“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
Advertisements

COSMO Workpackage No First Results on Verification of LMK Test Runs Basing on SYNOP Data Lenz, Claus-Jürgen; Damrath, Ulrich
Training course: boundary layer IV Parametrization above the surface layer (layout) Overview of models Slab (integral) models K-closure model K-profile.
Data assimilation for validation of climate modeling systems Pierre Gauthier Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Université du Québec à Montréal.
OpenFOAM for Air Quality Ernst Meijer and Ivo Kalkman First Dutch OpenFOAM Seminar Delft, 4 november 2010.
THE PARAMETERIZATION OF STABLE BOUNDARY LAYERS BASED ON CASES-99 Zbigniew Sorbjan Marquette University, Milwaukee Zbigniew Sorbjan Marquette University,
Reading: Text, (p40-42, p49-60) Foken 2006 Key questions:
Training course: boundary layer II Similarity theory: Outline Goals, Buckingham Pi Theorem and examples Surface layer (Monin Obukhov) similarity Asymptotic.
Wind Driven Circulation I: Planetary boundary Layer near the sea surface.
ESA Project- Coupled Model Assimilation Year 1 workshop Aim: To establish coupled Atmosphere-Ocean assimilation system at ECMWF and demonstrate improved.
Monin-Obukhoff Similarity Theory
Discussion and Future Work With an explicit representation of river network, CHARMS is capable of capturing the seasonal variability of streamflow, although.
The Importance of Atmospheric Variability for Data Requirements, Data Assimilation, Forecast Errors, OSSEs and Verification Rod Frehlich and Robert Sharman.
– Equations / variables – Vertical coordinate – Terrain representation – Grid staggering – Time integration scheme – Advection scheme – Boundary conditions.
Xin Xi. 1946: Obukhov Length, as a universal length scale for exchange processes in surface layer. 1954: Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory, as a starting.
Verification and Case Studies for Urban Effects in HIRLAM Numerical Weather Forecasting A. Baklanov, A. Mahura, C. Petersen, N.W. Nielsen, B. Amstrup Danish.
The revised Diagnostics of 2m Values - Motivation, Method and Impact - M. Raschendorfer, FE14 Matthias Raschendorfer DWD COSMO Cracow 2008.
Observational and theoretical investigations of turbulent structures generated by low-Intensity prescribed fires in forested environments X. Bian, W. Heilman,
Mass Transfer Coefficient
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
EMS Sep Reading UK Evaluating modelled surface long wave downward radiation with Cabauw observations: The GABLS3 SCM case. Fred Bosveld (KNMI)
COSMO Sibiu 2013 Matthias Raschendorfer Towards Separated Turbulence Interacting with Circulations (STIC):
HNMS contribution to CONSENS Petroula Louka & Flora Gofa Hellenic National Meteorological Service
Status of the COSMO-Model Package Ulrich Schättler.
Overview on the Work of WG 6 Reference Version and Implementation WG Coordinator: Ulrich Schättler.
A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia.
Further steps towards a scale separated turbulence scheme: Matthias Raschendorfer DWD Aim: General valid (consistent) description of sub grid scale (SGS)
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 3: Overview status report COSMO General Meeting, 19.
Matthias Raschendorfer DWD Recent extensions of the COSMO TKE scheme related to the interaction with non turbulent scales COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
COSMO Sibiu 2013 Matthias Raschendorfer Towards a consolidated turbulence and surface coupling for COSMO and ICON: Technical issues preparing the common.
LATHE VIBRATIONS ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUHHNESS OF MACHINED DETAILS LATHE VIBRATIONS ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUHHNESS OF MACHINED DETAILS * Gennady Aryassov,
Deutscher Wetterdienst COSMO-ICON Physics Current Status and Plans Ulrich Schättler Source Code Administrator COSMO-Model.
The correction of initial values of temperature at low model levels Blinov D. Revokatova A. Rivin G. Rozinkina I. Sapuncova E.
Continuous treatment of convection: from dry thermals to deep precipitating convection J.F. Guérémy CNRM/GMGEC.
A Thermal Plume Model for the Boundary Layer Convection: Representation of Cumulus Clouds C. RIO, F. HOURDIN Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, CNRS,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
COSMO_2005 DWD 15 Sep 2005Page 1 (11) COSMO General Meeting Zürich, September 2005 Erdmann Heise Bodo Ritter and Reinhold Schrodin German Weather.
Impact of the Modified Richards Equation on CLM3.5 Mark Decker and Xubin Zeng University of Arizona.
COSMO WG3-WG5 workshop 9 March 2005, Langen. WG3-WG5 workshop, , Langen 1 Agenda for joint WG3-WG5 workshop (1) WP.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
The presence of sea ice on the ocean’s surface has a significant impact on the air-sea interactions. Compared to an open water surface the sea ice completely.
Work Status: The project implementation is somewhat delayed due to the uncertainty about the future of some project participants A review about analogies.
WG 3: plans for next year COSMO General Meeting 23 September 2005 Marco Arpagaus.
HYBRID LARGE EDDY SIMULATION/REYNOLDS AVERAGED NAVIER-STOKES FORMULATION FOR NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICITON H. A. Hassan North Carolina State University,
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Interfacing Model Components CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
Wind Driven Circulation I: Ekman Layer. Scaling of the horizontal components  (accuracy, 1% ~ 1‰) Rossby Number Vertical Ekman Number R o and E v are.
COSMO General Meeting, 19 September 2007
Development of the two-equation second-order turbulence-convection model (dry version): analytical formulation, single-column numerical results, and.
Status of the COSMO-Software and Documentation
COSMO-SCM: The SC-framework has been upgraded to COSMO_5.0 (during the visit of Ines Cerenzia) : Various adaptions to the specific SC-code mainly due to.
Monin-Obukhoff Similarity Theory
Similarity theory 1. Buckingham Pi Theorem and examples
Numerical effects of a reformulated SAT
Retuning the turbulent gust component in the COSMO model
The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.
Radiation Fog Forecasting Using a 1-D Model
Workshop Results WG5 COSMO General Meeting
Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first results
Matthias Raschendorfer 2007
Characterizing the response of simulated atmospheric boundary layers to stochastic cloud radiative forcing Robert Tardif, Josh Hacker (NCAR Research Applications.
Mire parameterization
MODELING AT NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE Sylvain Dupont and Jason Ching
Bogdan Rosa1, Marcin Kurowski1, Damian Wójcik1,
Ulrich Schättler Source Code Administrator
Colombe Siegenthaler - Le Drian
Conservative Dynamical Core (CDC)
Overview of WG3a activities Upper air physical aspects
transport equations for the scalar variances
Presentation transcript:

