Evaluating North Atlantic Ocean Circulation and Properties

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The retroflection of the Faroe Current into the Faroe-Shetland Channel Karin Margretha H. Larsen, Bogi Hansen and Hjálmar Hátún Reykjavík, ICES ASC 2013.
Advertisements

SeaWiFS-based chlorophyll in selekt Chl [mg m -3 ] A trans-Atlantic linkage - between the Newfoundland and Rockall basins Hjálmar Hátún, and Annebritt.
The ocean and the global hydrologic cycle Jim Carton (University of Maryland) Paulo Nobre (INPE) São Paulo Summer School on Global Climate Modeling October,
A summary of the Bering Strait mooring array – volume, heat and freshwater fluxes Jonathan Whitefield, Tom Weingartner (UAF) Rebecca Woodgate (UW) Thanks.
Steffen M Olsen, Polar Oceanography, DMI, Copenhagen DK GEOMAR (6) Mojib Latif (WP lead) Wonsun Park %Thomas Martin %Fritz Krüger MPG (2) Johann Jungclaus.
Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation Slowdown Causes Widespread Cooling In The Atlantic Stuart A. Cunningham Scottish Association for Marine Science.
Slide 1 Predicting the Climate of Europe: the THOR project Laurent Mortier – University of Paris for Detlef Quadfasel (co-ordinator), University of Hamburg.
Jon Robson (Uni. Reading) Rowan Sutton (Uni. Reading) and Doug Smith (UK Met Office) Analysis of a decadal prediction system:
SeaWiFS-based chlorophyll in selekt Chl [mg m -3 ] Sub-decadal oceanic oscillations regulate the north-eastern Atlantic shelf ecosystems Hjálmar Hátún,
The Faroe Current: T-S properties and volume, heat and salt transports Karin Margretha H. Larsen Bogi Hansen, Hjálmar Hátún, Svein Østerhus Extended Ellett.
1 THOR as of What is it all about? NADW – North Atlantic Deep Water 1 Sv = 10 6 m 3 /s Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation.
Reconciling net TOA flux/ocean heating in observations and models 5-yr running means (Smith et al. 2015)Smith et al Spurious ocean data? CERES ERBS/reconReanalysis/recon.
RECENT OBSERVATIONS FROM THE 26ºN RAPID MOORING ARRAY: DROPS, DECLINES AND IMPACTS Gerard McCarthy National Oceanography Centre UK Molly Baringer, Adam.
Thermohaline Overtuning – at Risk? Detlef Quadfasel, THOR Project Office KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Germany
THOR-CT3 Summary 26 September 2012
Steffen M Olsen, Polar Oceanography, DMI, Copenhagen DK CT3 Barcelona 6-8/ GEOMAR (6) Mojib Latif (CT/WP lead) Wonsun Park Thomas Martin MPG (2)
Radiatively Active Gases from the N. Atlantic Region and Climate Change (RAGNARoCC) Andy Watson, UEA Biogeochemical sections for carbon and CFCs in the.
The North Atlantic Ocean and Climate Observing System Stuart A. Cunningham Scottish Association for Marine Science Barbara.
Western boundary circulation in the tropical South Atlantic and its relation to Tropical Atlantic Variability Rebecca Hummels 1, Peter Brandt 1, Marcus.
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK Center for Ocean and Ice Interpretation of simulated exchange across the Iceland Faroe Ridge in a global.
Transport in the Subpolar and Subtropical North Atlantic
NACLIM CT 2 Monitoring of North Atlantic parameters New Lead: Johannes Karstensen (GEOMAR) and Karin M. H. Larsen (HAV) WP 2.1 Exchanges across the Greenland-Scotland.
© Crown copyright Met Office Decadal predictions of the Atlantic ocean and hurricane numbers Doug Smith, Nick Dunstone, Rosie Eade, David Fereday, James.
DFO Northwest Atlantic Ocean Monitoring & Mooring Programs OSNAP Planning Meeting April 2011 BIO.
NACLIM CT 2 Monitoring of North Atlantic parameters Core Theme sessions Trieste 2 nd Oct 9:00-13:00 Lead: Svein Østerhus and Johannes Karstensen WP 2.1.
North Atlantic Observing System
The Pacific Gateway to the Arctic – Quantifying and Understanding Bering Strait Oceanic Fluxes R. Woodgate 1, T. Weingartner 2, T. Whitledge 2, Ron Lindsay.
S 1 Core Theme 1 Predictability of core ocean and atmosphere quantities UHAM, MPG, UPMC, GEOMAR, NERSC.
Steffen M Olsen, Polar Oceanography, DMI, Copenhagen DK CT3 Hamburg 22-23/ GEOMAR (6) Mojib Latif (CT/WP lead) Wonsun Park Thomas Martin MPG (2)
Summary 26 September 2012 Core Theme 2: Assessing sources of uncertainty in ocean analyses and forecasts Lead: Steffen M Olsen (DMI), Co-lead: H. Drange.
Climate Modeling Research & Applications in Wales John Houghton C 3 W conference, Aberystwyth 26 April 2011.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Large Scale Salinity Budget in the North Atlantic and a First Look at ENSO from Aquarius Josh Willis.
THOR Presented by Doug Smith (MET OFFICE) Project coordinator: Detlef Quadfasel (UHAM)
Western boundary circulation in the tropical South Atlantic and its relation to Tropical Atlantic Variability Rebecca Hummels1, Peter Brandt1, Marcus Dengler1,
Image:AGU 2003 Steingrímur Jónsson, University of Akureyri & Marine Research Institute Héðinn Valdimarsson, Marine Research Institute, Reykjavik Bogi Hansen,
THOR meeting Paris November 25-26, 2009 North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre forcing on the fresh water exchange with the Arctic Ocean Christophe HERBAUT and Marie-Noëlle.
10/24/03search_osm_10_032 Abrupt Change in Deep Water Formation in the Greenland Sea: Results from Hydrographic and Tracer Time Series SEARCH Open Science.
