Duquesne Light Company Makes Heads or Tails of “PJM Market Design Proposals Addressing State Public Policy Initiatives Capacity Repricing” OPSI 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

APPAs Competitive Market Plan: A Reform Proposal Susan Kelly VP, Policy Analysis and General Counsel, APPA AAI 9 th Annual Energy Roundtable March 3, 2009.
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
Brookfield Renewable Energy Group. Focusing on Renewable Power Generation and Transmission Conceptual discussion how to integrate renewable resources under.
Better Align Capacity Markets with Policy/Planning Objectives James Daly, VP Energy Supply Restructuring Roundtable Sept 21, 2012.
Ohio Utility Regulation Our approach to utility regulation is predicated upon our mission: Our mission is to assure all residential and business costumers.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
GridWise ® Architecture Council Becky Harrison GridWise Alliance Future of the Grid Evolving to Meet America’s Needs.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FERC’s Order on Possible BSM for ROS.
A Primer on Electric Utilities, Deregulation, and Restructuring of U.S. Electricity Markets W.M. Warwick July 2000 Revised May 2002.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Gas & Power Coordination: Growing Pains in Time of Transition Mark Stultz, BP Natural Gas Supply Association OPSI Annual Meeting Chicago, Illinois October.
Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) Overview Andrew Ott PJM Senior Vice President, Markets.
© Copyright 2011, NASDAQ OMX Commodities Clearing Company. All rights reserved. 1 Presentation to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 3, 2011 A.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
1 PRR 776 in the Context of the ERCOT Market Design Eric S. Schubert Regulatory Affairs Advisor BP Energy Company.
The Value of Electric Transmission NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 25, 2012.
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming.
Consumer Advocates of the PJM States Who we are and our policy focus OPSI Annual Meeting Raleigh, NC October 8, 2013.
1 CODE MODIFICATION PROPOSAL No 0243 Amendments to the process for initialisation of Enduring NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity at the Moffat NTS Exit Point Presentation.
George A. Godding, Jr. Director, Management and Communications Office of Market Oversight and Investigations Comments are the speakers and do not necessarily.
Overview of the Capacity Markets in the United States 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13-14, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Update - RTOs and Capacity January 28, Purpose of Presentation Update the Commission on issues related to – (1) Ameren Missouri – potential Local.
2014 Reports to the Minister Markets Team Ken Michael Room, 25 September 2014 Ensuring quality services for a reasonable price 1 Workshop.
Bulk Power Transmission System
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
What Was Learned From the 2015 Transition and Base Residual Auction Results? October 13, 2015 OPSI Annual Meeting CP Auction results – A DR perspective.
Midwest ISO Discussion February 5, 2009 Greg Levesque Manager – Regional Relations & Policy.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
© 2015 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2015 Session 6 – Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary?
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Regional System Operator Issues Analysis Ron Lehr Western Clean Energy Advocates January 7, 2016.
Mod Entry Capacity Transfers Transmission Work Stream, 5 April 2007.
1 Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
Accommodate or Achieve
Connecting the Dots in New England: NEPOOL’s IMAPP Initiative
Stages of Research and Development
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
FERC Standard Market Design Working Papers
PRS Rejection of NPRR Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
AES NewEnergy’s Initial View on the Proposed Alliance RTO
Regional Transmission Organizations
Electric Distribution Sector
OPSI 10th Annual Meeting Improving Generation Performance
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Perspectives on Integrating Markets and Public Policy in New England
Hot Topics in PJM: Price Formation and Public Policy
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
New England Resource Adequacy
Pay for Performance Regulation
Special MRC – Fuel Security
Panel II - Future of Competitive Transmission in the PJM Footprint December 1, 2016 Chip Richardson – PPL Electric Utilities.
Vice President, Markets Development
Distribution, sale, marketing
NYS Department of Public Service
Ofgem presentation to Gas Transmission Workstream
Maine's Standard Offer Service
Tom Welch October 18, 2002 Boston, Massachusetts
Scaling up of Renewable Energy for Power Generation in the Western Balkan countries
Renewable Action Plan Update
Presentation transcript:

Duquesne Light Company Makes Heads or Tails of “PJM Market Design Proposals Addressing State Public Policy Initiatives Capacity Repricing” OPSI 2017 Annual Meeting Presentation Tonja Wicks, Manager, FERC and RTO Affairs Duquesne Light Company October 3, 2017

Duquesne Light Company Pennsylvania Service Territory Western PA 817 square miles Transmission 690 miles of high voltage transmission lines Customers 590,000 customers 89% residential Service Centers Woods Run Complex Corporate Headquarters Distribution 7,200 miles of distribution circuit lines Substations 430 Substations

Duquesne Level-Setting Market Facts Duquesne joined PJM in 2005 Duquesne Operates in the Deregulated Customer Choice State of Pennsylvania Duquesne Does Not Own Generation Duquesne is a Default Service Provider Duquesne’s Primary Concern is Resource Adequacy and Cost to Customers/Load

QUESTION? So Why are We Here?

