Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Advertisements

Instructions for Template This is meant to be a resource to help you to plan and prepare for your weekly class. This resource is merely a suggestion of.
Assisting Peers to Provide W orthwhile Feedback UC Merced SATAL Program.
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
Lesson Design Study Suggestions from our text: Leading Lesson Study.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
A Closer Look I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
LESSON 15 / 16 INTERVIEWING TOGETHER Goals: Conduct an interview Summarize, paraphrase, and quote Synthesize answers and create a report of a Q&A interview.
WELCOME BACK TO CAMP!. Agenda Warm-Up for statistical and probabilistic thinking Norms for our PD Teaching through problem solving Break Lesson Study:
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Module 3: Observation for Assessment
Learning Management System
Teaching Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities: Research-Based Practices Second Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
How to Write a Book Review. Before You Begin Remember, there is no right way to write a book review. Book reviews are highly personal and reflect the.
Organizing Students to Practice and Deepen Knowledge
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Academic Conversations
SLP Training Day 3 30th September 2016
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Case Study Ethnographic Research
Classroom teaching observation tools
Reflections on Practice
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Classroom Video Observation
ELT 329 ACTION RESEARCH Week 4
Lesson 7: How Documentation Can Extend the Learning
The Learner Centered Classroom
What: Determine the utility of Thinking Routines to pursue our goal of increasing student understanding. Why: An apparent lack of thinking on the part.
Equality Project Part A Observations
Classroom Assessment CA NGSS Rollout 4 #CANGSSRollout
Three-Phase Lesson Plan Model
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Assessment and Instructional Planning
Together We improve student learning and achieve more by:
Research Live Presentation Template
Forging the Innovation Generation
Core Competencies: Moving forward with Self-Assessment
Olive Chapman University of Calgary Canada
MEETING TECHNOLOGY Unit 1
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners Literacy
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
(in general… and for this essay)
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Fishbowl Discussion Directions:
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
MEETING TECHNOLOGY Unit 1
PRIME+ Day 1 September 24, 2013 Welcome to PRIME+
Cooperating Teacher Training
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act,
Junior Math Study Group
Build it and They Will Come
Session 2, Modified Jigsaw
NGSS Tool and Process 1 . Five Tools and Processes for Translating the NGSS into Instruction and Classroom Assessment Tool 3: Using the 5E Instructional.
Developing departmental practice and culture to improve teachers’ confidence when addressing the reasoning component of the new secondary maths curriculum.
Learning Intentions and Success Criteria
MEETING TECHNOLOGY Unit 1
Introduction to Lesson Study July 27, 2011
ELA Department Data Talk
Overview Introduction to base ten blocks Practice modeling subtraction
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Interdisciplinary Case Management Experience
Data Meeting One (60 minutes)
Processing New Information
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Case Study Ethnographic Research
Exploring the Instructional Shifts Inherent in the 2020 CAS
Writing-to-Learn vs. Writing-to-Demonstrate Learning
Presentation transcript:

Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study

Ideas for conducting lesson review Interviewing Students Bringing in the student perspective following the teaching of the lesson can add an interesting, useful, and sometimes surprising dimension to the debriefing. Taking a few minutes to ask students the following questions, developmentally adjusted, usually generates rich responses.

Ideas for conducting lesson review Interviewing Students 1. What was the point of this lesson? What did you learn? 2. What worked in this lesson? What did you like about the lesson? 3. What didn't work in this lesson? What didn't you like about the lesson? 4. Your teacher might teach this lesson next year. How could she (or he) make it better? Students can be interviewed in small groups, or a small sample of students can be selected for the observers to interview.

IDEAS FOR CONDUCTING THE DEBRIEFING If the team does choose to seek more input, knowledgeable others and guests can help the team consider the direction that their revision might take and to make further sense of the evidence collected. It is helpful for the moderator to ask participants to frame suggestions in the form of questions, using sentence stems such as

Team Debriefing Questions for Guests I wonder what would happen if ...? What is another way you might ...? What might explain ... ? Why did you decide to ...? In your planning, did you consider ...?

Guiding debriefing from guests The sentence stems can be posted during the debriefing. Using questions helps knowledgeable others and guests to refrain from offering overly prescriptive solu­tions. It also helps engage the collective wisdom of the group in making sense of the data and improving the lesson. Sometimes direct suggestions are offered. It can be useful to follow a suggestion with a question that invites the team to imagine or hypothesize how the idea might work in the lesson.

Examples include: How might that look in your lesson? To what extent might that work in your lesson and with your students? What do you imagine might happen if you were to try something like that?

Final commentator comments. To end the debriefing, the moderator introduces and thanks the final commentator, who will add his or her thoughts and synthesize the discussion. As mentioned earlier in this chapter, the final commentator is responsible for the following:

Final commentator comments Contributing any new insights or questions not previously shared in the debriefing Summarizing the key ideas and questions that emerged from the debriefing Highlighting the areas and issues the team might want to pay attention to as they revise the lesson Expressing appreciation to the teacher for opening her classroom to the group Extending thanks to the team for all of their work

Form 5.3 Team Member Log-Post-debriefing Name _________________ Date _____ Describe participants' observations of student learning. Include details of what students said, did, and wrote/produced. ______________________________ Were there any unanticipated student responses? Explain. _______________________________

Form 5.4 Outside Observer Log-Post-debriefing School/Team ___________________________ Date ________ Research Lesson ______________ Teacher ______________________ Knowledgeable Other ____________________________ To what extent were the goals of the lesson achieved? Please provide supporting evidence. Which instructional decisions might have attributed to helping students meet these goals? Explain. What aspects of the goals were not reached? Please provide supporting evidence. Which aspects of the lesson plan should be reconsidered based on this evidence?

Re-teaching the lesson The following documents and items from the observation and debriefing should be gathered for the revision process. These artifacts will also be used in preparing the lesson study report. Observation notes Notes from the debriefing on participants' and team members' observations Post-debriefing individual reflection log Student work Photos of the blackboard Videotape of lesson (if available)

Gather and Review the Data There are several ways to sort the data. Individuals or pairs might look at: A specific section of the lesson plan (Introduction, Explore, Summary, etc.) Individual goals of the lesson One of the points of evaluation One type of data (debriefing notes, reflection logs, observations, student work, etc.)

Guiding Questions Guiding Questions Description What evidence do we need to authentically inform the team's learning? Teams go over the artifacts they have collected throughout their lesson study process. For the revision of the lesson, teams may want to include the following: Student work Photos of the blackboard Videotape of lesson Notes from the debriefing on participants' and team members' observations Post-debriefing individual reflection logs Example Our team gathered the following items: Research notes that were taken during the planning that focused on content, student understanding, and pedagogy The lesson plan Carole's notes from the debriefing Team members' individual reflection logs

Form 6.1 Revising Log-General Observations and Comments Record evidence of unanticipated student responses. Identify any possible changes to the lesson. Unanticipated Response: Evidence: Possible changes: Evidence: : Possible changes (p. 114)