Professor of Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Addressing Common Core Standards Using
Advertisements

Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
CA 2012 ELD Standards Appendix B
Common Core State Standards What are they? Why do we need them? What do they mean to us? Prepared by Grace Lee-Sim.
Objective Develop an understanding of Appendix B: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works.
Getting Started with the CA ELD Standards
WCSD ELL Department
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
CA 2012 ELD Standards Session 3 ESC North 2/5/15.
Sharon Rodriguez, Coordinator, Elementary Instruction Alicia Bernal, Coordinator, Secondary Instruction Lizza Irizarry, Coordinator, EL Programs September,
ALL TEACHERS OF ELLS NEED TO USE THESE TEN KEY STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING ELLS.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
General Considerations for Implementation
Simplifying Text Complexity Module 4. The Dilemma The difficulty in transitioning from high school to college and careers may be caused, in part, by a.
Science Notebooks January 12, 2008 Jennifer Roberts TC- NSTWP 2007 Using Writing as a Learning and Teaching Tool for Science Inquiry.
The Common Core State Standards and the English Language Learners Wen Ma, Ph.D. Le Moyne College.
SIOP Overview Shelter Instruction Observation Protocol
The Common Core for English Language Learners: Challenges and Opportunities Understanding Language Language, Literacy, and Learning.
ELD Transition Sessions
April 17, 2014 Glenda Harrell, Alesha McCauley, Denise Daniels, Steve West, Laura Cernik, Amanda Miller Transformed ELA MPIs Lesson Planning and Formative.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
SIOP The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP)
Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Science Standards and English Language Learners.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
The California ELD Standards Part 2 Rowland Unified School District Presented by Annabel Dannemann and Danielle Caro.
Differentiation PLC.
English Language Arts Six Instructional Shifts Focus on Shift 2: Literacy Across All Content Areas.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Understanding Language: A Discussion Photo: Courtesy Jeff Johnson Kenji Hakuta Stanford University.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
ELA/ELD CCSS Content and Pedagogy Grades 7-12: ELD CCSS Shifts and Expectations for EL Programs Taken from the California Department of Education Draft.
FEBRUARY, 2014 Key Principles for ELL Instruction.
LANGUAGE LITERACY LEARNING MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT CA ELD STANDARDS Session #3.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ELD STANDARDS December, 2015.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY STANDARDS. Check In With your thumb, show your level of comfort with the ELP standards. first exposure some previous exposure.
Evaluation 4.0 Or at least a 3.75.
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Integrated and Designated ELD –
COMMON CORE FOR THE NOT-SO-COMMON LEARNER
TODAY’S SITUATION Teachers in a self-contained classroom, as well as those in core content classes such as Social Studies, Math, Science, and Language.
ELD Next Generation Standards
All Standards All Students
Academic Vocabulary Development for English Language Learners
Digital library module #10 (sec. ela)
Professor of Education
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
Tutorial Welcome to Module 13
Performance Indicator F: Performance Indicator G
How do grade levels currently plan at your school?
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)
English Language Proficiency/Development ELP/D
Module 6a Funds of Knowledge
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Module 7: Secondary ELA Funds of Knowledge Application
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Professor of Education
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
The Formative Assessment Process Module #12 (Elem. & Sec.)
Section VI: Comprehension
Teaching Science for Understanding
Presentation transcript:

Professor of Education Module 16: Elem ELA Equity Pedagogy for All Learners: Differentiation for Linguistic/Cognitive Accommodations Belinda Louie, PhD, PI Professor of Education UW Tacoma Project Core/Time/Digital January 24-27, 2017

Project Goals: Goal 1.1b Improve teachers’ standard-based teaching skills by (i) Using research-based instructional strategies, (v) Differentiating instructional strategies for students with special needs and ELLs at different English proficiency levels, (vii) Connecting with students’ cultural and community assets. Session Goals: Improve teachers’ standard-based teaching skills by (1) Utilizing students’ Funds of Knowledge to connect with students’ cultural and community assets. (2) Bridging opportunity gap for students of color, ELLs, students in poverty, and special education students by increasing their comprehension of complex texts through personal connections

KEY PRINCIPLES FOR ELL INSTRUCTION Instruction focuses on providing ELLs with opportunities to engage in discipline- specific practices which are designed to build conceptual understanding and language competence in tandem. Learning is a social process that requires teachers to intentionally design learning opportunities that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening with the practices of each discipline.

Instruction leverages ELLs’ home language(s), cultural assets, and prior knowledge. ELLs’ home language(s) and culture(s) are regarded as assets and are used by the teacher in bridging prior knowledge to new knowledge, and in making content meaningful and comprehensible.

Standards-aligned instruction for ELLs is rigorous, grade-level appropriate, and provides deliberate and appropriate scaffolds. Instruction that is rigorous and standards-aligned reflects the key shifts in the CCSS and NGSS. Such shifts require that teachers provide students with opportunities to describe their reasoning, share explanations, make conjectures, justify conclusions, argue from evidence, and negotiate meaning from complex texts. Students with developing levels of English proficiency will require instruction that carefully supports their understanding and use of emerging language as they participate in these activities.

Instruction moves ELLs forward by taking into account their English proficiency level(s) and prior schooling experiences. ELLs within a single classroom can be heterogeneous in terms of home language(s) proficiency, proficiency in English, literacy levels in English and student's home language(s), previous experiences in schools, and time in the U.S. Teachers must be attentive to these differences and design instruction accordingly.

Instruction fosters ELLs’ autonomy by equipping them with the strategies necessary to comprehend and use language in a variety of academic settings. ELLs must learn to use a broad repertoire of strategies to construct meaning from academic talk and complex text, to participate in academic discussions, and to express themselves in writing across a variety of academic situations. Tasks must be designed to ultimately foster student independence.

Diagnostic tools and formative assessment practices are employed to measure students’ content knowledge, academic language competence, and participation in disciplinary practices. These assessment practices allow teachers to monitor students’ learning so that they may adjust instruction accordingly, provide students with timely and useful feedback, and encourage students to reflect on their own thinking and learning.

Accommodations for ELLs: Language objectives

Formative Assessment

Accommodation students’ language needs 1 Accommodation students’ language needs   1. Clarify Intended Learning: Identify language and content instructional objectives in specific content area;

2. Identify academic language demands - language features - discourse: text structure - syntax: sentence structure - vocabulary: general academic vocabulary content specific academic vocabulary

3. Elicit Evidence: Integrate instruction and assessment: Provide (1) low language demand tasks to focus on content and (2) language proficiency appropriate tasks to nourish and to monitor language growth;

4. Interpret Evidence: Develop scoring guides for the assessment tasks to facilitate teachers’ and students’ reflection on student learning ;

5. Act on Evidence: To develop the next level of language and content instructional objectives

Project Goals: Goal 1.1b Improve teachers’ standard-based teaching skills by (i) Using research-based instructional strategies, (v) Differentiating instructional strategies for students with special needs and ELLs at different English proficiency levels, (vii) Connecting with students’ cultural and community assets. Session Goals: Improve teachers’ standard-based teaching skills by (1) Utilizing students’ Funds of Knowledge to connect with students’ cultural and community assets. (2) Bridging opportunity gap for students of color, ELLs, students in poverty, and special education students by increasing their comprehension of complex texts through personal connections