“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT Priority Task “Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT COSMO Matthias Raschendorfer Sibiu 2013

Aim of the 1-year PT Finalizing already started and several times delayed work regarding the SAT-scheme: Implementation (and validation) of already prepared modifications of the SAT-scheme expected to improve the simulation of the diurnal cycle of near surface variables, such as surface fluxes, as well as 2m- and 10m-diagnostics and the representation of the stable boundary layer Setting up the SAT scheme (in relation to turbulence and numerical surface coupling) as a part of the common more clearly arranged physic package for COSMO and ICON Adaption the SC framework to the current version of the COSMO code and preparation for common use as a testbed for this and following development Documentation of the whole implementation This special implementation work is directed to the originating developer. The work should also prepare a basis for further investigation of the SAT scheme and the diurnal cycle problem COSMO-SMC Matthias Raschendorfer 2013

The task is integrated in the continuous process of model improvement: Detection of crucial processes , being badly represented by the model Conditional verification of 3D-forecast runs against observations and assimilation data. Component testing of specific parameterization by means of COSMO-SC. Maxing out the existing formulations together with existing extensions 1) Determination of optimal parameter values based on component testing 2) Statistical hyper-parameterization expressing so long not considered dependencies by empirical corrections Analysis and revision of related parameterizations and numerical procedures Implementation of revised formulations into the code Validation of the modifications Reporting and documentation of the modified parameterizations 1-st ConSAT task The 1-year task ConSAT deals with the implementation of a first revised version of the SAT-scheme starting at step IV in the process loop. Well defined follow-up actions according the process loop are desired (next maybe related to steps I to III) The rather extensive ConSAT plan is a guideline for the whole development process COSMO-SMC Matthias Raschendorfer 2013

Prepared measures to be implemented (step IV): This ConSAT task: Implementing the ICON-version of the turbulence-and SAT-code into COSMO including the revision of numerical security limits in the turbulence model (used by the SAT scheme) Changing the vertical profile functions used in the calculation of transfer resistances in case of stable stratification to those fitting better to the constant flux solution of the turbulence model. Expressing the transfer resistances without using the lowest diffusion coefficient above the CFL as an interpolation node, what may currently cause a damping of the diurnal amplitude the transfer resistances Extension of the profile function towards an universal one that includes the laminar limit, thus getting rid of using a virtual laminar layer (and the parameter rlam_heat). Revision of near surface diagnostics in particular with respect to their applicability at grid points with a large roughness length. Introduction of a rigid canopy layer less strongly coupled to the soil Presumably for a later ConSAT task: COSMO-SMC Matthias Raschendorfer 2013

Calculation of the transport resistances: The current scheme in COSMO explicitly considers the roughness layer resistance for scalars: applying and an effective SAI value for the whole roughness layer using the laminar length scale and a proper scaling factor for scalars assuming for , it can be written: Can be expressed by surface layer variables only, increasing sensitivity on thermal stratification The current scheme in COSMO explicitly considers the free atmospheric resistance: applying a linear -profile between level (top of the roughness layer) and level (top of the lowest model layer) using the atmospheric height and the stability parameter it can be written: new branch DWD Matthias Raschendorfer May.2013

COSMO-SMC Matthias Raschendorfer 2013

Remarks and conclusions: The proposed task is more or less an example how to apply the general strategy of improving parameterizations, and is first of all an opportunity to implement already prepared modifications in order to get a consolidated SAT-scheme Later tasks are possible, based on this consolidation Parameter estimation for separated processes Introduction a vertically resolved roughness layer Various issues of future science plan COSMO-SMC Matthias Raschendorfer 2013

Transfer scheme and 2m-values with respect to a SYNOP lawn: Effective velocity scale profile Mean GRID box profile SYNOP station lawn profile upper boundary of the lowest model layer from turbulence-scheme linear interpolated logarithmic Prandtl-layer profile unstable stable lowest model main level (expon. roughness-layer profile) Prandtl layer lower boundary of the lowest model layer roughness layer no storage capacity laminar layer Exponential roughness layer profile is valid for the whole grid box, but it is not present at a SYNOP station turbulence-scheme DWD Matthias Raschendorfer CLM-Training Course