PPR Clinical Vetting Session:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding your Potentially Preventable Readmissions (PPR) Reports Minnesota Hospital Association Mickey Reid, Patient Safety and Quality Manager December.
Advertisements

Context and Overview of Recommended Actions to Reduce Psychiatric Readmissions Michael Trangle, MD Associate Medical Director, Behavioral Health Division.
| 1| 1Peer Report: Dialysis Care & Outcomes in the U.S., 2014 | Hospitalization Peer Report: Dialysis Care & Outcomes in the U.S., 2014 Hospitalization.
Changes to Performance-Based Payment Programs
HOSPITAL PAYMENT MODERNIZATION CONNECTICUT’S OPPORTUNITY FOR CHANGE November 2013.
Vicky A. Mahn-DiNicola RN, MS, CPHQ Vice President, Solutions Strategy
Readmissions Coordinating & Transforming Care August 23, 2012.
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council PHC4 Health Care Toolkit.
The Big Puzzle Evolving the Continuum of Care. Agenda Goal Pre Acute Care Intra Hospital Care Post Hospital Care Grading the Value of Post Acute Providers.
Estimating Readmission Rates using Incomplete Data: Implications for Two Methods of Hospital Profiling William J. O’Brien, Qi Chen, Hillary J. Mull, Ann.
Validation of Mayo Clinic Risk Adjustment Model for In-Hospital Mortality following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions using the National Cardiovascular.
One stage coronary and peripheral intervention Pawel Buszman, MD, American Heart of Poland, Ustron Silesian Medical School, Katowice.
Potentially Preventable Readmissions: Overview of Definitions and Clinical Logic HSCRC April 6, 2010 Elizabeth McCullough, 3M Health Information Systems.
Preventable Hospitalization Costs and Mapping Tool John Bott Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets July 21, 2010.
Achieving High-Quality, Low Cost Care Amidst Payment System Reform
Ryan Kelly Dr. Nicolas Shammas Christine Beuthin Jackie Carlson Marti Cox Kathy Lenaghan Dr. Ram Niwas Dr. Jon Lemke 06/18/15 ASSESSMENT OF TIME TO HOSPITAL.
3M Health Information Systems APR-DRGs: A Practical Update.
What is Clinical Documentation Integrity? A daily scavenger hunt.
23 september 2010 Dr. H. Pincé – UZ Leuven Validity of PPR grouper for a university hospital.
The Transition to What you need to know for Endocrinology Date | Presenter Information.
AHRQ Quality Indicators 2005 AHRQ QI User Meeting September 26, 2005 Marybeth Farquhar, AHRQ.
PPR Clinical Vetting Session: November 1 st 2010.
Adverse Outcomes After Hospitalization and Delirium in Persons with Alzheimer Disease Charles Wang, PharmD Candidate.
Place picture here Potentially Preventable Readmissions RARE Mental Health Collab. Mark Sonneborn February 2014.
Non-Preventable Readmissions Are Assigned to One of 7 Categories: 1.Not Clinically Related 2.Clinically Related, but not preventable 3.Planned 4.Trauma.
Community Outreach to Reduce Disparities in Cardiovascular & Diabetes Morbidity & Mortality in the South Bronx Michael Alderman, MD Michelle Johnson, MD,
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) László Tornóci Inst. Pathophysiology Semmelweis University.
Comparative Effectiveness of Hospital Outcomes in Medicare Inpatient Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (ELC)  Data source: Medicare Limited Data Set.
Inpatient Quality Reporting In Colorado Sept HCUP User Group Meeting.
June Today’s meeting How are we doing? National perspective Project RED Break out sessions – what are you doing.. On admission During the stay At.
“NHS South Central – Improving health and alleviating the causes of poor health for the benefit of patients, the public and taxpayer alike in Oxfordshire,
If I want to identify potential delivery records, which DRG is the best for me?
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries in Long-term Care Hospitals William Buczko, Ph.D. Research Analyst Centers for Medicare.
3 rd Annual Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists Conference.
AHRQ QI Guide to Comparative Reporting AHRQ Annual Conference September 10, 2008 Bethesda, MD Presented by Sheryl Davies.
2016 Annual Data Report, Vol 1, CKD, Ch 4
Episodes of Care TennCare Episodes.
American Joint Replacement Registry
Reduction Of Readmissions To Hospitals Based on Actionable Knowledge Discovery and Personalization Zbigniew W.  Ras Sponsored by.
PfP Quality Metrics: Readmissions, Value-Based Purchasing and Beyond
Thirty-day Readmissions Following CABG Surgery in New York JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011;4(5): Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Lahey SJ, Culliford.
Interdisciplinary Team Role Play
APR DRG Classification Data Elements
Leah Savage MSN, RN, CCDS Norton Children’s Hospital
Volume 1: Chronic Kidney Disease
Courtney selby, Pharm.d. arcare pgy1 Community pharmacy resident
Potentially Preventable readmissions policy
Bayard R. Wilson, BA, Kathryn R. Tringale, BS, Brian R
Introducing-Hospital AdvisorTM by SubimoTM
Measuring Efficiency HSCRC Performance Measurement Workgroup
MARYLAND HEALTH SERVICES COST REVIEW COMMISSION
Presented by Joe Nichols MD Principal – Health Data Consulting
FHA Collaborative on Reducing Readmissions in Florida
Volume 2: End-Stage Renal Disease Chapter 4: Hospitalization
Chapter 4: Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with CKD
Section V: Erectile dysfunction: The patients you see
Syncope: Outcomes and Conditions Associated with Hospitalization
Benchmarking Clinicians using Data Balancing
The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index.
Non-Preventable Readmissions Are Assigned to One of 7 Categories:
MARYLAND HEALTH SERVICES COST REVIEW COMMISSION
Costs Per Inpatient Condition
Potentially Preventable Readmissions
No Financial Disclosure or Conflict of Interest
Elizabeth McCullough, 3M Health Information Systems
Measuring Efficiency HSCRC Performance Measurement Workgroup
Potentially Preventable Readmissions
Potentially Preventable Readmissions
Benchmarking Clinicians using Data Balancing
Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing Greater Los Angeles Care Coordination Learning and Action Network Lindsay Holland, MHA, Director,
Presentation transcript:

PPR Clinical Vetting Session: November 1st 2010

Identification of clinically unrelated readmissions designated as preventable It will always be possible to identify individual cases for which the readmission was a) probably planned or b) probably not preventable Identifying exceptions to the PPR logic misses the point of a system that is based on rates, and seeks to identify deviation from expected performance based on peer-hospital rates It is precisely because of the impossibility of specifying all possible rules, exceptions, and details for what constitutes a preventable readmission that the PPR system is built upon the comparison of rates.

Identification of clinically unrelated readmissions designated as preventable - 2 The guiding principle in identifying combinations of initial admissions and readmissions that might be potentially preventable was the following: If a hospital has a rate of a particular kind of readmission that is substantially higher than its peer hospitals, then reasonable clinicians would be concerned that a problem with the quality of patient care existed. Unless the APR DRG pair that constitutes a potentially preventable readmission can be demonstrated to be typically planned or unpreventable, then the existing logic, which was the product of an intensive iterative process of clinical hypothesis generation and testing, should stand.

How responsible is the discharging hospital for readmissions for the deterioration of a chronic condition?

Time Interval for Preventable Readmissions

Risk Adjustment – APR DRG Severity of Illness Levels

Top 10 Medical APR DRGs for Frequency of PPRs, by SOI (Florida 2005-2006)   All Pts SOI 1 SOI 2 SOI 3 SOI 4 194 Heart Failure Chains 15,053 1,304 8,151 4,675 923 Rate 12.5 8.9 11.7 15.0 19.4 140 Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 8,271 1,737 3,745 2,416 373 9.7 7.3 9.3 12.7 17.3 750 Schizophrenia 7,592 3,382 3,931 251 28 17.7 17.1 18.1 20.8 16.8 139 Other Pneumonia 7,579 393 3,295 3,394 497 7.7 2.7 6.5 11.4 16.4 751 Major Depressive Disorder 5,608 1,814 3,391 339 64 10.9 8.3 12.6 16.5 10.8 198 Angina Pectoris & Coronary Atherosclerosis 5,151 1,414 2,685 982 70 5.6 3.7 6.2 9.9 753 Bipolar Disorders 4,830 2,366 2,260 179 25 14.0 15.3 18.8 11.6 720 Septicemia & Disseminated Infection 4,370 46 881 1,808 1,635 3.6 19.3 460 Renal Failure 4,288 92 471 3,250 475 12.8 11.0 10.6 21.1 201 Card Arrhythmia & Conduction Disturbance 4,066 898 1,950 1,070 148 6.3 4.0 6.4 10.2 16.0 All Other Medical APR DRGs 41,412 8,036 15,942 13,011 4,423 2.9 1.7 2.5 5.0 9.4 Total Medical APR-DRG 108,220 21,482 46,702 31,375 8,661 3.2 4.7 7.4 These numbers are 1) the total number of PPR chains (Number of initial admissions with at least 1 PPR) and 2) the rate – no. of PPR chains/ no. of candidate admissions

