Report back: Group 3 Deliverables Area 2: Programme Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
Advertisements

The CeQuInt Assessment Frameworks Axel Aerden & Maria E. Weber.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Update on the Continuum of Teacher Education AHEAD conference 15 March 2012.
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Sharifah Hapsah Shahabudin Vice Chancellor 11 th Malaysian Education Summit 2007 Malaysian Education: Winning in the Global Race 11 th Malaysian Education.
Contribution Analysis A different approach to measurement of impact.
Evaluation and revalidation briefing seminar 1 October 2014.
24 August 2011 Dr JC Henning Technology based Quality Evaluation Instrument for Teaching and Learning: UNISA Library Services.
1 PARTNERING WITH LIBRARIANS FOR IMPROVED QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION PREM NAIDOO HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY COMMITTEE (HEQC)
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA STRATEGIC PLAN PSP – 4 28 NOVEMBER 2012 Neavera Olivier 1.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
RTI, MUMBAI / CH 101 CRITICAL ISSUES IN PERFORMANCE AUDITS DAY 10 SESSION NO. 3 (THEORY) BASED ON CHAPTER 10 PERFORMANCE AUDITING GUIDELINES.
Quality Assurance in Staff Development Training Seminar on Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Systems in Romanian Higher Education Institutions.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
CHE Business Plan Mission The mission of the CHE is to contribute to the development of a higher education system that is characterised by.
Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación Methods and approaches for a management and evaluation of research at the Higher Education.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
HEQC NATIONAL REVIEW OF ACADEMIC & PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMMES IN EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL PREPAREDNESS WORKSHOP 24 & 26 April 2006.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Enhancing capacity in the Child & Youth sector through situated supported distance learning Building Capacity through a Participatory Institutional Assessment.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Strategic Planning at Appalachian Student Life. Mission Statement The mission of Appalachian State University is to prepare students to lead purposeful.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion The HEQC Audit 23 January 2006.
Glasgow Caledonian University
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
QQI Statutory QA Guidelines, January 2016
Higher Education Quality Committee
The British Accreditation Council: ensuring standards
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Report back: Group 2 Teaching, Learning & Technology (TLT) Area 2: T&L.
Departmental Actions Teams Panel Discussion
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
Delivering World Class Student Experience & Service
Input Flow Diagram Output Doc’s Who Start End End Page 2
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Promoting an Internal Quality Culture in Mozambican Universities
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Teaching Quality Indicators Project
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
An introduction to the LiFE Index
Study Programmes: Modelling & Operation Project
Staff Feedback Forum 3pm-5pm, 22 March 2017
Embedding the concept of competency maps to improve the student learning experience and their preparation for work based learning and employability Catherine.
TEACHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FRAMEWORK
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs)
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Emeritus Professor Jonathan Garnett
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
An Introduction to LiFE
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
The School development plan for Parents and Carers
Presentation transcript:

Report back: Group 3 Deliverables Area 2: Programme Management Criteria: 7,8,9,10

Approach to Focus Area Teaching, Learning & Technology

Approach to Focus Area It will be an approach for TUT as a whole: inclusive consultative approach honest, open and transparent way of work very self critical Teaching, Learning & Technology

Scope of Work Teaching, Learning & Technology

Scope of Work Criterion 7: Administration of all academic programmes in the context of effective programme management system Criterion 8: Clear and efficient systems and procedures for the design and approval of new programmes, courses and modules Criterion 9: Recruitment, selection, development and support policies and procedures, facilitate the availability of suitably qualified and experienced academic and support staff to deliver the programme Criterion 10: Clear and effective systems to evaluate programmes on a regular basis Teaching, Learning & Technology

Scope of Work – Self Assessment Procedure During the TUT self-assessment process, this working group will address the following components: TUT Audit Themes Open Ended Questions Quality Management Audit criteria, evaluative questions, institutional data sources Teaching, Learning & Technology

TUT Audit Themes We will determine action steps for the following Test the validity and authenticity of planning assumptions and strategy Assess the merger integration and equity of academic provisioning across learning sites Alignment of planning, quality and resource allocation Appropriateness of multi-campus management model Quality management of the core focus areas Quality in the restructuring and transformation into a university of technology Teaching, Learning & Technology

HEQC Open Ended Questions Together with addressing the Audit Themes during the assessment process, the following open ended questions will be addressed. What are the unique and distinctive ways in which TUT enriches and adds excellence to the higher education sector and society, nationally, regionally and internationally? What does TUT do to produce a vibrant intellectual culture within the institution and in society at large? In what ways does TUT act as an incubator of new ideas and cutting edge knowledge and technologies within the national system of innovation? What are some of the notable examples in the last three years of institutional success in promoting and enhancing quality? Teaching, Learning & Technology

Quality Management Q Assurance Q Support Q Develop. Q Monitor Input The following quadrant will be completed for each criteria Q Assurance Q Support Q Develop. Q Monitor Input Process Output Impact Teaching, Learning & Technology

Scope of Work - Other Together with info in the previous slides, the following will also be addressed: Audit criteria Evaluative questions Institutional data sources Teaching, Learning & Technology

Membership Teaching, Learning & Technology

Membership of the Group The members of the Group will be the core group Additional members required from the following areas: Work-base learning Service Learning Human Resources Other to be co-opted on an “as required basis” Teaching, Learning & Technology

Two Months Work Schedule Teaching, Learning & Technology

Two Months Work Schedule Meetings will take place every second week in Pretoria utilising video conferencing facilities – Cjairman Secreatary to arrange Unpack themes – Sitwala Imenda – convene a meeting by not later than 3 February Detailed actions will be determined at next meeting Draft a Microsoft Gantt Chart – Jannie Zaaiman – 10 February 2006 Teaching, Learning & Technology