ILC DRAFT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Flat topography & Mountainous sites

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Advertisements

Global Design Effort - CFS Damping Ring Baseline Technical Review 1 DAMPING RING BASELINE TECHNICAL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Reduced Bunch Number 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
Global Design Effort - CFS for Asian Single Tunnel Configuration Design Progress Masanobu Miyahara KEK.
Global Design Effort - CFS CLIC 09 Workshop - WG 5 Technical Systems 1 CLIC 09 WORKSHOP Working Group 5 - Technical Systems ILC REBASELINE ILC.
ILC A SIAN D RAFT S CHEDULE K Foraz, M Gastal & J Osborne Many thanks to all contributors.
LCC Linear Collider Collaboratio ILC - CFS 12 November 2013 LCWS13 Tokyo University 1 Site-specific CF design from TDR LCWS13, 12 November 2013 Atsushi.
1 Alternative assembly option of ILD Y.Sugimoto 2010/10/18 ILD Integration
TS Department / Civil Engineering Group 17 October 2007 Civil Engineering Layouts & Tunnel Cross Section 1 CLIC workshop – Working group: Two beam hardware.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
November 17, st XFEL / ILC Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL Design Effort The Current ILC Twin Tunnel Design Wilhelm Bialowons and Nicholas Walker · MPY.
LHC scheduling applied to CLIC and ILC TILC09 & GDE AAP review – Tsukuba April 2009 K. Foraz K. Foraz - CERN TILC09 & GDE AAP review – Tsukuba April 2009.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
1 CLIC / ILC Collaboration for CES issues JOHN OSBORNE – CES 8 April 2009.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
Agenda : CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG.
27 Nov 07 VM Workshop Global Design Effort 1 ILC – Superconducting Linear Collider Marc Ross, Project Manager GDE Fermilab.
John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 19 May 2009 Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG CTC 19 May 2009 Tunnel Cross Section.
TDR Status of Asian CFS Team Part II: The ILC Baseline Reference Ch.SectionSubsectionsAuthor1 st draft 112: Asian Region Siting Studies Overview Location.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
10/2010 IWLC2010 Global Design Effort 1 Brief Overview of Interaction Region Conventional Facilities in RDR Times Presenter Tom Lackowski.
Civil Engineering and Services - drawings for CDR - CDR chapter J.Osborne and M.Gastal for CES WG 1.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC10 Beijing, March, Single-Tunnel Accelerator Configuration Of Asian Region Atsushi Enomoto (KEK)
The fourth Baseline Technical Review (BTR) - Conventional Facilities and Siting March 2012 All changes made to the CFS 2007 Reference Design during.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :
Experimental Areas Studies Lessons learnt at CMS M Gastal & CMS Technical Coordination (A Ball, W Zeuner)
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
General Infrastructures Services Department Civil Engineering planning for LSS4 Option, presented at review workshop 30/7/ months Planning and Resources:
ILC J.Osborne / A.Kosmicki / B.List – March 22 th 2012 CFS update for Europe.
PM Report CFS /Gbl ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design.
1 Update of detector hall in mountain regions Y.Sugimoto in Granada.
ILC CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES A. Enomoto, V. Kuchler, J. Osborne
ILC CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES A. Enomoto, V. Kuchler, J. Osborne
Civil Design for Tunnel Case Studies
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
Civil Engineering for FCC-eh and LHeC
Detector Hall Design and Cost Information CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (ARCFS)
Installation Global System
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Conventional Facility & Siting (CF&S) Overview for the Positron Source
Introduction and Meeting Objectives
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting
LCWS11 AWG9 PARALLEL SESSION SUMMARY
CLIC Civil Engineering & Infrastructure
Experimental hall design in Japanese site
Americas KlyCluster Cost Analysis Overview
Tunnel Cross Section Studies
CLIC / ILC Collaboration for CFS works
Integration Ideas for the Central Region Some old some new
Summary of WG2 :CFS for staging
5th FCC Infrastructure & Operation meeting
CLIC Rebaselining at 380 GeV and Staging Considerations
Detector hall in mountain regions
CLIC: from 380 GeV up to 3 TeV Will also study klystron based machine for initial stage.
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Andrei Seryi Materials for discussion TILC-08
Central Region Working Group
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
Presentation transcript:

ILC DRAFT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Flat topography & Mountainous sites K Foraz & M Gastal Many thanks to J Osborne, A Kosmicki, H Mainaud Durand, J Paterson for their help

