Institutional Research and Planning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADVISING STUDENTS: WHAT DO THEY REALLY WANT? Marymount Innovations October 2009.
Advertisements

1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2013 November 27th, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
PCI – 2 point scale Important Not Important Sample or Sample or Sample or Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Response to 1 st PCI variable Response to 2 nd PCI variable.
Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.
The Evergreen State College Game show Your hosts: The folks from Institutional Research and Assessment.
SATISFACTION AND SELF-PERCEPTIONS: HOW ARE THE RELATED? STEVE GRAUNKE INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS.
Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.
Advising Partnerships for Student Success University of Maryland Eastern Shore.
Entering Student Surveys (UG & Grad) and Non-Enrolling Survey (UG): Fall 2011 November 1, 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
New Business Overall Satisfaction Ratings Rating Scale = Extremely Satisfied 6 = Very Satisfied 5 = Satisfied 4 = Neither Satisf. nor Dissatisfied.
Period 5 Survey Findings English 10 A. Parents  1 of 6 did attend the Prep, that 1 stated the Prep HAS changed since they attended  Satisfaction with.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Alumni Survey Summer 2015 Undergraduate and Graduate.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (long version) Institutional Research and Planning.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Entering Student Surveys: Fall 2010 Perry Deess, Ph.D. Institutional Research and Planning November 17, 2010.
An Institutional Look at Students’ Satisfaction with NWTC Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Undergraduate&Graduate – Entering Students Survey Fall 2016
National Survey of Student Engagement Noel-Levitz Satisfaction Surveys
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
Impact of School Culture: Part-Time MBA Programs
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Community Survey Report
Faculty Diversity & Work Life Survey Review
Fall 2015 Faculty Satisfaction Survey
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
Student Experience Survey Spring 2009 Report
AACRAO-AICE SURVEY.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2017
2003 Student Satisfaction Survey
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
One Step Away Initiative
North Seattle College All College Meetings
Undergraduate Satisfaction with Advising Services
Montana University System Staff Association (MUSSA) Board of Regents meeting May 25, 2017 John.
PARENTS: THE KEY TO STUDENT’S EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (Short version)
National Student Survey 2018
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009
Pulling a Rabbit out of a Hat... Course Scheduling and Seat Demand
Employer Survey 2018 Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Institutional Learning Outcomes
Report to the Board of Trustees November 2018
Hartnell Climate Results
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2018
Student Satisfaction: Undergraduate Spring 2010
Student Satisfaction Spring 2006 (Short version)
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
McPherson College, Fall 2017
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
Institutional Research and Planning
Post-bac Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Certificate Program
Student Satisfaction Learning Community Spring 2011
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2012
2009 Student Opinion Survey Results
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
The NJIT Student Experience
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2019 Undergraduate Trends
Institutional Research and Planning
Kimberly Paulus Director, Student Academic Services
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Research and Planning Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2016 Undergraduate and Graduate Students Institutional Research and Planning

Undergraduate Student Sample (n = 736) 20% response rate

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Undergraduate Students Comparison

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction 2016 Importance and Satisfaction (percentage) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction 2016 Importance and Satisfaction (means) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Comparison with 2015 Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Factors with Increases/Decreases in Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Personal security and safety on campus.(+17%) Quality of academic advisement. (+7%) Availability of academic advisement. (+6%)

Key Factors* in Overall Satisfaction Spring 2016 Undergraduate quality of academic program satisfaction with NJIT Quality of campus life Overall satisfaction with food services .323 .367 .410 Overall quality of instruction .395 Relevance of coursework to career development . 407 General condition of building and grounds .202 .226 Personal security and safety on campus *Regression model run using SPSS to show academic and cultural variables that predict overall satisfaction.

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Academics

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Campus Life

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Computers/Technology

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Public Safety/Buildings & Grounds

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Student Services

Undergraduate Satisfaction Five Year Comparison (means) Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Satisfaction Five Year Comparison (percentage) Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction with NJIT 5 Year Comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction by School Academics Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Sample (n = 1121) 27% response rate

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Graduate Students Comparison

Graduate Student Satisfaction 2016 Importance and Satisfaction (percentage) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction Importance and Satisfaction (means) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction Comparison with 2015 Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Factors with Increases/Decreases in Graduate Student Satisfaction Personal security and safety on campus.(+27%) Availability of cultural and social events.(+13%) Quality of campus life.(+13%) General condition of buildings and grounds (+11%)

Key Factors* in Graduate Student Overall Satisfaction 2016 Quality of own academic program Overall satisfaction with NJIT Quality of campus life Opportunities to be involved in student organizations .320 .460 .289 Overall quality of instruction .484 Relevance of coursework to career development . 308 Overall satisfaction with food services .254 .270 General condition of building and grounds *Regression model run using SPSS to show academic and cultural variables that predict overall satisfaction.

Graduate Student Satisfaction Five Year Comparison (means) Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction Five Year Comparison (percentage) Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Graduate Satisfaction by School Academics Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction by School

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction by School CoAD Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction by School CCS Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction by School NCE Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction by School CSLA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction by School SOM Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Graduate Satisfaction Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction by School

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction by School CoAD Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction by School CCS Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction by School NCE Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction by School CSLA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction by School SOM Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied