EMN Conference, The Hague, 24 April 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Workshop Warsaw, January 2006 STATE UNION OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Basel Protocol on Liability and Compensation Questionnaire No. 2 Ratification.
Advertisements

Processus de Rabat / Rabat Process MEETING ON “STRENGTHENING EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY MAKING IN THE FIELD OF MIGRATION” 12 SEPTEMBER 2013, DAKAR GROUP 1:
ASYLUM PROCEDURE: THE CROATIAN EXAMPLE LEGAL PROVISIONS, PRACTICE AND FAILURES ANDREJ KRBEC FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB.
The Human Rights League
The complexity of migration in the Baltic Sea Region Immigration, a threat or a solution? Warsaw, April 24, 2008 Migration Policy Department Ministry of.
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Presentation of the Work Programme for the year 2008 Dušan Petrović, Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice December.
Right to Non-Refoulement – Protection Against Expulsion By Kris Spartanska.
Republic of Serbia Commissariat for Refugees and Migration ENARO Closing Conference Ragusa, 28 th -30 th November 2012.
THE EU REGULATION ON COMMUNITY STATISTICS ON MIGRATION AND INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION Ann Singleton, Audrey Lenoël Centre for the Study of Poverty and Social.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Cross-border cooperation is our way to take responsibility for refugees Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers in Europe materials for a better practice.
Guardianship for children deprived of parental care A handbook to reinforce guardianship systems to cater for the specific needs of child victims of trafficking.
Overview of ERF, EIF & RF AP th August 2013 Amanda Borg Funds and Programmes Division, MEAIM General Programme Solidarity & Management of Migration.
UNITS 1 and 2: THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS. THE JUDGE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA Joaquín Delgado.
BORDER GUARD HQ ALIENS DEPARTMENT
Guatemala City February 15-16, 2007 Best Practices on Refugee Protection Incorporated into the Legislation of RCM Member Countries.
Asylum MINISTRY OF INTERIOR POLICE DIRECTORATE BORDER POLICE DIRECTORATE
European Union Reception Law Implementation - best practices evaluation Comparison of protection and reception sytems within EU Borders.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Seminar on Migration Legislation Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala 15 – 16 February 2007.
European Union Asylum Procedure Law Implementation - evaluation of Polish experience The major problems of the migration law implementation process in.
MINISTRY OF INTERIOR The Bulgarian approach in the fight against illegal migration through Schengen borders The Bulgarian approach in the fight against.
Ministry of the Interior – its role in preventing trafficking in human beings 19th of March 2014 Urszula Kozłowska Unit against Trafficking in Human Beings.
Recent Developments in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the EU University of Oslo Asylum Course 10 March 2006.
Implementation of reception and detention regimes in Lithuania prepared by Renata Kulesh Kyiv 7-8 February, 2005.
UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees International Law regarding Refugees Basic Principles Seminar on Migration Legislation Regional Conference.
Policy Plan on Asylum An integrated approach to the protection of refugees across the European Union June 2008.
International Conference “Migration at Sea: International Law Perspectives and Regional Approaches”, Ohrid, Macedonia, 6 October 2015 MIGRATION CRISIS:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 2– Freedom Movement for Workers Bilateral.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 18 – Statistics Bilateral screening: Chapter.
EU acquis in the field of asylum ( plus an overview of the EU financial assistance to Turkey) JFS Team of the EU Delegation to Turkey.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 2– Freedom Movement for Workers Bilateral.
IMMIGRANTS IN POLAND VOIVODSHIP LABOUR OFFICE IN OPOLE MEASURES FOCUSED ON IMMIGRANTS.
July 15, 2008 Hnakuk University of Foreign Studies The Situation of Refugees in Korea & The Korean Civil Society in Action Pill Kyu Hwang Korean Public.
Non-refoulement and asylum procedures at the border The role of Border Guard in ensuring unhindered access to asylum procedures MAJ IWONA PRZYBYŁOWICZ.
Cooperation between Border and Asylum authorities in Poland MAJ IWONA PRZYBYŁOWICZ ALIENS DEPARTMENT BORDER GUARD HEADQUARTERS.
Levels of International Protection Terminology and Phases.
«Population Matters in the Russian Federation» FIRST Deputy Minister of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation Sergey F. VELMYAYKIN.
Ministry of Justice Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Ministry of Justice Sweden Government Offices of Sweden CEAS, a judicial reality or actual practice?
The revised EU Asylum Qualifications Directive WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR GRANTING INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION FOR FGM SURVIVORS OR WOMEN AND GIRLS AT RISK.
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS EUROPEAN LEGISLATION GREEK LEGISLATION ISAR - 3 rd GEL CORFU, GREECE.
Jovan Andonovski, PhD, Deputy Ombudsman Republic of Macedonia
Budget flexibility, agility and readiness to meet demands: Countries’ experience with regard to immigration REPUBLIC OF CROATIA June 2016.
HIPSSA Project PRESENTATION ON SADC DATA PROTECTION MODEL LAW
Recast Directives in CEAS
Georgetown, Guyana 14, 2016 Ignacio Goicoechea
Italian data collection on asylum
Ministry of the Interior of the CR
1- Introduction ii-. Part ONE : foreign and security policy.
The Swedish Protection System in a European Context
EU RETURN POLICY A GENERAL PRESENTATION by Philippe DE BRUYCKER
Dr THI DA OO Director General Union Attorney General’s Office
Human Rights approach to Refugee Protection and Asylum Policy
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
The External Dimension of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
Migration crisis and its impact on Polish integration policy
HELP Developments & HELP course on Violence Against Women Ana Medarska-Lazova, Strasbourg, 18 October /12/2018.
Working Group "European Statistical Data Support" April 2016
European response to Human trafficking
MIGRATION POLICY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND THE NEW SECURITY STRATEGY
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE
Border Procedures for Minors
Freedom of movement of workers in the EU
Actions of the International Committee of the Red Cross to Address
  Regional Workshop on Temporary Protection Status and/or Humanitarian Visas in Situations of Disaster February 2015.
Introduction to the Discussion Paper on Draft Elements of a Guide to Effective Practices Prof. Walter Kaelin, Envoy of the Chairmanship of the Nansen Initiative.
Regional trends on international protection in the region
Presentation transcript:

