Newborn Screening: Achieving Timeliness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Advertisements

Day 2 You receive 2 reports on your desk –The first describes the possibility of expanding the states newborn screening panel to include Severe Combined.
Prematurity Campaign Programs and Resources Vicki Lombardo, MSN, RN November 8, 2012.
Restructuring the Cancer Programs and Task Force Workgroups.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Fact sheet Policies and Programs to Address Drug-Exposed Newborns The use or abuse of either illegal or prescription drugs during pregnancy can have serious.
Missouri Newborn Hearing Screening: A status report Jenna M. Bollinger, B.A. Department of Communication Disorders & Deaf Education Fontbonne University.
Newborn Screening & Medical Foods Policy Overview Fatty Oxidation Disorders/Organic Acidemia Association Annual Conference July 26, 2014 Melanie Lockhart.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
1 Legal Framework for the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC) Legal Framework for the Secretary’s.
Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease
Newborn Screening Overview Marie Mann, M.D., M.P.H. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal.
Integration of Child Health Information Systems (CHIS) Public Health Data Standards Consortium March 2004 Deborah Linzer, MS MCHB/Genetic Services Branch.
In Collaboration with NewSTEPs: Data collection efforts at the national level for newborn screening quality improvement Marci K Sontag, PhD NewSTEPs (Newborn.
John Eichwald, Team Lead Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease.
Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease using Pulse Oximetry Legislative Advocacy Anoop Rao PGY2, Pediatrics Image
Improving Perinatal Data— the State Perspective Isabelle Horon, Dr.P.H. Director, Vital Statistics Administration Maryland Department of Health and Mental.
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Genetic Services Branch Joan A. Scott, M.S., C.G.C. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child.
Georgia’s Newborn Surveillance & Tracking System (NSTS) Akilah Heggs, MA, CCC-A Susan Bertonaschi, M.S. Elisa Stamey, R.N. Georgia Division of Public Health.
History of the Other Work of the SACHDNC Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, MS September 22, 2011.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of the Critical Congenital Heart Defect Screening Program Emily Reddy, OTR New England Genetics Collaborative (NEGC)
Improving Data Quality and Quality Assurance in Newborn Screening by Including the Bloodspot Screening Collection Device Serial Number on Birth Certificates.
1 NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY Subcommittee on Quality Measures for Children's Healthcare in Medicaid and CHIP Overview.
Big Strides for Small Patients: Developmental Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Department of Pediatrics Jerold Stirling, MD Rebecca Turk, MD Melanie.
Bob Bowman, MS Director of Genomics & Newborn Screening Indiana State Department of Health.
Proposed Changes to Advisory Committee Processes Sara Copeland, MD Designated Federal Official Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in.
CDC’s Preemie Act Activities Wanda Barfield, MD, MPH, FAAP Director, Division of Reproductive Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and.
Recommendations and a Plan for Preventing Preterm Birth Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality (SACIM) August 10, 2015.
Partnering with Your March of Dimes Executive Summary Edition.
Evidence Review Group: Past to Present James M. Perrin, MD Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy.
The NCC is funded by U22MC24100, awarded as a cooperative agreement between the Maternal and Child Health Bureau/Health Resources and Services Administration,
Update on SACHDNC Administrative Processes Sara Copeland, MD Chief, Genetics Services Branch Designated Federal Officer Secretary’s Advisory Committee.
March of Dimes National Prematurity Campaign and the PREEMIE Act (Public Law ) Dr. Jennifer L. Howse President, March of Dimes Secretary’s Advisory.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
Using Data for Program Improvement State and Local Activities in Minnesota Lisa Backer: 619 Coordinator/Part C Data Manager Loraine Jensen: Part C Coordinator.
TEXAS NEWBORN SCREEN PRESENTED BY: SHAYNA BAUMAN & ROSA CARRANZA UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AT GALVESTON ADVANCED NEONATAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT GNRS.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD): The Wisconsin Experience Region IV Genetics Meeting September 11, 2012 Sharon Fleischfresser.
Why? 1 in 100 newborns have congenital heart defects 25% of all CHD are critical (CCHD) requiring intervention in the.
About Newborn Screening  Newborn Screening Facts - A brief introduction to the most important information on newborn screening.
Federal Welcome: A View from the Office of HIV/AIDS and
Kent CHAP History Health Net of West Michigan. Kent CHAP History Health Net of West Michigan.
Reducing global mortality of children and newborns
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
California Department of Public Health (CDPH)
Planning for healthy babies
Expanding Newborn Screening Services for [STATE]
RAcE Niger Final Evaluation Results
Timely Screening Can Be Lifesaving In newborn babies, many disorders are not obvious at the time of birth but they can be life threatening or may lead.
The Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Program Overview
2009 Market Rate Study Overview and Update.
World Birth Defects Day 3 March 2018
Expanding Newborn Screening Services for [STATE]
Planning for healthy babies
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
First Annual National EHDI Meeting
SCHS and Health Statistics
Introduction on HRSA Funded CCHD Activities September 21, 2018
Newborn Bloodspot Screening: bringing it under the Screening Umbrella
Planning for healthy babies
Gerard R. Martin, MD Medical Director, Global Services
World Birth Defects Day – March 3, 2019
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
South Carolina Health Care Association
Newborn screening is a type of population screening to detect rare and serious conditions that can be easily and hastily treated before serious symptoms.
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
SAMPLE ONLY Dominion Health Center: Your Community Healthcare Home (or another defining message) Dominion Health Center is a community health center.
Presentation transcript:

