Kari Kiesiläinen Heikki Liljeroos

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ministry of Public Sector Development Public Sector Development Program Better Government Delivering Better Result.
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Principle 3 Commitment to the system of government.
Mr David Nicol Under Treasurer Chief Minister, Treasury and Economic Development Directorate ACT Government 20 November 2014 Presentation to 2014 CPA Congress.
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA CENTRAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM ( ): concept and results December 2007 Chisinau.
Development of internal control: methodology and responsibility
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
Financial Reforms and Accountability in Albania Presented by Dr. Sherefedin Shehu MP, Budget & Finance Committee, Albania International Symposium on the.
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
Financial Management and Control Arrangements in Practice Monika Kos, Ministry of Finance, the Republic of Poland.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU BUDGETING EU FUNDS IN LITHUANIA Rimantas Veckys Lithuanian.
Establishment and Development of the Internal Audit System for the Public Sector in Kyrgyz Republic INTERNAL AUDIT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE ISTANBUL
Structural reform of enforcement. Background Performance reviews Ministry of Justice - NAOE Reform of the administration of justice Framework.
What gets lost along the way? Chances and pitfalls of government led implementation procedures for GRB The case of Austria Dr. Elisabeth Klatzer European.
1 1 BRANCH: CORPORATE AFFAIRS 1. CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES To provide financial and strategic support services that enhance service delivery by the.
The National Audit Office of Finland
Supervision and regulation of banking system duty is given to a autonomous organization called Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. BRSA is public.
Session 5: Aligning accounting systems and performance information Juha Majanen, Ministry of Finance, Finland Matti Väisänen, Ministry of Education,
Public Financial Management: An Introduction Training for Support PAC Staff Hilton Hotel, Windhoek, Namibia May 2012.
Principles of Local Governance: Covering local governmental legislations and compliance issues IMFO WOMEN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CONFERENCE 07/02/13.
Relationship: PAC's, SAI's and Accountant General in Improving transparency and accountability process Contributions for discussion from Mozambique National.
Environmental Management System Definitions
Fiscal Policy Audit – National Audit Office of Finland Hannu Rajamäki Director for Performance Audit NAO of Finland.
Supreme Audit Office (the NIK): Basic Facts Riga, 4 April 2012.
Reforming civil service in the Baltic States: the Case of Lithuania Jurgita Siugzdiniene, PhD Department of Public Administration, Kaunas University of.
INDONESIA BUDGET REFORM (Priorities and Challenges) International Conference Budgeting for Performance-Modernizing PFM in Indonesia May , Hotel.
Legal and institutional foundation of economic statistics Overview of international experience Regional Workshop for African Countries on Compilation of.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT (PFM) Module 1.1 Definitions, objectives of PFM and its context.
HEALTH FINANCING MOH - HPG JAHR UPDATE ON POLICIES Eleventh Party Congress -Increase state investment while simultaneously mobilizing social mobilization.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN ( ) Date : 8/10/2010 Decision No : 2010/28.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 17– Economic and Monetary Policy Bilateral.
Financial Management and Control in the Dutch Public Sector Prague, March 24, 2016 Manfred van Kesteren.
Kishinev 2016 MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN.
Accounting Standards Board Annual Report 2006
the POLICE – EXECUTIVE RELATIONSHIP IN TANZANIA: A FRAMEWORK
Joint Seminar Brussels 2017.
Legal System of Finland
INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICE of the REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS
strengthening the elements of governance in Tajikistan
Audit of predetermined objectives
Agency Performance: A New Agenda
National Budget Unit Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning Rwanda
IIASA Governance Review
PEMPAL IACOP PUBLIC INTERNAL CONTROL: MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE PUBLIC ENTITIES Presenter: Malapateng Teka; National Treasury| March 2016.
Steering Policy and Steering Systems
PEMPAL, Moscow, October 2016 Natalia Pilets Deputy Head,
Presentation on the Joint Standing Committee on Financial Management of Parliament 07 September 2016.
PEMPAL Internal Control Working Group– 45th IACOP Meeting
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Somaliland PFM Reform Programme
MEASURING PERFORMANCE OF SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTION
The EPSO Peer Evaluation of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority
Sybi Hida ALBANIA February, 2005
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
Sybi Hida ALBANIA February, 2005
ДРЖАВНИОТ БУЏЕТ ВО ЧЕШКАТА РЕПУБЛИКА И НЕГОВАТА ПОВРЗАНОСТ СО ЕУ
Ilze Danga Chief Economist of the Budget Division
Importance of Law and Policies in the Environmental Management System
Bulgaria – Evolution in the Development of the Medium-Term Budgetary Framework Zagreb, Croatia | May 2018.
Institutions of Budget Execution: Rules and Roles
SECRETARY TO PARLIAMENT
The Sigma Experience of Public Internal Financial Control Peer Reviews
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
Director-General: Mr. E Africa
The accountability system in local government
11 July 2019 APP Presentation to the Joint Standing Committee on Financial Management of Parliament June 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Kari Kiesiläinen Heikki Liljeroos Steering Systems, Strategic Steering and Performance Management in Finnish Context

Department of Judicial Administration Head Mr. Kari Kiesiläinen Courts General, Administrative and Special Courts Legal Aid Enforcement Legal Aid Offices District Bailiffs Economy – Human Resources International affairs Legal Training Unit OFFICES AND INSTITUTIONS

The Department of Judicial Administration Main duty is to ensure that the preconditions for a functioning judicial system exist This requires that the courts and offices have: sufficient financial resources, sufficient staff, proper premises, facilities, communications, and sufficient training to maintain the professional skills of the staff at a high level.