CT2 : Assessing sources of uncertainty in ocean analysis and forecasts We consider the structural sources of uncertainty generic to all practical forecasting.
Arctic ice & ocean heat and freshwater fluxes: a new FAMOS coordinated experiment Sheldon Bacon National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK With thanks.
1 Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean – can we estimate the heat supplied through its inflow? Ursula Schauer + Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller, Eberhard Fahrbach,
Toward improved understanding of mass and property fluxes through Bering Strait Jaclyn Clement Kinney 1, Wieslaw Maslowski 1, Mike Steele 2, Jinlun Zhang.
Increased oceanic heat transport in the main Atlantic inflow branch to the Nordic Seas Bogi Hansen, Karin Margretha H. Larsen Hjálmar Hátún,
Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research NIOZ is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific.
ASOF II Objectives What are the fluxes of mass, heat, liquid freshwater and ice from the Arctic Ocean into the subpolar North Atlantic? How will anticipated.
Norwegian Marine Data Centre contributions from Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Lasse H. Pettersson.
Blue-Action – WP2 Lower latitude drivers of Arctic changes
Task 3.3: Impact of Arctic Ocean freshening on the Northern Hemisphere climate Didier Swingedouw, Christophe Herbaut, Juliette Mignot, Marie- Noelle Houssais.
Towards a new reanalysis with the IPSL climate model
from space Heat by winds by ocean currents
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Norway
WP4: Enhancing the capacity of seasonal-to-decadal predictions in the Arctic and over the Northern Hemisphere Daniela Matei (MPI) and Noel Keenlyside (UiB)
North Atlantic Sub-Polar Gyre
Marie-Noëlle HOUSSAIS
Radiative biases in Met Office global NWP model
Matthew Menary, Leon Hermanson, Nick Dunstone
Deliverable 2.8 Optimization of the GSR inflow arrays
WP3: Linkages of Arctic climate changes to lower latitudes
The Arctic Ocean in CMIP5 Simulations
Ben Moat, Bablu Sinha, Penny Holliday and Gerard McCarthy
Path Forward Discussion
Task 2.3 Optimization and coordination of existing TMA systems, improved data delivery for predictions and identification of gaps [Lead: HAV; Participants:
Processes and flow over the Iceland-Faroe Ridge
with contributions from Jan Aure, Roald Sætre and Didrik Danielssen
Transport Mooring Arrays in NACLIM
Lead: Karin Margretha H. Larsen, HAV
The coupling between Atlantic inflow and overflow in the Iceland-Scotland region Bogi Hansen, Karin M. H. Larsen, Hjálmar Hátún, Svein Østerhus, Steffen.
Understanding and forecasting seasonal-to-decadal climate variations
by M. A. Srokosz, and H. L. Bryden
in situ or Altimetry ? Arctic – Subarctic Ocean Fluxes focus topics:
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating North Atlantic Ocean Circulation and Properties B. Moat1, B. Sinha1, J. Hirschi1, P. Holliday1, G. McCarthy1, and S. Olsen2 1) NOC UK, 2) DMI RAPID ARRAY OSNAP GSR EEL OVIDE What’s happening in the Subpolar North Atlantic (from observations) 2) High resolution hindcast and coupled model evaluation (BLUE-ACTION) Aim: look at the heat and freshwater transport anomalies into the Arctic. 3) Links to Ocean Metrics STATION M 2.1 Assessment of key lower latitude influences on the Arctic and their simulation [Lead: NERC; Participants: UoS, NLeSC, MPI, HAV, GEOMAR, NIOZ, SAMS, MRI, MSS, UHAM, UNIRES, CNRS, DMI, UIB, NCAR, WHOI, MEOPAR] [Start: Month 1, End: Month 36; Deliverables associated to this task: D2.1, D2.2, D2.3, D2.4]
At key locations, Blue-Action *** will compare observations of heat and freshwater transport to state-of-the-art coupled climate models (HadGEM-Charisma, IPSL, CESM) and high resolution ocean-only models (e.g., NEMO (1/24°)). In-situ ocean data originating from transport mooring arrays (TMAs) and hydrographic GO-SHIP sections will be complimented with remote sensed data from Argo profiling floats, from underwater gliders and satellite data (including existing missions, and new missions data from Jason-3 and Sentinel-3, when they are operational). ***Correspondence, compensation or feedback between these ocean heat transport estimates and atmospheric heat transport will be examined in the coupled model simulations (D2.1) [NERC, MPI, UoS, NLeSC, GEOMAR, SAMS, NIOZ, MRI, HAV, MSS, UHAM, CNRS, UNIRES, UIB, NCAR, WHOI].
 RAPID 2004. OVIDE. Every 2 years since 2002. OSNAP: 2014 to present. Data released in the Autmn of 2017. EEL: 1975 to 1996. then EEL to present. Annual. M: 1948 to 2008. Mooring in place. 4 CTD to 100m a week. 1 2000m CTD weekly. ¼ degree eqivalents with an N216 atmosphere. Rcp 8.5 b) go6 and geo7 atmos (25km resolution) Qunatify different water massess across EEL, OVIDE ? volcanoes, solar, aerosols,  greenhouse gases (ALL FORCED) Baring strait – University of Washington Rebecca Woodgate ? 0.8Sv inflow and 26 Sv psu Station M – 1948 to 2009 daily CTD to 1000m, weekly CTD to 2200m. Mooring since 2010 (DNMI?) Testing ? Is the AMOC realistic ??? Modelling Workshop Evaluating climate and Earth System models at the process level. 23-24 May 2017, Brussels.

