The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
Advertisements

WBS 2.08 Extinction Independent Design Review of Mu2e 5/3/11 Eric Prebys L3 Manager for Extinction.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Kirk McDonald Monday, 28th May Report of the International Working Group on Muon Beamlines Bruno Autin, Roberto Cappi, Rob Edgecock, Kirk McDonald,
The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) Experiment
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Ivan Logashenko for Mu2e Collaboration
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
Muons, Inc. AAC Feb M. A. C. Cummings 1 Uses of the HCC Mary Anne Cummings February 4, 2009 Fermilab AAC.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
PRISM and Neutrino Factory in Japan Y. Kuno KEK, IPNS January 19th, 2000 at CERN.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
Project Overview Ron Ray Mu2e Project Manager Fermilab Sept. 26, 2008 Preliminary Director’s Review of mu2e Fermilab.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
Update of the DeeMe spectrometer design and its performance Nguyen Duy Thong, Masaharu Aoki, Doug Bryman C, Satoshi Mihara A, Yohei Nakatsugawa A, Hiroaki.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
Stopped Muon/Pion Measurements Jim Miller, BU May 2012 UW Test Beam Meeting.
Muon Beams for Particle Physics Ajit Kurup Winter Seminar March 2010.
Eric Prebys, FNAL HB2012, Beijing, China.  Representing the Mu2e Collaboration  24 Institutions  ~120 Collaborators  This talk has direct contributions.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center Fermilab *Very much a work in progress 7/24/09.
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility (CEBAF) at JLab in Newport News, Virginia, is used to study the properties of quark matter. CEBAF.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
NEUTRINO DETECTORS Cutting-Edge Accelerator Research for a Neutrino Factory and Other Applications Ajit Kurup for the FETS and UKNF Collaborations Cutting-Edge.
Μ→e search using pulsed muon beam μ -  e - νν nuclear muon capture Muon Decay In Orbit  π - +(A,Z)→(A,Z-1)*, (A,Z-1)* →γ+(A,Z-1), γ→e + e - Prompt.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Giovanni Onorato Fermilab University of Rome “Guglielmo Marconi” INFN Lecce Mu2e general presentation.
1 Beam Extinction and Monitoring at the Upcoming Mu2e Experiment Ryan J. Hooper on behalf of the Mu2e Collaboration DPF 2015 August 5th, 2015.
Physics with the COMET Staging Plan Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
M. Garcia-Sciveres July 2002 ATLAS A Proton Collider Detector M. Garcia-Sciveres Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
COMET μ-e conversion search at J-PARC. μ-e conversion physics SUSY-GUT, SUSY-seesaw (Gauge Mediated process) – BR = = BR(μ→eγ) × O(α) – τ→lγ SUSY-seesaw.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Jim Miller Boston University for the Mu2e Collaboration.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab: Giovanni Onorato, Fermilab - INFN Lecce – Universita’ G. Marconi Mu2e Member Institutions: Boston University; Brookhaven.
New cLFV search experiments using the mu-e conversion process Satoshi MIHARA KEK, Japan.
