Evaluating performance management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
Advertisements

1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Health and Work Development Unit 2011 Implementing NICE public health guidance for the workplace: Implementation and audit action planning toolkit.
Presentation at Regional Hub of Civil Service Workshop Astana, Kazakhstan October 2013.
Evaluation of Training and Education Activities. Objectives By the end of this presentation, participants will be able to List reasons why evaluation.
Learning Objectives LO1 Describe the role of professional judgment in achieving the overall objectives of the independent auditor in conducting an audit.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
SESSION ONE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISALS.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
1 Unit 4 Managing Employee Performance and Performance Appraisal.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
TCF and FCF-Online How can help you generate MI you need to satisfy FSA requirementswww.fcf-online.com.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
CLINICAL AUDIT A quick guide. Why Audit? ‘Clinical audit is about improvement. If you are not changing or improving things as a result of audit then ask.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
GC e-Orientation Program for New Hire Module 4 – Knowing your Career in Oracle Updated by HR in July 03.
Quality Assurance. Define Quality (product & service) Exceeds the requirements of the customer. General excellence of standard or level. A product which.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
 Planning an audit of cost statements, records and other related documents is considered necessary to ensure achievement of audit objectives with available.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.
Stages of Research and Development
What is ISO 9001? ISO 9001 is a standard that sets out the requirements for a quality management system. It helps businesses and organizations to be more.
Jean-Pierre Garitte Budapest 29 March 2017
Project Management 6e..
ROLE of a Continuous Improvement LEADER
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL
Allocating and assuring work
PowerPoint to accompany:
First Impressions and an Ethical Foundation
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
So where in ISO is Process?
Handout 3: Identify development needs
HANDLING PEOPLE PROBLEMS
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
SAMPLE Foster an Effective Feedback Environment
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS Chapter-2.
Competency Based Learning and Development
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Where is Your Organization on the Accessibility Maturity Scale
Chapter 2 Performance Management Process
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Analyse the EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Identifying enablers & disablers to change
Professional Tutor Conference 20th September 2018
Engaging People : Performance Monitoring
Handout 3: Identify development needs
Survey-Document Examination-Observation-Benchmarking
My Performance Appraisal How to write SMART objectives
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Induction Training Design
ISO 9001:2008 – Key Changes NOTE: use of this webinar depends on the instructor/speaker using the text in the notes of the slides!! Examples and speaking.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Jean-Pierre Garitte Skopje 8 April 2019
Project Management 6e..
Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople
Project Management 6e..
Enhancing Learning in Practice
Academic Promotion at the University of Warwick May 2019
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating performance management It is hard to ensure that a performance management system functions effectively, however carefully it has been developed and introduced. A performance management system is easy to conceive but hard to bring to life. Its operation must be monitored continuously and evaluated regularly by means of a performance management audit to provide information which will indicate how well it is working and identify any remedial actions required. This is evidence-based performance management.

Success criteria Measures of improved performance. Achievement of defined and agreed goals. Measures of employee engagement. Assessments of reactions of managers and employees to performance management. Personal development plans agreed and implemented. Performance development plans agreed and implemented. The criteria for evaluating performance management should have been defined when the system was introduced or amended. They will be based on how well its objectives have been achieved. If, for example, performance development is a major aim, how the impact of the system on performance can be measured should be described. The system design should specify how it is intended to operate and the evaluation will aim to determine the extent to which these operational requirements are being met.

Performance management audit Surveys of managers and employees. Focus groups to discuss survey results. Assessment of management training. Analysis of ratings. Analysis of completion of reviews. Analysis of any appeals. Assessment of sample reviews.

Performance management audit Surveys of managers and employees. Focus groups to discuss survey results. Assessment of management training. Analysis of ratings. Analysis of completion of reviews. Analysis of any appeals. Assessment of sample reviews. The best method of monitoring and evaluation is to ask those involved – managers and individuals – how it worked. As many as possible should be seen, individually and in groups by members of a project team and/or the HR function. Surveys as illustrated in the next two slides can be used as the basis for discussions. Individual interviews and focus group discussions can be supplemented by a special survey of reactions to performance management which could be completed anonymously by all managers and staff. The results should be fed back to all concerned and analysed to assess the need for any amendments to the process or further training requirements. The ultimate test, of course, is analysing organizational performance to establish the extent to which improvements can be attributed to performance management. It may be impossible to establish a direct connection but more detailed assessments with managers and staff on the impact of the process may reveal specific areas in which performance has been improved which could be assumed to impact on overall performance.

Evaluation of performance management against success criteria   Evaluate effectiveness as follows 1 = high level of achievement, 2 = acceptable level of achievement, 3 = poor level of achievement Measures of improved performance by reference to key performance indicators in such terms as output, productivity, sales, quality, customer satisfaction, return on investment. 1 2 3 Achievement of defined and agreed objectives for performance management. Measures of employee engagement before and after the introduction of performance management and then at regular intervals. Assessments of reactions of managers and employees to performance management. Assessment of the extent to which managers and employees have reached agreement on goals and performance development plans. Performance development plans agreed and implemented. 2 3 Personal development plans agreed and implemented.

Reactions of employees to performance management Rate the following statements on a scale of 1–5 where: 1 = fully agree, 2 = agree, 3 = not sure, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree 1 I am quite satisfied that the objectives I agreed were fair. 1 2 3 4 5 2 I felt that the meeting to agree objectives and standards of performance helped me to focus on what I should be aiming to achieve. 3 I received good feedback from my manager on how I was doing. 4 My manager was always prepared to provide guidance when I ran into problems at work. 5 The performance review meeting was conducted by my manager in a friendly and helpful manner. 6 My manager fully recognized my achievements during the year. 7 If any criticisms were made during the review meeting, they were acceptable because they were based on fact, not opinion. 8 I was given plenty of opportunity by my manager to discuss the reasons for any of my work problems. 9 I felt generally that the comments made by my manager at the meeting were fair. 10 The meeting ended with a clear plan of action for the future with which I agreed. 11 I felt motivated after the meeting. 12 I felt that the time spent in the meeting was well worthwhile.

Improving the performance of performance management – an eight-point plan Analyse the results of the audit. Consult senior management. Convene focus groups. Summarize consultations and draw up an action plan. Inform all concerned of the proposed actions. Design the training modules, brief and train the trainers Implement the action plan. Monitor the implementation and evaluate the effectiveness of the action.   This eight point plan is designed to make use of the evidence from a performance management audit. Analyse the results of the audit including any surveys and distribute a summary to all employees affected by performance management. Consult senior management to obtain their views on any actions that need to be taken in the light of the outcomes of the audit. Convene focus groups to analyse the audit results and consider what actions are required. Summarize the results of the consultations in steps two and three and draw up an action plan. Depending on the findings of the audit the actions could include any of the following: Revisions to performance management procedures such as goal setting, performance assessment (rating) or documentation. Focused training for both managers and individuals in the form of modules dealing with issues such as performance planning (defining role profiles, goal setting and preparing and implementing performance improvement and personal development plans), providing and acting on feedback, conducting performance review meetings, assessing performance, and coaching. The provision of coaching and mentoring to overcome weaknesses displayed by any individual managers as revealed by the upward assessments contained in the survey. Inform all concerned of the proposed actions. Design the training modules, brief and train the trainers and brief and train anyone involved in coaching or mentoring. Implement the action plan. Monitor the implementation and evaluate the effectiveness of the action. This may take the form of a follow-up audit.