Objectives and scope To provide a consolidated project construction schedule For flat topography sites (Americas, Europe) Mountainous region site (Asia) European site primarily used for flat topography Focus on the critical path From excavation to commissioning of the facility Using LHC and XFEL project construction data To integrate new data ARUP studies for IR Granada 2011 workshop Draft ILC PIP (Project Implementation Planning) Commissioning priorities Output of KILC2012 Many parameters can be tuned and affect this draft scenarios Tolerance to co-activity, number of teams deployed… 04/07/2012

Schedule Format – Flat Topography (FT) To follow work progress in time and space ILC layout (not to scale) Shafts position Distances (to scale) ~ 30km 04/07/2012

Schedule Format – Mountainous Region (MR) To follow work progress in time and space ILC layout (not to scale) Access tunnels position Distances (to scale) ~ 30km 04/07/2012

To follow work progress in time and space Schedule Format To follow work progress in time and space Using latest naming convention 04/07/2012

To follow work progress in time and space Schedule Format To follow work progress in time and space Only for IR, BDS, ML & RTML 04/07/2012

To follow work progress in time and space Schedule Format To follow work progress in time and space Time line In years 04/07/2012

Strategic aspects for FT sites Result of the ARUP/J Osborne studies recommends minimising stress concentration on the IP by excavating and finishing the interaction cavern before tackling the tunnels and service caverns TBMs launched from adjacent shafts (PM7) and extracted from an IR shaft Allows time for finishing of IR cavern Recommendations were made for CLIC IR Compatible with both the 2 and 3 shaft IR layouts 04/07/2012

Strategic aspects for FT sites The BDS tunnel and part of the main linac have a diameter of 8m To minimise cost and speed up excavation The rest of the main linac consists of 5.2m diameter tunnel TBMs cannot be refurbished to accommodate both tunnel sizes 2 different machines have to be used We are now looking at a 4 TBM scenario in DBS, ML, RTML (2x5.2 + 2x8) 5.2m Ø tunnel 8m Ø tunnel 04/07/2012

Strategic aspects Requests for early commissioning will set priorities for the delivery of parts of the ILC complex When designing the construction schedule, an attempt was made to deliver some components as early as possible: Damping Rings PLTR BDS & ML up to PM7/AH1 An attempt to design a detailed schedule of the commissioning period will be shown DR PLTR BDS 04/07/2012

Year 1 – Construction kick-off FT - Excavation of shafts in parallel IR: PX0, PXA0, PXB0 ML: PM+7, PM-7 DR: PMA0, PMB0 1 year per shaft MR – Excavation of access tunnels All 9 of them AH1, AH2, AH3, AH4, IP Launch construction of detector assembly halls on the surface Launch construction of service buildings 04/07/2012

Flat Topography Shaft excavation e-BDS e+BDS e- Main Linac PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 04/07/2012

Mountainous Access Tunnel ex. e-BDS e+BDS e- Main Linac e+ Main Linac AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 RTML (1.35km) e-BDS (3.33km) e+BDS (2.25km) e- Main Linac (11.19km) e+ Main Linac (11.07km) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 04/07/2012

Year 1 – FT vs MR Launch of works FT: Not all access shafts to the underground facilities are started together FT: 7 excavation crews in action over 4 sites FT: site setup not included, T0 is ground breaking MR: Quick deployment of resources to excavate all access tunnels MR: 9 excavation crews in action over 9 sites MR: Sites setup included? 04/07/2012

Year 2 – Tunneling FT Tunneling has to start in various parts of the facility Shafts excavation of PM8,9,10,11,12,13 Shaft based caverns have to be excavated (IR cavern, US-7, US+7, USB0) Two 8m diameter TBMs: ML + BDS Two 5.2m diameter TBMs: ML One 5.2m diameter TBM: DR Progress rates for European site: 8m: 100m/w (3 shifts) 5.2m: 150m/w (3 shifts) 04/07/2012

e-BDS e+BDS e- Main Linac e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Shaft excavation Cavern excavation TBM installation/extraction 8m tunnel excavation 5.2m tunnel excavation PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 04/07/2012

Year 2 – Tunneling MR Tunneling has to start in various parts of the facility 8 Access halls have to be excavated (AH-4, AH-3, AH-2, AH-1, AH+1, AH+2, AH+3, AH+4) Tunneling crews are sent from access tunnels AH-3, AH-2, AH-1, AH+1, AH+2, AH+3 Excavation of IR Cavern started Start concrete lining in sectors IP-AH-1 and IP-AH+1 Progress rates: Tunneling: 20m/week AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 04/07/2012

