Schools and the Learning Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Criminological Psychology Charlton et al 2000: St. Helena study.
Advertisements

Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory
Operant Conditioning Summary Question… Please write your individual response a piece of paper (remember to show analysis) –How does operant conditioning.
A / AS Psychology.. Key Studies Developmental Psychology Key study Bandura, Ross and Ross (1961)
Psychlotron.org.uk What does this advert suggest about children’s behaviour?
Social Learning Theory Social Learning Theory Our third theory of Learning P36-37 Green Pack P Brain Text Book.
A / AS Psychology.. Key Studies Developmental Psychology Key study Bandura, Ross and Ross (1961)
Social Learning Theory Explaining Gender PSYB1. Look through the magazines choose just one person you like and explain why…
AS level Psychology The Core Studies The developmental approach Behaviourist & Social Learning perspective.
Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross and Sheila A. Ross
Social Learning Theory Social Learning Theory Our third theory of Learning P34-35 Orange Pack P Brain Text Book.
Session 7: Social Learning Theory. Explain social learning theory, making reference to two relevant studies.
 Social cognitive theory is acquiring symbolic representations through observation.  Learning through imitation of observed behaviour.
BANDURA’S SOCIAL MODELLING APPROACH TO AGGRESSION.
Bobo doll study Bandura, Ross & Ross (1961). Hypothesis To see whether children will imitate aggressive behaviour, even if in different environments and.
5. Observational Learning
Behavioral Theories. John Watson O Father of American behavioral psychology O Believed that children are passive, and can be molded by conditioning (nurture.
Bandura, Ross & Ross (1961) Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models.
Social Learning Theory Albert Bandura. Learning Outcomes To describe Social Learning Theory and the stages involved.
Bandura Developmental Psychology The Core Studies.
For the below examples decide whether it is operant conditioning or classical conditioning being described and why? (2 marks each: 1 mark for the identification.
Explain Social Learning Theory, making reference to TWO relevant studies Social Learning Theory.
Research methods Designing an experiment Lesson 5.
Getting you thinking: Extension: Use your knowledge of the approaches to develop these suggestions. Discuss with somebody else the reasons why somebody.
SCLOA: Social and Cultural Norms (Social Learning Theory)
Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory
Discuss how classical conditioning can be applied to this scenario (8 marks) This scenario suggests Jack has associated the nurse’s white clothes with.
Sample answer for the Classical Conditioning application question (6)
Learning approach.
AS level Psychology The Core Studies The developmental approach
Approaches AQA A level Origins of psychology slide 2
Discuss how classical conditioning can be applied to this scenario (8 marks) This scenario suggests Jack has associated the nurse’s white clothes with.
Social Learning Theory
Introduction to Gender
What does this advert suggest about children’s behaviour?
Topics in Psychology Aggression
Unit 2: Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory
How did you learn how to fold the t shirt? How successful were you? What determined your success?
Bandura (1965).
Bandura-Abridged.
The Social Learning Theory of Aggression
Social Learning Theory Approach
Transmission of Aggression through Imitation of Aggressive Models
Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory
Results (1) Children from the aggressive model group showed significantly more imitation of the model’s physical & verbal aggression and non-aggressive.
Approaches in Psychology
Research Methods.
Social Learning Theory
Starter Imagine - you did not do as well as you wanted to in a biology test, but your teacher praises you for working hard and trying your best. You feel.
Social Learning Theory
AQA AS and year 1 Approaches Origins of psychology Learning approach
Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross and Sheila A. Ross
The Social Learning Theory
Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models
SLT/Behaviourist approach
Unit 6: Learning (Behaviorism)
Research into social learning
Social Learning Theory
Bandura (1965) Bo Bo doll experiment
METHODS OF TREATING OFFENDERS
Thunk- Do you agree? Using social media sites has a negative impact on our mental health and psychological wellbeing Extenstion- How does social media.
Social Learning Your CC is excellent: p
Observational learning
Social Cognitive Theory (Albert Bandura)
Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models
Presentation transcript:

Schools and the Learning Approach Starter Activity

Social Learning Theory Our third theory of Learning

By the end of today’s session You will be able to You will learn the meaning of the following key terms... Describe Social Learning Theory Explain – how SLT could explain ??? Imitation Modelling Observation Vicarious reinforcement Identification Shaping

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8tcnF_Styw What does this advert suggest about children’s attitudes and behaviour?

