Status Update for NRI Commissioned Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LCC status Lyn Evans 1April 18, 2015PAC Orsay. ILC in Linear Collider Collaboration 2 ICFA Chair: J Mnich Program Adv. Committee PAC – Chair: N. Holtkamp.
Advertisements

Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
1 DOE Annual Review -June 15,2005 An Overview of Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) U. S. ILC Civil studies and cost issues for Snowmass Fred.
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
LCB/ICFA meeting at Newport News with full snow, February This is only for TB meeting Presentation and not for Distribution. ( )
MEXT Review Process in Japan 2014/7/16 Y. Sugimoto 1.
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting June 30, 2010 Agenda 1.Report from PMs (5 min.) 2.General Report from Group Leaders(15 min.) 3.Special Discussions 1.TDP R&D.
1 st October Linear Collider workshop The CLIC/ILC common work plan progress J. Clarke and L. Rinolfi.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Atsuto Suzuki. 1. Toward ILC Construction : Japanese Activities 1. Toward ILC Construction : Japanese Activities.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
ILC – Recent progress & Path to Technical Design Report Brian Foster (Hamburg/DESY/Oxford & GDE) Plenary ECFA CERN 25/11/11.
1 Global Design Effort TILC08 - WG1 Summary WG-1: Cost Reduction Studies J. Carwardine, T. Shidara, N. Walker (For WG-1 participants)
D.Proch, DESY; GDE meeting Vancouver 06 Technical systems: Cavity Report Overview on costing activities for ILC –European costing method Overview industrial.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
1 ILC Internal Cost Review Major Points from External Reviewers T. Elioff, J. Marx, V. Soergel, M. Yoshioka, and A. Yamamoto, (C. Wyss, absent) To be presented.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
The fourth Baseline Technical Review (BTR) - Conventional Facilities and Siting March 2012 All changes made to the CFS 2007 Reference Design during.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
A Satellite Meeting at IPAC-2010 SCRF Cavity Technology and Industrialization Date : May 23, 2010, a full-day meeting, prior to IPAC-2010 Place: Int. Conf.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 9/13/2006 Americas Regional Team FY08-09 Planning Meeting 1 1/11 ILC-Americas FY08-09.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Progress and Plans for R&D and the Conceptual Design of the ILC Main Linacs H. Hayano, KEK PAC2005 5/18/2005.
Global Design Effort Main Linac Technology System Kick-off Meeting Cavity Summary 20 Sept 2007 DESY Marc Ross.
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
PM Report AS ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design –Marc.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
Main Linac Technology (MLT) Meeting To be held through WebEx July 13, 2007.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
AWLC14 - FERMILAB May 12-16, 2014 Conventional Facilities & Siting Working Group Summary V Kuchler, A Enomoto, J Osborne.
A Proposal for FJPPL (TYL) Development of Frequency Tuners Optimization and Cryomodule Integration for 1.3 GHz SRF Cavities G. Devanz, F. Nunio, O. Napoly.
SRF Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Fermilab. Overview Charge: Does the laboratory make effective use of collaboration and existing SRF capabilities at other.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC CFS & Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC CFS & GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP CFS Status.
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting March 9, Report from PMs (15 min.) 1.Acknowledgements for completing S1-Global cold/RF test (A. Y.) 2.GDE meeting plan.
PM Report CFS /Gbl ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design.
SCRF: Monthly WebEx Meeting Oct., 19, 2011
WP High Beta Cavities Delivery
ATF status and plans for 2017
The Evolving ILC Project
ILC Accelerator Activities in Japan
CLIC work program and milestones
Introduction and Meeting Objectives
LCC L. Evans, Santander, 2nd June 2016
LCWS11 AWG9 PARALLEL SESSION SUMMARY
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Evolving an ILC focused SCRF Facility from the XFEL Infrastructure
ILC Status in Japan LCWS2016, Morioka M.Yamauchi KEK December 5, 2016
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting Jan. 12, 2010
Introduction to the Workshop
A. Yamamoto, S. Michizono, and B. List
Ralph Aßmann (DESY) 2nd collaboration week November 24th, 2017, Lisbon
2. SCRF General Preparation for the AD&I Preparation for AAP Review
ILC/CLIC e+ generation working group
CLIC/ILC Collaboration Meeting: Objectives & Organization
ILC Global Design Effort
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
FALC report and KEK’s plan for the ILC
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
Daresbury ESS In-Kind Contributions
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
Presentation transcript:

Status Update for NRI Commissioned Survey Akira Yamamoto A report on 21 July, 2015

ILC being studied in Japan 150421 ILC being studied in Japan SCJ Recommendation in 2013 MEXT ILC Taskforce formed in 2013 Commissioned Survey by NRI ( in 2014, and 2015) Academic Experts Committee in JFY 2014 ~ 2015 Particle & Nuclear Phys. Working Group in 2014 ~ 2015 TDR Validation Working Group in 2014 ~ 2015 Human Resource Working Group in 2015 planned planned 15/05/11 MEXT Commissioned Survey

