Chromaticity decay and snapback

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Advertisements

E-Cloud Effects in the Proposed CERN PS2 Synchrotron M. Venturini, M. Furman, and J-L Vay (LBNL) ECLOUD10 Workshshop, Oct Cornell University Work.
Mystery unable to inject: timing, BIS, SIS… 8:15 to 12: 30 Injection/LBDS studies  Fine delay adjustment of injection kickers  Synchronization of MKI.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Final results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS (26 and 55 GeV/c) G.
E. Todesco FIELD MODEL AT 7 TEV N. Aquilina, E. Todesco CERN, Geneva, Switzerland On behalf of the FiDeL team CERN, 17 th June.
Thursday 21/4 07:30: End of fill #1727. Beam dumped. ALICE compensator magnet fault. Delivered ~6.7 pb -1 in 7.5 h. 11:30 Stable beam # bunches/beam.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Chromaticity correction (without RCS.A78B2) Thanks to: F. Roncarolo, E.Todesco, M.Lamont, J.Wenninger.
ADT Tune Measurement F. Dubouchet, W. Hofle, D. Valuch Acknowledgement: R. Calaga, F. Roncarolo, E. Bravin, shift crews New developments and tests on August.
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
How precisely can we control our magnets? Experience and impact on the expected control of machine parameters (tune and chromaticity) Thanks to: M.Lamont,
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
FCC ramp – first stab Mike Lamont. I’(t) = 0 to avoid a voltage discontinuity “it has been shown that if I’(t) is kept low at the end of the snapback,
E. Todesco CAN WE IMPROVE THE MAGNETIC CYCLE/MODEL AND THEIR EFFECTS? E. Todesco For the FiDeL team: C. Alabau Pons, L. Bottura, M. Buzio, L. Deniau, L.
E. Todesco ENERGY OF THE LHC AFTER LONG SHUTDOWN 1 ( ) C. Lorin, E. Todesco and M. Bajko CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues.
7 th March 2008 Magnet Modelling N. Sammut On behalf of the FIDEL Working Group.
07:30 – 10:30 Asynchronous dump test with Beam 2. No issue found. FIDEL update. Now chromaticity decay corrected. 12:13 Beam dump due to problem in the.
Ramping faster? Mike Lamont Ralph Steinhagen. I’(t) = 0 to avoid a voltage discontinuity “it has been shown that if I’(t) is kept low at the end of the.
“ Decay & snapback in main LHC dipoles vs injection current”, LUMI-05, Arcidosso, 1 September 2005, Page 1/4 During ramps, boundary-induced.
Tune: Decay at Injection and Snapback Michaela Schaumann In cooperation with: Mariusz Juchno, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci, Jorg Wennigner.
A Possible Source of the Tune Drift on the Front Porch in the Tevatron.
E. Todesco THE LHC MAGNETIC MODEL AT 6.5 TEV E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With contributions from N. Aquilina, L. Bottura, R. De Maria, L. Deniau,
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
(Towards a) Luminosity model for LHC and HL-LHC F. Antoniou, M. Hostettler, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Papotti Acknowledgements: Beam-Beam and Luminosity studies.
Booster lattice measurement and correction with LOCO C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya Booster workshop 23 Nov 2015.
AGS FY11 Summary RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 5/6/11.
17 th April 2007 Nicholas J. Sammut Decay Prediction and Minimisation During LHC Operation University of Malta Field Quality Working Group with several.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
Wednesday
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
Space charge studies at the SPS
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
E. Todesco for the QBT CERN, Geneva Switzerland
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Impact of remanent fields on SPS chromaticity
Tune and Chromaticity: Decay and Snapback
Update on Chromaticity Measurements
Tune and Chromaticity Measurements during the 10 A/s Ramp(s)
Field model deliverables for sector test and commissioning: when and what? The implementation of an accurate magnetic model will be vital for efficient.
Status of Magnet Setup Cycling for LHC
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
M. Gasior, A. Boccardi, S. Jackson, O. R. Jones, R. J
LHC Beam Commissioning WG Meeting
Cycle-to-cycle reproducibility and magnet modeling.
EXPONENTIAL FUNCTIONS
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
Wednesday 8th August & night
LHC OPERATION AND SUPPORT
Planning at 5 o’clock meeting Friday
Friday 16/3 08:30 – 10:15 Access for QPS and EPC (BI in point 4)
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
Studies for TBT optics measurements in the PSB
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Section 4.5 Graphs of Sine and Cosine Functions
MD Planning Fri – Sat (1. – 2.7.)
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
31/3/2010 Difficult day… but at the end stable beams.
Feedbacks & Stabilization Getting them going
Friday 1st October : Van der Meer scans
On reproducibility From several inputs of N. Sammut, S. Sanfilippo, W. Venturini Presented by L. Bottura LHCCWG
Presentation transcript:

Chromaticity decay and snapback CERN, LBOC meeting, 17th April 2012 Chromaticity decay and snapback Nicholas Aquilina TE-MSC-MDT Acknowledgements: E. Todesco, M. Lamont, G. Papotti, EICs

Overview Chromaticity decay during injection Chromaticity snapback recall of 2011 situation 2012 beam measurements analysis and proposed model based on 2012 beam measurements Chromaticity snapback Chromaticity decay during flattop 17/04/2012

b3 decay and snapback We need to model and correct the b3 component Chromaticity depends on the b3 (1 unit b3 = 45 Q’) decay snapback snapback decay 17/04/2012

Chromaticity decay during injection Parameter Magnetic measurements 2011 beam measurements 2011 expected at 4 TeV τ‘ (s) 200 1000* - d' 0.66 0.5 c' 20 units 16 units 19 units *First data points were after 15 minutes @ injection For 2012 operation, energy has been increased from 3.5 to 4 TeV, an increase of 20% is expected in the decay amplitude 17/04/2012

2012 beam measurements Fill no 2395 2404 2406 Date 24/03/12 25/03/12 Lattice sextupoles constant Spool pieces constant (no decay, no snapback correction) dynamic (decay and snapback correction) First data point after injection plateau 500 s 210 s 50 s tinj 51 minutes 90 minutes 6 hours Previous cycle tFT 9 hours 17 minutes tprep 24 minutes 17/04/2012

Fill 2395 – the “naked” ramp decay decay snapback 17/04/2012

Fill 2406 (with dynamic correction) 17/04/2012 FiDeL model was based on this measurement

2012 FiDeL model as obtained from Fill 2406 17/04/2012

2012 FiDeL model as obtained from Fill 2406 17/04/2012

2012 FiDeL model as obtained from Fill 2406 17/04/2012

2012 FiDeL model as obtained from Fill 2406 17/04/2012

FiDeL model based on Fill 2406 Scaled for a pre-cycle case 2012 FiDeL parameters FiDeL model based on Fill 2406 previous IFT 6740 A previous tFT 17 minutes previous tprep 23 minutes c 20 units d 0.44 tau 600 s Scaled for a pre-cycle case 6740 A 10 minutes 20 minutes 17 units* 0.44 600 s using powering history scaling law *Decay amplitude for pre cycle is 17 units w.r.t. 19 units expected from scaling of 2011 beam measurements 17/04/2012

2012 FiDeL model compared with Fill 2395 17/04/2012

2012 FiDeL model compared with Fill 2395 17/04/2012

2012 FiDeL model compared with Fill 2395 17/04/2012

2012 FiDeL model compared with Fill 2395 17/04/2012

Implementation of new FiDeL The new parameters have been used in the CCC since Friday 6th April With new parameters chromaticity is kept within 1 unit (over a duration of 20 – 30 minutes) 17/04/2012

Fill 2478 17/04/2012

Fill 2479 17/04/2012

Fill 2480 17/04/2012

Snapback analysis from Fill 2395 17/04/2012

Snapback Parameters for snapback correction Fitting parameters as obtained for the snapback parameter b3 Qh’ b1 b3 Qh’ b2 b3 Qv’ b1 b3 Qv’ b2 ∆b3 0.63 0.66 0.74 0.75 ∆I (A) 11 9 13 12 gSB 0.057 0.072 0.061 delta chroma 28 29 Parameters for snapback correction 2012 gSB 0.06 this implies that the snapback is slower 2011 gSB 0.176 based on series magnetic measurements – but evidence from beam that correction was not perfect 17/04/2012

Snapback modelling 2012 FiDeL fit (red curve) versus beam measurements (fill 2395 – the « naked ramp ») 17/04/2012

Decay during flattop at 4 TeV Fitting parameters as obtained for the decay during flattop (Fill 2395) No asymmetry between the vertical and horizontal plane parameter Qh’ b1 Qh’ b2 Qv’ b1 Qv’ b2 c -4.95 -4.73 5.08 4.36 d 0.43 0.51 0.65 0.49 tau 48 63 191 89 vx -11.74 -11.54 -10.69 -10.70 Parameters for decay correction c d tau 4.78 0.52 100 s 17/04/2012

Decay during flattop at 4 TeV 17/04/2012

Decay during flattop at 4 TeV 17/04/2012

Fill 2452 17/04/2012

Fill 2466 17/04/2012

Conclusions Decay during injection Snapback Decay during flattop decay amplitude increased by 5% from 2011 operation time constant is around 600 s (more data was available during the first moments of injection) correction is in place and it is working chromaticity decay is kept within 1 unit Snapback gSB is found to be smaller, therefore slower snapback not implemented yet Decay during flattop a correction using the spool pieces is in place and active 17/04/2012