Rich Occupancies and Bandwidth in Minimal Upgrade Layout

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hybrid pixel: pilot and bus K. Tanida (RIKEN) 06/09/03 Si upgrade workshop Outline Overview on ALICE pilot and bus Requirements Pilot options Bus options.
Advertisements

Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
March, 11, 2006 LCWS06, Bangalore, India Very Forward Calorimeters readout and machine interface Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy.
LHCb Upgrade Overview ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ Château de Bossey 13 March 2013 Beat Jost / Cern.
Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong EE3900 Computer Networks Data Transmission Slide 1 Continuous & Discrete Signals.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Phase 2 pixel electronics 21 May 2015 – CERN, Geneva First look at data compression Konstantin Androsov – INFN Pisa & University of Siena Massimo Minuti.
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
Vth INFIERI workshop April 2015 – CERN, Geneva First look at data compression Konstantin Androsov – INFN Pisa & University of Siena Massimo Minuti – INFN.
Power Supply of Front-End Electronic in RICH/TORCH Upgrade Rui Gao, University of Oxford LHCb Upgrade Electronics Meeting 14 th April, 2011, CERN.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
L1 Pixel Trigger: Is 20 us Latency Achievable? David Christian Fermilab April 29, 2015.
PicoTDC Features of the picoTDC (operating at 1280 MHz with 64 delay cells) Focus of the unit on very small time bins, 12ps basic, 3ps interpolation Interpolation.
April 21st 2010Jacques Lefrancois1 UPGRADE NEWS Scope of upgrade presented by Andrei in upgrade meeting April 16th Role of trigger presented by Hans in.
HPD Performance in the RICH Detectors of the LHCb Young Min Kim University of Edinburgh IoP HEPP Conference – April
Frontend of PHENIX Si pixel K. Tanida (RIKEN) FEM/DAQ meeting for PHENIX upgrade (10/24/02) Outline Overview of PHENIX Si pixel detector ALICE1 chip readout.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Status of the MaPMT o Status quo o Ongoing work o Issues – mechanics – electronics – schedule o Conclusions LHCb meeting Milano Franz Muheim.
Muon Electronics Upgrade Present architecture Remarks Present scenario Alternative scenario 1 The Muon Group.
Testbeam Studies of the LHCb Vertex Locator Modules Lisa Dwyer.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
Malte Hildebrandt, PSIMEG - Review Meeting / 1   e  Drift Chambers Charge Division Test Chamber Testsetup for Cosmics Chamber Construction.
RICH upgrade simulation: updates RICH upgrade-software meeting 1 S.Easo.
RICH upgrade simulation: updates S.Easo RICH upgrade-mechanics meeting 1.
21 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of Imperial tasks Paul Dauncey.
Upgrade of LHCb-RICH Detectors RICH-2013 Conference Shonan, Kanagawa, Japan Sajan Easo December 02, 2013 LHCb-RICH collaboration RAL 1.
IXO Instrument Working Group Meeting January 27, 2009 — Cambridge, MA Count-Rate Performance for X-Ray Microcalorimeter Spectrometer Richard Kelley NASA/GSFC.
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
Activity related CMS RPC Hyunchul Kim Korea university Hyunchul Kim Korea university 26th. Sep th Korea-CMS collaboration meeting.
Predicting the In-System Performance of the CMS Tracker Analog Readout Optical Links Stefanos Dris CERN & Imperial College, London.
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 17: Segmentation: Canny Edge Detector & Hough Transform Prof. Charlene Tsai.
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 5 page 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 5 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem 2Random variables and.
The RICH detectors of LHCb and the proposed upgrade Antonis Papanestis On behalf of the LHCb RICH collaboration 1.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
FPGA based signal processing for the LHCb Vertex detector and Silicon Tracker Guido Haefeli EPFL, Lausanne Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake,
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
Magnetic Shielding Studies of the LHCb RICH Photon Detectors Mitesh Patel, Marcello Losasso, Thierry Gys (CERN )
Beam test Analysis Micromegas TPC by Wenxin Wang.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
LHCb Outer Tracker Electronics 40MHz Upgrade
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Updates on vertex detector
F2F Tracking Meeting, Prague 12/12/2013
Digital readout architecture for Velopix
ETD summary D. Breton, S.Luitz, U.Marconi
Trigger, DAQ, & Online: Perspectives on Electronics
CMS Feedback on the High pileup (PU) Fill
Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake, Nikko, Japan
The LHC collider in Geneva
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
Quarkonium production in ALICE
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
TDC Occupancy Estimate
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
LHCb Electronics Brainstorm
The LHCb Trigger Niko Neufeld CERN, PH.
Pixel Non-Uniformity Study
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
The LHCb L0 Calorimeter Trigger
Mapping Simulation — in concern with MA64 crosstalks
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Drift Chamber Monitoring
Reconstruction and calibration strategies for the LHCb RICH detector
Presentation transcript:

