FIGURE 1. Low folate intake (E) may increase the risk of preterm delivery and infant low birth weight (C) (Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71(suppl):1295s–303s), and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1.06 Understand the fundamentals of wellness
Advertisements

Chapter 12 Maternal and Fetal Nutrition Debbie Hogan RN.
Jean Amoura, MD, MSc Marvin L.Stancil, MD.  Evaluate how fetal, infant, and childhood development is critical to understanding chronic diseases among.
Pregnancy And Lactation Copyright 2005 Wadsworth Group, a division of Thomson Learning Life Cycle Nutrition.
Prenatal Care ..
NUTRITION AND PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Congenital malformations and birth weight: a family perspective Dr. Kari K.Melve Department of Public Health & Primary Health Care University of Bergen,
Preventing Infant Mortality: What We Know, What We Don’t, and What You Can Do Tom Ivester, MD, MPH UNC School of Medicine Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine.
Healthy Before Pregnancy March of Dimes NC Preconception Health Campaign.
Nutrition Framing Maternal & Infant Nutrition.
Action and forces influence nutrition through life cycle (nutrition intervention) Maternity and Infancy Dr. Dina Qahwaji.
Copyright © 2008 Delmar. All rights reserved. Chapter 22 Maternal and Child Populations.
The Association between Antenatal Depression and Adverse Birth Outcomes among Women Receiving Medicaid in Washington State Amelia R. Gavin, PhD School.
Birth Defects and Complications / Diseases Objective: The student will be able to compare and contrast the different birth defects and complications /
Role of CBR Strategy on disability prevention and control Deepak Raj Sapkota Country Director Karuna Foundation Nepal.
Life Cycle: Maternal and Infant Nutrition BIOL 103, Chapter 12-1.
CityMatCH / NACCHO Emerging Issues in Maternal and Child Health Conference Call Impact of Healthy Weight in Mothers on Birth Outcomes August 19, 2004 Siobhan.
Reduced Risks of Neural Tube Defects and Orofacial Clefts With Higher Diet Quality Carmichael SL, Yang W, Feldkamp ML, et al; National Birth Defects Prevention.
Pregnancy And Lactation Copyright 2005 Wadsworth Group, a division of Thomson Learning Life Cycle Nutrition.
Problems in Prenatal Development
CONCLUSIONS Women with eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and eating disorders not otherwise specified, may be at increased.
Healthy Before Pregnancy
An Ounce of Prevention  2000, 2005, 2011 The Curators of the University of Missouri Preconception Planning and Monitoring Fetal Health Twenty Questions.
Human Development: Prenatal-Toddler Problems in Prenatal Development.
Instructor: Jose Davila
INFANT BIRTH OUTCOMES AMONG SUBSTANCE USING WOMEN: WHY QUITTING SMOKING IS JUST AS IMPORTANT AS QUITTING HARDER DRUGS Beth Bailey, PhD; Judy McCook, PhD,
Spina Bifida Association of America Mission: To promote the prevention of spina bifida and to enhance the lives of all affected Local Group Members 59.
Preterm Birth, Infant Mortality and Birth Defects National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
An Ounce of Prevention  2000, 2005, 2011 The Curators of the University of Missouri Chapter 1 Birth Defects.
CityMatCH / NACCHO Emerging Issues in Maternal and Child Health Conference Call Impact of Healthy Weight in Mothers on Birth Outcomes August 19, 2004 Siobhan.
A MOTHER CAN DO A LOT TO IMPROVE THE CHANCES OF HAVING A HEALTHY BABY PRENATAL CARE SHOULD BEGIN AFTER CONFIRMING PREGNANCY PRENATAL CARE: STEPS A PREGNANT.
Lifestyle factors associated with preterm births Felicity Ukoko RGN RM MSc Public Health Head of Programmes Wellbeing Foundation Africa.
CityMatCH PPOR Learning Network, Integrating PPOR and FIMR, June 2007 Integrating PPOR and FIMR CityMatCH PPOR Level 2 Learning Network Seminar Call, June.
Chapter 4 Pregnancy and Birth. During Pregnancy Eating well with healthy food is very important during pregnancy because eating fresh fruits are a rich.
NUR 231 Pediatric Nursing Laura Salisbury RN, MSN/Ed.
Lifestyle factors associated with preterm births
Family Health History Health project.
First Antenatal Assessment
Chapter 4.2: Problems in Prenatal Development
Copyright © 2013, 2004 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Factors that Influence Human Development
Drug Abuse and Pregnancy
Birth Defects The Basics.
Family Health History Health project.
Prenatal Development and Birth
Planning for healthy babies
Consequences of Teenage Pregnancy
Prenatal Development Activity
Maternal health and early years
FIGURE 1. Relative risk (RR) of clubfoot associated with having one or two copies versus no copies of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR)
Chapter 4: Risk Reduction
Uniting to Reduce Infant Mortality
Bronx Community Health Dashboard: Maternal and Child Health Last Updated: 1/31/2018 See last slide for more information about this project.
Chapter 11 Nutrition During Pregnancy and Infancy
Reassurance and Anxiety Reduction Meaningful Informed Decision Making
Pregnancy in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Lecture 4: Introduction to confounding (part 2)
Planning for healthy babies
1.06 Understand the fundamentals of wellness
Planning for healthy babies
Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine
Epidemiology of Reproductive and Early Years
Office of Public Health Studies
Copyright © 2013, 2004 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
Problems in Prenatal Development
Birth Defects and Complications
Copyright © 2013, 2004 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Breastfeeding Initiation: Impact of Obesity in a Large Canadian Perinatal Cohort Study Julie Verret-Chalifour, Yves Giguere, Jean-Claude Forest, Jordie.
Family Health History Health project.
Presentation transcript:

FIGURE 1. Low folate intake (E) may increase the risk of preterm delivery and infant low birth weight (C) (Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71(suppl):1295s–303s), and many birth defects (D) result in preterm deliveries and low birth weight infants (Am J Dis Child 1991;145:1313–18). From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 2. The association between multivitamin use (E) and pregnancy outcomes may be due to shared sociodemographic characteristics. For example, teen pregnancy age (U<sub>1</sub>) can result in lower micronutrient intake (J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:17–23) and in poor prenatal weight gain and low birth weight infants (it>C) (J Sch Health 1998;68:271–5). Some malformations (D) involve incomplete or small fetuses, which may have an impact on birth weight and maternal weight gain. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 3. The association between the birth defect of interest (D) and maternal weight gain (C) may be due to shared genetic characteristics, such as an enzymatic polymorphism U<sub>2</sub>, which may affect the risk of this birth defect and, independently, maternal weight gain. E, multivitamin use. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 4. This could be a combination of figures 2 and 3. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 5. Multivitamin use (E) may reduce the risk of certain birth defects (D), and maternal age (C) may affect multivitamin use (J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:17–23). From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 6. Maternal obesity (C) may cause certain defects (D) (JAMA 1996;275:1089–92). Advanced maternal age (U) may increase the risk of obesity and increases the chances of periconceptional multivitamin use (E) (J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:17–23). From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 7. History of birth defects in the family or in previous pregnancies (C) may lead to more careful pregnancy planning and counseling, which will increase the chances of periconceptional multivitamin use (E) (Can Fam Physician 1999;45:2053–7). If a genetic factor (U) was a cause of previous malformations in the family, it may also affect the risk of that malformation (D) in the current pregnancy (N Engl J Med 1994;331:1–4). From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 8. A certain enzymatic polymorphism (U) decreases plasma folate levels early in pregnancy (E) (Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:1044–51) and increases the risk of neural tube defects (D) (Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:862–77), perhaps through mechanisms other than folate levels. C represents enzymatic function measured after delivery. C may occur after E or D but still be a marker for a factor's occurrence before E and D. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 9. Antiepileptic drugs (E) may lower plasma folate levels (C) and may cause birth defects (D) through mechanisms not related to folate. Alcohol intake (U) may also decrease folate levels but may be associated with birth defects through other paths. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 10. Case-control studies of birth defects (D) often rely on maternal recall (E′) of antenatal exposure (E). From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

FIGURE 11. When mothers of malformed infants (D) recall the information more completely (or less completely) than mothers of controls, D will influence E′ (maternal recall). Study designs that use malformed controls try to avoid the arrow between D and E′. E, antenatal exposure. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

APPENDIX FIGURE 1. A partial representation of our study on neural tube defects. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

APPENDIX FIGURE 2. The path between L and D is blocked after conditioning on A. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

APPENDIX FIGURE 3. The path between L and A is open after conditioning on D. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

APPENDIX FIGURE 4. The path between L and A is open after conditioning on S. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |

APPENDIX FIGURE 5. A and D may be unassociated under nonfaithfulness. From: Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Confounding Evaluation: An Application to Birth Defects Epidemiology Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 Am J Epidemiol |