Newborn Screening: Achieving Timeliness Newborn Screening (NBS) is a public health program that provides early identification and follow-up for treatment of infants affected by certain genetic, metabolic, hormonal, and/or functional conditions. The success of NBS programs has made screening routine for over four million infants born in the United States each year. Screening tests are done using a few drops of blood from a newborn’s heel, usually within 24- 48 hours after birth, or by functional testing such as a hearing test, and pulse oximetry test. Each state or territory operates by law, its own NBS program. Prior to the passage of the original Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act in Congress in 2008, individual programs varied in the number and quality of newborn screening tests. Today, 44 states and the District of Columbia require screening for at least 29 of the 32 treatable core conditions. These 32 core disorders are listed on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) which is reviewed by the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC). Recent additions to RUSP include: severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), critical congenital heart disease (CCHD), and Pompe disease. Adding Newborn Screenings to the State Panel Currently, conditions are added to the RUSP upon approval by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, based on evidence review and a recommendation from the SACHDNC. When considered to add condition to the state newborn panel, state programs should ensure that every newborn is screened at birth for conditions/disorders that meet all of the following public health criteria: 1) there is documented medical benefit to the affected infant from early detection, and treatment; 2) there is a reliable screening test for the disorder; and 3) early detection can be made from newborn blood spots, or other specific means. The 32 core conditions on the RUSP meet all three public health criteria for adding new newborn screening conditions. March of Dimes is supportive of state policies that include a provision that would automatically add conditions to the state newborn panel once it is approved for the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services. Issue brief Newborn Screening: Achieving Timeliness What is newborn screening? Each year, more than 12,000 babies with serious but treatable conditions are identified by state newborn screening programs. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, newborn screening is one of the great public health achievements in the 20th century. In order to identify these serious and potentially fatal conditions, health professionals use newborn screening tests. In most cases, these tests require small samples of a newborn’s blood taken before the baby leaves the hospital or within 1-2 days of birth that are analyzed in state laboratories. The results are reported to the child’s health care provider. Thousands of infants have been rescued from disability and death due to the success of current screening practices.1   What is timeliness in newborn screening? Because newborn screening is largely a state-specific public health activity, hospital protocols and laboratory requirements vary significantly across the country. Newborn screening is a multi-step process that involves individual providers, hospital administrators, state health departments, laboratory staff, and courier services to transport blood spots. In November 2013, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel series Deadly Delays reported on serious delays in testing and followup among newborn screening programs across the country. Key factors in these delays included laboratories being closed on weekends and holidays, slow transport of samples, and insufficient tracking and followup of hospitals that sent late samples. 2 Since then, state and federal officials and stakeholders have been working to improve programs. In 2015, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children recommended timeliness goals for newborn screening programs and established a benchmark for states to achieve 95% of each goal. Those goals include reporting all newborn screening results no later than 7 days after birth and presumptive positive results for time-critical conditions within 5 days. Initial samples should be collected no later than 48 hours after birth and should be received at the laboratory within one or two days for testing.3 Barriers and Solutions Barriers to timely newborn screening can occur at multiple points in the process. They can include inconsistent hospital protocols, transport of multiple days of blood samples in batches, and insufficient laboratory hours and workforce. 3 To address these barriers, states have implemented a number of changes in newborn screening practices including improving transit times, utilization of courier services and expanded laboratory operating hours. Key Points Newborn screening involves the collection of a blood sample, transport of the sample to a state laboratory, and reporting of the results to the health care provider. Newborn screening protocols are not uniform across the states and as such there are inconsistencies in timely results reporting. Timeliness goals include collecting samples no later than 48 hours and reporting results no later than 7 days after birth. Solutions to timeliness barriers include addressing transit time, courier service and lab hours. States that have expanded lab hours indicate improvement in meeting timeliness goals. t The March of Dimes is a national voluntary health agency whose volunteers and staff work to improve the health of infants and children by preventing birth defects, premature birth and infant mortality. Founded in 1938, the March of Dimes funds programs of research, community services, education and advocacy. For the latest resources and information, visit marchofdimes.org or nacersano.org.

State Examples References Improving transit times In 2014, Arizona turned its newborn screening program into a model other states can follow in just a few short months, earning it the first-ever Newborn Screening Quality Award from the March of Dimes. Through the Transit Time Project, the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) established a policy of full transparency for the length of time it takes Arizona hospitals to send newborn blood samples to the lab for analysis, and set a target of having 95 percent of samples screened within 72 hours. 4 Utilizing a courier service In 2015, the Utah Department of Health’s (UDOH) Newborn Screening Program received the Governor’s Award for Excellence for its efforts in improving timeliness and other operational improvement by partnering with FedEx and the Utah Hospital Association to ensure all blood samples would be received by the lab within three days and at no cost to the hospital. 5 Expanding laboratory hours As of April 2017, 33 newborn screening (NBS) programs reported operating at six or seven days a week (see map),6 greatly increasing the lab’s ability to receive and process specimens in a timely fashion. It has been demonstrated that states with expanded newborn screening lab hours are more likely to achieve the 95% timeliness reporting goal.7 References 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Newborn screening portal. Retrieved May 25, 2017, from https://www.cdc.gov/newbornscreening/index.html 2. Gabler, E. Deadly Delays, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Published November 16, 2013. 3. US Government Accountability Office. (2016). Newborn screening timelines No. GAO-17-196) 4. Arizona Department of Health Services. http://www.azdhs.gov/preparedness/state-laboratory/newborn-screening/index.php#transit-time-home 5. Utah Department of Health http://udohnews.blogspot.com/2015/05/newborn-screening-program-receives.html?_sm_au_=iVVH0rq8TF4WWntH 6. Summary of NBS Operating Hours Survey Results, April 2017: https://www.newsteps.org/newborn-screening-program-operating-hours 7. Newborn Screening Technical assistance and Evaluation Program (NewSTEPs). (2016). NewSTEPs collaborative improvement and innovation network (CoIIN) for timeliness in newborn screening: Final report