Behaviourism S R Behaviourists aren’t interested in what happens in between S and R. They don’t think it is relevant!

Social learning theory Social Learning Theorists say important things take place in the mind of the organism that mediate between S and R. Human’s aren't the same as animals. They say we do need to know about a person’s mental processes.

Bandura agreed with the behaviourist learning theories Classical conditioning Operant conditioning But He was interested in The mediating processes between stimulus & response The role of Observation in learning

Social learning Theory Bandura’s research in the 1960’s suggested that children seem to learn by observation and imitation without being directly reinforced. He called this ……

He suggested that social learning could be broken down into stages * 07/16/96 He suggested that social learning could be broken down into stages Modelling Identification Observation Imitation Reinforcement Brain p 340 *

Modelling We model ourselves on other people We choose our own role models This is a COGNITIVE PROCESS. People actively seek out and decide who they want to be like. Copying the behaviour of a chosen person - a ‘role model’ depends on a number of factors.

Who makes an effective role model? Same gender Same age/slightly older Attractive Higher status/powerful Admired or/and respected Popular Someone we can identify with

Observation We have to notice the behaviour being modelled (GIVE ATTENTION) and remember what we’ve seen (RETENTION)

Imitation This is simply copying behaviour and is the fastest type of learning in humans. Behaviour may be imitated because it is seen as rewarding in some way.

1. Attention to the role model Bandura believed that four criteria need to be met for imitation to occur 1. Attention to the role model 2. Retention of the observed behaviour 3. Reproduction of the target behaviour 4. Motivation to imitate the observed behaviour

Restrictions on imitation So not all behaviour is likely to be imitated. According to SLT, the two conditions for performing a behaviour are: Reproduction Motivation

Observe behaviour being reinforced in other people * Why do we imitate? 07/16/96 Vicarious reinforcements What??? Observe behaviour being reinforced in other people Lupita Nyong'o *

Vicarious Reinforcement Is a form of indirect learning We copy someone's behaviour because of the particular outcome it had for that person. Thus, we learn from observing other peoples experiences

Self - efficacy In order to imitate, children need the belief that they have the capacity to imitate a behaviour they have observed. They also need Reinforcement of that behaviour to keep them from extinguishing the learned behaviour. Reinforcement strengthens behaviour with positive consequences.

Supporting Evidence Schools and SLT Aim: Dweck et al (1978) observed teachers use of negative and positive feedback in the classroom. Method: 79 children were observed in the classroom twice a week for 5 weeks. Observers were blind to the purpose of the experiment The teacher’s verbal responses to the children were observed: whether feedback is related to work/behaviour, whether it was positive or negative, whether is was related to content/presentation (i.e. neatness). Results: Boys tended to receive positive reinforcement for content, whilst girls for neatness. The pattern was reversed for negative comments. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that teachers do respond in different ways to boys and girls.

Discussion points Who would you say is a role model for young boys? Who is a role model for young girls these days? How might parents encourage sex appropriate behaviours? Do you think mothers and fathers differ in how concerned they are about sex appropriate behaviour? What makes children continue to copy certain behaviours? Do you think other children encourage sex typed behaviours?

Check Modelling Reinforcement Identification A group of students have a disagreement about which of the three definitions below can be applied to the terms Modelling Reinforcement Identification A person’s desire to be like another person or to be part of a particular social group The process by which a response is strengthened A procedure whereby a person observes another person and then attempts to imitate his or her behaviour.

Activity Time Use your text book to read and make notes on Social Learning Theory (pages 212-216) For next lesson be prepared to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of SLT Stretch & Challenge: Compare & contrast how the cognitive, biological and learning approach explain child development.

