Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. The Rate (Time)-Dependent Mechanical Behavior of the PMR-15 Thermoset Polymer at Temperatures.
Advertisements

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Introduction of the Element Interaction Technique for Welding Analysis and Simulation.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Considerations in the Design and Analysis of an ASME Section VIII, Div. 2 Reactor.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Finite-Element Analysis of Waspaloy Using Sinh Creep-Damage Constitutive Model.
Date of download: 6/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Adjoint-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Error Correction Methods Applied to Solid.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Leakage in Flange Joints Under External Loads J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
Date of download: 6/24/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Infill-Drilling Potential in Tight Gas Reservoirs J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2012;135(1):
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optical Microscopy-Aided Indentation Tests J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2008;130(1):
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. Cost-Effective Reliability Analysis and Testing of Medical Devices 1 J. Med. Devices.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Creep Strength and Microstructure of AL20-25+Nb Alloy Sheets and Foils for Advanced.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Investigation of Boiler Pressure Behavior in Closed-Open-Closed System.
Date of download: 7/16/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study on Hardness and Elastic Modulus of Surface Nanostructured 304 Stainless.
Date of download: 11/13/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Analysis of the Iridescent Ring Around Cavitation Erosion Pit on Stainless.
Date of download: 9/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Measures of Bulk and Grain Strain in Deformation Processes
From: Boilers Optimal Control for Maximum Load Change Rate
Date of download: 10/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Optimal Design of Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/4/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Damage-Mechanics-Based Constitutive Model for Solder Joints
Date of download: 12/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/13/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/22/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Creep rupture data for Alloy 617

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Mole fraction of γ′ precipitates in Alloy 617 and Alloy 740 as a function of temperature

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at respective temperatures. (a) 593, (b) 649, (c) 704, (d) 760, and (e) 816 °C.

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: (a) Creep rupture data and (b) correlation between sulfur and boron concentration and rupture elongation for Alloy 617 at 760 °C

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at 593–816 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Second order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter for Alloy 617 using long-term creep rupture data above (a) 2000 hrs and (b) 5000 hrs

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at 649–760 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Logarithm of time to rupture versus reciprocal temperature lines for Alloy 617 at constant stresses, based on Fig. 9

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Larson–Miller constant C estimated from log tr versus reciprocal temperature plot for Alloy 617 and Alloy 740, together with constant C for Alloy 617 and Alloy 740 obtained by Swindeman program. The Cav = 18.5 shown by dotted line is average value of C = 17–20 obtained by log tr versus reciprocal temperature plot for Alloy 617 and Alloy 740.

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Creep rupture data for Alloy 740 at 600–850 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Schematic illustration for obtaining constant C by linear extrapolation of log tr versus reciprocal temperature 1/T plots to 1/T = 0 at constant stresses, according to Eq. (1)

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Isothermal rupture curves and some horizontal lines showing constant stress conditions, together with creep rupture data for Alloy 617

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at 593 °C–816 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter with (a) C = 18.45 and (b) C = 30

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: SEE for second order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter for Alloy 617 as a function of Larson–Miller constant C. The regression curves with C = 12.70, 18.45, and 30 are shown in Figs. 5 and 13.

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 with different data scattering of Δ = 0, 0.5 and 1 and second order regression curve of Larson–Miller parameter with C = 18.45

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: (a) SEE for second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter for Alloy 617 and (b) 100,000 hrs creep rupture strength at 700 °C, as a function of Larson–Miller constant C

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Stress versus Larson–Miller parameter plots of data with no scattering Δ = 0 and second-order regression curve of Larson–Miller parameter with C = 18.45

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: SEE for second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter for Alloy 617 as a function of Larson–Miller constant C

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Stress versus Larson–Miller parameter plots of test data Δ = 1 and second-order regression curve of Larson–Miller parameter with C = 18.45

Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1):011403-011403-9. doi:10.1115/1.4033290 Figure Legend: Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at 593–816 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter. The solid and dotted lines show regression curves for creep rupture data excluding and including shorter time to rupture data at 760 °C, respectively.