Beam Tunnel excavation BDS Tunnel excavation Access Tunnel ex. BDS Service Tunnel excavation Concrete Lining Cavern ex. Hall ex. AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 RTML (1.35km) e-BDS (3.33km) e+BDS (2.25km) e- Main Linac (11.19km) e+ Main Linac (11.07km) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 04/07/2012 18

Year 2 – FT vs MR Tunneling effort is most significant in the Asian region During Year 2 the Flat topography regions would be still providing access to the underground worksite by excavating shafts The Asian worksite looks a lot more labor intensive with 8 access halls excavation proceeding in parallel with the IP cavern excavation. The Asian also foresees the construction of 14 tunnels in parallel 04/07/2012

Year 3 – Tunneling, finishing, ceiling ducts FT Tunneling will proceed in BDS, ML and DR Spoil to be evacuated through PM8 Invert concreting and tunnel finishing will start as soon as spoil management allows Progress rate: 50m/d for 3 shifts Ceiling ducts for fire safety purposes 04/07/2012

Spoil Management - FT Work in a tunnel section, e.g. T-8, can only start once the conveyor belt evacuating the spoil produced by the TBM is redirected to the nearest shaft 04/07/2012

e-BDS e+BDS e- Main Linac e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Shaft excavation Invert & finishing Ceiling ducts Cavern excavation TBM installation/extraction 8m tunnel excavation 5.2m tunnel excavation PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil 04/07/2012

Year 3 – Tunneling, and concrete lining MR Excavation of IP cavern Tunneling will proceed in all 14 tunnels sections Concrete lining to follow Progress rate: 25m/week Spoil to be carefully managed once concrete lining starts in the same tunnel section 04/07/2012

Beam Tunnel excavation BDS Tunnel excavation Access Tunnel ex. Survey & supports set-out BDS Service Tunnel excavation Concrete Lining Electrical general services Cavern ex. Invert & Drainage Piping & ventilation Hall ex. Shield Wall Cabling Supports Machine installation AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 RTML (1.35km) e-BDS (3.33km) e+BDS (2.25km) e- Main Linac (11.19km) e+ Main Linac (11.07km) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 04/07/2012 24

Year 3 – FT vs MR Thanks to a higher progress rate the tunneling in the FT site is catching up with the MR. Spoil management will be a critical challenge 04/07/2012

Year 4 – End of CE, infrastructure installation FT End of CE phase BDS: Q2 ; ML: Q4 ; RTML: Q4 Start of infrastructure installation Survey and set out of components supports Electrics General Services Piping and ventilation Cabling Progress rate 120m/w for 1 shift Courtesy of BE-ABP-SU 04/07/2012

End of civil engineering: Y4 Q4 Shaft excavation Invert & finishing Ceiling ducts Cavern excavation TBM installation/extraction 8m tunnel excavation 5.2m tunnel excavation PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil End of civil engineering: Y4 Q4 04/07/2012

e-BDS e+BDS e- Main Linac e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Piping & ventilation Survey & supports set-out Cabling Electrics general services PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil 04/07/2012

Year 4 – End of tunneling in Main Linac, finishing MR End of tunneling phase in Beam Tunnel and BDS Tunneling to proceed in BDS service tunnel Concrete lining to proceed in Beam Tunnel Invert and drainage work to start Progress rate: 45m/week 04/07/2012

Beam Tunnel excavation Survey & supports set-out BDS Tunnel excavation Access Tunnel ex. Beam Tunnel excavation Survey & supports set-out BDS Service Tunnel excavation Concrete Lining Electrical general services Cavern ex. Invert & Drainage Piping & ventilation Hall ex. Shield Wall Cabling Supports Machine installation AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 RTML (1.35km) e-BDS (3.33km) e+BDS (2.25km) e- Main Linac (11.19km) e+ Main Linac (11.07km) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 04/07/2012 30

Year 4 – FT vs MR The civil engineering work reaches completion during Year 4 in the flat topography site Due to slower tunneling progress rates the MR civil engineering work will need one more year to reach completion Year 5 for MR is dominated by the construction of the Shield wall Progress rate: 45m/week Milestones: Civil engineering work complete FT: Y4 Q4 MR: Y5 Q1 04/07/2012

Beam Tunnel excavation BDS Tunnel excavation Access Tunnel ex. BDS Service Tunnel excavation Concrete Lining Cavern ex. Invert & Drainage Hall ex. Shield Wall AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 RTML (1.35km) e-BDS (3.33km) e+BDS (2.25km) e- Main Linac (11.19km) e+ Main Linac (11.07km) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 62.0 60.3 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 04/07/2012 32

