Outline: Why now ? What ? How ?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WP2: Targets Proposed Outline Work Programme Chris Densham.

Advertisements

September 23, 2005ISS Plenary Meeting - Zisman International Scoping Study Accelerator Working Group: Tasks and Plans Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam.

Participants WP3total Imperial College CERN STFC University Warwick CRNS University Oxford6 6 Total Euro  - WP3.

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.

25/10/2007M. Dracos1 EURO The European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation facility (Rob Edgecock, Mats Lindroos, Marcos Dracos)

Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.

MCTF Harold G. Kirk MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Targetry R&D in the 5-Year Plan Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Lab.

Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Using Lead-Bismuth Eutectic in MERIT Syringe Pump Van Graves October, 2007.

30 June 2008M. Dracos, NuFact081 Challenges and Progress on the SuperBeam Horn Design Marcos DRACOS IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg NuFact 08 Valencia-Spain, June.

K. McDonald Muon Collaboration Meeting 19 Mar 2008 Future Target System R&D Analysis (and simulation) of MERIT data is ongoing, but the success of the.

Alain Blondel Neutrino physics in Switzerland collaborate among ourselves and in Europe to ensure a rich programme collaborate in T2K leading role in GLACIER,

The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.

Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of

The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.

(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,

Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:

Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London. Neil Bliss, Norbert Collomb, Alan Grant, STFC/DL, Daresbury. Costing Methodology and Status of the Neutrino Factory.

A powder jet target for a Neutrino Factory Ottone Caretta, Chris Densham (RAL), Tom Davies (Exeter University), Richard Woods (Gericke Ltd)

RAL/BENE meeting, April Marcos Dracos Collection system for future neutrino beams horn and target integration 2 LoI's sent –CERN –Strasbourg.

Introduction to EC Framework Programme 7 Rob Edgecock CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction to Framework Programmes “ “ FP7 Neutrino LOI Mapping.

Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.

MOMENT Synergies with Other Projects Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS NuFact2015, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Aug , 2015.

Initiatives in the Target Sector J. R. J. Bennett CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon. OX11 0QX, UK.

Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.

Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)

Steve Geer OsC RAL 21 June, Muon Accelerator Program MUON COLLIDER & NEUTRINO FACTORY R&D in the U.S.  

K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, Materials for the Target System Internal Shield K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 27, 2010) Iron Plug Proton.

Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.

J. Pozimski UKNF WP1 meeting 10 March 2010 UKNF WP1 milestone table status.

Initiative in the Target Sector J. R. J. Bennett CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK.

UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.

KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.

Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.

J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,

Preparation of design study ICL May 2005 accelerator Alain Blondel ECFA/BENE Future Neutrino Beam studies Towards a comparison of options on equal footing.

Highlights of Tuesday’s session Machine aspects Copyright © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Accelerator and Beams Working Group 3 NUFACT06 Irvine, Ca. August 24-30, 2006 Conveners: R. Garoby, H. Kirk.

IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.

Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.

29 September 2006M.Sakuda NuFact06 Asian Regional Outlook (Japan) -by Y.Kuno (Osaka) (1) SuperBeam (T2K) (2) J-PARC current upgrade plan (3) T2HK or T2KK.

Summary of Nufact-03 Alain Blondel NuFact 03 5th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories & Superbeams Columbia University, New York 5-11 June 2003.

H. Haseroth Friday, August 31, 2001 MUG Meeting 1 Overview of the CERN Neutrino Factory Machine Studies H. Haseroth for the Neutrino Factory Working Group.

FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The E951 Targetry Program Targetry Meeting CERN September 19, 2003.

EU accelerator contributions to the IDS … R. Garoby ISS meeting RAL 28/04/2006.

ESGARD – OMIA 10 & 11/09/2007 JRA on Sc cavities and Cryomodule for a Pulsed proton Linac Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources R. Garoby for S.

WP3: The Neutrino Factory Costing Status Ajit Kurup CERN Costing Workshop 8 th December 2011.

1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.

