Figure 1 Predictions of (a) polar wander speed, (c) polar wander direction and (e) as a function of lower-mantle viscosity, in which an elastic lithosphere.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framtidens Östersjön – resultat från oceanografisk modellering Markus Meier SMHI, Norrköping
Advertisements

The general equation for gravity anomaly is: where:  is the gravitational constant  is the density contrast r is the distance to the observation point.
Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Contributions to Tide Gauge, Altimetry and GRACE Observations Glenn Milne Dept of Earth Sciences University of Durham, UK.
Climatological Estimates of Greenland Ice Sheet Sea Level Contributions: Recent Past and Future J. E. Box Byrd Polar Research Center Understanding Sea-level.
Glacial Rebound Glacial Rebound Studies depend on many factors. What are they ? Ice load History of the load Ocean water load on coastlines and globally.
V.F. Cormier, J. Attanayake, K. He, A. Stroujkova, and L. Xu History of the Inner Core Recorded by Seismology: Freezing, Melting, Differential Rotation.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 24 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 5 Nov: T&S Last Time: Flexural Isostasy Generally, loading will occur both by.
Earth as a System: Earth: A Unique Planet 2.1 and 2.2 Page 27.
FORWARD AND INVERSE MODELLING OF GPS OBSERVATIONS FROM FENNOSCANDIA G.A. Milne 1, J.X. Mitrovica 2, H.-G. Scherneck 3, J.L. Davis 4, J.M. Johansson 3,
Monitoring Earths ice sheets from space Andrew Shepherd School of Geosciences, Edinburgh.
The Hunting of the SNARF Giovanni F. Sella Seth Stein Northwestern University Timothy H. Dixon University of Miami "What's the good of Mercator's North.
Global warming and Sea Level Rise: Best estimates by 2100 John King
Thermosteric Effects on Long-Term Global Sea Level Change Jianli Chen Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Sea-Level Change Driven by Recent Cryospheric and Hydrological Mass Flux Mark Tamisiea Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics James Davis Emma Hill.
Thoughts on the GIA Issue in SNARF Jim Davis & Tom Herring Input from and discussions with Mark Tamisiea, Jerry Mitrovica, and Glenn Milne.
The Sea Level Rise Story Bruno Tremblay McGill University Slide from Steven Nerem – University of Colorado.
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. 1 Chapter 14 Cuffey & Paterson.
Rheology of the Earth. Schedule Rheology Viscous, elastic & plastic Viscous, elastic & plastic Deformation maps and “Christmas tree’s” for mantle & lithosphere.
Closure of the Budget of Global Sea Level Rise Over the GRACE Era: The Importance and Magnitudes of the Corrections Required for Quaternary Ice-Age Influence.
Using Global Ocean Models to Project Sea Level Rise Robert Hallberg NOAA / GFDL.
Prof. David G. Vaughan British Antarctic Survey Sea-level rise: another face of climate change.
(a) Pre-earthquake and (b) post-earthquake Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) images of North Sentinel Island. The.
Sarah Raper, Understanding Sea-level Rise and Variability, 6-9 June, 2006 Paris Glacier modeling: Current Status and Needed Improvements Sarah Raper Centre.
Figure sec mean topography (m, shaded following scale at upper left) of the Intermountain West and adjoining regions,
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. 1 Chapter 11 Cuffey & Paterson.
Aspects of a climate observing system: energy and water Kevin E Trenberth NCAR Kevin E Trenberth NCAR.
The effect of GIA models on mass-balance estimates in Antarctica Riccardo Riva, Brian Gunter, Bert Vermeersen, Roderik Lindenbergh and Hugo Schotman Department.
The Plausible Range of GIA Contributions to 3-D Motions at GPS Sites in the SNARF Network 2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Mark Tamisiea 1, Jerry Mitrovica 2,
A better GRACE solution for improving the regional Greenland mass balance Z Xu 1, E.J.O Schrama 1, W. van der. Wal 1 1 Department of Astrodynamics and.
Static and dynamic support of western U.S. topography Thorsten W Becker University of Southern California, Los Angeles Claudio Faccenna (Universita di.
Gravimetry Geodesy Rotation
An Overview of the Observations of Sea Level Change R. Steven Nerem University of Colorado Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Colorado Center.