Top five things you have learned today HW: Complete today’s learning activities. Read ahead. It’s Bandura’s Bo Bo doll study next (BTB p350).

SLT Identification – seek out a role model PPA Attention – pay attention, notice the behaviour Retention – remember what you saw Reproduction – have the means to copy it Motivation – have the desire to copy it (vicarious learning) Imitation – copy it Reinforcement – can be internal or external

Bandura, Ross and Ross (1961) Learning Approach Key study Bandura, Ross and Ross (1961)

By the end of today’s session You will be able to You will recap ... Describe (APRC) the ‘Bo Bo’ doll study by Bandura Ross and Ross (1961) Evaluate (GRAVE) the study by Bandura Ross and Ross (1961) See p1 Orange Pack Terminology associated with Laboratory Experiments and experimental design You will have considered how observation can be used as a way of gathering data

Before we begin……. 1 List two behaviours you think might be learned by watching others 2 List two behaviours you think could not be learned in this way

And now lets think! Which type of learning best explains how we display aggression? Can aggressive behaviour be learned by observation? See your task slip – time to think creatively!

Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models Bandura, Ross & Ross (1961)

Aims To investigate whether participants exposed to an aggressive model would reproduce aggressive acts resembling those of the models To investigate if boys would be more predisposed than girls towards imitating aggression

Bandura Ross & Ross The BOBO doll study The participants 72 children (Stanford University nursery school) 36 boys & 36 girls age range 37 months - 69 months Mean age 52 months (4 years 4 months)

Method - an experiment there were three conditions 24 children in each condition

The THREE CONDITIONS Non aggressive condition Aggressive condition Control condition

Participants Participants in the experimental and control conditions were matched individually on ratings of their aggressive behaviour in social interactions in their nursery school Participants were rated by both the teacher and the experimenter - both of whom knew the children well They were rated on physical, verbal aggression, aggression towards inanimate objects and aggressive inhibition (subjects tendency to inhibit aggressive reactions in the face of high instigation) High inter-rater reliability correlation .89 Physical Aggression 1 – 5 Verbal aggression 1-5

Confederates Two adults: one male, one female served in the role as the model One female experimenter conducted the study for all 72 children

6 boys saw aggressive male 6 boys saw non-aggressive male 6 boys saw aggressive female 6 boys saw non-aggressive female

6 girls saw aggressive female 6 girls saw non-aggressive female 6 girls saw aggressive male 6 girls saw non-aggressive male

Level 1 Independent Variable (IV) aggressive or non-aggressive role model Level 2 Independent variable (IV) Same sex or opposite sex role model Level 3 Independent variable…?

The Experimental design * 07/16/96 The Experimental design What is the problem with the sample size? What could be a problem with the 6 children in a specific group……Nat Agg How would Bandura overcome this? *

Question What type of experimental design did Bandura use? What type of research method did Bandura use?

Write a TESTABLE two-tailed hypothesis for the study Write a TESTABLE one-tailed hypothesis for the study

Children were rated for In order to ensure that each group contained equally aggressive children they were all rated for aggression before the experiment Children were rated for physical aggression verbal aggression aggression to inanimate objects aggression inhibition (self control)

Modelling the behaviour phase The Procedure Phase one of the experiment Modelling the behaviour phase Children were taken one at a time to a separate part of the building by the female experimenter for…

Phase 1 - Modelling The child was sat in one corner of the room and was encouraged to play with toys – potato printing and tinker toys. The model was sat in another corner. The model also played with toys. Either in a subdued way or aggressively depending on the experimental condition.

