INTEGRATING NUTRITION INTO VALUE CHAINS BA Agriculture Productivity Annual Review Meeting Agriculture Productivity 29 June 2017
Biometric information and technologies PRESENTATION OUTLINE Biometric information and technologies 2. Crop establishment and management 3. Harvest and post harvest activities 4. Yields 5. Lessons learnt 6. Some challenges
GROUP RECRUITMENT Partner Target Actual beneficiaries Total beneficiaries % Female Total Female Male 1 ACE 3,000 1,023 1,506 2,529 40.4% 2 FUM 5,400 4,003 2155 6158 65% 3 CADECOM 5,306 2,286 1,814 4,100 55.8% 4 We Effect 2,100 1,990 274 2,264 87.9% 15,806 9,302 5,749 15,051 61.8%
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION GENDER DISTRIBUTION SEED DISTRIBUTION
Seed Fair group District Male Female Total % Female Balaka 2,230 3,770 6,000 63% Machinga 1702 4,298 72% Mangochi 2,247 3,718 5,965 62% 6,179 11,786 17,965 66%
Seed fair graphical
SEED DISTRIBUTION Dedza FUM Soybean 1,500 10 15,000 CADECOM Groundnuts DISTRICT PARTNERS CROP NO. OF BENS BEN QTY (KG) QTY PER /EPA (Kgs) Dedza FUM Soybean 1,500 10 15,000 CADECOM Groundnuts 2,500 25,000 Lilongwe 2,784 30,300 ACE 1,174 30 34,700 Mchinji 1,900 19,000 1,357 40,710 Ntcheu 1,600 16,000 Mangochi WE Effect 2,264 TOTAL 15,051 210,000
HECTARAGE UNDER CULTIVATION
CRS – Qty seed traded (Kgs) District EPA Gnut Ppeas Soybean Balaka 6,000 23,397 22,488 18,666 Machinga 23,621 24,045 17,202 Mangochi 5,965 24,554 23,118 17,726 71,572 69,651 53,594
TRAININGS
TRAININGS ToTs Farmer trainings
TRAININGS LF vs follower farmers Field days
SEED GERMINATION & CROP ESTABLISHMENT
SOYA: PLANTING & GERMINATION Soya inoculation
CROP ESTABLISHMENT- SOYBEAN Soybean germination Soybean crop establishment
VEGETATIVE - GROUNDNUT POOR GERMINATION LOCAL VS PROJECT SEED
PIGEON PEA STAND
TECHNOLOGY UPTAKE
AGRONOMIC PRACTICES Technology adoption (LOAN)
TECHNOLOGY UPTAKE (CRS)
PESTS & DISEASES
PEST AND DISEASES Fall Army Worms Termites
PEST & DISEASES White grabs Larvae
Pest and disease cont Gnut field almost wiped out Gnut attacked by white grab
CROP YIELDS
YIELDS (GROUNDNUTS)
YIELDS -GROUNDNUTS
YIELD - SOYBEAN
Yield targets Yield comparison with INVC 1 Percentage wise
SOIL IMPROVEMENT HUGE BIOMAS LEFT BY SOYBEAN CROP COMPOST
LESSONS Double row – apart from increase yield; lessen costs; huge biomass for soil improvement; Working with local IPs require commitment and understanding of their goals
Coordination between IP and DAES Budgetary constraint on part of IP CHALLENGES Coordination between IP and DAES Budgetary constraint on part of IP Crop prioritization by farmers Land problem Use of LF vs wholesale training Farmers mindset. (Farmers wanted the seed spread out to cover larger area) Getting quality seed Lack of commitment by some IP staff
SUCCESS STORIES Double row- a farmer is able to reduce the operational cost, increase yield etc
THANK YOU FOR LISTERNING ZIKOMO P MVETSERA