Activation Records Mooly Sagiv

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
Advertisements

Programming Languages and Paradigms
ECE 232 L6.Assemb.1 Adapted from Patterson 97 ©UCBCopyright 1998 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers ECE 232 Hardware Organization and Design Lecture 6 MIPS Assembly.
10/6: Lecture Topics Procedure call Calling conventions The stack
Computer Architecture CSCE 350
CPS3340 COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE Fall Semester, /17/2013 Lecture 12: Procedures Instructor: Ashraf Yaseen DEPARTMENT OF MATH & COMPUTER SCIENCE CENTRAL.
Procedures II (1) Fall 2005 Lecture 07: Procedure Calls (Part 2)
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
1 Storage Registers vs. memory Access to registers is much faster than access to memory Goal: store as much data as possible in registers Limitations/considerations:
1 Handling nested procedures Method 1 : static (access) links –Reference to the frame of the lexically enclosing procedure –Static chains of such links.
Activation Records Mooly Sagiv html:// Chapter 6.3.
CS 536 Spring Code generation I Lecture 20.
Activation Records Mooly Sagiv html:// Chapter 6.3.
Activation Records Mooly Sagiv html:// Chapter 6.3.
Run time vs. Compile time
The environment of the computation Declarations introduce names that denote entities. At execution-time, entities are bound to values or to locations:
1 Run time vs. Compile time The compiler must generate code to handle issues that arise at run time Representation of various data types Procedure linkage.
Chapter 8 :: Subroutines and Control Abstraction
Chapter 7: Runtime Environment –Run time memory organization. We need to use memory to store: –code –static data (global variables) –dynamic data objects.
Runtime Environments What is in the memory? Runtime Environment2 Outline Memory organization during program execution Static runtime environments.
13/02/2009CA&O Lecture 04 by Engr. Umbreen Sabir Computer Architecture & Organization Instructions: Language of Computer Engr. Umbreen Sabir Computer Engineering.
Runtime Environments Compiler Construction Chapter 7.
Programming Language Principles Lecture 24 Prepared by Manuel E. Bermúdez, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of Florida Subroutines.
CSc 453 Runtime Environments Saumya Debray The University of Arizona Tucson.
Functions and Procedures. Function or Procedure u A separate piece of code u Possibly separately compiled u Located at some address in the memory used.
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Chapter 8 :: Subroutines and Control Abstraction Programming Language Pragmatics Michael L. Scott.
Activation Records CS 671 February 7, CS 671 – Spring The Compiler So Far Lexical analysis Detects inputs with illegal tokens Syntactic analysis.
Compilation (Semester A, 2013/14) Lecture 9: Activation Records + Register Allocation Noam Rinetzky Slides credit: Roman Manevich, Mooly Sagiv.
1 Control Abstraction (Section ) CSCI 431 Programming Languages Fall 2003 A compilation of material developed by Felix Hernandez-Campos and Michael.
COP4020 Programming Languages Subroutines and Parameter Passing Prof. Xin Yuan.
Activation Records (in Tiger) CS 471 October 24, 2007.
Run-Time Storage Organization Compiler Design Lecture (03/23/98) Computer Science Rensselaer Polytechnic.
CSC 8505 Compiler Construction Runtime Environments.
CS412/413 Introduction to Compilers and Translators Spring ’99 Lecture 11: Functions and stack frames.
RUNTIME ENVIRONMENT AND VARIABLE BINDINGS How to manage local variables.
LECTURE 19 Subroutines and Parameter Passing. ABSTRACTION Recall: Abstraction is the process by which we can hide larger or more complex code fragments.
Code Generation Instruction Selection Higher level instruction -> Low level instruction Register Allocation Which register to assign to hold which items?
Procedures Procedures are very important for writing reusable and maintainable code in assembly and high-level languages. How are they implemented? Application.
Implementing Subprograms
Chapter 10 : Implementing Subprograms
Run-Time Environments Chapter 7
Implementing Subprograms Chapter 10
Mooly Sagiv html://
Compilation /15a Lecture 7
COMPILERS Activation Records
Implementing Subprograms
Subprograms The basic abstraction mechanism.
Run-time organization
Introduction to Compilers Tim Teitelbaum
Procedures (Functions)
Functions and Procedures
Chapter 9 :: Subroutines and Control Abstraction
Implementing Subprograms
Chap. 8 :: Subroutines and Control Abstraction
Chap. 8 :: Subroutines and Control Abstraction
Stack Frame Linkage.
MIPS Instructions.
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
Implementing Subprograms
10/4: Lecture Topics Overflow and underflow Logical operations
Activation records Programming Language Design and Implementation (4th Edition) by T. Pratt and M. Zelkowitz Prentice Hall, 2001 Section
Code generation for procedure calls Noam Rinetzky
Run Time Environments 薛智文
Runtime Environments What is in the memory?.
Computer Architecture
Where is all the knowledge we lost with information? T. S. Eliot
Lecture 4: Instruction Set Design/Pipelining
Activation records Programming Language Design and Implementation (4th Edition) by T. Pratt and M. Zelkowitz Prentice Hall, 2001 Section
Implementing Subprograms
Presentation transcript:

Activation Records Mooly Sagiv html://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~msagiv/courses/wcc12-13.html Chapter 6.3

Outline of this lecture Operations on routines Stack Frames The Frame Pointer and Frame Size The Lexical Pointers and Nesting Levels Machine Architectures Parameter Passing and Return Address Frame Resident Variables Limitations Summary

Operations on Routines Declarations Definitions Call Return Jumping out of routines Passing routines as parameters Returning routines as parameters

Nested routines in C syntax

Non-Local goto in C syntax

Non-local gotos in C setjmp remembers the current location and the stack frame longjmp jumps to the current location (popping many activation records)

Non-Local Transfer of Control in C

Passing a function as parameter void foo (void (*interrupt_handler)(void)) { … if (…) interrupt_handler(); }

Currying in C syntax int (*)() f(int x) { int g(int y) return x + y; } return g ; int (*h)() = f(3); int (*j)() = f(4); int z = h(5); int w = j(7);

Compile-Time Information on Variables Name Type Scope when is it recognized Duration Until when does its value exist Size How many bytes are required at runtime Address Fixed Relative Dynamic

Stack Frames Allocate a separate space for every procedure incarnation Relative addresses Provide a simple mean to achieve modularity Supports separate code generation of procedures Naturally supports recursion Efficient memory allocation policy Low overhead Hardware support may be available LIFO policy Not a pure stack Non local references Updated using arithmetic

A Typical Stack Frame previous frame higher addresses argument 2 outgoing parameters argument 1 lexical pointer administrative return address dynamic link frame pointer registers locals frame size temporaries current frame outgoing parameters argument 2 argument 1 stack pointer lower addresses next frame

L-Values of Local Variables The offset in the stack is known at compile time L-val(x) = FP+offset(x) x = 5  Load_Constant 5, R3 Store R3, offset(x)(FP)

Code Blocks Programming language provide code blocks void foo() { int x = 8 ; y=9;//1 { int x = y * y ;//2 } { int x = y * 7 ;//3} x = y + 1; } adminstrative x1 y1 x2 x3 …

Pascal 80386 Frame higher addresses previous frame ebp current frame argument 1 previous frame argument 2 lexical pointer return address previous ebp ebp locals temporaries current frame saved registers lower addresses argument 1 outgoing parameters argument 2 lexical pointer sp next frame

Summary thus far The structure of the stack frame may depend on Machine Architecture Programming language Compiler Conventions The stack is updated by: Emitted compiler instructions Designated hardware instructions

The Frame Pointer The caller The callee caller responsibilities: the calling routine The callee the called routine caller responsibilities: Calculate arguments and save in the stack Store lexical pointer call instruction: M[--SP] := RA PC := callee callee responsibilities: FP := SP SP := SP - frame-size Why use both SP and FP?

Variable Length Frame Size C allows allocating objects of unbounded size in the stack void p() { int i; char *p; scanf(“%d”, &i); p = (char *) alloca(i*sizeof(int)); } Some versions of Pascal allows conformant array value parameters

Pascal Conformant Arrays program foo ; const max = 4 ; var m1, m2, m3: array [1..max, 1..max] of integer var i, j: integer procedure mult(a, b: array [1..l, 1..l] of integer; var c:array [1..l, 1..l] of integer)); var i, j, k: integer; begin { mult } for i := 1 to l do for j := 1 to l do begin c[i, j] := 0 ; for k := 1 to l do c[i, j] := c[i, j] + a[i, k] * b[k, j]; end end; { mult} begin { foo} … mult(m1, m2, m3) end. { foo}

A Typical Stack Frame previous frame higher addresses argument 2 outgoing parameters argument 1 lexical pointer administrative return address dynamic link frame pointer registers local1 Space Of Local 1 Constant frame size current frame local2 temporaries lower addresses stack pointer

Supporting Static Scoping References to non-local variables Language rules No nesting of functions C, C++, Java Non-local references are bounded to the most recently enclosed declared procedure and “die” when the procedure end Algol, Pascal, Scheme Simplest implementation Pass the lexical pointer as an extra argument to functions Scope rules guarantee that this can be done Generate code to traverse the frames

Routine Descriptor for Languages with nested scopes Lexical pointer routine address

Calling Routine R from Q

Nesting Depth The semantic analysis identifies the static nesting hierarchy A possible implementation Assign integers to functions and variables Defined inductively The main is at level 0 Updated when new function begins/ends

offset(lexical_pointer) Calculating L-Values int i; void level_0(void){ int j; void level_1(void) { int k; void level_2(void) { int l; k=l; j =l; }}} offset(k) + 1 *( 2 offset(lexical_pointer) + FP 3

Code for the k=l void level_0(void){ int j; void level_1(void) { int i; void level_0(void){ int j; void level_1(void) { int k; void level_2(void) { int l; k=l; j =l; }}}

