Chapter 6 Relevance (Red Herring) Fallacies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy 148 Chapter 5.
Advertisements

Argumentation.
Chapter 6 Fallacies involving Relevance: A fallacy is a common mistake in reasoning where people take the argument to be good when it is irrelevant. The.
Unit 1A Recognizing Fallacies. LOGIC Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning.
Rhetorical Fallacies. What is Rhetorical Fallacy? Rhetorical fallacy Rhetorical fallacy Is a failure of discussion or argument Is a failure of discussion.
Logical Fallacies. Definition & Facts  Defects that weaken arguments weaken arguments  Common in politics and politics and advertisements advertisements.
Logical Fallacies Persuasion Pitfalls. Logical Fallacies What is a logical fallacy? A mistake in reasoning that seriously affects the ability to argue.
Logical Fallacies AKA “How NOT to Win an Argument”
More Bad Reasoning and Bad Rhetoric Violence to both People and Logic.
More Bad Reasoning and Bad Rhetoric Violence to both People and Logic.
Flawed Arguments COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES.  Flaws in an argument  Often subtle  Learning to recognize these will:  Strengthen your own arguments 
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
More Bad Reasoning and Bad Rhetoric Violence to both People and Logic.
Chapter 6 Relevance fallacies! What you need to know…
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Or How I Overcame My Addiction to Illogical Conclusions and Persevered in the Age of Reason Logical Fallacies.
Bell Work: 10/14  describe the following fallacies in 1 sentence each 1. Fallacy #7 – Appeal to popular passions. 2. Fallacy #8 – Appeal to tradition.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Let’s see some more examples!
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Fallacies of Irrelevance
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 5b More Fallacies By David Kelsey.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Learning Outcomes Identify and describe logical fallacies and other bad arguments Identify the different types of logical fallacies.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Fallacies of Relevance Bianca helped with this one too….apparently pink is pretty.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
Logical Fallacies. Slippery Slope The argument that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational claim. If we allow A to happen.
Persuasive Speech Unit Logical Fallacies Fallacy: A mistake in an argument that automatically invalidates it.
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
Environmental Science and Technology HS
Logical Fallacies.
Rhetorical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere (author of Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0) reprinted with permission as a Nizkor Feature on the Nizkor.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Common Logical Fallacies
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
4 The Art of Critical Reading Reading Critically Mather ▪ McCarthy
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in Reasoning.
Chapter 6 Part 2 Relevance (Red Herring) Fallacies
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b Fallacies in Reasoning (2)
Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Logical fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Fallacies Implicit or explicit arguments that: Ignore logic and reason
Errors in Reasoning.
Informal Logical Fallacies
Looking for false logic in someone’s argument
Torture’s Terrible Toll
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies.
Logical fallacies.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Logical Fallacies English III.
1. Could I receive an A for this class
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 6 Relevance (Red Herring) Fallacies Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter Outline (1) Define and recognize argumentum ad hominem fallacies. Define and recognize straw man fallacies. Define and recognize false dilemma fallacies. Define and recognize fallacies involved in misplacing the burden of proof. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter Outline (2) Define and recognize fallacies involved in begging the question. Define and recognize fallacies classified as appeals to emotion. Define and recognize other fallacies involved in arriving at irrelevant conclusions. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. What is a fallacy? A mistake in reasoning, an argument that does not support or prove the contention it is supposed to support or prove Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

