Our Vision Our vision is to be recognised nationally and internationally as a leader in qualification, assessment and verification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Unit Assessment The Nominee and Team Leader Role.
Advertisements

Head teacher Performance Management
SVQ in Food & Drink Operations External Verification Report.
Appraisal and performance management
How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
Computing Science CPD Presentation Internal Verification of National 4 and National 5 Units.
Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies CPD Presentation.
Engaging in Effective Performance Discussions June 6, 2013.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
Biology CPD Presentation Aims To supplement previously published information about the internal assessment of Biology Units at National 3, 4 and 5 To.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Assessment Writing What does it involve? Aims of workshop:  To explain the process through which Assessment Exemplars are developed  To explore how.
History CPD Presentation The Verification Process and Making Assessment Decisions.
The Nominee and Team Leader Role Understanding Unit Assessment Design and Manufacture National 4 & 5.
Development of Assessments Laura Mason Consultant.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Physical Education: Unit Assessment at Advanced Higher.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Your Performance Review
Nominee Training Event 2016
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Performance Management
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
OTLA Report Writing Training
SLP Training Day 3 30th September 2016
2017 HN Accounting Network Kim Tree.
QV Training August 2017: Report-writing
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
External Verification Report 2014/15
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Welcome.
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Governor Visits to School
Preparing for Systems Verification
What is performance management?
Why do we track children’s progress
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
NPQH Final Assessment.
NPQonline - Final Assessment
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
HN Accounting Network Kim Tree Writing an Alternative Assessment.
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Multi-agency Safeguarding Adults Policy and Procedure
Professional Tutor Conference 20th September 2018
The Assessment Process
Engaging People : Performance Monitoring
OTLA Report Writing Training
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Managing Internal Assessment
Governor Visits to School
3 Training Presentation Mar 16
TA Toolkit Teacher Session
Managing Internal Assessment
Handout 5: Feedback and support
Annual Professional Development Conference
Qualification Verification 2016/17
Performance management and appraisal
OTLA Report Writing Training
Reading Paper discussion – Week 4
Internal Verification and Standardisation
Internal Verification
Role of the Internal Verifier
Presentation transcript:

Our Vision Our vision is to be recognised nationally and internationally as a leader in qualification, assessment and verification.

OUR CORPORATE VALUES SQA will be known for being: Trusted Progressive Enabling

Outputs from external verification activity: Confirmation of the validity of the approach to assessment Confirmation of the reliability of assessment judgements Confirmation of the effectiveness of internal quality assurance Identification of good practice Provision of developmental advice Identification of materials which exemplify national standards The overall aim is to provide support and advice to our centres whilst ensuring that national standards are maintained.

WHY DO WE NEED VALUES SQA’s three corporate values define the way SQA staff work with each other and centre staff. Knowing what the corporate values are will help you understand how SQA would like you to engage with colleagues and staff in centres when carrying out your role. TRUSTED As an appointee, you play a key role in maintaining national standards ensuring the quality of assessment in your subject, carrying out verification and providing clear and professional reports to SQA centres. PROGRESSIVE You view new and unfamiliar approaches to assessment with an open mind whilst ensuring quality is maintained. You believe that creativity should be seen not as a threat to quality assurance but as an opportunity for improving on existing practice ENABLING You understand that by working in partnership with SQA centres you will achieve common goals of excellence and consistency in assessment. You maintain a professional approach at all times regardless of the challenges you might face in carrying out your work

THE ROLE OF THE EXTERNAL VERIFIER The role of the external verifier is not to reassess candidates work but to consider if the centre’s approach is valid and the assessment judgements reliable

AREAS OF CONCERN Communication – Oral and Written Tone Language Uncertainty –Centre isn’t sure what is being asked of them

Duties of an External Verifier Plan and conduct verification visits Ensure the validity and reliability of assessment instruments and reliability of assessment judgements Assess centres against verification criteria Make recommendations on the level of risk Set agreed actions plans Provide constructive feedback to centres and SQA Carry out follow up activity to ensure action plans are implemented Participate in training and CPD Sharing best practice

PERSONAL QUALITIES Listening and supporting Encouraging Advising Helping Motivating Diplomatic Empathetic Good communicator and listener Authoritive when required Know when to seek advice

FEEDBACK 1 Feedback starts at the beginning of the visit and continues throughout the visit. Yes, there may be a more formal feedback session at the end of the visit but it is vitally important that you view all discussions between you and centre staff as feedback. You can’t be saying one thing throughout the visit and then hit them with something different at the end. Encourage staff to ask for clarification and ask questions Preparing for more formal final feedback: Take time to structure and prepare for the more formal final feedback to centre staff Take time to consider the support you can offer the centre to improve processes

FEEDBACK 2 Check that all staff attending the final feedback are present before starting Thank centre staff for the preparations they have made for the visit, for engaging in interviews and discussions, for providing any additional evidence and for providing any additional evidence and for their hospitality. Provide an overview for each criteria Start with Positives Non Positive issues should be addressed in a supportive and constructive and manner – don’t use the term negative. Be specific not general – use the evidence gathered to cite examples to support your evaluations Outline what you have found to be good practice Outline any recommendations which will help to improve the process. Get the centre to agree to implement the recommendations and state this in the report.

FEEDBACK 3 Be clear on what the centre needs to do to resolve any actions and agree timelines All the time allow questions and discussion In your Report you must justify why they are Non Compliant Any agreed actions should be SMART We are now using Confidence Ratings instead of Significant Strengths Leave written evidence using the new summary of agreed action form Note the Event ID Tick box to indicate agreed action Leave a copy of the form If the Centre does not sign the agreed action form – Leave copy of the form and contact/inform SQA Logistics

RESISTANCE TO FEEDBACK You have made your decision – stand by your decision – pointing out again the evidence on which you are basing your decision Be authoritive but in a diplomatic way Be empathetic – supportive/encouraging/providing developmental advice

IMPACT OF POOR FEEDBACK HUGE CONSEQUENCES On Centre On Candidates On validity of you as an External Verifier – if Report is overturned or centre have not understood required actions. On reputation of SQA So unfair on other External Verifiers who are doing it properly

Workshop Exercise   In your group, consider the following scenarios; Your visit has concluded that all criteria has been met (Outcome Green) Your visit has concluded that some criteria has not been met i.e. 2.4/3.3/4.7 (Outcome Amber) Your visit has concluded that some criteria have not been met i.e. 4.2/4.3/4.6 (Outcome Red) Please discuss in your group how you would feed the above outcomes back to the centre on the day of the visit.