g beam test of the Liquid Xe calorimeter for the MEG experiment
Uses of the HCC Mary Anne Cummings February 4, 2009 Fermilab AAC
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
Search for CLFV at COMET experiment muon to electron conversion
MICE The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
Muon stopping target optimization
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
Muon Front End Status Chris Rogers,
Design of the MANX experiment
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
ACCELERATORS AND DETECTORS
The Detector System of the MICE Experiment
COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
What is μ-e Conversion ? μ μ-+(A,Z)→e-+(A,Z) muon decay in orbit
Uses of the HCC Mary Anne Cummings February 4, 2009 Fermilab AAC
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Presentation transcript:

The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) experiment aims to measure muon to electron conversion with an unprecedented sensitivity of less than 1 in 10 million billion. The COMET experiment was given stage 1 approval by the J-PARC Program Advisory Committee in July 2009 and work is currently underway towards preparing a technical design report for the whole experiment. The need for this sensitivity places several stringent requirements on the beamline, such as, a pulsed proton beam with an extinction level between pulses of 9 orders of magnitude; a 5T superconducting solenoid operating near a high radiation environment; precise momentum selection of a large emittance muon beam and momentum selection and collimation of a large emittance electron beam. This paper will present the current status of the various components of the COMET beamline. PION CAPTURE SOLENOID See THPEC030 MUON STOPPING TARGET The choice of material for the stopping target defines the lifetime of muonic atoms. For COMET the target material is chosen to be aluminium. The stopping target is composed of 17 Al disks, 100 mm in radius and 0.2 mm thick. The magnetic field varies from 3 T at the end of the muon transport channel to 1 T at the entrance of the electron spectrometer. This field gradient improves the acceptance of conversion electrons in the detector. Simulations studies are underway to optimise the geometry of the stopping target. PROTON BEAM COMET plans to use an 8 GeV, 7 μA, slow-extracted proton beam from the J-PARC main ring (MR). Currently, there are two bunching configuration options for the operation of the RCS and MR: Recent work has focussed on the development of the proton extinction device used to reduce the fraction of protons outside of the pulse to 10−9. The instrinsic extinction of the J-PARC MR is 10−7, which means an additional device is needed to reduce this further by a factor of 10−2. The design described in the CDR consists of two AC dipole magnets with a collimator between them. The magnets have a peak field of 600 G and oscillate at a frequency of 385 MHz. The development of this AC dipole extinction device was done in collaboration with the Mu2e experiment. ELECTRON SPECTROMETER The vertical dispersion of the toroidal field of the electron spectrometer allows lower momentum DIO electrons to be removed by placing an aluminium collimator at the end of the channel. The figure below shows the vertical position of electrons from muon conversion and DIO electrons after passing through the electron spectrometer. By placing a collimator that extends from 20 cm below the median plane it is possible to remove electrons that have a momentum < 60MeV/c, thus reducing the rate in the detector systems. The electron spectrometer is designed to transport electrons from muon conversion or normal decay. The main source of background electrons is from muons that decay after nuclear capture. These are called decay in orbit (DIO) electrons. Electrons from muon conversion have a momentum around 104.7 MeV/c whereas DIO electrons have a range of energies with a tail that extends up to around 104.3 MeV/c MUON TRANSPORT CHANNEL The dispersive drift of the bent solenoid channel allows charge and momentum selection. In order to keep particles with the reference momentum in the centre of the transport channel an additional vertical dipole field is required. This can be done in a cost–effective way by tilting the solenoid coils. However, post–manufacturing tuning of the dipole field is restricted with this method. An alternative technology choice for producing the dipole field is to use an additional winding on top of the solenoid windings that has a current distribution that follows cos(). A prototype of this design has been constructed for the MUSIC project at Osaka University. The design presented in the CDR uses 2 T superconducting solenoids for the muon transport channel. However, this leads to a rise in the magnetic field just before the stopping target. The current design uses a field of 3 T, which eliminates this bump and increases the number of stopped muons. The results of this study is presented in WEPE046. CALORIMETER The calorimeter needs to be highly--segmented and have a fast response time. A number of inorganic scintillator crystals were considered in the CDR, with Gd2SiO5 (GSO) being the favoured choice. For GSO, the calorimeter will be segmented into 3x3x15 cm3 crystals (about 11 radiation lengths long) covering a total area of 552 cm2, which requires 1056 crystals. Recent studies have looked at using Cerium-doped Lutetium Yttrium Orthoscilicate (LYSO) instead of GSO. The readout of the calorimeter also needs to operate in a 1 T magnetic field, which excludes the use of low-noise, high-gain phototubes. Multi–pixel photon counters are best suited for this application as they offer the benefits of high gains and fast response times and can operate in magnetic fields. tilt angle TRACKER The purpose of the tracker is to measure the momentum of electrons with high precision, in order to distinguish those that come from conversion and those that come from a background process, e.g. DIO. These are relatively low momentum particles and are easily scattered so the amount of material the electrons see has to be as low as possible. The tracker also needs to withstand a charged particle rate of 800 kHz and a photon rate of 8 MHz. In order to meet these requirements, a straw–tube tracker was proposed in the CDR. This consists of five transverse straw planes 48 cm apart, operating in a 1 T solenoid field. Each plane has two (x, y) arrays of straws, rotated by 45◦, to provide a redundant measurement. Tilted solenoid coils. Actual tilt angle is 1.43◦.