EEL: 1975 to 1996. then EEL to present. Annual. 2.1 Assessment of key lower latitude influences on the Arctic and their simulation [Lead: NERC; Participants: UoS, NLeSC, MPI, HAV, GEOMAR, NIOZ, SAMS, MRI, MSS, UHAM, UNIRES, CNRS, DMI, UIB, NCAR, WHOI, MEOPAR] [Start: Month 1, End: Month 36; Deliverables associated to this task: D2.1, D2.2, D2.3, D2.4]
At key locations, Blue-Action *** will compare observations of heat and freshwater transport to state-of-the-art coupled climate models (HadGEM-Charisma, IPSL, CESM) and high resolution ocean-only models (e.g., NEMO (1/24°)). In-situ ocean data originating from transport mooring arrays (TMAs) and hydrographic GO-SHIP sections will be complimented with remote sensed data from Argo profiling floats, from underwater gliders and satellite data (including existing missions, and new missions data from Jason-3 and Sentinel-3, when they are operational). ***Correspondence, compensation or feedback between these ocean heat transport estimates and atmospheric heat transport will be examined in the coupled model simulations (D2.1) [NERC, MPI, UoS, NLeSC, GEOMAR, SAMS, NIOZ, MRI, HAV, MSS, UHAM, CNRS, UNIRES, UIB, NCAR, WHOI].
 RAPID 2004. OVIDE. Every 2 years since 2002. OSNAP: 2014 to present. Data released in the Autmn of 2017. EEL: 1975 to 1996. then EEL to present. Annual. M: 1948 to 2008. Mooring in place. 4 CTD to 100m a week. 1 2000m CTD weekly. ¼ degree eqivalents with an N216 atmosphere. Rcp 8.5 b) go6 and geo7 atmos (25km resolution) Qunatify different water massess across EEL, OVIDE ? volcanoes, solar, aerosols,  greenhouse gases (ALL FORCED) Baring strait – University of Washington Rebecca Woodgate ? 0.8Sv inflow and 26 Sv psu Station M – 1948 to 2009 daily CTD to 1000m, weekly CTD to 2200m. Mooring since 2010 (DNMI?) Testing ? Is the AMOC realistic ???

