Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1: Locations of rosette strain gauges (n = 10) on the cadaveric pelvis. * * * * * * * * * * G Figure 3: Fixture for loading the pelvis (A) actuator,
Advertisements

Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Measurement of Strain in the Left Ventricle during Diastole with cine-MRI and.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Incorporating Six Degree-of-Freedom Intervertebral Joint Stiffness in a Lumbar.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Multiaxis Programmable Robot for the Study of Multibody Spine Biomechanics Using.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Computational Prediction of Muscle Moments During ARED Squat Exercise on the International.
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tensile Properties of the Mandibular Condylar Cartilage J Biomech Eng. 2008;130(1):
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Three-Dimensional Modeling of Supine Human and Transport System Under Whole-Body.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Calibration Method on Tekscan Sensor Accuracy J Biomech Eng. 2008;131(3):
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A New Sensor for Measurement of Dynamic Contact Stress in the Hip J Biomech Eng.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Compressive Follower Load Influences Cervical Spine Kinematics and Kinetics During.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Use of Virtual, Interactive, Musculoskeletal System (VIMS) in Modeling and Analysis.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 9/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 9/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Effect of ACL Deficiency on MCL Strains and Joint Kinematics
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Simulation of Aperiodic Bipedal Sprinting
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Orifice Design of a Pilot-Operated Pressure Relief Valve
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Effect of High Strain Rate on Indentation in Pure Aluminum
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/4/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
A Rigid Mechanism With Uniform, Variable Curvature1
Date of download: 1/11/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/15/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Three-Dimensional-Printing of Bio-Inspired Composites
Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 3/4/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 3/5/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A New Sensor for Measurement of Dynamic Contact Stress in the Hip J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(3):035001-035001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4026103 Figure Legend: A hip joint contact stress sensor showing the ring-and-spoke configuration. The spoke leads, on the front (“UP”) of the sensor, and the ring leads, on the back, converge at the active region, where they are separated by an intervening layer of piezoresistive ink to form a grid of stress-sensing sensels. Eight 1-mm diameter holes on the periphery provide for suture tie-down to the acetabular labrum.

Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A New Sensor for Measurement of Dynamic Contact Stress in the Hip J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(3):035001-035001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4026103 Figure Legend: Hip contact stress sensor placement within a cadaver hip joint. (a) An oblique view of the femur showing the sensor positioned on the femoral head. The outer perimeter of the sensor active region rests approximately at the equator of the head. (b) An anterior view, showing the femoral head within the acetabulum. The periphery of the active region is still visible at the edge of the labrum. (c) A mediolateral view of the acetabulum only; arrows indicate where the sensor has been sutured to the labrum.

Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A New Sensor for Measurement of Dynamic Contact Stress in the Hip J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(3):035001-035001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4026103 Figure Legend: The hip sensor flat- and conical-calibration devices and representative contact patches. In (a), the flat upper platen spanned 12 spokes and 21 rings (not visible) of the sensor; (b) graphically indicates sensor raw output at an applied contact stress of approximately 10 MPa. Four repositionings of the platen were sufficient to calibrate the full surface of the sensor. (c) Conical upper platen with a sensor in place; raw output at 10 MPa is shown in (d). Two further rotations of the cone are sufficient to calibrate the entire sensor.

Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A New Sensor for Measurement of Dynamic Contact Stress in the Hip J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(3):035001-035001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4026103 Figure Legend: A hip motion simulator was used to drive a human cadaver hemi-pelvis through a user-programmed three-dimensional motion/force protocol. A PMMA-potted femur (a) is supported on a 2-DOF translational stage (b) (at 45 deg flexion in the case shown); the hemi-pelvis (c) is mounted to the inner yoke (d), which applies flexion/extension. The outer yoke (e) applies abduction/adduction while the Bionix axial-rotary actuator (f) delivers endorotation/exorotation and axial force. Hip joint forces and moments are transduced via a 6-DOF load cell (g).

Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A New Sensor for Measurement of Dynamic Contact Stress in the Hip J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(3):035001-035001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4026103 Figure Legend: Sensor calibration curves obtained with three different platen configurations. Comparison of the flat-platen curves, rigid versus 90A polyurethane (PU), indicated that the PU lining attenuated sensor output by approximately a factor of 4, to simulate in situ cartilage response. The flat- and conical-platen results, when both platens were lined with PU, were virtually identical, which indicated that sensor behavior was unaffected by substrate curvature.

Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A New Sensor for Measurement of Dynamic Contact Stress in the Hip J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(3):035001-035001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4026103 Figure Legend: A comparison of hip sensor measured contact stress (top) versus pressure-sensitive film measured stress (bottom) for a statically loaded cadaver hip joint. Stress patterns exhibited good qualitative agreement. (a) and (b) Heel strike during walking and heel strike during stair climbing, respectively. Applied loads and the percentage of applied load recovered by the sensor are listed in Table 3.

Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A New Sensor for Measurement of Dynamic Contact Stress in the Hip J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(3):035001-035001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4026103 Figure Legend: Contact stress dynamic results: Nine representative (of 80 total) frames recorded at 5 frames per second during a hip-simulator applied loading protocol. (a)–(c) were recorded during the load uptake phase; (d)–(f) were recorded during the joint flexion phase; and (g)–(i) were recorded during the load removal phase. Applied loads for each frame and the percentage of that load recovered by the sensor are listed in Table 3.