WaterTime model and website

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Civil Society Days Strengthening democratic spaces for civil society in the European public sphere Civil dialogue practices in Europe The example.

Advertisements

Together. Free your energies How open and collaborative are public administrations in Europe? A benchmarking perspective October 2011.

Estonian public sector quality award pilot project 2003 Learning state agency Karin Närep Ministry of Finance of Estonia Rome 2003 Rahandusministeerium.

© 2014 Cogentus Consulting Ltd Smart Decisions End-to-end problem solving.

Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in Relation to The Project of Flood Directive Marcin Jacewicz Regional Board for Water Management in Gdańsk.

Conclusions, planning and prospects Follow-up committee meeting 6 October, Leuven.

European Framework: Milestones in formal and social recognition of non- formal and informal learning in youth work Hans-Joachim Schild, European Commission,

Developing Capacity on Water Integrity WATER INTEGRITY NETWORK Delft 31st May 2013 Francoise Nicole Ndoume Regional Coordinator Water Integrity Network,

BTS730 Communications Management Chapter 10, Information Technology Management, 5ed.

THE VIVA (VISION IDEA VOICE ACTION) PROJECT Authoritative, Authentic Public Policy Directly from Classroom Teachers.

A unique software and decision making platform for collaborative thinking and decision making.

Managing Performance The experience of the World Bank Mauritania Country Office.

E-participation and transparency in the decision making process Rauna Nerelli Ministry of Justice, Finland.

Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.

Managed by AEA Technology plc and funded by DIUS 1.

Thomas Pettersson Andreas Lindhe and Lars Rosén Identification and management of risks in water safety planning Decision support method using multi-criteria.

Software Architecture Evaluation Methodologies Presented By: Anthony Register.

Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Use.

Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into Turkish Legal Framework Improving the Transparency, Consultation and Communication Aspects of RIA’s March.

MCDA can be realized in many ways A. Decision makers and experts use MCDA on their own, no stakeholders involved B. Stakeholders opinions are.

We’re an Edge library! Applying Edge Results to Elevate Digital and Technology Services Insert Library Logo Here.

Technology’s Role in Student Organizations: Beyond Twitter and Facebook Michael Shah Tufts University November 8, 2013 ~20 minutes

Alternative Designs  Why?  Whole or portion?  Expand the solutions.

Tactical and Strategic Approaches for a Meaningful Relationship in Policy Development Sarah Allan, Engagement

DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission Standardisation Aspects of ICT and e-Business Antonio Conte Unit D4 - ICT for Competitiveness and Innovation.

Using the Internet for citizen engagement Using the Internet for citizen engagement 1. about the Internet 2. choosing an online engagement strategy 3.

Second Preventing Overdiagnosis Conference September 15-17, Oxford UK

Look for Corporate Tax Experts

EU Public Consultations in the Digital Age: Enhancing the Role of the EESC and Civil Society Organisations Workshop New Technologies and Transition: What.

Building Governance for Risk Management

EAPN EU Inclusion Strategies Group

The role of social media networks in communication of stakeholders.

Nadjeli Babinet Rojas Sustainable Development Director

Important things to know about post office address things

CSOs as a subject of open governance.

DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making

Building Coalitions for Change Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making Experience from OECD countries Directorate for Public.

Educational Resources Center

Introduction to risk management

Regional Seminar ENP, Russia, Yemen & Iraq Introduction to Wg3 Needs resulting from WG1&2 discussions & conceptual clarifications Baku, February 9-11,

Gender statistics in Information and Communication Technology for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality Dorothy Okello, Annual.

EAPN EU Inclusion Strategies Group

James Medhurst, Project Director Brussels, 11th November, 2004

Decision Matrices Business Economics.

Statutory participatory mechanisms

Quantitative Methods Dr. Aravind Banakar –

Quantitative Methods

Quantitative Methods

Quantitative Methods

Quantitative Methods

Giuseppe Munda Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona

Access to Innovative Medicines in UHC: Advancing the Dialogue

Cumulative Effects Assessment and Marine Spatial Planning

APPROACHES, METHODS AND TOOLS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT, VULNERABILITY

Brussels, 15 September 2009.

Identify stakeholders. Design a strategy. Set up a program.

URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION

Introduction to Multi Criteria Analysis MCA

CCPM (Cluster coordination performance monitoring) results

Rahandusministeerium

Youth Participation in Internet Governance

Managing a PSIA process

ICRP Views on Radiation Risk at Low Doses through the Lens of Fukushima Applicability of Radiation-Response Models to Low Dose Protection Standards Tri-Cities,

Jørgen Friis, ETSI VP SES

EU initiative on integrating ecosystems and their services into decision-making Draft outline CGBN, Brussels, 1 March 2018.

Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation

Training module 8 Adoption of territorial assessment tools

EEB 2017 report ‘BURNING: THE EVIDENCE’

Youth in dialogue 2.0.: We include!

Innovation in Democracy Programme

Presentation transcript:

WaterTime model and website Robin de la Motte Watertime model and website 25 November 2005 WaterTime model and website Robin de la Motte, PSIRU, University of Greenwich

Decision-making Model Robin de la Motte Watertime model and website 25 November 2005 Decision-making Model One of Watertime’s objectives was to elaborate a decision-making model that would enable a comparative evaluation of various options on a multi-criteria basis have participation and flexibility at its core The model uses Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach Good Practice Recommendations and related Discussion tools

Robin de la Motte Watertime model and website 25 November 2005 MCDA Specifying criteria Specifying options Evaluating options in terms of criteria Weighting criteria (a) Results (a score for each option) (b) Conclusions

Participation and MCDA Robin de la Motte Watertime model and website 25 November 2005 Participation and MCDA The Watertime model aims to combine MCDA and participation in a novel way: participative MCDA, publically available online. MCDA is usually aimed at a single person making a decision requires costly software requires expert support Online participation usually is less focussed on the details of how a decision is to be reached does not provide any kind of decision analysis tool

Robin de la Motte Watertime model and website 25 November 2005 The Watertime model aims to combine MCDA and participation, in a system publically available on the internet. This involves Structured analysis of decisions Transparency on possible options, criteria for decision-making, etc Public deliberation on relative importance of criteria, options excluded, risks overlooked, etc And thereby Clarifies the nature of decisions for decision-makers Strengthens public sphere and transparency Enables structured and problem-focussed stakeholder dialogue Complements citizen juries and other public participation methods

Robin de la Motte Watertime model and website 25 November 2005 Watertime website These tools are on the Watertime website, and available: permanently for anyone to use, without charge, to support decision-making in the water sector in 20 languages