Hatch-Waxman Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Richard J. Berman, Partner Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC
Advertisements

Patent-Extender Drugs: Loop-holes in the Law Sandy H. Yoo 4/14/06.
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA Lawrence T. Welch Eli Lilly and Company.
The Gaming of Pharmaceutical Patents Brief Overview.
An Introduction to the Hatch-Waxman Act and ANDA Litigation
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
FDA Counsel.com 1 ANDAs, OTCs, Orphans and Cosmetics -- Key Issues Wednesday, August 18, 2004 SDRAN RAC STUDY COURSE Michael A. Swit, Esq. FDACounsel.com.
What You Need to Know About Biosimilars: Products, Recent Deals, IP Issues and Licensing August 2, 2012 Madison C. Jellins 1.
Hatch Waxman: Prescriptions for Innovative and Inexpensive Medicines
1 Law School For Pharmaceutical And Medical Manufacturer Executives Understanding Your Company’s Antitrust Exposure While Litigating Or Settling Patent.
Hatch-Waxman Reforms Under The “Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, And Modernization Act 2003” Brian V. Slater, Esq. Fitzpatrick,
The Hatch-Waxman Act and How it Works: Balancing Incentives to Innovate with the Need for Affordable Drugs Minnesota Intellectual Property Association.
Prof. David W. Opderbeck Seton Hall University Law School Gibbons Institute of Law, Science & Technology.
Patent Term Adjustments and Extensions
The Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations
Leveraging Pharmaceutical Patent Exclusivities Michael R. Dzwonczyk Sughrue Mion, PLLC Global Perspective on Pharma and Biotech Patents Taj Residency,
Development and Review Process of NDA, ANDA/AADA and OTC Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Associate Professor Department of Pharmaceutics KLE.
AXINN, VELTROP & HARKRIDER LLP © 2007 | The PIV Notice Letter Essential Considerations and Necessary Requirements Chad A. Landmon 90 State.
Legal and Regulatory Considerations When Pursuing an ANDA Shaoyu Chen Managing Director China Food and Drug Practice Covington & Burling LLP Third DIA.
A New Pathway for Follow-on Biologics Presented by: Steve Nash May 7, 2010.
Regulation of Generic Drugs Office of Generic Drugs Craig Kiester Regulatory Support Branch.
© 2009 Pharmaceutical Law Group PC Market Exclusivity Paradigm Gregory J. Glover, MD, JD Pharmaceutical Law Group
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
Subsequent Entry Biologics (SEBs) – Canada Presentation to AIPLA Biotechnology Committee January 25, 2012 Daphne C. Lainson
Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. AIPLA BIOTECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE Pinning Down a Moving Target: Patenting Biotech in Uncertain Times.
2011 Japanese Patent Law Revision AIPLA Annual Meeting October 21, 2011 Yoshi Inaba TMI Associates.
Follow-on or Biosimilar Biologic s Points to Consider Paul Kim Foley Hoag LLP Massachusetts Biotechnology Council Thursday, May 28, 2009 © 2008 Foley Hoag.
Safe Harbor or Not: Application of 271(e)(1) to Pioneering Drug Discovery Activities Susan Steele October 21, 2003.
ADAMS & ADAMS Intellectual Property within the Pharmaceutical Industry Presentation to SAPRAA. 04 September 2009 By : Alexis Apostolidis B.Sc (Chem, Law);
© 2008 Dechert LLP Pharma v. Pharma or Pharma & Pharma: The Legal Interface Between the Makers of Original and Copied Versions of Medicines AIPLA Antitrust,
The Research Use Exception to Patent Infringement Earlier cases Whittemore v. Cutter 29 F. Cas (C.C.D. Mass. 1813) “It could never have been the.
The FDA: Basic Facts It takes 12 to 15 years to develop a single drug Only 1 in 10,000 potential medications makes it completely through the process Only.
Our PatientsOur PeopleOur BusinessOur Community © 2008 Endo Pharmaceuticals. All Rights Reserved. Biosimilars 2009 Update Pending Legislation Review Pam.
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues Hosted by: Update on U.S. Patent Legislation.
GMP- A Regulatory Perspective. Regulatory Perspective in entering Global Pharma Markets.
Hatch-Waxman As Amended (MMA) Thomas O. Henteleff Kleinfeld, Kaplan and Becker, LLP November 9, 2005.
Defenses & Counterclaims III Class Notes: March 27, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
CDER/Office of Generic Drugs1 Regulatory Issues Related to Crystal Habits - Polymorphism 1:45 - 2:00Polymorphs - What’s the Problem? Gary Buehler, R. Ph.,
 An Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) contains data which when submitted to FDA's CDER, Office of Generic Drugs, provides for the review and ultimate.
1 Bolar Provisions in Europe Robert Watson Chartered Patent Attorney European Patent Attorney AIPLA, February 2006.
International Patent Litigation Speakers: –David Marcus, Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Chief Patent Counsel, Comcast Cable Communications.
BARASH LAW LLC Case Competition Eyal H. Barash BARASH LAW LLC January 29, 2016
Recent FTC Pharmaceutical Cases: Background and Examples Sue H. Kim This presentation was prepared from public sources. The views expressed herein do not.
MECHANICS LIENS: NEW CHANGES & OLD ISSUES Ryan Hiss, Lyman & Nielsen, LLC Brienne Berscheid, Chicago Title Insurance Company.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 11 – Bio/Pharma Issues 1.
Invoicing Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October.
Cheaper Drugs Today And Better Drugs Tomorrow History The industry’s lobbying efforts were well-timed. In the late 1970s, the U.S. economy was in recession.
University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law
Inter Partes Review and District Court
Paediatric Medicine: The Paediatric Investigation Plan
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
New Drug Application(NDA) Vs Abbreviated new drug application (ANDA)
Enhanced Damages for Patent Infringement: Halo v. Pulse
MECHANICS LIENS: New Changes & Old Issues
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Project Control
Content of Tender Dossier - Instructions to Tenderers - Tenders
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
Interactive Session: Presentation of Scenarios and Q&A
Patent law update.
America Invents Act: Litigation Related Provisions
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
Speeding access to therapies
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA
IND Review Process Seoul National University
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SPORT AND RECREATION ON THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE SASREA APPEAL BOARD.
Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division
Generic vs Name Brand Drugs
Calculation of Damages in Korean Patent Litigation
Presentation transcript:

Hatch-Waxman Overview

Innovator Company Identifies Patents to FDA Orange Book Listing Innovator Company Identifies Patents to FDA Patents Generally Cover the Brand Product Must be Listed within 60 days of FDA Approval or 30 Days From Issuance Exclusivity Bearing vs. “Pop-Up” Most Common Types of Patents Listed: Compound Formulation Method of Use Polymorph Pharmacokinetic Profile Process Patents Cannot be Listed | CONFIDENTIAL

ANDA Filer Certifies to FDA Patent Certification ANDA Filer Certifies to FDA Four Types of Certification Paragraph I – There is no patent information in the Orange Book Paragraph II – The patent(s) have all expired Paragraph III – The planned marketing will not occur until the expiry of the patent(s) Paragraph IV – That listed patents are invalid, unenforceable or not infringed 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii) Can have “mixed” certifications if more than 1 patent in the Orange Book | CONFIDENTIAL

ANDA Filer Must Provide Notice to Innovator Notice Letters ANDA Filer Must Provide Notice to Innovator Within 20 Days From FDA Acceptance of ANDA Immediately for Patent Amendments on “Pop-Up” Patents Notice Letters Contain: Detailed Bases for Allegations of Invalidity, Unenforceability, and/or Non-Infringement Need not be all bases that may later be alleged Offer for Confidential Access Sent to Patentee and NDA Holder Patentee/NDA Holder Has 45 Days from Receipt to Sue Can still sue after 45 Days, but no 30-month Stay | CONFIDENTIAL

Patentee/NDA Holder Can Sue Lawsuit Patentee/NDA Holder Can Sue If filed within 45 Days of Receipt of Notice Letter – 30 Month Stay of FDA Approval No 30-Month Stay for: Suits filed after 45-Days Later-Listed “Pop-Up” Patents Additional 30-Month Stays For: New Strengths New Uses* | CONFIDENTIAL

Unique Provisions of Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor to File ANDA Work Reasonable Related to FDA Submission Exempted. 35 U.S.C. §271(e)(1) Artificial Act of Infringement No Marketing of Accused Product Has Occurred 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2) 30-Month Stay of Approval 180-Day Exclusivity for First PIV ANDA Filer Can be Forfeited in Certain Circumstances. 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(iv)(D) | CONFIDENTIAL

Unique Provisions of Hatch-Waxman New Chemical Entities 5 Years of Regulatory/Data Exclusivity No ANDAs filed until 4 Years after NDA Approval Gets 7.5 Years from Approval Instead of 30-Month Stay New Uses/Dosage Forms Eligible for Other Regulatory Exclusivities | CONFIDENTIAL

Unique Provisions of Hatch-Waxman Bench Trials Usually No Damages Unless ANDA Product is Launched Often Many Defendants Joined | CONFIDENTIAL

Additional Considerations IPR In the Patent Office More Limited Defenses Shorter Timeline Different Evidentiary Standards Can Be Filed Any Time Have Caused Stays | CONFIDENTIAL