The Influence of loss saturation effects on the assessment of polar ozone changes Derek M. Cunnold 1, Eun-Su Yang 1, Ross J. Salawitch 2, and Michael J.
Glaciation-Induced Sea-Level Change: Theory and Applications Glenn Milne, University of Durham February 2004.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea, James Davis, and Emma Hill Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Recent decades of climate and cryospheric change on the Antarctic Peninsula David G. Vaughan British Antarctic Survey.
Ice Loss Signs of Change. The Cryosphere  Earth has many frozen features including – sea, lake, and river ice; – snow cover; – glaciers, – ice caps;
Fig Wilkins Ice Shelf breakup events of (a) MODIS band 1 image 10 days after the end of the first event; (b) Envisat ASARimage during the second.
FORWARD AND INVERSE MODELLING OF GPS OBSERVATIONS OF FENNOSCANDIAN GIA G.A. Milne 1, J.X. Mitrovica 2, H.-G. Scherneck 3, J.L. Davis 4, J.M. Johansson.
Jacqueline Austermann Harriet Lau, Jerry Mitrovica CIDER community workshop, May 6 th 2016 Image credit: Mike Beauregard Towards reconciling viscosity.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Designing Strength-Proportional Hydraulic Resistance for an Elbow Flexion-Extension.
9 Residual of InSAR data from the preferred model for the four satellite tracks shown in Fig. 3. The colour scale used for displaying the data in Fig.
Bathymetric Maps and Plate Tectonics
Upper Rio Grande R Basin
What causes sea level to change?
Ice sheets and their relation to sea level
Ice on the Land How has climate change affected the distribution of ice around the globe?
From: Substrate Heating in the Planar-Flow Melt Spinning of Metals
Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
From: The alpine Swiss-French airborne gravity survey
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Global Sea Level Rise Sandra Ashhab & Ram Fishman December 5th 2006.
Bathymetric Maps and Plate Tectonics
Volume 90, Issue 7, Pages (April 2006)
by A. Dutton, A. E. Carlson, A. J. Long, G. A. Milne, P. U. Clark, R
Large Currents Generate Cardiac Ca2+ Sparks
Structure of Supported Bilayers Composed of Lipopolysaccharides and Bacterial Phospholipids: Raft Formation and Implications for Bacterial Resistance 
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Water Systems The Water Cycle.
Median and likely range (17th–83rd percentile as used in the AR5) estimates of the ice sheet SLR contributions for different temperature scenarios and.
Simulated Increase of Hurricane Intensities in a CO2-Warmed Climate
Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1
Destabilization of the WAIS in the unperturbed reference simulation
Fig. 1 Time series of air temperature anomalies, cumulative contribution to GMSL since 2008, and rate of GMSL rise due to mass changes of the Greenland.
Membrane Perturbation Induced by Interfacially Adsorbed Peptides
Fig. 1 a) All-India Summer (JJAS) Monsoon rainfall anomalies (% of mean) during The 31-yr sliding mean of the anomalies is shown in.
Fig. 1 Environmental conditions and concentrations of floating plastic debris in the Arctic Ocean. Environmental conditions and concentrations of floating.
California Science Project
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 Predictions of (a) polar wander speed, (c) polar wander direction and (e) as a function of lower-mantle viscosity, in which an elastic lithosphere (infinite viscosity) is assumed (results denoted by ‘el’). Those for (b), (d) and (f) correspond to Earth models with a viscoelastic lithosphere of 10<sup>24</sup> Pa s (results denoted by ‘ve’). The upper-mantle viscosity and lithospheric thickness are 5 × 10<sup>20</sup> Pa s and 100 km, respectively. The ice model is ICE3G from Tushingham & Peltier (1991). The results denoted by ‘full’ (solid line) are based on the surface load distribution including ice and water loads. The contributions owing to ice (dashed line) and water loads (dotted line) are also depicted to understand the change of the polar wander direction. The shaded regions show the range of the observations for the polar wander (McCarthy & Luzum 1996) and (Nerem & Klosko 1996). From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS

Figure 2 Predictions of (a) polar wander speed, (b) polar wander direction and (c) as a function of the lower-mantle viscosity and lithospheric thickness. The lithospheric thickness adopted here is 50, 100 and 200 km. The upper-mantle viscosity is 5 × 10<sup>20</sup> Pa s and the ice model is ICE3G. The results denoted by ‘el’ and ‘ve’ correspond to Earth models with an elastic lithosphere and viscoelastic lithosphere of 10<sup>24</sup> Pa s, respectively. The observations for polar wander (McCarthy & Luzum 1996) and (Nerem & Klosko 1996) are represented by shaded regions. From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS

Figure 3 Predictions of (a) polar wander speed, (b) polar wander direction and (c) as a function of the lower-mantle viscosity and the upper-mantle viscosity. The upper-mantle viscosity adopted here is 2 × 10<sup>20</sup>, 5 × 10<sup>20</sup> and 10<sup>21</sup> Pa s. The lithospheric thickness is 100 km and the ice model is ICE3G. The results denoted by ‘el’ and ‘ve’ correspond to Earth models with an elastic lithosphere and viscoelastic lithosphere of 10<sup>24</sup> Pa s, respectively. The observations for polar wander (McCarthy & Luzum 1996) and (Nerem & Klosko 1996) are represented by shaded regions. From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS

Figure 4 Predictions of (a) polar wander speed, (c) polar wander direction and (e) as a function of the lower-mantle viscosity and the Late Pleistocene ice models, in which elastic lithosphere is assumed (results denoted by ‘el’). Those for (b), (d) and (f) correspond to Earth models with a viscoelastic lithosphere of 10<sup>24</sup> Pa s (denoted by ‘ve’). The upper-mantle viscosity is 5 × 10<sup>20</sup> Pa s, and the lithospheric thickness is 100 km. The ice models adopted here are ICE3G by Tushingham & Peltier (1991), ARC3 + ANT4b (results denoted by AC3AT4b) by Nakada & Lambeck (1988), ARC4 + ANT4b (results denoted by AC4AT4b) by Lambeck (1995) and Nakada & Lambeck (1988) and ARC4 + ANT5 (results denoted by AC4AT5) by Lambeck (1995) and Nakada et al. (2000). The results denoted by ‘J92’ are based on the ice model J92 scenario describing the recent mass imbalance of the Antarctic ice sheets (James & Ivins 1995). The equivalent sea level rise is 0.45 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>. The observations for polar wander (McCarthy & Luzum 1996) and (Nerem & Klosko 1996) are represented by shaded regions. From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS

Figure 9 Schematic figures showing the polar wander for solutions of (a) s1 and (b) s2 (see the text). The polar wander vectors arising from the recent mass imbalance of both polar ice caps are in opposite directions. From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS

Figure 8 Relationship between the present-day total ESL rise and the ESL rise of the Antarctic for models with the effect of internal processes. The polar wander direction and speed for (a) and (b) are 24°W and 0.37 deg Myr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, corresponding to the estimates by Steinberger & O'Connell (1997). Those for (c) and (d) are 60°W and 0.37 deg Myr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The adopted ice model is shown in each figure. The upper-mantle viscosity is 5 × 10<sup>20</sup> Pa s and the thickness of the viscoelastic lithosphere (10<sup>24</sup> Pa s) is 100 km. From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS

Figure 7 Relationship between the present-day total ESL rise and the ESL rise of the Antarctic for ice models of ARC3 + ANT4b, ARC4 + ANT4b, ARC4 + ANT5 and ICE3G + MTGLA (see the text). The ice model MTGLA corresponds to the recent melting of mountain glaciers tabulated by Meier (1984). The upper-mantle viscosity is 5 × 10<sup>20</sup> Pa s and the thickness of a viscoelastic lithosphere (10<sup>24</sup> Pa s) is 100 km. From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS

Figure 6 As in Fig. 5, except for the case of a lithospheric thickness of 200 km. From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS

Figure 5 Solutions that give the minimum χ<sup>2</sup> residuals in eq. (20) (see the text) and also satisfy the observations of both polar wander (McCarthy & Luzum 1996) and (Nerem & Klosko 1996). The upper-mantle viscosity is 5 × 10<sup>20</sup> Pa s, the lithospheric thickness is 100 km and the ice model is ICE3G. (a), (b) Relationship between the present-day total ESL rise and the ESL rise of the Antarctic ; (c), (d) relationship between the and the location (E-longitude) of the Antarctic melted ice; and (e), (f) relationship between and the lower-mantle viscosity. Results for (a), (c) and (e) correspond to Earth models with an elastic lithosphere, and those for (b), (d) and (f) are for Earth models with a viscoelastic lithosphere of 10<sup>24</sup> Pa s. The results with ‘A1’ indicate the source area of 50°≤λ≤ 180° (E) for the recent melting of the Antarctic ice sheet. The areas denoted by ‘A2’ correspond to 180°≤λ≤ 290° (E), and those denoted by ‘A3’ are for 290°≤λ≤ 360° (E) and 0°≤λ≤ 50° (E). From: Perturbations of the Earth's rotation and their implications for the present-day mass balance of both polar ice caps Geophys J Int. 2003;152(1):124-138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01831.x Geophys J Int | © 2003 RAS