.86 pm Lifetime measurements indicate a factor 6.3 reduction in emittance. Tune crossing measurement may have some accuracy problems. If the model is accurate then we may well be achieving very small emittances.

Planned Improvements Investigate skew quadrupole repositioning. All sextupoles have skew quad windings, only one family has power supplies (28/98) . Interferometric measurement of the emittance on the optical diagnostic beamline may yield more accurate results than X-ray pinhole. Refinement of LOCO correction technique. Turn-by-turn BPM analysis may be also used to calculate quadrupole strengths (phase advance), may be used to independently check the model

Conclusion Our calibrated model indicates we can currently achieve a vertical emittance of ~ 2-3 pm.rad More work need to be done to confirm the accuracy of the model. Coupling control may be enhanced by repositioning skew quads. The Accelerator Physics team at the Australian Synchrotron are keen to work on this topic and eager to share our experiences with the ILC

Australian Synchrotron www.synchrotron.org.au