Rich Occupancies and Bandwidth in Minimal Upgrade Layout My Work so far... Robert Currie 12/04/2010

'... a stepping stone in development of the LHCb software...' Simulation Want to estimate the requirements of the electronics for the RICH detectors in the LHCb upgrade. Using events simulated using the Minimal Upgrade Layout (MUL without Aerogel) : https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCb/MinimalUpgradeLayout '... a stepping stone in development of the LHCb software...' To measure the bandwidth required we need to know the Occupancy of modules within the RICH detectors. Gauss Boole Occupancy Thanks to Young Min for helpful discussions on Simulation work Slide 2

Simulation Data Physics Events Simulated in Gauss and digitized in Boole according to the MUL and the occupancy per HPD is extracted from the expert histograms. The total number of events analysed in my work so far is: ~10k events at Lumi20 ~25k events at Lumi2 Only Lumi20 results will be discussed in the main talk with Lumi2 Occupancies given in backup Slides Slide 3

Cable & Bandwidth Numerical Example: For each module in RICH, the number of GBT cables required is Determined by the number of hits in each module and this is calculated from it's occupancy 1 cable carries 80bits per cable per event[1] 1 hit in RICH module (1024 pixel) binary readout, zero suppressed = 10bits of data/hit Numerical Example: E.g. 4 cables per module: (suitable for outer detector) 4 x 80 / 10 gives a BW limit of 32 hits/ (module * event) = occupancy of ~3% for each module. Slide 4 [1] Johans slides on Torch: http://lhcb-elec.web.cern.ch/lhcb-elec/html/upgrade.htm

Module Occupancies Lumi 20 Typical Low Occupancy: Outer Detector Occupancy PDF typical of most low occupancy modules within both Rich1&Rich2 Typical Low Occupancy: Outer Detector Red: Data Blue: Fit Slide 5

Module Occupancies Lumi 20 Highest Occupancy: Inner Detector Occupancy PDF typical of High Occupancy modules at the centre of the detector planes in Rich1&Rich2 Highest Occupancy: Inner Detector Red: Data Blue: Fit Slide 6

Cables required to read 99% of all events across RICH 1 at Lumi20 Slide 7

Cables required to read 99% of all events across RICH 2 at Lumi20 Slide 8

Example link-map required for 99% data readout for Rich1 Slide 9

Example link-map required for 99% data readout for Rich2 Slide 10

Efficiency Map of Rich1 Slide 11

Efficiency Map of Rich1 Slide 12

Efficiency vs Bandwidth Hits are truncated between events if BW limit is exceeded: for a fixed number of links with the single highest occupancy module at Lumi20 one gets: Same module as on Slide 6 (Rich1 Col7 Row4) Number of Links % of events with truncated data Max Number of transmitted hits Average number of lost hits 2 90.5 16 51.8 4 76.4 32 38.5 8 47.3 64 19.6 12 24.7 96 8.3 10.5 128 3.0 20 3.8 160 0.9 24 1.2 192 0.2 Slide 13

Zero Suppression Threshold Passing just binary readout data from the module equates to 1024 bits of data per event. 1024 / 80 = 12.8 Hence 13 cables required for all data to be transmitted from each module. When zero suppression requires more than 13 cables it is more efficient to change the data transmission strategy to binary only readout. Slide 14

Cable Numbers Only zero-suppressed data transmitted: Rich1 Rich2 Only zero-suppressed data transmitted: Total Number of Cables: 1200 1632 Max per Module: 24 16 With non-zero-suppressed data transmitted in centre modules: Total Number of Cables: 992 1484 Max per Module: 13 13 Slide 15

Number of Cables for Rich1 non-zero suppressed in centre Slide 16

Number of Cables for Rich2 non-zero suppressed in centre Slide 15

Conclusions Developed method to study the number of required links in RICH for expected occupancies in LHCb Minimal Upgrade Layout. Large numbers of cables per module required at the centre of the RICH detectors to read zero suppressed data at high efficiencies. Moderate numbers of links required at outer regions of detector planes. Link numbers suggest to employ zero-suppressed readout for most of the detector planes, but non-zero-suppressed readout for centre areas. Slide 18

Further Work Repeat the Study for MUL with Aerogel for the simulation (occupancy in RICH1 may be higher) Obtain Better Statistics for Lumi20 and directly compare to Lumis 5 & 10 as well (to check for proper evolution of occupancies) Optimise cable number / module Slide 19

BACKUPS

Module Occupancies Lumi 2 Typical Low Occupancy: Outer Detector Occupancy PDF typical of most low occupancy modules within both Rich1&Rich2 Typical Low Occupancy: Outer Detector Red: Data Fit not plotted Slide 5

Module Occupancies Lumi 2 Highest Occupancy: Inner Detector Occupancy PDF typical of High Occupancy modules at the centre of the detector planes in Rich1&Rich2 Highest Occupancy: Inner Detector Red: Data Fit not plotted Slide 6