EMN Conference, The Hague, 24 April 2013 CEAS, A JUDICIAL REALITY OR ACTUAL PRACTICE? POLAND AND THE QUALIFICATION DIRECTIVE EMN Conference, The Hague, 24 April 2013

International protection: evolution of national legislation Early 90. and first asylum applications in Poland The use of temporary protection before the adoption of the EU acquis Act of 13th June 2003 on granting protection to foreigners within the territory of the Republic of Poland principles, conditions and procedures for granting protection to foreigners within the territory of the Republic of Poland; authorities competent in the asylum matters; modified by several Amendments in accordance with i.a. the Qualification Directive

Forms of international protection Non-EU harmonised protection statuses EU harmonised protection statuses In ad-hoc situations temporary protection before the adoption of the EU acquis In permanent use asylum and tolerated stay medical grounds family reasons Illegally staying unaccompanied minors stateless tolerated stay/suspension of removal witnesses to criminal proceedings victims of special offences „national interest” victims of environmental disasters Refugee status Subsidiary protection Temporary protection single refugee procedure Protection statuses granted to victims of human trafficking

International protection: evolution of national legislation Amendments to the national law: Act of 13 June 2003 on granting protection to foreigners within the territory of Poland „Polish migration policy – current situation and further actions” New Act on Foreigners (final stage of preparations) Draft scenarios in case of i.a. massive inflow of foreigners seeking international protection in Poland

The influence of the Qualification Directives Changes in the Act of 13 June 2003 on granting protection to asylum seekers within the territory of Poland : introduction of a subsidiary protection (result: decrease in number of humanitarian statuses granted – permits for tolerated stay) clarify the rules on procedure for granting refugee status to streamline the procedure strenghtening of the non-refoulment principle introduction of relocation and ressetlement focus on benefits granted international prtection status (i.a. work, integration)