ESA CCI : http://www.esa-sst-cci.org/ Cci 1991 to prsent ESA CCI : http://www.esa-sst-cci.org/ EN4 : www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/en4/

Berx: http://data.marine.gov.scot/dataset/sub-polar-gyre-index Thus, when the SPG is strong, there is an eastward shift of cold, fresh waters, as a branch of the NAC peels off into the Rockall Plateau (RP, Figure 2). Conversely, a weak SPG allows subtropical waters to extend north and west, spreading warm, saline conditions over the RP [Hátún et al 2009a]. Therefore, the SPG index (calculated from altimetry) is used as an indicator of the climatic forcing over the NA [Hátún et al 2005, Hátún et al 2009b, Häkkinen and Rhines 2004]. McCarthy: https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v521/n7553/full/nature14491.html Berx: http://data.marine.gov.scot/dataset/sub-polar-gyre-index

EEL: 1975 to 1996. then EEL to present. Annual. 2.1 Assessment of key lower latitude influences on the Arctic and their simulation [Lead: NERC; Participants: UoS, NLeSC, MPI, HAV, GEOMAR, NIOZ, SAMS, MRI, MSS, UHAM, UNIRES, CNRS, DMI, UIB, NCAR, WHOI, MEOPAR] [Start: Month 1, End: Month 36; Deliverables associated to this task: D2.1, D2.2, D2.3, D2.4]
At key locations, Blue-Action *** will compare observations of heat and freshwater transport to state-of-the-art coupled climate models (HadGEM-Charisma, IPSL, CESM) and high resolution ocean-only models (e.g., NEMO (1/24°)). In-situ ocean data originating from transport mooring arrays (TMAs) and hydrographic GO-SHIP sections will be complimented with remote sensed data from Argo profiling floats, from underwater gliders and satellite data (including existing missions, and new missions data from Jason-3 and Sentinel-3, when they are operational). ***Correspondence, compensation or feedback between these ocean heat transport estimates and atmospheric heat transport will be examined in the coupled model simulations (D2.1) [NERC, MPI, UoS, NLeSC, GEOMAR, SAMS, NIOZ, MRI, HAV, MSS, UHAM, CNRS, UNIRES, UIB, NCAR, WHOI].
 RAPID 2004. OVIDE. Every 2 years since 2002. OSNAP: 2014 to present. Data released in the Autmn of 2017. EEL: 1975 to 1996. then EEL to present. Annual. M: 1948 to 2008. Mooring in place. 4 CTD to 100m a week. 1 2000m CTD weekly. ¼ degree eqivalents with an N216 atmosphere. Rcp 8.5 b) go6 and geo7 atmos (25km resolution) Qunatify different water massess across EEL, OVIDE ? volcanoes, solar, aerosols,  greenhouse gases (ALL FORCED) Baring strait – University of Washington Rebecca Woodgate ? 0.8Sv inflow and 26 Sv psu Station M – 1948 to 2009 daily CTD to 1000m, weekly CTD to 2200m. Mooring since 2010 (DNMI?) Testing ? Is the AMOC realistic ???

WP2.1 Model-observation and re-analyses comparison at key locations for heat transport to the Arctic RAPID ARRAY OSNAP GSR EEL OVIDE STATION M 1) NEMO Ocean only hindcast 1/12° 1958 to 2015 1/12° 1958 to present day (ACSIS) 2) Three (HadGEM3) - Coupled simulations All are 1/12° Ocean N512 Atmosphere 20 year control run b) 100 year control run (RUNNING NOC) fixed present day CO2 c) 100 year “all-forced” run to present day and then a RCP scenario 1950 to 2050 (RUNNING UK MET OFFICE ?) 2.1 Assessment of key lower latitude influences on the Arctic and their simulation [Lead: NERC; Participants: UoS, NLeSC, MPI, HAV, GEOMAR, NIOZ, SAMS, MRI, MSS, UHAM, UNIRES, CNRS, DMI, UIB, NCAR, WHOI, MEOPAR] [Start: Month 1, End: Month 36; Deliverables associated to this task: D2.1, D2.2, D2.3, D2.4]
At key locations, Blue-Action *** will compare observations of heat and freshwater transport to state-of-the-art coupled climate models (HadGEM-Charisma, IPSL, CESM) and high resolution ocean-only models (e.g., NEMO (1/24°)). In-situ ocean data originating from transport mooring arrays (TMAs) and hydrographic GO-SHIP sections will be complimented with remote sensed data from Argo profiling floats, from underwater gliders and satellite data (including existing missions, and new missions data from Jason-3 and Sentinel-3, when they are operational). ***Correspondence, compensation or feedback between these ocean heat transport estimates and atmospheric heat transport will be examined in the coupled model simulations (D2.1) [NERC, MPI, UoS, NLeSC, GEOMAR, SAMS, NIOZ, MRI, HAV, MSS, UHAM, CNRS, UNIRES, UIB, NCAR, WHOI].
 RAPID 2004. OVIDE. Every 2 years since 2002. OSNAP: 2014 to present. Data released in the Autmn of 2017. EEL: 1975 to 1996. then EEL to present. Annual. M: 1948 to 2008. Mooring in place. 4 CTD to 100m a week. 1 2000m CTD weekly. ¼ degree eqivalents with an N216 atmosphere. Rcp 8.5 b) go6 and geo7 atmos (25km resolution) Qunatify different water massess across EEL, OVIDE ? volcanoes, solar, aerosols,  greenhouse gases (ALL FORCED) Baring strait – University of Washington Rebecca Woodgate ? 0.8Sv inflow and 26 Sv psu Station M – 1948 to 2009 daily CTD to 1000m, weekly CTD to 2200m. Mooring since 2010 (DNMI?) Testing ? Is the AMOC realistic ???

