WE SAW IT COMING The rising tide of deaths in prison

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 EU/UNICEF project to end torture and ill-treatment against children.
Advertisements

Children in Prison From Convention to National Legislation: Legal Implementation of International Standards Bragi Guðbrandsson Government Agency for Child.
Oversight and Accountability: Working together to improve care in police custody Sarah Green IPCC Commissioner.
1 Ha Noi, Viet Nam, 6 June 2014 Manfred Nowak Professor of International Law and Human Rights, University of Vienna, Austria Austrian Chair Visiting Professor.
1 Ha Noi, Viet Nam, 6 June 2014 Manfred Nowak Professor of International Law and Human Rights, University of Vienna, Austria Austrian Chair Visiting Professor.
Proactive Interventions: Incorporating a Children’s Rights Approach
Thematic inspection on the welfare of vulnerable people in police custody Heather Hurford Lead Inspector.
Domestication and Implementation Package B The duty to prevent torture and other ill treatment © The Article 5 Initiative, 2013.
© 2006 Prohibition of Torture Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Austria.
“Global Violence: Consequences and Responses” Deprivation of liberty in armed conflict and other situations of violence – Legal Aspects The Crime of Torture.
Torture Prevention: Deconstructed Dr Elina Steinerte Human Rights Implementation Centre University of Bristol Regional Conference ‘Prevention of Torture:
Human rights during detention Workshop 8 Alexandria, Arab Republic of Egypt by Perry C. Quak The Netherlands.
Right to an Effective Remedy:
Domestication and Implementation Package C The duty to provide redress to victims of torture and other ill treatment © The Article 5 Initiative, 2013.
HUMAN RIGHTS BASED APPROACH See Me Brewing Lab Cathy Asante.
THE EUROPEAN NPM PROJECT CHILDREN RIGHTS IN PLACES OF DETENTION Víctor Rodriguez-Rescia SPT member European NPM Project’s 6th NPM Thematic Workshop: “The.
Safeguarding Adults in Ealing
Safeguarding Adults Board 6 th Annual Conference Adult Safeguarding and the NHS Alison Knowles Commissioning Director NHS England, West Yorkshire.
Drug Treatment in Prisons: update on the Patel Report Professor Lord Patel of Bradford OBE.
National Preventive Mechanism in the United Kingdom Laura Paton UK NPM Coordinator Kyiv, 18 October 2011.
ISS Conference, 21 August ISS Conference August 2013.
Monitoring for human rights in places of detention: NPMs and IMBs – how effective are they in securing human rights? An ARC-funded project Cambridge University,
 ECOSOC agreed conclusions 1997/2 :..the process of assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action, including.
Pretrial Detention and Torture Moritz Birk, Julia Kozma and Debra Long MULTI-DISCIPLINARY MEETING THE GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR PRETRIAL JUSTICE 19th-20th November.
Law Reform Commission Criminal Process Pre-Trial Procedures Pierre Rosario DOMINGUE Chief Executive Officer Wednesday, May 7,
Violence against children in conflict with the law: developing international indicators ICOPA XII - International Conference on Penal Abolition Rosie Meek:
Seminar on Migration Legislation Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala 15 – 16 February 2007.
Helping to make care better Cynthia Bower, CEO National Care Association Conference 11 November 2009.
Mental Health Policy, Human Rights & the Law Mental Disability Advocacy Program Open Society Institute Camilla Parker October 2004.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) Inspecting Immigration Detention 31st March 2015 Introductions. Roles at HMIP. Bev Alden - Inspector 1.
UK National Preventative Mechanism NPMs’ experiences of allegations of active ill-treatment Rachel Lindsay Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland.
Zoë Billingham HM Inspector of Constabulary APCC 4 October 2013 HMIC’s Approach to Monitoring Forces.
NPM: Framework of technical modalities and criteria Kiev, October 2011 © APT.
Law Human Rights, OPCAT and ‘closed environments’ Dr Bronwyn Naylor Presentation for DHS and DoH 9 th September 2011 Dr Bronwyn Naylor.
Fight For Your Rights! By: AJ Campbell.
1 Foundation module 2 Child rights-based approaches.
Juvenile Justice Justice Renate Winter. International Standards The UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, “the Beijing.
Article 1 Everyone under the age of 18 has all the rights in the Convention. Definition of the child.
The UK National Preventive Mechanism 1 Maneer Afsar Team Leader –HMI Prison January 2017.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on International Relations and Cooperation 9 May 2012 The Roles of Parliament in the Implementation of Human Rights.
Plymouth BCU – What is the view from the Frontline? A typical 2 week period The importance of walking in the shoes of those receiving and providing our.
Health and Social Care Mental Health Act 2007 Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (MCA / DoLS) What is Depriving a Person’s Liberty?
 International non-governmental organization founded in 1979 (International Year of the Child)  Forefront.
Who monitors? NPM IMBs HMCIP Ofsted HMI Probation CQC GPhC COMMUNITY Media NGOs Community groups Politicians Families Prisoners Former prisoners Whistle-
 The body of government officials who are employed in civil occupations that are neither political nor judicial.  In most countries the term refers.
Introduction to Human Rights The Human Rights Act and Human Rights Based Approaches.
CFOA Change Programme.
Fiona Grossick National Clinical Quality Assurance Lead, Health & Justice NHS England Change for JW to come first.
Women’s Health in Prison in the Northern Dimension Area
Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture (OPCAT)
Human Rights in Complaints Handling and Inquiries: Perspectives from the Equality and Human Rights Commission Jonathan Timbers – Policy Manager, Equality.
Overview Introduction Background: The Geneva Convention
Cardiff Partnership Board
Normative content of the right to freedom from
Prevention of torture in South Africa
EU –OPCAT PROJECT The 4th regional network workshop Manila
European Human Rights Law and Death in Prison:
Purposes of the Convention
Prisoner’s Education Trust Academic Symposium
Investigations of deaths in custody – trends and themes
Corrections reform in ontario
The Estonian pilot Legal context : National law vs Human Rights
Foundation module 2 Child rights-based approaches.
Cardiff Partnership Board
Women’s Health in Prison in the Northern Dimension Area
Prison Inspection in England and Wales
European Model for Restorative Justice with Children and Young People
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S.
Management and supervision of men convicted of sexual offences
A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS
Presentation transcript:

WE SAW IT COMING The rising tide of deaths in prison Professor Nick Hardwick The School of Law, Royal Holloway University of London The University of Sheffield/Leverhulme Trust Deaths in Punishment Conference Sheffield 25-26 October 2017

The Mandela Rules principles United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (The Nelson Mandela Rules) adopted 2015 Human dignity and the prohibition against torture and ill-treatment: ‘All prisoners shall be treated with respect due to their inherent dignity and value as human beings. No prisoners shall be subject to, and all prisoners shall be protected from, torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment for which no circumstances whatsoever may be invoked as justification. The safety and security of prisoners, staff…shall be ensured at all times’. No discrimination and the needs of vulnerable prisoners: ‘There shall be no discrimination…prison administrations shall take account of the individual needs of prisoners… in particular the most vulnerable…’ Prison as punishment, not for punishment: ‘Imprisonment.. afflictive by the very fact of… depriving them of liberty. The prison system…shall not aggravate the suffering inherent in such a situation.’ Reintegration: ‘Those purposes [of imprisonment] can only be achieved if the period of imprisonment is used to ensure…the reintegration of such persons into society upon release…’ Normalisation: ‘The prison regime should seek to minimise any differences between prison life and life at liberty that tend to lessen the responsibility of the prisoners or the respect due to their dignity as human beings.’

Prison safety data: The last 10 years1 2007-8 2017 % changed 168 deaths in prison custody 316 + 88% 2.1 deaths/1000 prisoners 3.7 + 76% 76 apparent self-inflicted deaths 97 + 28% 0 homicides 2 - 22,462 reported incidents of self-harm 40,414 + 80% 278 self-harm incidents/1000 prisoners 474 + 71% 6,126 prisoners self-harmed 11,010 + 80% 15,644 assaults 26,643 + 70% 193 assault incidents/1000 prisoners 312 + 62% 1,481 serious assaults 3,606 + 143% 3,247 assaults on staff 7,159 + 120% 278 serious assaults on staff 805 +190% 1. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/safety-in-custody-quarterly-update-to-march-2017

HMI Prisons: Living Conditions HMI Prisons HMI Prisons: Living Conditions HMI Prisons. Life in prisons: Living conditions. 2017

HMP Nottingham – Rebuilt 2010. Single cell.

HMP Hull – two person cell

HMP Pentonville – Occupied cell

HMP Pentonville – Occupied cell

HMP Pentonville – First night cell ready for use

Outside a wing

It need not be like this… From HMI Prisons Annual Reports 2010/11 and 2014/15

From Safety in Custody Statistics Bulletin – Deaths to June 17,asaults and self harm to March 17

Men and women

Reoffending rates From Proven Reoffending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin, October 2014to September2015  

External challenges

Staff reductions Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) Workforce Statistics Bulletin, 30 June 2017 March 2010 – 24,831 March 2015 - 18,221 June 2017 - 18755 (’Reserves’=4!)

