FDPIR Management Evaluations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

REINVENTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW (The Overview) BEGINNING SCHOOL YEAR
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Financial Management.
John Lowe Associate Chief Consultant PBM Why Are We Here?
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
Division of Special Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” USDA Civil Rights and School Nutrition Programs.
CNP DIRECTORS’ WORKSHOP Administrative Review Be Prepared! March 14, 2014.
MODULE FIVE Monitoring/Reviews/Record Keeping/Forms and Documents School and Community Nutrition 2013.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
CACFP Recordkeeping Essentials HOW READY ARE YOU FOR A CACFP REVIEW? 1.
Maine CACFP Website Program Information - by type Resources Forms
FDPIR Management Evaluations Purpose Process Common Findings NAFDPIR 2015.
Administrative Reviews Determining Compliance. Administrative Review Basics Formal “full” reviews – At least once every 3 years – Announced or unannounced.
Administrative Reviews Determining Compliance. Administrative Review Basics Formal “full” reviews – At least once every 3 years – Announced or unannounced.
Emergency Food Assistance Program EFAP 101. What is the EFAP program? The Emergency Food Assistance Program is federally and state funded food program.
Procurement and Food Service Contracts Pages
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
1Annual Training Check SFA Compliance with Regulations Provide Technical Assistance Ensures Program Integrity 3Annual Training 2015.
New Administrative Review
Planning your Summer Food Service Program Staffing Oregon Department of Education Summer Food Service Program.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” USDA Civil Rights and School Nutrition Programs.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
State Program Review Process Presented by GSFC Compliance Team.
Monitoring. Learning Objectives Introduction & purpose Federal monitoring - highlights & approach Common findings.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
CIVIL RIGHTS FOR SCHOOL NUTRITION PROGRAMS Presented to School Nutrition Managers and Employees North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Safe and.
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
CACFP Record Keeping: Permanent Records 1. 7 CFR (e)(1) Copies of all applications and supporting documents submitted to the State agency shall.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Arizona Nutrition Network Program Operations Policy and Procedure FY 09 Training October 2008 Therese Neal, MSW.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Completing the Commercial Kitchen Daily Meal Production Record
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Completing the Commercial Kitchen Daily Meal Production Record Revised July 2014 “The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination.
Georgia WIC Program Management Evaluation Training Nutrition Services Directors Meeting Sonia Jackson March 22, 2016.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Department of Child Support Services OFFICE OF AUDITS AND COMPLIANCE.
COMPLETING THE TRANSPORTED MEALS DAILY MEAL PRODUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Public Instruction School Nutrition Services Revised July 2015.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Adult Education and Literacy Monitoring FY17
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
CMAA Site Visit Guidelines & Requirements Presenters
Anna Preston Vance, HA of Paris
Equipment Management Chris Crutcher | Branch Director, Internal Operations | September 19, 2017.
Adult Education and Literacy Monitoring FY17
Oregon Department of Education Summer Food Service Program
Stepping Forward Together Financially
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP)
What to Expect during a program review
Pantry System Overview
TEMPLATE – Annual Title I Meeting
Monitoring & Managing Your WIF Grant
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
OSU Controlled Substances Training Module for Researchers
Presentation transcript:

FDPIR Management Evaluations Tammy Larma Lead Program Specialist Midwest Regional Office-Chicago, IL

Goal Purpose of the ME Process Timeline What to expect Common Findings

Differences Several factors might result in slight variations in the ME process between ITOs. Size of the FDPIR program Multiple distribution sites or warehouses, participants served Accessibility to ITO Drive time Lodging Funding Staffing Program needs

Similarities National Management Evaluation Guidance FDPIR Management Evaluation Module http://www.fns.usda.gov/fdpir-management-evaluation-module

New Program Integrity and Monitoring Branch Monitor MEs for trends: Need for additional training Technical assistance Change or develop policies or procedures

Purpose of the ME Ensure compliance with Federal Regulations and other guidance materials. Identify needs for technical assistance Share best practices

Format Most MEs are conducted on-site with a desk review of some documents and/or case files prior to the on-site portion. There can also be follow-up conference calls or site visits as needed. Some MEs may be conducted as “focused” MEs and consist of a desk review of case files or other documentation.