PJM Concern: Impact of State Subsidies on the Competitive Market Response to that Concern was a Repricing Proposal by PJM Response to PJM’s Repricing Proposal was additional stakeholder proposals Some seek to offer some variation of PJM’s initial repricing proposal to reduce the number of infra-marginal units (through reallocating capacity obligations of subsidized units to remaining unsubsidized cleared resources or lowering the capacity clearing price for all resources cleared in the bid stack) Some seek to eliminate all subsidized resources from participating in BRA and bilateral arrangements Some seek to institute a price floor for all resources, (i.e. existing and new resources) Some seek to return to a Pre-RPM model--bilateral arrangements to meet load obligations/with a residual auction Some seek to maintain the status quo Is the Concern Warranted?

FACTS: PJM MARKET FACT: There is no evidence of a reliability problem FACT: The Current PJM capacity market construct promotes resource adequacy FACT: Current Reserve margins exceed UCAP targets FACT: There is new entry and exits of competitive supply resources FACT: Capacity prices are significantly below Net Cost of New Entry (CONE) FACT: PJM Auction results to date have been certified and deemed competitive

FACTS AS DUQUESNE SEES IT Energy is not a natural market. The current competitive wholesale market is an administrative construct and the product of human design. As a result, the potential to “accommodate”, harmonize or achieve a market that incorporates enacted state policies is possible. Duquesne appreciates the thorough analysis of this issue. But before solutions are implemented, we must ensure there is a problem to be solved through the imposition of market construct modifications.

Duquesne’s Perspectives on Current Debate Theme 1: Duquesne Supports a Competitive Market Duquesne Believes it is Premature to Redesign the Current PJM Capacity Construct Capacity Performance not Fully Phased-in and implemented until 2020 Theme 2: States’ Authority Duquesne Light “understands” a State’s authority and autonomy to initiate public policy that seeks to maintain a desired generation resource mix that meets the needs and preferences of its customer and constituent base. State entities have the autonomy, authority, and ability to propose public policy initiatives that are in the best interest of their consumers. Theme 3:Components of a Well-Functioning Capacity Market Multi-Year Forward Procurement Obligation Duquesne Light supports retaining the established 3-year forward capacity obligation. Base Residual and Incremental Auctions Duquesne Light supports the continued use of capacity auctions, i.e. Base Residual Auction and Incremental Auctions, for procuring short and long-term capacity resources. Limitations on Bilateral Arrangements Duquesne Light does not support changing PJM market rules to expand the use of bilateral arrangements beyond the current Fixed Resource Requirement (FRR) model. 

Duquesne’s Perspectives on Current Debate (CONT) Theme 4: Limited Centralized Wholesale Market Changes - Capacity Markets Duquesne Light supports the most recent PJM Capacity Performance construct that maintains a 3-year forward capacity obligation and applies substantial penalties for non-performance Capacity Performance provides the most efficient means of providing resource adequacy and guaranteeing reliability at low cost. Duquesne Light remains concerned with recent activities and endeavors that threaten to undermine or completely undo the current capacity market construct in PJM. A complete overhaul of Capacity Performance, that has not fully matured and is not slated to be fully implemented until 2020, could undermine the ability of the markets to function. Theme 5: FERC Identified Solutions “5 Paths Forward”, inclusive of Status Quo Initially, Duquesne Light expressed support for Path 2, “Accommodation of State Action”. Upon a deep dive into the impact state actions have had on the PJM market or lack thereof, Duquesne may reevaluate its positon.

FERC Proposed 5 Paths Forward: Analogous FERC Effort: Options for Addressing State Action and Impact on Competitive Markets (AD-17-18) FERC Proposed 5 Paths Forward: Limited or No Minimum Offer Price Rule (MOPR) Accommodation of State Action (allow to obtain capacity obligations, subject to adjustments) Status Quo Pricing State Policy Choices (value the attributes or externalities, ex; carbon price) Expanded MOPR (to both existing and new capacity resources) Duquesne Light Company submitted FERC Post-Technical Conference Comments in AD17-18

DUQUESNE’S FINAL THOUGHT The current PJM effort to address the potential impact of state actions and the thorough vetting of market proposals has been informative. In spite of all of the discussion and effort, Duquesne advocates for the Status Quo, but absent that option, we continue to deliberate and assess the viability of each proposal in the PJM stakeholder forum and their impact on Duquesne’s operations and customers.

Are Stakeholders Being Asked to Flip a Coin and Call Heads or Tails? If Status Quo is Not an Option…Deciding Between PJM Market Design Proposals Are Stakeholders Being Asked to Flip a Coin and Call Heads or Tails?

Duquesne Light Company CONTACT INFORMATION Tonja Wicks Duquesne Light Company (412) 393-6302- Office (412) 742-2103- Cellular twicks@duqlight.com