Cases of School-Based Evaluations Reasons for School- Based Evaluations Capacity building Professional development Accountability (Samuels & Ryan, 2011) Theories of Evaluation Use, Methods, Values ( Fitzpatrick, Christie, &Mark, 2009) School-Based Evaluations for Accountability 2-Year-School-Based Intervention –Physical Education Bullying Prevention Teenage Pregnancy Prevention

2-Year-School-Based Intervention Physical Education Program Sacchetti, Ceciliani, Garulli, Dallolio, Beltrami, and Leoni (2013) Setting and Context Italy - Hills, plains, cities Health of school aged children - obesity Primary School-gym, classroom, play ground Theory: Use Conclusion: school is an ideal setting for promoting physical activity that will lead to improved health conditions.

Process Evaluation Bullying Prevention Program (Edmondson &Hoover, , 2008) Context and Setting Rural Midwestern county, Primary School Health Department Mission Impact on Learning Theory: Methods (Olweus Process Model) Conclusion: Another example of using schools to promote healthy behavior but wider community involvement (parents and professionals) is needed.

Teenage Pregnancy Program (Hulton, 2007) Context and Setting Mid-Atlantic state, rural, high school Health y People 2010 Funding - methods, processes Culturally responsive intervention Accountability of ancillary services Theory: Methods ( Logic Model) Conclusion: Gender disparity in self-efficacy for abstinence, so model shows abstinence programs still have challenges. The notion of culture may have to be reworked to facilitate “youth culture’’ and use other perspectives in the intervention.

Critical Analysis: Evaluation for Capacity Building While schools are held accountable for learning the arts and sciences, they can be used to promote changes in the health condition of their students. However, do schools have the Knowledge Management skills Trained personnel Funding Incentives Technology capacity to handle these programs? Because these social problems faced by students important, evauations should be done to determine and improve schools’ capacity to handle these programs.

References Edmondson, L., & Hoover, J. (2008). Process evaluation of a bullying prevention program: A public school-county health partnership. Reclaiming Children and Youth: The Journal of Strength-Based Interventions, 16(4), 25-33. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid= Fitzpatrick, J., Christie, C., & Mark, M. M. (2009). Evaluation in action: Interviews with expert evaluators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Evaluation in Action by Fitzpatrick, J., Christie, C., & Mark, M. M.  Copyright 2008 by SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC BOOKS.  Reprinted by permission of SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC BOOKS via the Copyright Clearance Center. Hulton, L. J. (2007). An evaluation of a school-based teenage pregnancy prevention program using a logic model framework. Journal of School Nursing, 23(2), 104-110. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid= Sacchetti, R., Ceciliani, A., Garulli, A., Dallolio, L., Beltrami, P., & Leoni, E. (2013). Effects of a 2-year school-based intervention of enhanced physical education in the primary school. Journal of School Health, 83(9), 639-646. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid= Samuels, M., & Ryan, K. (2011). Grounding evaluations in culture. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(2), 183–198. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.