Staff recruitment progress Table 2: Headcount of Band 3 to 5 Prison Officers in post in establishments, 31 October 2016 to 31 August 2017 and future POELT places booked (as at end of August 2017) across the period September 2017 to January 2018   Headcount Staff in Post Official Statistics Management Information Establishment 31-Oct-16 30-Nov-16 31-Dec-16 31-Jan-17 28-Feb-17 31-Mar-17 30-Apr-17 31-May-17 30-Jun-17 31-Jul-17 31-Aug-17 Change Oct-16 to Aug-17 Prison Service Establishment total 18,503 18,541 18,438 18,780 18,691 18,950 19,051 19,194 19,304 19,469 19,742 1239 Non-establishment based officers1 210 207 206 219 290 224 230 251 239 262 261 51 Total Officers 18,713 18,748 18,644 18,999 18,981 19,174 19,281 19,445 19,543 19,731 20,003 1,290

A timeline of decline From NOMS/HMPPS Annual Reports 2010/11 to 2016/17 Ken Clarke becomes Justice Secretary ‘Rehabilitation Revolution’ HQ restructuring and net reduction of 1500 staff across NOMS Total deaths: 200 SIDs: 63 2011/12 Riots – population increase ’Working Prisons’; Prison competition programme £228M savings Total deaths: 193 SIDs: 53 2012/13 Chris Grayling Justice Secretary £246M savings ‘Fair and sustainable’ pay policy begins’; ‘Privatisation’ of whole prisons replaced by ‘benchmarking’ and competition for works and facilities management Closure of 7 prisons; opening Oakwood/Thameside Total deaths: 193 SIDs: 63 2013/14 £274M savings; ‘Bench marking’ Phase 1 ’Transforming Rehabilitation’ launched Total deaths: 230 SIDs: 92 2014/15 £149M savings Launch of NPS and CRCs ‘New ways of working in all Cat B and C prisons. Total deaths: 247 SIDs: 82 2015/16 Michael Gove Justice Secretary ‘Prison Reform Programme’ Total deaths: 322 SIDs: 107 2016-18 NOMS becomes HMPPS £1.3B prison modernisation capital funds Total deaths: 316 SIDs: 97 Announcement of recruitment 2,500 additional prison officers

Warnings HMI Prisons Annual reports 2010/11 to 2014/15 2010/11: Things had improved over the previous five years but the first signs of slippage were there. 'The assessments we have made over the last five years have steadily improved' …but… 'there are some signs of slippage in 2010/11'. 2011/12: The risks were becoming more apparent. 'In my view overall, our inspection findings suggest that there is a risk of undermining the progress that has been made in recent years and threatening the delivery of the government’s rehabilitation revolution. If a rehabilitation revolution is to be delivered, with all the economic and social benefits that promises, there is a pretty clear choice for politicians and policy makers – reduce prison populations or increase prison budgets'. 2012/13: The cracks were beginning to show. "All the establishments we inspected during the year were under pressure to do more with less and, in some, the cracks were beginning to show…Politicians and policy makers should be very careful not to put the valuable policy and savings gains they have already made at risk by ignoring those signs and piling on the pressure regardless'.

2013/14: Safety was in sharp decline 2013/14: Safety was in sharp decline. 'Increases in self-inflicted deaths, self-harm and violence cannot be attributed to a single cause. They reflect some deep-seated trends and affect prisons in both the public and private sectors. Nevertheless, in my view, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that the conjunction of resource, population and policy pressures, particularly in the second half of 2013–14 and particularly in adult male prisons, was a very significant factor in the rapid deterioration in safety and other outcomes we found as the year progressed and that were reflected in NOMS’ own safety data.' 2014/15: Outcomes were the worst for ten years. 'Assessed outcomes in the prisons we reported on in 2014–15 fell sharply across all areas and, overall, the outcomes we reported on in 2014–15 were the worst for 10 years'.

OPCAT Establishes international and national preventative visiting bodies INTERNATIONAL: Sub- Committee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) NATIONAL: National Preventative Mechanisms (NPMs) Article 1 The objective of the present Protocol is to establish a system of regular visits undertaken by independent international and national bodies to places where people are deprived of their liberty, in order to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

The UK NPM UK ratified OPCAT in 2003 and designated its NPM in 2009 Co-ordinated by HM Inspectorate of Prisons (E&W) 20 bodies in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland Covering prisons, police and court custody, immigration detention, secure children’s homes, secure mental hospital

Should the inspectorate be able to do more? Prevention and protection – not investigation or regulation Requirement to respond to recommendations and ‘special measures’ Human rights based standards Legal protection from victimisation

OPCAT requirements for an NPM Article 3: Each State Party shall set up, designate or maintain at the domestic level one or several visiting bodies for the prevention of torture... Article 4: Allow visits…to any place under its jurisdiction or control where persons are or may be deprived of their liberty with a view to strengthening protection… Article 18: Guarantee and ensure: Functional independence, competence and make-up, resources, adherence to the Paris Principles Article 19: NPM powers to regularly examine treatment of detainees to strengthen their protection; make recommendations and submit proposals/observation on legislation Article 20: Access to information concerning the number, treatment and conditions of detainees; unrestricted access to all places of detention/detainees; private interviews; access to the SPT Article 21: Protection from victimisation Article 22: Consideration of and dialogue about recommendations Article 23: Publish and disseminate NPM Annual Report