Ids120h_side. ids120h_top ids120h_iso ids120h_end.

MCTF Harold G. Kirk MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Other R&D Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Lab.

PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.

CARESG, 11Apr2006V. Palladino Report on BENE Activities Beams for European Neutrino Experiments (BENE) subtitle: A Network aiming at a consensual road.

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Summary of WP3 J. Pozimski.

PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,

1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.

UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design

Targets Neutrino Factory J. R. J. Bennett

Challenges and Progress on the SB Horn Design

The Accelerator Complex from the International Design Study

Tungsten Powder Test at HiRadMat Scientific Motivation

MOMENT Overview Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS

Target and Horn status report

Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects

Beam Dump outline work plan (UK perspective)

W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory

Expression of Interest for future flagship projects

A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe

A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe

Presentation transcript:

Outline: Why now ? What ? How ? Accelerator R & D Outline: Why now ? What ? How ? R. Garoby 1

Why now ? Because of the need to prepare for: continuation after ISS (deadline: NuFact06 in August) continuation after CARE. + It has to fit inside the future European Strategy as outlined by the CCSG and as supported by the CERN council (to be known at the latest in October 2006). R. Garoby 2

What ? Proton drivers: Linac-based solutions: high energy part (superconducting cavities, high power RF, beam dynamics,…) RCS-based solutions: no request (mature) FFAG-based solutions: not mature (could be part of generic R & D on FFAGs) R. Garoby 3

What ? Targets: Liquid jet: MERIT experiment results mid-2007 Solid: investigations started. To be pursued. Flowing liquid: remains to be defined R. Garoby 4

From R. Bennett # ITEM STAFF COST Years kEuro 1. Free Mercury Jet - After MERIT? 1 100 2. Increase experience with mercury jet and handling/safety. Consider low temperature eutectics as alternatives to Hg. 2 200 3. Contained, flowing liquid metal targets - possibly combined with pulsed spallation neutron source research work? 4. Shock studies in solids –tungsten and carbon –for targets (and at high temperatures) and windows. 5. In-beam tests required. 10 6. Investigate low thermal expansion metals. 50 7. Produce a viable rotating/moving solid target design. 8. Radiation Damage in solids –high temperatures - annealing. 9. Design a target station for Jet target and Solid target. Including remote handling, maintenance and replacement. 20 Produce a viable beam dump design for solid and free jet targets. 11 Safety aspects. Mercury presents special hazards. Total 13 1300 750 12 Test Target Station with 4 MW proton beam ~ 50 MEuro R. Garoby 5

Preliminary schedule ( M. Dracos) What ? Muons collection: Solenoid: not foreseen in EU yet Horns (super-beam): horn & power-supply Preliminary schedule ( M. Dracos) Design of Power Supply: 2006-2007 R&D, tests and simulations, feasibility: 2006-2008 new horn prototype: 2009 R. Garoby 6

What ? Muons Front End (K. Long): MICE Phase II Contribution to concept development of Geer’s scheme: Development of front end (phase-rotation, bunching, cooling scheme etc.) in context of end-to-end design Technological developments for normal conducting/high gradient cavities (in high B field), sc magnets, RF power sources… Investigation of “novel” cooling schemes [helical cooler, cooling in a ring (FFAG ?), …] R. Garoby 7

What ? Muons Acceleration and storage (F. Meot): Need for major effort on beam dynamics. Acceleration: numerous schemes available (FFAGs, RLA) & no obvious “winner” today => need for technological developments (Superconducting RF & high power RF hardware, study of FFAGs potential…) + comparisons Storage: 2 possibilities (racetrack or triangle) => technological developments (magnets, RF, kickers,…) R. Garoby 8

How ? Numerous proposals submitted to ESGARD. Unlikely to be integrated in a single I3 (R. Edgecock). Look for synergy with other teams (FFAGs with industry and medicine, sc RF with ILC, Target and radioprotection with IFMIF/EURISOL/n spallation sources…) However, need for a coordinating body. R. Garoby 9