Report back: Group 3 Deliverables Area 2: Programme Management Criteria: 7,8,9,10
Approach to Focus Area Teaching, Learning & Technology
Approach to Focus Area It will be an approach for TUT as a whole: inclusive consultative approach honest, open and transparent way of work very self critical Teaching, Learning & Technology
Scope of Work Teaching, Learning & Technology
Scope of Work Criterion 7: Administration of all academic programmes in the context of effective programme management system Criterion 8: Clear and efficient systems and procedures for the design and approval of new programmes, courses and modules Criterion 9: Recruitment, selection, development and support policies and procedures, facilitate the availability of suitably qualified and experienced academic and support staff to deliver the programme Criterion 10: Clear and effective systems to evaluate programmes on a regular basis Teaching, Learning & Technology
Scope of Work – Self Assessment Procedure During the TUT self-assessment process, this working group will address the following components: TUT Audit Themes Open Ended Questions Quality Management Audit criteria, evaluative questions, institutional data sources Teaching, Learning & Technology
TUT Audit Themes We will determine action steps for the following Test the validity and authenticity of planning assumptions and strategy Assess the merger integration and equity of academic provisioning across learning sites Alignment of planning, quality and resource allocation Appropriateness of multi-campus management model Quality management of the core focus areas Quality in the restructuring and transformation into a university of technology Teaching, Learning & Technology
HEQC Open Ended Questions Together with addressing the Audit Themes during the assessment process, the following open ended questions will be addressed. What are the unique and distinctive ways in which TUT enriches and adds excellence to the higher education sector and society, nationally, regionally and internationally? What does TUT do to produce a vibrant intellectual culture within the institution and in society at large? In what ways does TUT act as an incubator of new ideas and cutting edge knowledge and technologies within the national system of innovation? What are some of the notable examples in the last three years of institutional success in promoting and enhancing quality? Teaching, Learning & Technology
Quality Management Q Assurance Q Support Q Develop. Q Monitor Input The following quadrant will be completed for each criteria Q Assurance Q Support Q Develop. Q Monitor Input Process Output Impact Teaching, Learning & Technology
Scope of Work - Other Together with info in the previous slides, the following will also be addressed: Audit criteria Evaluative questions Institutional data sources Teaching, Learning & Technology
Membership Teaching, Learning & Technology
Membership of the Group The members of the Group will be the core group Additional members required from the following areas: Work-base learning Service Learning Human Resources Other to be co-opted on an “as required basis” Teaching, Learning & Technology
Two Months Work Schedule Teaching, Learning & Technology
Two Months Work Schedule Meetings will take place every second week in Pretoria utilising video conferencing facilities – Cjairman Secreatary to arrange Unpack themes – Sitwala Imenda – convene a meeting by not later than 3 February Detailed actions will be determined at next meeting Draft a Microsoft Gantt Chart – Jannie Zaaiman – 10 February 2006 Teaching, Learning & Technology