HSE, ICAD RAS, MERI RAS. Moscow

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Řešení vybraných modelů s obnovou Radim Briš VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava (TUO), Ostrava, The Czech Republic
Advertisements

Multi‑Criteria Decision Making
THE INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM OF SOFTWARE COMPLEXITY AND QUALITY EVALUATION AND PREDICTION Oksana Pomorova, Tetyana Hovorushchenko Khmelnitsky National University.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5S Decision Theory.
Modeling and Analysis of Random Walk Search Algorithms in P2P Networks Nabhendra Bisnik, Alhussein Abouzeid ECSE, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
Social Choice Theory By Shiyan Li. History The theory of social choice and voting has had a long history in the social sciences, dating back to early.
Management Science (Goh) Chapter 1: Introduction
Nominal Level Measurement n numbers used as ways to identify or name categories n numbers do not indicate degrees of a variable but simple groupings of.
Advisor: Yeong-Sung Lin Presented by Chi-Hsiang Chan 2011/5/23 1.
Introduction to Management Science
K.Fedra ‘97 Decision Support Systems multiple objectives, multiple criteria and valuation in environmental DSS.
Multi-Criteria Analysis – compromise programming.
1 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory Classical Exploration Methods for Design Space Exploration (multi-criteria.
«Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process» DAGKINIS IOANNIS, Dr. NIKITAKOS NIKITAS University of.
Presented by Johanna Lind and Anna Schurba Facility Location Planning using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Specialisation Seminar „Facility Location Planning“
By Saparila Worokinasih
Social threshold aggregations Fuad T. Aleskerov, Vyacheslav V. Chistyakov, Valery A. Kalyagin Higher School of Economics.
Design Space Exploration
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
Methods of Solving the Problem of Construction the Optimum Regression Model as a Discrete Optimization Task Ivan Melnyk The International Research and.
MULTICRITERIAL REASONING of PRIORITIES1 THE PRINCIPLES OF MULTICRITERIAL REASONING OF THE DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Buracas & Zvirblis
LECTURE 8-9. Course: “Design of Systems: Structural Approach” Dept. “Communication Networks &Systems”, Faculty of Radioengineering & Cybernetics Moscow.
Chiara Mocenni Roma, June 4-5, 2009 Dept. Information Engineering – Centre for the Study of Complex Systems – Univ. of Siena The “DITTY” DSS In the DITTY.
A two-stage approach for multi- objective decision making with applications to system reliability optimization Zhaojun Li, Haitao Liao, David W. Coit Reliability.
Decision Theory Decision theory problems are characterized by the following: 1.A list of alternatives. 2.A list of possible future states of nature. 3.Payoffs.
USING PREFERENCE CONSTRAINTS TO SOLVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS Tanja Magoč, Martine Ceberio, and François Modave Computer Science Department,
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY SELECTION BASED ON HYBRID AHP-GP MODEL SUZANA SAVIĆ GORAN JANAĆKOVIĆ MIOMIR STANKOVIĆ University of Niš, Faculty of Occupational Safety.
LECTURE 13. Course: “Design of Systems: Structural Approach” Dept. “Communication Networks &Systems”, Faculty of Radioengineering & Cybernetics Moscow.
Decision map for spatial decision making Salem Chakhar in collaboration with Vincent Mousseau, Clara Pusceddu and Bernard Roy LAMSADE University of Paris.
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
Tanja Magoč, François Modave, Xiaojing Wang, and Martine Ceberio Computer Science Department The University of Texas at El Paso.
Finnish-Russian Doctoral Seminar on Multicriteria Decision Aid and Optimization Iryna Yevseyeva Niilo Mäki Institute University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Introduction 1. Similarity 1.1. Mechanism and mathematical description 1.2. Generalized variables 1.3. Qualitative analysis 1.4. Generalized individual.
Prepared by Mrs. Belen Apostol DECISION-MAKING. Decision- Making as a Management Responsibility Decisions invariably involve organizational change and.
Working Proposals Working Proposals Rosário D. Laureano D2.03.
Preference Modelling and Decision Support Roman Słowiński Poznań University of Technology, Poland  Roman Słowiński.
Engineering Optimization Chapter 3 : Functions of Several Variables (Part 1) Presented by: Rajesh Roy Networks Research Lab, University of California,
Chapter 1 Introduction n Introduction: Problem Solving and Decision Making n Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making n Quantitative Analysis n Model.
Vaida Bartkutė, Leonidas Sakalauskas
Proprietary & confidential. © Decision Lens 2010 Decision Lens Criteria Development Session PSU ITS Pilot Gina Patel, Senior Client Decision Manager
2nd Meeting of Young Researchers on MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION AIDING Iryna Yevseyeva Niilo Mäki Instituutti University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Management Science Helps analyze and solve organizational problems. It uses scientific and quantitative methods to set up models that are based on controllable.
Maximizing value and Minimizing base on Fuzzy TOPSIS model
Software Project Management Lecture # 2 Originally shared for: mashhoood.webs.com.
Evolutionary Design (2) Boris Burdiliak. Topics Representation Representation Multiple objectives Multiple objectives.
Utility Model for Minimizing Risk Chandru Mirchandani Lockheed-Martin August 9, 2004 P115/MAPLD2004 MIRCHANDANI 1.
Multi-objective Optimization
LECTURE 10. Course: “Design of Systems: Structural Approach” Dept. “Communication Networks &Systems”, Faculty of Radioengineering & Cybernetics Moscow.
Designing Optimal Taxes with a Microeconometric Model of Labour Supply Evidence from Norway Rolf Aaberge, Ugo Colombino and Tom Wennemo WPEG Conference,
Fuzzy Logic Placement Emily Blem ECE556 Final Project December 14, 2004 Reference: E. Kang, R.B. Lin, and E. Shragowitz. “Fuzzy Logic Approach to VLSI.
Preference Modelling and Decision Support Roman Słowiński Poznań University of Technology, Poland  Roman Słowiński.
Multiple-criteria Optimization Lecture 11 (5/11/2016)
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Nizhni Novgorod State University Faculty of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics Searching Globally-Optimal Decisions for Multidimensional Optimization.
Flexible and Interactive Tradeoff Elicitation Procedure
Part 4 Nonlinear Programming
ION 21 Team Portal System Decision-making and motivation forecasting system for the 21st century.
DEMAND THEORY III Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
DEMAND THEORY III Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
13. Acting under Uncertainty Wolfram Burgard and Bernhard Nebel
3rd International Conference Terahertz and Microwave Radiation: Generation, Detection and Applications (TERA-2018). Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, October 22.
Decision Making Template.
Introduction to Modeling
Multicriteria Decision Making
Dr. Arslan Ornek DETERMINISTIC OPTIMIZATION MODELS
The DerUCP Algorithm Replay(P,C,G,…) Modified version of UCP: loop:
State University of Telecommunications
Presentation transcript:

HSE, ICAD RAS, MERI RAS. Moscow Methods of criteria importance theory and their software implementation Podinovski V.V. Potapov M.A. Nelyubin A.P. HSE, ICAD RAS, MERI RAS. Moscow The 7th International Conference on Network Analysis, June 22 – 24, 2017, Nizhny Novgorod

Multicriteria decision making (choice) problems M = < X, K, Z, R >, X – set of alternatives (decisions), K1, … , Km – criteria (objective functions) with common scale Z0 = {1, …, q}, where q ≥ 2, Z = Z0m – set of vector estimates y(x) = (K1(x), … , Km (x)), R – partial preference relation of the decision maker

Criteria Importance Theory Criteria 1 and 2 are equally important (denote as 1 ~ 2) if variants (a, b) and (b, a) are indifferent for decision maker. Criterion 1 is more important then Criterion 2 (denote as 1  2) if variant (a, b), where a >b, is more preferable than (b, a).

Argumentation of the solution Criteria importance theory P0 – Pareto relation 12 – the 1st criterion is more important than the 2nd (5, 3) P12 (3, 5) P0 (3, 4) Argumentation of the solution 12 (4, 2) P12 (2, 4) P0 (2, 3)

Information about importance of criteria : Qualitative ordering: 1 ≥ 2 ≥ … ≥ m Ξ: Interval information: li ≤ i /i+1 ≤ ri, i = 1, …, m  1. : Exact information: i, i = 1, …, m

Information about criteria scale Ordinal scale: v(1) < … < v(q) : First ordered metric scale: 1 > 2 >…> q-1 или 1 < 2 <…< q-1, где k = v(k +1)  v(k), k = 1, …, q  1. [V]: First bounded metric scale: dk ≤ k /k+1 ≤ uk , k = 1, …, q  2 V: Interval scale: k /k+1 = gk , k = 1, …, q  2

Criteria Importance Theory Information types and decision rules Criteria importance Quantitative Exact information R R R[V] RV Interval information RΞ RΞ RΞ [V] RΞV Qualitative ordering R R R[V] RV No information Pareto relation Information about the DM preferences Ordinal scale First ordered metric scale First bounded metric scale Interval scale Criteria scale

Decision rules under interval preference information Interval constraints determine the set А of possible values of criteria importance coefficients. Under this inexact information In case of ordinal scale, optimization decision rule: Analytic decision rule:

Bilinear programming problem Interval constraints on both parameters of preferences: Additive value function Coordinates of vertices of the set A:

Software DASS (Decision Analysis Support System) Implements iterative approach to the analysis of decision making problems: In the beginning, it collects simple, qualitative information about the DM preferences. Than, if it is necessary, the DM specifies more complex, quantitative information in the interval form. http://mcodm.ru/soft/dass

Example of the choice problem solution process Pareto preference relation Partial preference relation according to qualitative criteria ordering by importance 1234

Refinement of the information about the decision maker preferences helps to reduce the number of nondominated alternatives

Refinement of quantitative information about criteria importance: «The 2nd criterion is more than 2 times important than the 3rd criterion»

Thank you for your attention www.mcodm.ru