Frye vs. United States By: Justin Anderson Alejandro Reyes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Evolving Forensic Sciences Joseph L. Peterson Sam Houston State University College of Criminal Justice Huntsville, Texas.
Advertisements

NC Court System.
Identification and Individualization
“We think they did it… now what?”. In general…  crime is committed  suspect identified  information / evidence collected  enough to establish probable.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF FORENSIC SCIENCE CHAPTER 2.
Legal Issues in Forensic Science Capt. Sanford Herzon, M.Ed. Thomas S. Wootton High School Montgomery County Public Schools.
When will the P300-CTP be admissible in U.S. Courts? J.Peter Rosenfeld & John Meixner Northwestern University.
Vocabulary Indictment- Determines if there is enough evidence for a defendant to go to trial Arraignment- Defendant is officially informed of charges and.
August 12,  Crime-scene investigators (police) arrive to find, collect, protect, and transport evidence. (More on this later!)
Briana Denney, Esq. of Newman & Denney P.C Briana Denney, Esq. of Newman & Denney P.C. E VIDENTIARY I SSUES R ELATING TO F ORENSIC R EPORTS.
Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.
Capital Punishment McCleskey v. Kemp 481 U.S. 279.
By: Elizabeth Yoder. THE ISSUE atch?v=lC15kOoe4_s SHOULD THE DEATH PENALTY BE ENFORCED??
COEN 252 Computer Forensics Writing Computer Forensics Reports.
Let’s review what you’ve learned.  Is where science and the law collide!  Study and application of science to the law.  Can be called criminalistics.
Forensic Science. In its broadest definition, forensic science is the application of science to criminal and civil laws Forensic science owes its origins.
SCIENCE AND LAW The case of the Italian Supreme Court ruling Paolo Vecchia Former Chairman of ICNIRP 1.
 Forensic Science. What is the relationship between science and the law?  Discuss the functions of the forensic crime lab  Understand key contributions.
Analytical Forensic Science The adventure Begins Now.
Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,
The Nature of Evidence A Guide to Legal Evidence & the Courts.
Analytical Forensic Science The adventure Begins Now.
REFLECTIONS ON EXPERT WITNESS TRAINING ACADEMY Mona Behl, Ph.D. Texas Sea Grant College Program Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
Chapter Ten – Lineups and Other Means of Pretrial Identification Rolando V. del Carmen.
Forensic Science and the Law. Federal Labs  FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation  DEA: Drug Enforcement Agency  ATF: Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.
Litigating a DNA Case.
FORENSIC SCIENTISTS, EXPERT TESTIMONY Notes 1.3. Objectives 1. Explain the role and responsibilities of the expert witness. 2. Compare and contrast the.
Skills of a Forensic Scientist & Frye vs. Daubert Standards
Court reporting is a fundamental part of journalism but the rules surrounding reporting change depending on the type of court you are reporting from.
1. True 1. True 2. True 2. True 3. True 3. True 4. False 4. False 5. True 5. True 6. True 6. True 7. False 7. False 8. True 8. True 9. True 9. True 10.
What is Forensic Science? the study and application of science to matters of law… it examines the associations among people, places, things and events.
Two Faces of Causality: A Small Case Study of the Admission of Scientific Evidence to Show Causality in a Bias and a Toxic Tort Case in the 4th Circuit.
1 What Is Scientific Evidence? Scientific evidence is most often presented in court by an expert witness testifying on expert opinions. It also includes.
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Chapter 8 Quiz Review. What act established the structure of the federal court system and became the first bill ever introduced in the Senate?
The Criminal Court System Chapter 7. In this chapter we will look at… The Criminal Court Structure The Criminal Court Structure The Participants The Participants.
September 10, 2012 Warm-up: Use pg. 13 in your text book to answer the following question: 1.What was the most significant modern advance in forensic science?
Admissibility. The Frye Standard  1923 – became the standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. To meet.
Plagiarism By: James, Petch Plagiarism, its bad.. and you know it!
Chapter 1 Review Game FORENSIC SCIENCE. PLEASE SELECT A TEAM: 1.Team Locard 2.Team Jeffries 3.Team Bertillon.
Jurisdictional Hierarchy in Australia. Magistrates Court Civil disputes with claims up to $150,000 Minor criminal offences such as simple assault, drink.
Jurisdiction and Inferior Courts Article III, Section 1.
Check your answers. 1. Remand: To send a case back to a lower court for a retrial. 2. Brief: a summary of what an attorney plans to say before the Supreme.
Jurisdictional Hierarchy in Australia. Magistrates Court Civil disputes with claims up to $150,000 Minor criminal offences such as simple assault, drink.
Classification of Offences
Capital Punishment What is Capital Punishment?
In Search of the Magic Lasso: The Truth About the Polygraph
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
Introduction Forensic science begins at the crime scene.
Laying the Foundation: Expert Witnesses
Unit 4 Word power.
NORTH CAROLINA COURTS.
Forensics Science and the Law
Process of Law.
Judicial Branch.
William Walsh CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
Warm-Up (61L) TURN BACK SEVERAL PAGES…
Growth in Recent years is due to:
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
The difference between original and appellate jurisdiction.
Important court decisions
Analytical Forensic Science
Get Started Immediately!
Courts and Court Systems
Case Studies Chapter 1.
Types of Evidence.
Chapter 1 Notes Groups 5, 6, 7.
Yoyo: QUESTION: A man was found dead with a cassette recorder in one hand and a gun in the other. When the police came in, they immediately pressed the.
1-3 Functions of a Forensic Scientist
Review Sheet for Judicial Branch
Presentation transcript:

Frye vs. United States By: Justin Anderson Alejandro Reyes

Summary James Frye gets away with the killing of a physician Later gets caught and convicted of armed robbery During the trial he is administered a primitive lie detector test which is unreliable. Due to the test, he avoids the death sentence.

Significance This case set the standard in scientific examinations. In court, all scientific evidence must meet a certain requirement to be deemed reliable . This is known as the “Frye Standard” This proves the admissibility aka legitimacy of the scientific evidence.

Works cited Fisher, J. (2008, June). Jim fisher. Retrieved from http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/forensics/frye.html Maskin, A. & Cailteux, K. (1998, Mar). The supreme court establishes standard of review for daubert decisions and reaffirms district court. Retrieved from http://www.weil.com/news/pubdetail.aspx?pub=3467

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.