Year 5 6 7 8– Getting ready for machine components installation FT Installation of infrastructure Survey and set out of components supports Electrics General services Piping and ventilation Cabling Impact of the number of teams deployed is significant Baseline: 2 teams Option: 4 teams Progress rate 120m/w for 1 shift 04/07/2012

Assumption: 2 teams Piping & ventilation Survey & supports set-out Cabling Electrics general services PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil Assumption: 2 teams 04/07/2012

End of RTML 1.5year earlier Piping & ventilation Survey & supports set-out Cabling Electrics general services PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil Assumption: 4 teams End of RTML 1.5year earlier 04/07/2012

Year 6 7 8– Getting ready for machine components installation MR Installation of infrastructure Survey and set out of components supports Electrics General services Piping and ventilation Cabling 4 teams deployed In the Asian schedule, teams from different activities are allowed to work in one same sector ex in e-BDS between electrical teams and piping teams Having shield wall might make this possible Progress rate 120m/w for 1 shift 04/07/2012

Beam Tunnel excavation BDS Tunnel excavation Survey & supports set-out Access Tunnel ex. Beam Tunnel excavation BDS Tunnel excavation Survey & supports set-out BDS Service Tunnel excavation Concrete Lining Electrical general services Cavern ex. Invert & Drainage Piping & ventilation Hall ex. Shield Wall Cabling AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 RTML (1.35km) e-BDS (3.33km) e+BDS (2.25km) e- Main Linac (11.19km) e+ Main Linac (11.07km) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 62.0 60.3 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 120m/week 04/07/2012 37

Year 5 6 7 8– FT vs MR Progress rates used for the Installation of infrastructure are the same for both regions Survey and set out of components supports Electrics General services Piping and ventilation Cabling Allowing multiple types of activities in a same tunnel section allows the MR schedule to catch up slightly with the FT one Milestones: Installation of infrastructure complete FT: Y7 Q3 MR: Y8 Q1 Milestone: Installation of machine components in BDS started FT: Y6 Q1 MR: Y7 Q2 04/07/2012

Year 7 8 9 10– Installing machine components Installation of supports for machine components Progress rate: 250m/w for 1 shift Installation of machine components Transport Interconnections Alignment Progress rate: 100m/w for 1 shift (Average value from LHC, to be further defined…) 2 teams for each activity for FT; 4 teams for each activity for MR 04/07/2012

Assumptions: Infrastructure: 2 teams Machine installation: 2 teams Supports Piping & ventilation Survey & supports set-out Cabling Machine installation Electrical general services PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil Assumptions: Infrastructure: 2 teams Machine installation: 2 teams 04/07/2012

Assumptions: Infrastructure: 4 teams Machine installation: 2 teams Supports Piping & ventilation Survey & supports set-out Cabling Machine installation Electrical general services PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil Assumptions: Infrastructure: 4 teams Machine installation: 2 teams 04/07/2012 Completion date depends heavily on what happens in BDS region

Assumption: 4 teams in BDS, 2 teams in ML & RTML Supports Piping & ventilation Survey & supports set-out Cabling Machine installation Electrics general services PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil Assumption: 4 teams in BDS, 2 teams in ML & RTML Machine installation: 2 teams 04/07/2012

Beam Tunnel excavation BDS Tunnel excavation Survey & supports set-out Access Tunnel ex. Beam Tunnel excavation BDS Tunnel excavation Survey & supports set-out BDS Service Tunnel excavation Concrete Lining Electrical general services Cavern ex. Invert & Drainage Piping & ventilation Hall ex. Shield Wall Cabling Supports Machine installation AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 RTML (1.35km) e-BDS (3.33km) e+BDS (2.25km) e- Main Linac (11.19km) e+ Main Linac (11.07km) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 62.0 60.3 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 04/07/2012 43

Construction schedule – FT vs MR The Asian site schedule is a lot more labor intensive The faster rate of TBMs allows for a faster completion of the civil engineering work in the FT schedule Spoil management to be studied carefully Building the shield wall takes an entire year in the MR schedule The installation of infrastructure is slightly faster in the MR region thanks to the deployment of more teams and greater tolerance to coactivity Allowing the installation of the machine components to be carried out by 4 teams allows the MR schedule to catch up with the FT schedule Milestone: Ready for early commissioning (BDS and ML up to PM7/AH1) FT: Y7 Q2 MR: Y8 Q2 Milestone: Ready for Full commissioning (whole accelerator available) FT: Y10 Q1 MR: Y10 Q1 Milestone: ILC ready for beam FT: Y10 Q4 MR: TO BE FURTHER STUDIED (commissioning program to be fine tuned) 04/07/2012