What is a relevance fallacy? Mistake in reasoning "Red herring" that is a distraction Argument that is not really relevant to its conclusion Example “You tell me it’s dangerous to text when I’m driving, but I have seen you doing it.” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Argumentum Ad hominem (1) Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. Argumentum Ad hominem (1) © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Argumentum Ad Hominem (2) This fallacy is committed if a speaker or writer attempts to dismiss someone’s position (idea, proposal, claim, argument, etc.) by dismissing him or her. Most common fallacy on Earth Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Argumentum Ad Hominem (3) “According to Al Gore, global warming is the most serious threat facing us today. Folks, what a crock. Al Gore spends $20,000 each year on electricity in his Tennessee mansion!” Issue Is global warming the most serious threat? Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Argumentum Ad Hominem (4) Premise Al Gore spends $20,000 each year on electricity. Conclusion Therefore, global warming is not the most serious threat facing us today. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Argumentum Ad Hominem (5) Which of the following assertions is not relevant with respect to the previous example? Global warming will cause rising sea levels to swamp all east coast cities by 2100. Global warming will cause coral reefs to die within 30 years. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Argumentum Ad Hominem (6) CO2 levels have risen over 30 percent in the last 25 years due to global warming. According to a study published in Nature, current rates of global warming will lead to the extinction of 1 million species by 2050. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Argumentum Ad Hominem (7) Al Gore spends $20,000 each year on electricity. This is not a relevant assertion. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of Argumentum ad hominem (1) Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. Varieties of Argumentum ad hominem (1) © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of Argumentum Ad Hominem (2) Abusive ad hominem Circumstantial ad hominem Inconsistency ad hominem Poisoning the well Guilt by association Genetic fallacy Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Example of Abusive Ad Hominem “What Al Gore says about air pollution is a joke! That clown will say anything to get attention!” The speaker is bad-mouthing Mr. Gore. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Example of Circumstantial Ad Hominem “What Al Gore says about air pollution is pure bull. Al Gore makes a fortune from alternative energy investments. What do you think he’d say?” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Example of Inconsistency Ad Hominem “Senator Clinton says we should get out of Iraq. What a bunch of garbage coming from her! She voted for the war, don’t forget.” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Poisoning the Well Trying to get listeners to dismiss what a person is going to say by talking about the person’s consistency or character or circumstances Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Example of Poisoning the Well “Senator Clinton is going to give a talk tonight on Iraq. Well, it’s just gonna be more baloney. That gal will say anything to get a vote.” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Example of Guilt by Association “You think waterboarding is torture? That sounds like something these left-wing college professors would say.” The belief is “guilty” by virtue of its alleged association with supposedly left-wing college professors. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Genetic Fallacy A fallacy that occurs when someone argues that the origin of a contention in and of itself automatically renders it false An idea is rejected since its origin (genesis) is presumed to be defective. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Genetic Fallacy versus Circumstantial Ad Hominem “Does God exist? Of course not. That idea originated with a bunch of ignorant people who knew nothing about science.” Example of genetic fallacy “John says God exists. What nonsense. He’s just saying that because he works for a church.” Example of circumstantial ad hominem Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. Straw Man Fallacy (1) © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Straw Man Fallacy (2) Occurs when a speaker or writer attempts to dismiss a contention by distorting or misrepresenting it Example “Twenty percent? You want to tip her 20 percent? Hey, maybe you want to give her everything we make, but I frankly think that is ridiculous!” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

False Dilemma Fallacy (1) Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. False Dilemma Fallacy (1) © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

False Dilemma Fallacy (2) Someone tries to establish a conclusion by offering it as the only alternative to something we will find unacceptable, unattainable, or implausible. Also known as the black/white fallacy, either/or fallacy, false choice fallacy, and false alternative fallacy Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Example of the False Dilemma Fallacy (1) “Either we allow the oil companies to drill for oil in the Gulf or we will be at the mercy of OPEC. Therefore we shouldn’t prevent the oil companies from drilling for oil in the Gulf.” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Example of the False Dilemma Fallacy (2) “Either we increase the number of troops in Iraq, or the terrorists will be attacking the U.S. cities. Seems like a simple choice to me.” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

"Perfectionist" Version of the False Dilemma Fallacy Example “It’s impossible to eliminate terrorism entirely. We should stop wasting money on it.” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

"Line-Drawing" Version of the False Dilemma Fallacy Example “There shouldn’t be restrictions on violence in the movies. After all, when is a movie ‘too violent’? You can’t draw a line.” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Misplacing the Burden of Proof (1) Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. Misplacing the Burden of Proof (1) © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Misplacing the Burden of Proof (2) Occurs when people try to support or prove their position by misplacing the burden of proof and trying to make others disprove it Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Examples of Misplacing the Burden of Proof “I believe our former president’s birth certificate was a forgery. Can you prove it isn’t?” “Can I prove the Biblical flood really happened? Hey, can you prove it didn’t?” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Appeal to Ignorance This fallacy occurs when it is argued that we should believe a claim because nobody has proved it false. It is a variation of the fallacy of misplacing the burden of proof. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Begging the Question (1) Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. Begging the Question (1) © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Begging the Question (2) A speaker or writer is guilty of begging the question logically when he or she tries to “support” a contention by offering as “evidence” what amounts to a repackaging of the very contention in question. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Examples of Begging the Question “Obviously the president told the truth about Benghazi. He wouldn’t lie to us about it.” “Can I prove the Biblical flood really happened? Of course it happened! Why else would Noah build an ark?” Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Statements with Fallacies Do not demonstrate or support their conclusions. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Appeal to Emotion AND Irrelevant conclusions Next Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. Appeal to Emotion AND Irrelevant conclusions © 2017 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.