Non-aggressive Condition Procedure Non-aggressive Condition The model assembled the tinker toys in a non-aggressive manner and ignored the Bobo doll Aggressive Condition The model began by assembling the Tinker Toys for about a minute. The model then turned to Bobo and spent the remaining time being aggressive towards it

procedure The model performed a number of distinctive aggressive acts Physical Aggression The model lay Bobo on its side and sat on it then punched it repeatedly on the nose The model hit Bobo on the head with the mallet The model tossed Bobo in the air aggressively then kicked it around the room Verbal Aggressive Statements ‘Sock him in the nose’ ‘Hit him down’ ‘Pow’ ‘Kick him’ Verbal Non-Aggressive Statements ‘He sure is a tough fella’ In addition to punching Bobo (an act that would likely be performed by the children, independent of a demonstration) the distinctive acts were performed so that could be scored as ‘imitative acts’ if the children copied them

Bandura Ross & Ross The BOBO doll study What happened then? Phase two of the experiment The Arousal phase This was necessary to provoke the children

The children were intentionally upset In phase 2 the child was taken into a separate room laid out with a wonderful array of brand new toys. Once the child had started to play with the toys they were told they had to stop…as these toys were intended for other children. This upset many of the children

Bandura Ross & Ross The BOBO doll study What happened then? Phase three of the experiment The Observation phase

What was observed? Imitative physical & verbal aggression – i.e. what was copied. Non-imitative physical & verbal aggression – i.e. what the child made up themselves

Test for Imitation Participants were then taken to the experimental room This room contained a variety of toys of Aggressive toys A mallet and peg board Two dart guns A tether ball with a face painted on it, hung from the ceiling

Non-aggressive toys Tea set Crayons Colouring paper Dolls Farm animals Cars and trucks As a control, the toys were placed in a fixed order for each of the sessions The control was to eliminate any variation in behaviour that was simply due to the placement of toys in the room

Controlled observation conducted under laboratory conditions The participant spent 20 minutes in this experimental room The participants behaviour was rated using predetermined response categories It was rated by observers who observed via a one way mirror

Procedure Behaviour was rated using TIME SAMPLING Behaviour was rated every 5 seconds during the 20 minute session (using an electronic timer) 240 response units were recorded for each participant The male model scored all 72 sessions Half the participants were also scored by a second observer Inter-rater reliability was high – the correlation coefficient being in the .90s Apart from when the male model acted as a model he didn’t which conditions the children had been assigned to

Recap - 4 measures were obtained Imitation of physical aggression Imitation of verbal aggression Imitative non-aggressive verbal response (‘he sure is a tough fella’) Novel aggressive acts

Question 72 – 36 boys and 36 girls What was the total number of participants? 32 42 52 62 72 82 Answer 72 – 36 boys and 36 girls

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr0OTCVtHbU&feature=related

The results They also imitated non-aggressive behaviours IMITATION - the children in the aggressive condition imitated many of the modelled physical and verbal aggressive behaviours They also imitated non-aggressive behaviours

Results Imitation of Physical aggression 5.5 7.2 2.5 0.0 12.4 25.8 0.2 Aggressive Non-aggressive F model M model Female pps 5.5 7.2 2.5 0.0 Male pps 12.4 25.8 0.2 1.5 Significantly more imitation of physical aggression by boys. Both boys and girls showed higher imitation of the male model. Boys over double the amount of imitative physical aggression of the male model, compared to female

Results Imitation of Verbal Aggression 13.7 2.0 0.3 0.0 4.3 12.7 1.1 Aggressive Non-aggressive F model M model Female pps 13.7 2.0 0.3 0.0 Male pps 4.3 12.7 1.1

Results Non-imitative aggression Female pps 21.3 8.4 7.2 1.4 Male pps Aggressive Non-aggressive F model M model Female pps 21.3 8.4 7.2 1.4 Male pps 16.2 36.7 26.1 22.3 Relatively high levels of non-imitative aggression shown by boys across the groups (girls only in the female model aggressive group) BUT remembering the ‘violent’ toys that were available in the experimental room

The children in the NON- aggressive condition imitated very few of the modelled behaviour. 70% had zero scores.

the children in the non-aggressive condition spent more time playing with the toys (dolls etc.) also more time doing nothing

The children in the aggressive condition displayed MUCH more non-imitative (non-copied) aggressive behaviour – in other words they just played a lot more aggressively!