Finances Operating expenses in 2016 The budget of the administrative branch for 2017 is approximately EUR 917 million, which accounts for less than 2 per cent of the government expenditure. Operating expenses in 2016

whole administrative sector STATE BUDGET 2017 / MoJ whole administrative sector appropriation 915 mil € (incomes 145 mil €) MOJ AND ADMINISTR. 126 mil € COURTS AND LEGAL AID 423 mil € (incomes 69 mil) A) Courts of law 279 mil € 1) Supreme Court 8,6 mil € 2) Supreme Administr. Court 13,1 mil € 3) Other Courts 257 mil €, from which 66 % the District Courts 20 % the Appeal Courts 10 % the Administrative Courts 4 % the Special Courts B) Legal aid and trustees 66 mil € Payments for private lawyers 78 mil € ENFORCEMENT 106 mil € (incomes 73 mil €) PROSECUTION 46 mil € PRISON ADMINISTR. 219 mil € ELECTION 8,5 mil €

Courts of Law Court Of Impeachement Supreme Court Supreme Administrative Court Labour Court Courts of Appeal (5) Insurance Court Market Court Administrative Courts (6+1) District Courts (27)

The course of courts performance negotiations General about development Resources (personnel/euros) Targets; Incoming/ solved cases Time of hearing (lead times) economic efficiency/productivity

The most used indicators: Number of incoming cases Length of proceedings Number of postponed cases Number of pending cases Number of decisions Caseload of judges and courts The budgetary means of a court and the spending of the budget Quality indicators

Steering Policy and Steering Systems

Steering Policy and Steering Systems Defines a big picture of steering policies in time (privatisation, public service delivery through state agencies) Political point of view: rules and principles set up in the Government Programme and its Implementation plan Currents issues: reform of social welfare and healthcare and regional administration reform Actor: Government and all the ministries Ministry of Finance has a role to steer state administration Interest of public finances, efficiency and quality of service production

Steering Policy and Steering Systems Steering Instruments Steering instruments refer to processes, documents and instruments seeking to obtain targets set up by the Government or the administration Measures of economic policy and measures of governance policy Management and leadership key areas in implementation Objective is to seek balance between public finances and state operations, to develop efficient steering mechanisms and guarantee clear processies and logical system Interest of Corporate steering becomes more and more important

Strategic Level Steering Other Steering instruments - Government Programme and its Implementation Plan - Steering Policies Steering of Resources - General Government Fiscal Plan - Budget Process - Performance Management Normative Steering - Acts and Decrees - Regulations and directives of EU - Other regulation Corporate Steering Other Steering instruments - Leadership - Organisational Structures - Strategies - Information Steering and Training - Incentive Systems

Corporate Steering: Joint Service Providers

Performance Management

Key ideas and principles Performance management (PM) is an agreement based steering model Parties negotiate and then agree. Reporting and follow up PM’s main purposes: To find balance between resources and targets To improve quality of public services To ensure cost- efficiency in service production Societal advantages must be also considered

Key ideas and principles The principal instrument for performance management is the annual central government budget Includes: resources and the agreed targets indicators to analyse achievement of the targets

Key ideas and principles Other main instruments of performance management: four year financial framework for Public Finances compiled by the Government (Fiscal Plan) performance agreements between sector Ministries and agencies on the respective administrative sector reports and statements upon results achieved The government and ministries report to the parliament in the Annual Central Government Report Legal framework: no single enactment but legal provisions in a few acts Budget Act, Budget Decree, Government Rules of Procedure

Actors and roles Ministry of Finance is responsible for the development of performance management as a steering system in state administration Performance management process Budget process and budget State Treasury has supportive role under the MoF Provide support regarding the development of the whole steering system Responsible for State performance and reporting system Netra Provide practical consultation to certain extent (performance analysis, indicators, reporting) Line ministries are responsible to execute performance management in their administrative branch The Government financial controller's function is the Government's joint supervisor of performance and finances State Audit Office: fulfils its external audit task by conducting financial audit, compliance audit, performance audit, fiscal policy audit role of administrational controller and independent supervisory authority ensuring financial accountability

New Performance Management - more strategic, horizontal, integrated and less administrative burden

Less administrative burden 6. Travelling towards new performance management More strategic Less administrative burden More horisontal More integrated

- Support to Government's Strategic Objectives - New Corporate Steering Package

More strategic and clear target setting Restricted amount of targets Genuinely common targets Shared process including strategic decisions and use of resources Information based decision making Indicators and follow up are key areas of interest

Support to Government’s Strategic Objectives Common Targets Support Common targets in performance management support implementation of common policies set up by the Government Common targets consist of 5 Strategic Priorities materialised in the form of 26 key projects in the Government Programme and its Implementation plan Common Targets Consist Negotiate and Agree Ministry (owner) and Agency (steered party) negotiate and select relevant targets under 5 strategic priorities to each agency. They may employ targets as such or derive more functional ones to each steering relationship. Database Available Performance Management Database supports the presentation and reporting of targets