Figure 1. Representative photographs of control (a, b) and oak powdery mildew (E. alphitoides)-infected (c, d) leaves of Q. robur. The images for both.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

From: An open day in the metric space

Advertisements

Figure 1: seasonal courses of (a) PAR (daily sums, solid line; daily maxima, broken line), (b) wind speed (daily means, solid line; daily maxima, broken.

Figure 1 WBC count (A), platelet count (B), MPV (C), platelet activation rate (D) and TGF-β1concentration (E) in the PF of women with endometriosis and.

Figure 6. Biochemical analysis of mTORC1- and mTORC2-dependent signaling in response to UVB. iRicKO cells were treated with vehicle or with 4OHT for 3.

Figure 6. Effect of Withaferin A (WA) treatment on leptin-induced signaling in breast cancer cells. A) Immunoblotting for pSTAT3 (Tyr705), total STAT3,

Panel C plots the effect of changes in employer pensions on total pension contributions and total saving using a threshold approach. The lower series (triangles)

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Index Funds, Financialization, and Commodity Futures Markets

Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 3. Relationship between plot-level mean (PLM) leaf mass per area (LMA, g m–2) and gap light index (GLI, a percentage measure of light availability)

Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.

Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Fig. 7. Path analysis of selected traits

Fig. 1. Architectural limitations (dark grey area) and functional limitation (light grey filled with forward diagonal lines) of canopy photosynthesis rate.

From: Data Visualization for Human Rights Advocacy

Fig. 2 Two-dimensional embedding result obtained using nMDS.

Figure 3 Rule of law and cost of enforcement EBA

Figure 1: monthly precipitation and air temperature in 2006 and 2007 and their departures from the means of the previous 50 years (1956–2005) at the study.

Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p

Figure 1 Decrease in neuronal activity during n-back task in real tDCS as compared to sham stimulation. (A) Main effects of group (sham > real) based on.

Fig. 7. Estimated damage ratio (eqn 3) of Abies mariesii along an altitude. The lines indicate 5, 10, 20 and 40 cm of DBH, as shown. Regression lines are.

Figure 1. MS<sup>E</sup> data of THC-COOH

Fig. 3. Mean percentage of landing (a) and mean trapped R

Figure 1 A decision tree diagram for problems and its German correspondences From: Corresponding lexical domains: A new resource for onomasiological.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 1 The pattern reversal stimuli

Fig. 1. proFIA approach for peak detection and quantification

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1 Individual Lifted from Group Photograph

Figure 1. Structures of Tafluprost and four related impurities.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Fig. 1 Overview of model components to identify if hormonal pleiotropy constrains or facilitates phenotypic responses to selection. The environment imposes.

From: Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language

Figure 2. Illustration of minimum cross-sectional area (a) and measurements for oropharynx and soft palate in sagittal plane (b, c). From: Airway volume.

Fig. 2. Leaf area (A), dry (B) and fresh mass (C) in relation to leaf volume in all studied species. The inset in (B) demonstrates the correlation between.

From: Unmasking Masks in Makkah: Preventing Influenza at Hajj

Figure 4. p-Values from Larsson et al

Figure 1. Overall survival of patients receiving alternative medicine (solid lines) vs conventional cancer treatment (dashed lines). Overall survival of.

Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.

Fig. 2. Histograms of estimated lateral root growth rate (cm d−1): (A) Control, no leaves removed; (B) CML, removal of cotyledons and mature.

Figure 1. Identification of the most-abundant phytochemicals in GLE

Figure 1. Academic productivity and high academic income: top earners vs. the rest of academics. The average number of ‘peer-reviewed article equivalents’

Figure 1. Characteristics of Policy Outcomes and Multi-level Governments. From: What Are the Areas of Competence for Central and Local Governments? Accountability.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Figure 1. Comparisons across evergreen coniferous (green bars), deciduous broadleaf (blue bars) and tropical forests (red bars), regarding (A) NEP in proportion.

Figure 1. Examples of e-cigarette discussions in social media

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.

Figure 1. Publication channels used by scholars at the faculty of Arts, 2006–2013. From: Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems.

FIG. 1. Various models of rate variation across sites and lineages

Figure 2. Change of cooling ventilation load from 1950 to 2007.

Figure 1: Logistic regression showing association of prescribing provider and patient panel characteristics with occurrence of a hospitalization or ED.

Figure 3. Visualisation of ESMO-MCB scores for curative and non-curative setting. A & B and 5 and 4 represent the grades with substantial improvement.

Figure 1. Percentage of trainees is represented on the y-axis for each competency/knowledge item represented in the x-axis. Only Poor/Fair (P/F) ratings.

