HB 153 and the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Performance Assessment
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Professional Growth and
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Iowa Department of Education Teacher Leadership & Compensation Task Force Iowa Department of Education.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 1 INTRODUCTION STATES LEADING REFORM States and districts have initiated groundbreaking reforms and innovations.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Professional Growth and
 Reading School Committee January 23,
BEN RARICK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 Development of a Revised Accountability Framework.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project: Instructional Framework Selection.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Update on the MA Task Force on Evaluation of Teachers and Administrators Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Associate Commissioner.
BROMWELL COMMUNITY MEETING November 17, SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF)
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
TEACHER EVALUATION TEACHER TENURE TEACHER MENTORING New Educational Laws and What They Mean for Us.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
HB 153 and the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Association Advocacy for Members and the Learners We Serve 1.
Developed by Earl W. Hughes, KLA Regional Facilitator and PGES Integrated Design Team Member.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Principal Evaluation Update
XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project:
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Update on Educator Effectiveness August 2012
State Board of Education Progress Update
Monitoring-Stakeholder Engagement
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Michigan’s Educator Evaluations
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Presentation transcript:

HB 153 and the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Association Advocacy for Members and the Learners We Serve

HB 153 and Teacher Evaluation Every school district must have a policy for teacher evaluation by July 1, 2013 Student academic growth must account for 50% of a teacher’s evaluation The State Board of Education must adopt an evaluation framework by December 11, 2011 The framework must provide for teacher ratings of accomplished, proficient, developing and ineffective

HB 153 and Teacher Evaluation Every school district must have a policy for teacher evaluation by July 1, 2013 Local policy must be operative upon expiration of the CBA in effect on September 29, 2011 (HB 153 eff. date) Evaluation results must be used for promotion and retention decisions Seniority can be a deciding factor for RIF only when 2 or more teachers evidence comparable evaluation results

HB 153 and Teacher Evaluation Every school district must have a policy for teacher evaluation by July 1, 2013 ONLY for Race to the Top districts: If performance-based compensation is a component of the local RttT scope of work, then the district must comply with the timelines therein. If performance-based compensation is NOT a part of the local RttT scope of work, the district is NOT required to implement it.

HB 153 & RttT Timeline for Teacher Evaluation Sep 29, 2011 Nov 15, 2011 End 2011-2012 school year Jul 1 2013 End 2013-2014 school year HB 153 effective SBE adopted OTES (prior to Dec 31 deadline) Ohio target: 50% RttT LEAs have evaluation systems Due date: local board evaluation policy adopted Ohio target: 100% RttT LEAs have evaluation systems

OTES Creates Opportunities for Local Associations to Shape Evaluation OTES is focused on teacher development to improve student learning: Built from research-based standards, and Recommends use of multiple measures and weight of the evidence decisions. Studies suggest that evaluations built through teacher engagement are more effective for teachers and yield better results for students Because teachers and principals have similar interests/concerns about the use of student data, they can be allies for effective teacher evaluation systems

Opportunities for Local Association Leadership Advocate for a school board policy reflecting OTES policy and local circumstances Negotiate labor-management collaboration on building and improving the system Lead in ways that foster member engagement toward making the evaluation system work for them and the students they serve Engage the principals in making the system fair, effective and non-burdensome.

Challenges for Local Association Leadership Very short timeline to shape local policy and to build and operationalize the system For non-RttT districts, this is an unfunded mandate Being able to embrace evaluation as a helpful tool Using student growth measures to foster teacher development, not to publicly criticize them and the school Designing a system that is fair, effective and efficient – not one burdened by unhelpful procedures

HB 153 & RttT Timeline for Teacher Evaluation Sep 29, 2011 Nov 15, 2011 End 2011-2012 school year Jul 1 2013 End 2013-2014 school year HB 153 effective SBE adopted OTES (prior to Dec 31 deadline) Ohio target: 50% RttT LEAs have evaluation systems Due date: local board evaluation policy adopted Ohio target: 100% RttT LEAs have evaluation systems