GENDER RESULTS Boys imitated more physical aggression (but not verbal) Boys were more aggressive after watching the MALE aggressive model Girls were more verbally aggressive after watching the FEMALE aggressive model

Question How did they check that the two observers were recording the behaviour in the same way A) by testing for inter-rater reliability B) by testing for experimenter bias C) by testing for demand characteristics D) By testing for extraneous variables Answer A) inter-rater reliability

b & c Question Which of the following are aims of the experiment? To investigate whether participants exposed to the non-aggressive model would produce acts resembling those of their models To investigate whether participants exposed to aggressive models would reproduce aggressive acts resembling those of their models To investigate if boys would be more predisposed towards imitating aggression than girls To investigate whether children enjoy observing and imitating aggressive behaviour Answers b & c

Analysing the data Which statistical test could Bandura have used? Mann-Whitney U test Name the conditions required for this test to be used Test of difference Ordinal data Independent Measures design Write down the statement of significance if Bandura tested at the 5% level of significance P<0.05

Bandura et al concluded that… Learning can take place by observation no classical or operant conditioning was required! Also that children are more likely to learn from same sex models!

Bandura suggested that Freud’s theory of identification may be used to explain how learning took place. The child first identifies with the same sex role model and then copies their behaviour.

Evaluation Thinking about the participants To whom can we generalise the findings? Thinking about the methodology Is the study reliable?

Evaluation Thinking about methodology Does this study have ecological validity? Does the study have internal validity?

Evaluation Thinking about BPS guidelines…….. WAS THIS STUDY ETHICAL?

Application This study started the debate about children learning aggressive behaviour from watching violence on TV. How might watching TV differ from the experience of the children in the Bandura experiment?

Activity Time  Use your text book (pages 350-354) to help you complete pages 28-30 in your Orange Pack Complete the gap fill on p32 of your Orange Pack Stretch & Challenge: Collect a ‘spot the mistake’ sheet from me  Extension Activity: Read the original study. See Stretch & Challenge box See the blog

Describe (APRC) the study by Bandura Ross and Ross (1961) Learning objectives Activity Time  You should now be able to…. Describe (APRC) the study by Bandura Ross and Ross (1961) Evaluate (GRAVE) the study by Bandura Ross and Ross (1961) Have practiced using terminology associated with Laboratory Experiments and experimental design Use your text book (pages 350-354) to help you complete pages 28-30 in your Orange Pack Complete the gap fill on p32 of your Orange Pack Stretch & Challenge: Collect a ‘spot the mistake’ sheet from me  Extension Activity: Read the original study. See Stretch & Challenge box See the blog

Top five things you have learned today

Recap reinforcement Direct learning – behaviour is strengthened or weakened (repeated/not repeated) due to a particular response (i.e. reward/punishment) Rewards can be Internal (feelings) and external (materialistic) Positive reinforcement – A behaviour is followed by something pleasant Negative reinforcement – A behaviour is followed by the removal of something unpleasant Positive Punishment – The likelihood of a behaviour is reduced when followed by something unpleasant Negative Punishment - The likelihood of a behaviour is reduced by the removal something pleasant

SLT Identification – with a role model PPA Attention – pay attention, notice the behaviour Retention – remember what you saw Reproduction – have the means to copy it Motivation – have the desire to copy it Imitation – copy it Reinforcement – can be internal or external (vicarious learning)

Exam questions Define reinforcement (2 marks) Define imitation (2 marks) Define modelling and give two examples of why someone chooses to have particular role models. (3 marks) Distinguish between the terms imitation and identification. (3 marks) Distinguish between positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement (3 marks)

Copy and complete – a later study by Bandura Modelling involves learning through ________. The adults behaviour was ______ in this study. The likelihood of imitation depended on the __________ of the adults actions. If the child saw the adults behaviour __________, this acted as _________ (indirect) learning/reinforcement ,because the child then proceeded to imitate it. If the child saw the adult ________ for their actions, they were less likely to imitate them. observation imitated vicarious consequences rewarded punished