Figure 6. Effect of seed MC on the global DNA methylation of Acer platanoides (A) and Acer pseudoplatanus (B) seedlings. Values labeled with different.

From: Dynamic Dependence and Diversification in Corporate Credit*

Figure 1. Distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels at the baseline visit in a study population of adults aged 18–59 years (n = 309), Toronto,

Figure 2. Entrance dose at the detector for the clinical (light grey bars) and reference (dark bars) protocols. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS.

Figure 1. Variance partition for the different phases of bud and cambial phenology in black spruce provenances. From: Synchronisms between bud and cambium.

Figure 1. Example of phase shift angles among three different terns where one of them has been taken as a reference. From: Assessment of ELF magnetic fields.

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

Figure 1. Seasonal time course of the main meteorological parameters during the period of this study (May–September 2011): (a) precipitation; (b) daily.

Figure 1. Ricker S–R curve fitted to 1977–2005 red king crab S–R data (solid curve). The straight line is the replacement line passing through (0, 0) and.

Scheme 1. Scheme of the quartz sample holder.

Figure 1 Three example candidate spike ripple events

Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.

Fig. 1 Comparison of LOX concentrations between study groups

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Representative photographs of control (a, b) and oak powdery mildew (E. alphitoides)-infected (c, d) leaves of Q. robur. The images for both the upper (a, c) and lower sides (b, d) of the leaves are demonstrated. From: Oak powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides)-induced volatile emissions scale with the degree of infection in Quercus robur Tree Physiol. 2014;34(12):1399-1410. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu091 Tree Physiol | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 2. Leaf net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate (a), stomatal conductance to water vapor (b) and intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (c) in relation to the percentage of leaf area (upper surface) infected with E. alphitoides in Q. robur. The data correspond to different leaves and the relationships were fitted by linear regressions. Values for visually completely healthy non-infected leaves are shown by open symbols. Data are shown separately for 2011 and 2013 measurement campaigns. From: Oak powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides)-induced volatile emissions scale with the degree of infection in Quercus robur Tree Physiol. 2014;34(12):1399-1410. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu091 Tree Physiol | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 3. Comparison of representative light responses of net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate (a) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (b) among Q. robur control (non-infected) and E. alphitoides-infected leaves (percentage of leaf area infected ∼60%, see Table 2). Data are averages ± SE (n = 3 for both control and infected leaves). From: Oak powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides)-induced volatile emissions scale with the degree of infection in Quercus robur Tree Physiol. 2014;34(12):1399-1410. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu091 Tree Physiol | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 4. Correlations of isoprene (a, Φ<sub>Iso</sub>), monoterpene (b, Φ<sub>Mon</sub>) and lipoxygenase pathway volatiles (LOX, Φ<sub>Lox</sub>, various C6 alcohols, aldehydes and derivatives, also called green leaf volatiles), (c) emission rates with the percentage of E. alphitoides infection (upper surface) in Q. robur leaves. The sum of all monoterpenes and LOX volatiles is reported in Table 1. Data presentation and fitting as in Figure 2. The regressions with the degree of infection (D<sub>I</sub>) are: Φ<sub>Iso</sub> = 8.91 − 0.0743D<sub>I</sub>; Φ<sub>Mon</sub> = 0.0732 + 0.00532D<sub>I</sub>; Φ<sub>Lox</sub> = 0.00213 + 0.00624D<sub>I</sub>. From: Oak powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides)-induced volatile emissions scale with the degree of infection in Quercus robur Tree Physiol. 2014;34(12):1399-1410. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu091 Tree Physiol | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 5. Correlations between isoprene emission rate and monoterpene and LOX volatile emission rates among the Q. robur leaves with different degrees of E. alphitoides infection. Data were fitted by linear regressions (solid line, relationship with monoterpene emission; dashed line, relationship with LOX volatile emission). From: Oak powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides)-induced volatile emissions scale with the degree of infection in Quercus robur Tree Physiol. 2014;34(12):1399-1410. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu091 Tree Physiol | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 6. Light-response curves of isoprene (a), monoterpene (b) and LOX volatile (c) emissions in control and E. alphitoides-infected leaves of Q. robur. Data were fitted by Eq. (1) (Table 2 for the parameters). The inset in (c) demonstrates the correlation between LOX volatile emission rate and stomatal conductance (g<sub>s</sub>) through the light-response curve (Figure 3b for the light response of stomatal conductance). From: Oak powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides)-induced volatile emissions scale with the degree of infection in Quercus robur Tree Physiol. 2014;34(12):1399-1410. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu091 Tree Physiol | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com