Code for the j=l void level_0(void){ int j; void level_1(void) { int i; void level_0(void){ int j; void level_1(void) { int k; void level_2(void) { int l; k=l; j =l; }}}

Other Implementations of Static Scoping Display An array of lexical pointers d[i] is lexical pointer nesting level i Can be stored in the stack lambda-lifting Pass non-local variables as extra parameters

Machine Registers Every year CPUs are improving by 50%-60% Main memory speed is improving by 10% Machine registers allow efficient accesses Utilized by the compiler Other memory units exist Cache

RISC vs. CISC Machines Feature RISC CISC Registers 32 6, 8, 16 Register Classes One Some Arithmetic Operands Memory+Registers Instructions 3-addr 2-addr Addressing Modes r M[r+c] (l,s) several Instruction Length 32 bits Variable Side-effects None Instruction-Cost “Uniform” Varied

Caller-Save and Callee-Save Registers Saved by the callee before modification Values are automatically preserved across calls Caller-Save Registers Saved (if needed) by the caller before calls Values are not automatically preserved across calls Usually the architecture defines caller-save and callee-save registers Separate compilation Interoperability between code produced by different compilers/languages But compiler writers decide when to use calller/callee registers

Callee-Save Registers Saved by the callee before modification Usually at procedure prolog Restored at procedure epilog Hardware support may be available Values are automatically preserved across calls .global _foo Add_Constant -K, SP //allocate space for foo Store_Local R5, -14(FP) // save R5 Load_Reg R5, R0; Add_Constant R5, 1 JSR f1 ; JSR g1; Add_Constant R5, 2; Load_Reg R5, R0 Load_Local -14(FP), R5 // restore R5 Add_Constant K, SP; RTS // deallocate int foo(int a) { int b=a+1; f1(); g1(b); return(b+2); }

Caller-Save Registers Saved by the caller before calls when needed Values are not automatically preserved across calls .global _bar Add_Constant -K, SP //allocate space for bar Add_Constant R0, 1 JSR f2 Load_Constant 2, R0 ; JSR g2; Load_Constant 8, R0 ; JSR g2 Add_Constant K, SP // deallocate space for bar RTS void bar (int y) { int x=y+1; f2(x); g2(2); g2(8); }

Parameter Passing Most procedures are leaf procedures In memory No recursion is allowed 1970s In stack 1980s In registers First k parameters are passed in registers (k=4 or k=6) Where is time saved? Most procedures are leaf procedures Interprocedural register allocation Many of the registers may be dead before another invocation Register windows are allocated in some architectures per call (e.g., sun Sparc)

Modern Architectures return-address also normally saved in a register on a call a non leaf procedure saves this value on the stack No stack support in the hardware function-result Normally saved in a register on a call A non leaf procedure saves this value on the stack

Limitations The compiler may be forced to store a value on a stack instead of registers The stack may not suffice to handle some language features

Frame-Resident Variables A variable x cannot be stored in register when: x is passed by reference Address of x is taken (&x) is addressed via pointer arithmetic on the stack-frame (C varags) x is accessed from a nested procedure The value is too big to fit into a single register The variable is an array The register of x is needed for other purposes Too many local variables An escape variable: Passed by reference Address is taken Addressed via pointer arithmetic on the stack-frame Accessed from a nested procedure

The Frames in Different Architectures g(x, y, z) where x escapes Pentium MIPS Sparc InFrame(8) InFrame(0) InFrame(68) InFrame(12) InReg(X157) InFrame(16) InReg(X158) M[sp+0]fp fp sp sp sp-K M[sp+K+0] r2 X157 r4 X158 r5 save %sp, -K, %sp M[fp+68]i0 X157i1 X158i2 x y z View Change

The Need for Register Copies void m(int x, int y) { h(y, y); h(x, x); }

Limitations of Stack Frames A local variable of P cannot be stored in the activation record of P if its duration exceeds the duration of P Example 1: Static variables in C (own variables in Algol) void p(int x) { static int y = 6 ; y += x; } Example 2: Features of the C language int * f() { int x ; return &x ; } Example 3: Dynamic allocation int * f() { return (int *) malloc(sizeof(int)); }

Currying Functions int (*)() f(int x) { int g(int y) return x + y; } return g ; int (*h)() = f(3); int (*j)() = f(4); int z = h(5); int w = j(7);

Compiler Implementation Hide machine dependent parts Hide language dependent part Use special modules

Source program (string) Basic Compiler Phases Source program (string) lexical analysis Tokens syntax analysis Abstract syntax tree semantic analysis Code generation Frame manager Assembly Assembler/Linker .EXE

Hidden in the frame ADT Word size The location of the formals Frame resident variables Machine instructions to implement “shift-of-view” (prologue/epilogue) The number of locals “allocated” so far The label in which the machine code starts

Invocations to Frame “Allocate” a new frame “Allocate” new local variable Return the L-value of local variable Generate code for procedure invocation Generate prologue/epilogue Generate code for procedure return

Summary Stack frames provide a simple compile-time memory management scheme Locality of references is supported Can be complex to implement Limits the duration of allocated objects Memory allocation is one of most interesting areas