Top 10 Surgical APR DRGs for Frequency of PPRs, by SOI (Florida 2005-2006)   Surgical APR DRG All Pts SOI 1 SOI 2 SOI 3 SOI 4 175 Percutaneous Cardiovascular Procs w/o AMI Chains 7,260 3,222 2,850 1,043 145 Rate 7.9 6.4 9.0 12.7 14.8 221 Major Small & Large Bowel Procedures 3,426 606 1,201 913 706 9.4 6.0 8.3 11.1 19.5 173 Other Vascular Procedures 3,186 627 1,140 1,075 344 11.3 6.9 10.2 16.9 23.7 174 Percutaneous Cardiovascular Procedures with AMI 3,115 791 1,288 648 388 9.8 10.0 14.4 18.5 165 Coronary Bypass with Cath or PCI 2,638 101 909 1,073 555 12.3 7.2 9.3 13.9 21.5 301 Hip Joint Replacement 2,870 1,123 1,106 445 196 6.2 5.1 8.9 21.4 308 Hip/femur Procedure x Joint Replacement d/t Trauma 2,395 234 1,115 835 211 8.0 4.9 10.6 302 Knee Joint Replacement 2,373 780 1,323 233 37 4.0 2.9 4.5 7.4 13.1 161 Cardiac Defibrillator & Heart Assist Implant 2,048 113 614 1,132 189 171 Perm Card Pacemaker w/o AMI, CHF, or Shock 2,044 523 1,068 382 71 8.1 5.5 8.7 19.6 All Other Surgical 36,608 8,940 13,142 10,196 4,330 6.1 3.2 12.4 18.6 Total Surgical APR-DRG 67,963 17,060 25,756 17,975 7,172 6.8 19.0

Percutaneous cardiovascular procedures w/o AMI Predicted v. Actual Number of PPRs for Reporting Year 2007 Florida, Selected APR DRGs (Based on Calendar Year 2005 Rate) Admission Volume APR Description SOI CY 05 PPR Rate RY07 Volume Predicted Actual 540   Cesarean delivery 1 0.03% 56,689 15 16 2 0.06% 17,269 11 9 3 0.09% 4,820 4 0.98% 295 Sub Total 0.04% 79,073 33 28 139 Other pneumonia 3.14% 6,828 215 246 7.38% 21,987 1,622 1,677 12.71% 12,314 1,565 1,654 17.77% 1,387 222 8.58% 42,516 3,648 3,799 175 Percutaneous cardiovascular procedures w/o AMI 7.90% 20,312 1,604 1,474 11.15% 14,902 1,662 1,596 15.84% 4,906 777 761 18.04% 639 115 164 10.20% 40,759 4,158 3,995

Predicted v. Actual Number of PPRs for Reporting Year 2007 Florida, Selected APR DRGs (Based on Calendar Year 2005 Rate) APR Description SOI PPR Rate 2007 Volume Predicted Actual 194   Heart failure 1 11.04% 4,852 535 591 2 14.61% 24,769 3,618 3,767 3 18.53% 14,833 2,748 2,820 4 18.38% 1,870 344 373 Sub Total 15.64% 46,324 7,245 7,551 750 Schizophrenia 21.26% 4,610 980 941 22.42% 10,138 2,273 2,407 25.44% 791 201 191 20.51% 45 9 12 22.23% 15,584 3,464 3,551 460 Renal failure 13.76% 387 53 47 13.29% 2,283 303 286 14.21% 16,040 2,279 2,258 18.17% 1,331 242 295 14.36% 20,041 2,878 2,886

PPR Performance Florida data, FY 2005 vs RY 2006 Pearson Correlation Coefficient = 0.9976 (Calendar year ’05, Reporting year ’07) Hospital level R-square = 0.45

“Elective” Admissions as a proxy for planned readmissions

Readmissions with one of these procedures following an Initial Admission for DRG 301 (Total Hip Replacement) WILL be considered preventable: 0070 Revision of hip replacement, both acetabular and femoral components 0071 Revision of hip replacement, acetabular component 0072 Revision of hip replacement, femoral component 0073 Revision of hip replacement, acetabular liner and/or femoral head only 8153 Revision of hip replacement, not otherwise specified

Readmissions with one of these procedures following an Initial Admission for DRG 301 (Total Hip Replacement) will be considered PLANNED, and not preventable: 0085 Resurfacing hip, total, acetabulum and femoral head 0086 Resurfacing hip, partial, femoral head 0087 Resurfacing hip, partial, acetabulum 8151 Total Hip Replacement 8152 Partial Hip Replacement

Re DRG 173 (Other Vascular Procedures) Readmissions for endovascular grafts following peripheral vascular procedures (procedure 3971) will be classified as planned. Re the suggestion that “Some patients cannot physiologically tolerate enough contrast and require 2 different vascular bypass procedures in order to perform multiple grafting.” This is not only an unusually rare group of patients but should be randomly distributed between hospitals. Thus this consideration does not merit excluding the entire group of readmissions, many of which are potentially preventable and should be adequately addressed in a rate-based system.

Re APR DRG 304 (Dorsal and Lumbar Fusion) Regarding the suggestion that “These fusion procedures may be done in a staged process requiring 2 separate planned admissions”: Based on consultation with orthopedists about this situation, staging is rarely done for dorsal and/or lumbar fusions.