Timeline > 30 days before on-site review: On-site review Notify State Agency/ITO of ME Requested documents/questionnaire due to RO On-site review Typically 1-5 days 60 days after on-site review or exit conference: Report due to SA/ITO 60 days after ITO/SA receives ME report: SA/ITO’s initial corrective action response due to RO

Timeline continued… Corrective Action negotiation continues until RO accepts Corrective Action Plan (CAP) When CAP is accepted, RO must also verify that the actions have taken place. ME will remain open/in progress until corrective actions have been verified. RO sends closure letter

Process: Pre-site Review Negotiate schedule for review Send official notification letter Request any documents needed for pre-site review, which may include: Case Files Plan of Operation Self-Assessment Questionnaire Equipment List

Process: On-Site Review Reviewers use the FDPIR ME modules and program’s Plan of Operation to guide the review Entrance Conference Interview: Program director Financial/grants management staff Other staff as needed (i.e.: warehouse, certifiers) Inspect: Condition of the warehouse Temperature logs Food storage organization

Process – On-Site Review continued… Review and verify: Case files (claims, fair hearings, denied cases) Equipment list Training materials and other records Other administrative procedures and documents Observe (when possible): Distribution (including Tailgate, if applicable) Certification appointments Inventory procedures Exit Conference Discussion on potential findings and observations

How to Prepare The best way to prepare for an ME is to complete an annual self-assessment and ongoing monitoring of your program Use the FNS FDPIR ME module to anticipate what reviewers look for and request: http://www.fns.usda.gov/fdpir-management-evaluation-module

Tips Invite all interested parties to the entrance conference Share any cultural tips or etiquette that you want reviewers to know Have documents organized and ready for review Hold a brief meeting to introduce reviewers to help put your staff at ease Be prepared to share best practices and ideas

ME Report – What to Expect Executive summary Noteworthy initiatives: May include best practices that exceed regulatory requirements. Findings: Identification of non-compliance with program regulations, policies, and procedures. Required Corrective Actions: Actions that must be taken to change or improve operational effectiveness and correct non-compliance.

ME Report - What to Expect continued… Observations: Identification of a weakness involving management practices or unregulated activity. Suggestions: Actions that address observations made in the ME- may not be required under the regulations but should be taken to improve program operations and management.

Common ME Findings – Plan of Operations The Plan of Operation must be in compliance with FNS regulations. The program must be in compliance with its Plan of Operation. Not up-to-date with FNS policies that have changed Does not reflect current program operations

Common ME Findings - Staffing There are limitations to the type of staff who may perform certification functions. Volunteers used inappropriately Staff who work on multiple programs or non-FDPIR activities do not correctly allocate time for budget purposes

Common ME Findings – Records and Reports Late reports Records not kept for required 3 year time period/inaccessible Equipment list not kept or missing required information

Common ME Findings – Inventory Control Outdated product in inventory FNS-152 reports show frequent losses and gains Food losses not adequately tracked Excessive or inadequate inventory

Common ME Findings - Warehousing Warehouse must be clean, temperature-controlled, and protect against the elements, infestation, and theft. USDA Foods were improperly stored with no space separation; with non-food items; or with non-USDA Foods Temperature logs were not being kept Sanitation/health inspections of the warehouse are not up-to-date

Common ME Findings - Eligibility Case files do not contain adequate documentation Income deductions are applied incorrectly Two-year certification periods incorrectly assigned Common errors in case files Conversion factors or earned income deduction incorrectly applied or not used when necessary Application and Notice of Decision do not contain required information

Common ME Findings – Nutrition Education & Outreach Public notification system (e.g., brochures, bulletins, leaflets, letters, newspapers, etc.) to inform potentially eligible persons, is not effective/inadequate No records of nutrition education activities held at the ITO warehouse/tailgates for FDPIR recipients Nutrition Education funds spent on inappropriate items

Common ME Findings – Civil Rights Non-discrimination statement is incorrect or missing on program forms All staff do not complete annual CR training/No records of CR training by staff

Common ME Findings - Training Programs must have a continuing training program for all staff, including volunteers. Program does not assess training needs / staff do not receive training on all required elements / No records of training conducted.

Common ME Findings – Program Monitoring Programs must monitor and review their operations and local agency operations at least annually. Annual self-monitoring review is not conducted Annual self-monitoring review does not include all required elements

Questions ?