Considerations of the high-tech mass production schedule - Light blue:  Pre-production or pre-industrialization stage (or preparation for full production)  - Yellow :   Full production of material and components/parts. - Orange: Full assembly stage and test stage in parallel. yr Step SC material SCRF cavity CM parts CM ass. and test RF parts RF ass. and aging 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 yr Step SC material SCRF cavity CM parts CM ass. and test RF parts RF ass. and aging 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Prep. Production Installation of machine components - FT 04/07/2012

consideration of the high-tech mass production schedule yr Step SC material SCRF cavity CM parts CM ass. and test RF parts RF ass. and aging 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 yr Step SC material SCRF cavity CM parts CM ass. and test RF parts RF ass. and aging 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Prep. Production Installation of machine components - MR 04/07/2012

Considerations of the high-tech mass production schedule The Asian region schedule allows for a longer production time of the accelerator parts Next step: come up with a production schedule compatible with an installation schedule, ex for CLIC shown below 04/07/2012

Commissioning Early Commissioning : Draft program (Ewan): The e- injector system to 5 GeV and dump : 3 Months The e+ source and systems to 5 GeV and dump utilizing the auxiliary low current e- source to produce e+ : 3 Months Hardware commissioning of injection lines and both Damping rings : 3 months Commission both rings with beams from injectors with extraction only into first dump in the PLTR (beam still in injection/extraction tunnels): 9 months Requires the availability of: BDS and ML up to PM7/AH1 (FT: Y7 Q2) PLTR Damping Rings Draft schedule for the construction and installation of the DR+PLTR – FT only DR: One 6m diameter, 3240m long tunnel – excavation using TBM at a rate of 150m/w for 3 shifts PLTR: Two 6-8m diameter, 270m long tunnels – excavation using road headers at a rate of 30m/w for 3 shifts When possible, the RD and PLTR are treated as one 3780m tunnel 04/07/2012

Early Commissioning – FT only CE phase Invert and finishing: 250m/w Ceiling ducts: 250m/w Installation of infrastructure in DR and PLTR Survey: 120m/w 120m/w Electrics: 80m/w 120m/w Piping & ventilation: 80m/w 120m/w Cabling: 80m/w 120m/w Installation of machine components Supports: 250m/w Machine elements: DR: 50m/w ; PLTR: 100m/w Many more components per meter to install in DR 04/07/2012

Delivery of DR and PLTR for commissioning FT only Under our set of assumptions, the DR and PLTR would be made available to commissioning before the BDS becomes available The early commissioning would be over during Y8 Q3 04/07/2012

Global Commissioning FT only Still quite early to come up with precise estimates Based on LHC: 6 month of pre-commissioning per sector 12 months of global commissioning Key dates BDS ready for commissioning: Y7 Q2 ML ready for commissioning: Y9 Q3 Pre-requisite to launch commissioning with beam IF detectors not available Temporary vacuum pipe through IR area Temporary QD0 Temporary shielding 04/07/2012

Commissioning Supports Piping & ventilation Survey & supports set-out Cabling Machine installation Electrical general services Commissioning PM+11 PM+13 PM+7 PM+9 PM+10 PM+12 PM+8 RTML (0.6km) e-BDS (3.2km) e+BDS e- Main Linac (11.9km) e+ Main Linac 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil spoil Commissioning 04/07/2012

Commissioning Access Tunnel ex. Beam Tunnel excavation BDS Tunnel excavation Survey & supports set-out BDS Service Tunnel excavation Concrete Lining Electrical general services Cavern ex. Invert & Drainage Piping & ventilation Hall ex. Shield Wall Cabling Supports Machine installation AH-4 AH-3 AH-2 AH-1 AH+1 AH+2 AH+3 AH+4 RTML (1.35km) e-BDS (3.33km) e+BDS (2.25km) e- Main Linac (11.19km) e+ Main Linac (11.07km) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 62.0 60.3 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 Commissioning 04/07/2012 53

Conclusion and next steps This draft schedules shows how the ILC could be built in less than 9 years Many additional studies will be necessary to finalise the work plans New iteration would be necessary if layouts are modified The commissioning of the Asian region has to be further studied Next steps: Include waveguide and RTML (input needed from installation studies) Include Service Tunnel and its cavern Include Surface buildings Consolidate scheduling studies for the construction and installation of the detectors in both FT and RM regions – synergies with CLIC 04/07/2012