The influence of the Qualification Directives New strategic document „Polish migration policy – current situation and further actions”: introduction of the resettlement and relocation the conditions to be granted a permit for tolerated stay shall be clearly divided due to reasons linked with the situation in the country of provision (in cases of international protection) and the "humanitarian" protection (linked only to the issues concerning the right to family life, privacy, etc.) implementation of the pre-integration actions for foreigners awaiting a decision on international protection introduction of the institution mentor / assistant for persons covered by the programs of integration and professional activation of refugees

General trends in international protection The number of applications starts to grow again The number of first applications submitted in 2012 and 2013 (by month) Source: Office for Foreigners (System „POBYT”)

General trends in international protection Main determinants of the refugee procedure in Poland Homogenous group of migrants (Caucasus region) Families Documented applicants Influx mainly through one border crossing point Main countries of origin of asylum aplicants are: Russia (of Chechens nationality) Georgia Armenia Ukraine and Belarus Source: Office for Foreigners (System „POBYT”)

International protection in Poland year Total number of persons who were granted protection on the territory of Poland Number of persons who were granted one of the forms of protection harmonised with the EU law on the territory of Poland Number of persons who were granted one of the national forms of protection on the territory of Poland refugee status subsidiary protection temporary protection asylum permit for tolerated stay under refugee procedure permit for tolerated stay under expulsion procedure other circumstances of granting permit for tolerated stay* 2008 2957 (100%) 193 (7%) 1077 (36%) 1527 (52%) 46 (2%) 114 (4%) 2009 2781 (100%) 133 (5%) 2377 (85%) 82 (3%) 68 (2%) 111 (4%) 2010 677 (100%) 84 (12%) 229 (34%) 210 (31%) 110 (16%) 44 (6%) 2011 765 (100%) 157 (21%) 207 (27%) 211 (28%) 154 (20%) 36 (5%) 2012 666 (100%) 106 (16%) 164 (25%) 319 (48%) 67 (10%) 10 (2%) TOTAL 17581 1988 4054 10065 842 622 * Circumstances in which permits for tolerated stay are issued, if the decision on expulsion was unenforceable for reasons beyond the control of the authority in charge of enforcing decision on expulsion and beyond the control of a foreigner; court issued a judgment on the inadmissibility of a foreigner’s extradition; the Minister of Justice issued a decision on refusal to extradite a foreigner. Source: Office for Foreigners (System „POBYT”)

General trends in international protection Poland vs other EU countries with a total number of decision on refugee status granted Source: EUROSTAT Source: EUROSTAT

Refugee status and the decision-making process  year Country of origin: Russia Country of origin: Georgia Country of origin: Belarus Min. EU Max. EU Poland 2008 1,78% 25,32% 3,41% 6,02% 12,16% 0% 7,14% 63,64% 37,50% 2009 2,19% 30,00% 1,56% 8,05% 7,69% 44,44% 2010 1,40% 45,16% 0,55% 1,69% 50,00% 2011 3,82% 1,25% 10,00% 1,96% 57,14% 2012 3,46% 75,00% 0,85% 20,00% 2,04% 60,00% 55,56% Source: Office for Foreigners (System „POBYT”) and EUROSTAT database

Up-to-date practice Due to geographical matters the number of foreigners applying for international protection differs between the EU countries Diversity of reception conditions (social policy and integration programmes) and the decision-process practice (type of protection statuses granted) have also an important impact in the process of CEAS creation Paramount of EU harmonised protection statuses granted in majority of EU countries (over non-EU harmonised statuses)

Areas of necessary changes (UNHCR, ECRE) Conditions for granting international protection should be harmonised at a higher level actors of protection; internal protection Persons fleeing persecution and other forms of serious harm should have access to an equivalent level of rights Refugee status should only end when all reasons for persecution have ceased Applicants should enjoy the benefit of the doubt

Qualification Directive vs CEAS objectives EU common solidarity principle, exchange of information regarding countries of origin, trainings of asylum officials as well as the Asylum Support Teams are expected to strenghten the system European Asylum Support Office shall promote the need to use the same eligibility criteria for international protection (important role of the EAC curiculum) Further harmonisation is needed (2015 as a reference year)

Thank you for your attention!! EMN National Contact Point to Poland Joanna Sosnowska [esm@msw.gov.pl; www.emn.gov.pl]