MG Barbara Fast Deputy Director / Chief of Staff

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
InformationInWarfareIW-100 College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education.
Advertisements

Learning organization and knowledge management
1 Joint Logistics Education & Development Forum Welcome Fort Lee … home of the Army Logistics University.
C2 Integration Division Marine Corps Combat Development Command
JSIMS 28-Jan-99 1 JOINT SIMULATION SYSTEM Modeling Command and Control (C2) with Collaborative Planning Agents Randall Hill and Jonathan Gratch University.
Navy’s Operational Authority for Naval Networks, Information Operations, and FORCEnet 2004 Strike, Land Attack & Air Defense Annual Symposium Vice Admiral.
Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) Communications System
Previous Slide TRADOC DCSINT Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC DCSINT.
5/17/ SUPPORT THE WARFIGHTER DoD CIO 1 (U) FOUO DoD Transformation for Data and Information Sharing Version 1.0 DoD Net-Centric Data Strategy (DS)
P X A MG William H. Wade II, USA Operations Director, Joint Forces Command Naples, Italy June 2010 SEDM DCHOD Conference 1.
Joint Operations Command SIMULATION AS A SERVICE UNCLASSIFIED Australian Defence Simulation And Training Centre TITLE SLIDE DATE AUTOMATICALLY UPDATES.
NATO Network Enabled Capabilities
UNCLASSIFIED Strike COI Spiral 1 Lessons Learned and Implementation JFCC Global Strike and Integration Col Bryan Bartels JFCC GSI J32, C2 Development.
United States Army Combined Arms Center TIER III SUPPORT.
KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports lessons learned,
11 DoD Information Sharing Update for US-NATO Information Sharing (UNIS) TEM 6 Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information.
FM 7-0 Training Units and Developing Leaders for Full Spectrum Operations Collective Training Directorate Combined Arms Center-Training Fort Leavenworth,
Network-Centric Battlefield Operations
CLAIMING THE FUTURE THE ASSOCIATION OF THE FUTURE.
JOINT FIRES AND EFFECTS TRAINER SYSTEM (JFETS). We currently rely on service component schools to inform on service capabilities, and train component.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
1 Institutional Adaptation Panel Association of the United States Army Mr. Dean G. Popps Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics.
Sustainability/Logistics – Transportation and Distribution Management (4b) Technology Enabled Capability Demonstration Alan Santucci
Joint Vision Why a New Document n Sustain and build on momentum of Joint Vision process ã Continue evolution of the joint force n Lessons learned.
Import of New Security Environment Keys to Transformation: Exploit Technology Exploit DOD ability to integrate processes Result: JV2010 Vision shall.
Training for a Network Enabled Capability
IS Metrics for C2 Processes Working Group 3 Brief Team Leaders: Steve Soules Dr. Mark Mandeles.
FA50 Qualification Course
Network-Enabled Platforms – Tools to Maximize Operational Performance.
Brig Gen Henry Taylor, USAF The Joint Staff Vice Director for Logistics (VJ4) Future Joint Logistics Initiatives Panel 19 May 2004 Future Joint Logistics.
PM UA Networks System Integration 2004 Combat Vehicles Conference
C4ISR for the Military: Development and Implementation Presentation to the Security Network’s C4ISR, Robot Platforms, and Sensor Conference Greg Collins,
MPE – Enabling ALL to securely SEE, DECIDE, ACT MPE - Highlights  Establish Core Implementation Working Group  Build Joining, Membership, and Exiting.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
JNTC Joint Management Office
Fort Benning, Home of the MCoE Maneuver Center of Excellence - Team of Soldiers, Families, and Civilians from the Best Army in the World! UNCLASSIFIED.
Operations Overview The levels of war are doctrinal perspectives that clarify the links between strategic objectives and tactical actions.
USJFCOM 27 Jul EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Col David Brown, USAF JFIIT Commander UNCLASSIFIED Joint Fires Integration and Interoperability Team (JFIIT)
Coalition Battle Management Language Study Group Dr. Michael Hieb Alion Science & Technology Major Kevin Galvin Ministry of Defence (UK), Directorate of.
This Briefing is Unclassified Space Situation Awareness (SSA) for the Warfighter 25 August 2005 HQ AFSPC/DRC Lt Col Troy Pannebecker.
GORT Planning/Guidance Session with LTG Barclay
Why KM is Important KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports.
U.S. Army RDE Command (Prov) - Supporting the Objective Force -
Technology Implications for Net Centric Operations 2004 Interoperability & Systems Integration Conference Industry Views Dr. Aaron Budgor Vice President.
Joint Command and Control
TRANSFORMATION UPDATE
Special Operations Joint Interoperability Working Group (SOJIWG)
AUTL concept of Unit Ministry Team Religious Support Training Model
CIO G-6 Signal Conference
Fires Conceptual Framework Supporting Multi-Domain Battle
Seabasing…Enabling Operational Maneuver from the Sea
Information Brief (Deep Dive)
Deployable Training Division (DTD)
Mission Command Center Excellence Directorate of Training
Mission Command Center Excellence Directorate of Training
Combatant Commanders’ Future Logistics Support Perspectives
Existing Army Systems Force XXI Battle Command Brigade-and-Below (FBCB2) Provides battle command and situational awareness information Digitally networks.
Joint Staff J8, Deputy Director for C4
An Introduction To VDEM VDEM Director of External Affairs
Intelligence Support to Allied and Coalition Operations
Army Medical Logistics Enterprise: USAMMA Overview
Defense Health Agency Industry Exchange J-6 I&O’s Enterprise Approach by COL Beverly Beavers November 08, 2018 Authorized Use Only Authorized Use Only.
United States Joint Forces Command
“TWV: Fixing the current fleet while preparing for the future”
AGCCC Battle Analysis Adjutant General School - Advanced Officer Training Division.
Steering Committee Brief to the DoD M&S Conference 2008
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
Joint Vision 2020.
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
Presentation transcript:

MG Barbara Fast Deputy Director / Chief of Staff US Army Capabilities Integration Center Fort Monroe, Virginia

The Challenge Joint Collaborative Environment Special Operations Forces CFLCC CFACC The joint land campaign will be planned and conducted by a coalition of ground forces, linked to a robust network through which all forces, at all echelons leverage information and data to provide common understanding and enhance our interoperability. The Army’s participates in the Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental and Multi-national (JIIM) operational environment and requires an end-to-end set of information capabilities to enable it. This view represents the operational challenge, that includes linkages to the joint and interagency and multi-national (JIM) community. Platoons/Squads Soldiers The “Network” provides a decisive advantage through decision superiority, situational awareness, information, speed, and access to Joint capabilities.

Major Interoperability Challenge We currently do not have a single integrated Battle Command System (BCS). Multiple systems within the Army Battle Command Systems (ABCS) Eleven major programs of record (POR) and a number of smaller non-POR systems. Our requirement to operate in a joint collaborative environment has resulted in numerous excursions to provide “means” to support “needs.” Lessons learned have been invaluable in assisting us to move – not only our thinking but our development approach - away from “stovepipes,” Although we have made great strides over the years in working the interoperability of ABCS, we still have a BC system that creates burdens for the commander and their staffs in tactical decision making. Currently, we are not resolving the interoperability problem in a proactive manner: We add to the problem every time a system is allowed to introduce system specific new capabilities/features without addressing the holistic affects on the battlefield We continue to add systems capabilities that are focused on stove-pipe capabilities The introduction of unit-specific systems adds to the problem of non-interoperability We cannot successfully execute and implement a “modular force” Army if we do not become proactive in resolving the interoperability issues Acronyms GCCS: Global Command & Control System NECC: Network-Enabled Command Capability NCES: Net-Centric Enterprise Services SOSCOE: System of Systems Common Operating Environment FCS: Future Combat System BC: Battle Command FBCB2: Force XXI BC Brigade & Below JBC-P: Joint BC – Platform BCS3: BC Sustainment Support System