MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
TOF0 TOF1 Ckov1 Iron Shield TOF2 Ckov 2Cal Diffuser Proton Absorber Iron Shield ISIS Bea m LN2 Option RICH Option LH Option PARTICLE ID - CKOV1 STATUS.
PID activities 1. Summary of work/activities since last CM in Berkeley 2. PID parallel session in Frascati 3. Topics specific to each subdetector CKOV1.
SUNJI KIM, H. BHANG, M. KIM, K. TSHOO, K. TANIDA, H. FUJIOKA1, Y. SADA1, and H. ASANO1 Seoul National University, 1 Kyoto University Abstract Introduction.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Printed by MICE is a Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment running at the Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Chilton UK. Cooled muon beams.
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
1 MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters Lucien CremaldiAerogel R&D and Test Beam Ghislain GregoireDesign and Simulation Don SummersAerogel Procurement &
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
KEK Beam Test Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting
E166 “Polarized Positrons for Future Linear Colliders” John C. Sheppard E166 Co-spokesman SLAC: August 31, 2004.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
MICE Pid & trigger detectors MICE CM15, FNAL Jun 11, 2006 V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for the small PID team Bonesini, Chimenti, Cremaldi, Graulich,
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a workable solution 4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon.
In this event 240 eV electron is passing through the MICE Cerenkov detector.
Dec 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Improving MuCal Design o Why we need an improved design o Improvement Principle o Quick Simulation, Analysis & Results.
PID, trigger and DAQ for the GLAST beam test (preliminary study) Nicola Mazziotta INFN Bari Dec. 6, 2005.
28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting.
Study of optical properties of aerogel
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
E-  identification 1. Reminder from previous presentations, questions, remarks 2. Čerenkov option 3. Study of several optical configurations 4. Conclusions.
T1008 status W.Baldini for the Ferrara and Padova SuperB-IFR Group.
Marco Musy INFN and University of Milano-Bicocca Pylos, June 2002 Aerogel as Cherenkov radiator for RICH detectors for RICH detectors.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Position Sensitive SiPMs for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters C.Woody BNL January 17, 2012.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
1 Fast Timing via Cerenkov Radiation‏ Earle Wilson, Advisor: Hans Wenzel Fermilab CMS/ATLAS Fast Timing Simulation Meeting July 17,
Optical performances of CKOV2 Gh. Grégoire 1. Optical elements in relation with beam properties 2. Comparison of optical geometries 4. Electron detection.
Status of Aerogel detector for high pT upgrade at PHENIX Budget from US-J project for next two years : (1) 400 liters of Aerogel (2) 600 photomultiplier.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
EIC Detector – JLab – 04/June/2010 Cisbani / HERMES RICH 1 HERMES: Forward RICH Detector Evaristo Cisbani / INFN-Rome Sanità Group Most of the slides from.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, 7 July 2012 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration The MICE Beam Line Instrumentation (Trackers and PID) for precise Emittance.
Cherenkov Counters for SoLID Z.-E. Meziani on behalf of Simona Malace & Haiyan Gao (Duke University) Eric Fuchey (Temple University) SoLID Dry Run Review,
Water Tank as the Outer Muon Veto Mingjun Chen
Aerogel counter with a Fresnel lens
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
VVS Prototype Construction at Fermilab Erik Ramberg 26 February,2002 Design issues for VVS Details of VVS prototype design Schedule and Budget Testing.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
1 CKOV1 at the MICE Experiment CKOV1 to perform mu/pi id w TOF0/TOF1. Progress since CM16 CKOV1 Fabrication and Installation TOF0 CKOV1 TOF1 EMCAL TOF2.
1 MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters Ghislain Gregoire, Don Summers, Lucien Cremaldi*, MICE Collaboration Meeting, FNAL, Jun 06.
30/06/08E. Garutti1 CALICE testbeam 2008 FNAL. 30/06/08E. Garutti2 The installation.
Aerogel Cherenkov Counters for the ALICE Detector G. Paić Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM For the ALICE VHMPID group.
Tests of a proximity focusing RICH with aerogel as radiator and flat panel PMT (Hamamatsu H8500) as photon detector Rok Pestotnik Jožef Stefan Institute,
Performance of Scintillator-Strip Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the ILC experiment Satoru Uozumi (Kobe University) for the CALICE collaboration Mar 12.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Aerogel detector revisited Sokolov Oleksiy, UNAM, progress report, 20 Sept 2006 E int = M – wall reflectivity є – PMT relative area Belle geometry (traditional):
Eli Piasetzky Tel Aviv University Beam Scintillating Fibers PSI, Technical Review, July 2012 Guy Ron Hebrew University Israel.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
FARICH status E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
KOPIO meeting, T. Nomura (Kyoto U.)
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Status of GEANT4 in LHCb S. Easo, RAL, The LHCb experiment.
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
  at Super tau-charm
MICE Collaboration Meeting
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
CLAS12 Forward Detector Element PCAL
Particle Identification in LHCb
Development and Construction of PHENIX Aerogel Cherenkov Detector
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
Presentation transcript:

MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters Ghislain Gregoire, Don Summers, Lucien Cremaldi*, MICE Collaboration Meeting, FNAL, Jun 06

ISIS Beam Line A B C

Array is offset from x,y = 0,0. Beam Spot at z = 20.763.4m 4x4 Aerogel Array Provides ample coverage. ~95% containment in 3x3. Array is offset from x,y = 0,0. Triangle tiles can reduce cost. Variation of Beam Spot size over counter length is minimal. Triangle tiles

Matsushita Electric Works 1.030+-0.001

Matsushita Aerogel Samples n=1.03 n=1.07(1.08) n=1.12 115 x 115 x 10.5 mm3 115 x 115 x 11.5 mm3

T = A exp{ -t C/l4} Rayleigh-like Transmittance T = A exp{ -t C/l4} Rayleigh-like C =0.041 1.03 n A C 1.03 98.99 0.041 1.08 98.84 0.252 1.12 96.96 0.638 t(nm) sample thickness (nm) wavelength 0.252 1.07 0.638 1.12 Blue photons are scattered w dN/dq = 1+cos2. Absorption minimal.

Performance (1) Run Configuration of good Mu/Pi (T.Roberts) Muons Peaking at 220 MeV/c Pion show high energy tail (p>350 MeV/c removed by tracking??) 16200 280

Muon Detection Efficiency The efficiency drop at low momenta is due to the proximity of the muon threshold in n=1.12 aerogel The efficiency at low momenta could be improved by increasing the thickness of the radiator

Momentum distributions of triggers Remember: the pion sample is exaggerated by a factor 40 Misidentified pions in the range 285 to 320 MeV/c Unambiguous separation of muons and pions (32 pions / 385 muons) There is no need for a momentum cut i.e. an actual pion impurity in this configuration only

Purity Matrix(4) Purity (4) Purity = Percent of good muons for a particular Trigger Configuration. P = Muon Purity >99% P = Pion Misid < 1.2 x 10-4

Design (1)

Aerogel Counter Design

Dimensions (3)

Radiator (2) Collection Mirror Radiator

Fermilab Test Beam July ‘06 Beam 200 GeV  Aerogel 1.03, 1.07, 1.12 PE yield vs incident angle Sr90 Measurements aerogel 200 GeV  mirror Rotating Table

Summer ‘06  = 1 @ FNAL 1x1x1 module white reflector Measure pe yields Pricing/Road Map Price (2 det) -64 Aerogel x $350USD ~ $20K -Reflectors $5K -Steele Boxes $5K -Table $5K -Installation and checkout $5K -Shipping $5K -(8-10) PMTs HARP - -Parts Fabricated in UM shop. -Mechanical Drawings UL. Summer ‘06  = 1 @ FNAL 1x1x1 module white reflector Measure pe yields Spring ‘07 Assembly Fall- 06 Mechanical fabrication Reflectors/Cones Aerogel purchase Summer ‘07 ready

Milestone Progress Report

Conclusion Aerogel Technology well suited to tag  in MICE beamline. Photoelectron yield adequate for high efficiency and low misid rate. Mechanical design highly advanced. Fabrication staightforward. Ready to install in MICE in summer ‘07. TRD Update & Saftey Sheets completed (Ghislain).

Muon Detection Efficiency (5)

Performance (3) n=1.12 muon n=1.12 pion n=1.07 muon n=1.07 pion

Performance (2) n Npe/cm L-cm e Npe(b=1) 1.07 11.4 2.3 0.6 16 1.07 11.4 2.3 0.6 16 1.12 18.3 2.3 0.6 25