Track Finding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Ozgur Ates Hampton University HUGS 2009-JLAB TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design”
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
October 20th, 2006 A. Mazzacane 1 4 th Concept Software First Results.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
1 Ghost Trackers If there’s something strange (or charm or bottom) in your neighbourhood… Dave Jackson Oxford University / RAL LCFI Collaboration 28 th.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
MDC Simulation Yuan Ye BESIII Collaboration Meeting.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Pattern Recognition in OPERA Tracking A.Chukanov, S.Dmitrievsky, Yu.Gornushkin OPERA collaboration meeting, Mizunami, Japan, of January 2009 JINR,
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Palaiseau, 13/1/ 2005 P. Colas - Optimising tracking 1 Optimising a Detector from the Tracking Point-of-View P.Colas, CEA Saclay constraints role Optimisation.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
GenFit and RAVE in sPHENIX under Fun4All
by students Rozhkov G.V. Khalikov E.V. scientific adviser Iyudin A.F.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
F2F Tracking Meeting, Prague 12/12/2013
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Muon stopping target optimization
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
HARPO Analysis.
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
The LHC collider in Geneva
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

Track Finding

g-2 tracking Trackers are placed at 3 location around the ring, directly in front of the calorimeters They measure the momentum of the positron that decayed from the muon Give us beam information around entire ring 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

g-2 tracking Each tracker contains 8 modules Each module consists of 128 straws, in 4 layers, the first 2 angled at +7.5° (U view), the final layers angled at -7.5° (V view) Designed optimised for radial position measurements, but vertical coordiante also measured 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Straw hits Shown here is the distribution of positrons as seen by the straws More hits at higher radius Most important modules are nearest the calorimeters (of course) 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Reconstruction Tracking can be split up into 3 steps Track candidates - Grouping together of straw digits Fitting - Calculating best fit track given positions and uncertainties Extrapolating - Given best fit track swim tracks to different places (calos, decay vertex) through B field STEP 1 - Track Candidates STEP 2 - Fitting STEP 3 - Extrapolation This talk concentrates on - Track candidates 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Track finding flow artG4 generates hits from muon decays. Full detector geometry in place. GEANT Makes art record for all tracks passing through straws. True time, pdgID, trackID etc. saved from geant hit. StrawArtRecord Place where data matches simulation. Combine StrawArtRecords into single digits, impose single straw dead time, apply efficiencies, calculate drift times. StrawDigitArtRecord StrawTimeIslandArtRecord Temporal grouping of straw digits. All hits within a given time window (~100ns) are grouped. StrawClusterArtRecord Spatial grouping of straw digits. Group hits in same view with different layers if adjacent. StrawSeedArtRecord Optional grouping of U and V views into seeds. TrackCandidateArtRecord Group of clusters/seeds that form a track candidate for fitting. 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Example of finding What follows is an example of reconstructed track that has passed through the entire chain Focusing on track finding so use the straw positions to try and obtain the correct track First look only at the positron from the muon decay… 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Positron track Top down view of primary track X is ~radial Y vertcial module 3 module 4 module 2 module 5 Top down view of primary track X is ~radial Y vertcial Z along beam module 6 module 1 module 7 module 0 × - wire pos at y=0 - avg U pos - avg V pos Starting point of alg. is average position of doublet - red/green circles Treating U and V separately Ignoring vertical (y) component 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

U points - 0,1,2 Solid line is circle bisecting first 3 U points Dashed line is projection Not good for whole length of track Picks out next point well Points 0,1,2 Calculate circle that fits exactly to average point of 3 layers Algorithm performs this for all consecutive layers… 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

All U points Points 1,2,3 Points 2,3,4 Points 3,4,5 Points 5,6,7 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

V points Perform same algorithm for V layer Solid line is circle bisecting next 3 V points Dashed line is projection Similar plots for all combinations 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Secondaries Identify that a simple circle fitting algorithm predicts approximate position of hit in next module Use this simple algorithm to try and remove secondaries... 54% 32% 9% 3% 1% >45% of events have secondary tracks The majority of these are photons and electrons 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Accounting for secondaries Top down view of primary track X is ~radial Y vertical Z along beam layers with secondary hits as well as primary × - wire pos at y=0 - avg U pos - avg V pos Now apply same algorithm when secondaries are present Pick out view with multiple hits - ignore them in segment formation 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Segments in the U layers U view gives 3 circle segments made from modules with uique hits 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Segments in the V layers V layer only has 2 circle segments made from modules with unique hits 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

U points Have highlighted IGNORED straw hits at each view 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Final results Final tracks selected at end of algorithm U and V tracks shown separately Algorithm has succesfully removed secondaries from track candidate Can now pass the final track candidate to the fitting algorithm 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Fitting Fitting is performed using GEANE ~1.9% resolution Fitting is performed using GEANE Final momentum resolution is ~ 2% 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

Conclusions Trackers are used for momentum measurement of positron decays Demonstrated simple algorithm to remove secondaries to purify the sample GEANE used to fit the track candidates Momentum resolution ~2% Next step is the extrapolation… 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting

backups 12/05/17 Joe Price, MUSE meeting