Temperature/Heat transports at 26.5°N 4 3 2 1 -1 -2 -3 (Moat et al. 2016, JGR-Oceans) RAPID thick line, model thin line ORCA083 (PW) RAPID (PW) FC 2.54±0.16 2.50±0.25 EKMAN 0.34±0.31 0.35±0.30 Mid- Ocean -2.02±0.27 -1.81±0.31 WBW 0.12±0.21 0.12±0.18 EDDY -0.02±0.06 0.08±0.03 Total heat transport 0.93±0.32 1.24±0.36 Temperature/Heat Transports (PW) RAPID: 17.20±4.60 Sv ORCA083: 15.18±4.03 Sv Extending to SALT and FW fluxes. 1/12° NEMO hindcast model overestimates the Southwards Mid-Ocean temperature transport. Model HT 0.3 PW lower than RAPID, but good agreement in the variability.

Heat transports at 26.5°N 2 COUPLED 1/12 CONTROL 1.1 ± 0.26 PW COUPLED, R2=0.92 HINDCAST, R2=0.84 Johns 2011, R2=0.94 Heat transport (PW) 1.1 ± 0.26 PW 0.94 ± 0.22 PW Mean over RAPID period = 1.24±0.36 PW NEMO 1/12 HINDCAST MOC (Sv) 0 30 Larger variability in 20year coupled model 1/12 degree RAPID: 17.20±4.60 Sv ORCA083: 15.18±4.03 Sv COUPLED : 15.3 ± 3.6 Sv Rsquare COUPLED = 0.92 Rsquare hinf = 0.84 10 year coupled mean HT 1.0823 +/- 0.25746 PW 10 year ocean only mean HT 0.93641 +/- 0.21831 PW Johns 0.079*MOC-0.12 Extending to SALT and FW fluxes. 25Km resolution atmosphere 8.3 km, becoming finer at higher latitudes such that at 608N/S it becomes 4.6 km. Model info : Hewitt et al. (2016) Roberts et al. (2016)

OSNAP Challenge 2017 (NOC won) NEMO 1/12 hindcast OSNAP time series from the array will be released October 2017. OSNAP time series out in October 2017

FSC FSC IF DS DS EGC Inflow Overflow/Outflow Østerhus et al., in prep. Center for Ocean and Ice Inflow Overflow/Outflow FSC FSC IF DS DS EGC Østerhus et al., in prep. Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk)

26N AMOC time series: April 2004 to Oct 2015 (update to Feb 2017 in October ) http://www.rapid.ac.uk/rapidmoc/rapid_data/datadl.php Contact: gerard.mccarthy@noc.ac.uk or ben.moat@noc.ac.uk 26N HT time series : April 2004 to March 2014 update to Feb 2017 in October ) http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/users/mocha/mocha_results.htm Contact: Bill Johns bjohns@rsmas.miani.edu OSNAP time series : Summer 2014 to Summer 2016 (will be released in the Autumn 2017) http://www.o-snap.org/ Contact: Stuart.Cunningham@sams.ac.uk OVIDE : every two years since 2002. ( 2018 and 2020 cruises in planning stage ) https://cchdo.ucsd.edu/ Contact: Marie-Noelle Houssais mnh@locean-ipsl.upmc.fr Faroe Shetland Channel Transport Mooring Array  ( 1993 to present ) Barbara Berx B.Berx@MARLAB.AC.UK; Karin Margretha H. Larsen Bering Strait : 1990 to present. http://psc.apl.washington.edu/HLD/Bstrait/Data/ woodgate@apl.washington.edu