JFY2015, Commissioned Survey by MEXT contracted with Nomura Research Institute (NRI) Subjects for survey and analysis: Technical feasibility to realize the ILC Regarding components, system design, management, and infrastructure Technical issues to prepare for the ILC construction Regarding industrial technology, and necessary time-scale, and prototype works. Cost increase risk Cost reduction possibility with technical approaches not described in TDR

ILC Progress Report prepared to be useful as a starting point for surveys in 2015 It contains the LCC-ILC technical progress after TDR, respecting: Civil engineering studies Accelerator hardware design/development updates Accelerator system layout updates Integration/test facilities to be prepared for “hub-laboratory” functioning Project Implementation Plan Further preparatory work

Issues to prepare for ILC Realization Themes Issues/Subjects Global Cooperation/work-sharing ADI Acc. Parameter optimization & eng. Design Change Management (CM) LCC-ILC-ADI to take a central role with global cooperation SRF Mass-production & Testing technology  Hub-lab functioning to be balanced Stabilization of the performance TTC Collab., as a worldwide community - KEK-STF: Hub-Lab function - EXFEL: mass production and testing - LCLS : mass production and testing Nano-beam Ultra low emittance, Nano-beam, and the stability ATF Collab., as a worldwide community KEK-ATF to be maximized in use, as a globalyl unique CFS Site-specific CFS design, env. assess. General plan, eng. Design, drawings JP-CFS to serve a central role in cooperation with global experts. Management Preparation for the int’l ILC laboratory A main Issue for the ILC to be prepared ILC Progress after TDR 15/07/10

設計改定管理・基本プロセス Change Management: The Basic Path B. List, Design Integration and Configuration Management ILC Progress after TDR 提案 Propose 評価 Review 決定 Decide 実施・具体化 Implement 15/07/17 07.10.14

TDR 以降の設計の進展: ILC Accelerator Design: Post-TDR Updates Objectives: : Further optimize the ILC accelerator design parameters, assuming a site model in Japan, and to seek for the best cost-effective construction, Process for the Change Management: 有識者会議からの 提言に応える努力 Decision Note CR-001 Add return “Dogleg” to target by-pass No approved CR-002 Adapt equal L* (4.1 m) for both detectors Approved 設計の統一、信頼性向上 CR-003 Detector hall with vertical shaft access 建設期間の確度向上 CR-004 Extension of the e-e+ ML tunnels by about 1.5 km 500 GeV 、到達確度向上 CR-005 Update top-level parameter 加速器設計値の確度 CR-006 Add BPM down stream of QD0 CR-007 Adoption of the Asian design as sole baseline TDR をアジア版に統一 CR-008 Formal release TDR 2015a lattive CR-TBD ML tunnel central call to be thinner To be evaluated ビーム加速中アクセスなし  Cryogenics system mainly on surface 安全対応 BDS timmel allowing e-driven e+ source in parallel 陽電子源・確度向上 Cost effective SRF cavity integration In discussion SRF 空洞コストの信頼性

10. Further Preparatory Work (1) 10.1 General It is anticipated that preparation (w/ appropriate funding) will take about 4 years 10.2 超伝導高周波技術:SRF technology Nb material, cutting sheet from Ingot w/ control grain size Tuner in cooperation w/ LCLS-II Coupler value engineering w/ simplified structure and new ceramic w. optimized process of CM assembly. Long term effort for further gradient to scope 1 TeV upgrade, Hydro-forming w/ seamless Nb cylilnder, or Cu cylinder followed by surface coating w/ Nb. High-Q realization w. new surface treatment or doping technology Mitigation of degradation during the process of the CM assembly 10.3 SRF 電力供給のための電源:Modulator industrialization for SRF Demonstration of the industrial manufacturing and long-term reliability 15/07/17 ILC Progress after TDR

10. Further Preparatory Work (2) 10.4 試験システム技術・人材養成 Test/Qualification infrastructure at KEK Full prototype cryomodules under high power in which a beam can be accelerated must be completed with the highest priority. An assembly and cryogenic-test hall at KEK must be equipped with the entire infrastructure necessary for integrating full CMs and for testing, to demonstrate the capability of series production rate. 10.5 極小ビーム技術:Nano-beam technology The effort at the accelerator test facility (ATF) at KEK must be continued to achieve the technical goals of both the beam size and the stability at the final focus, providing sufficient operational margin. 10.6 陽電子源:Positron production The positron source is challenging. Further effort must be put into the undulator-based design including the convertor target. In parallel an alternative design using conventional means (which will exclude polarised positrons) must be pursued as a backup solution. 15/07/17 ILC Progress after TDR

Status and Plan 7/10: ILC Progress Report pre-explained to NRI 7/17: PR explained to MEXT 7/23: PR to be reported to NRI (at the 1st study comm. Mtg. --- 7/15: Appointment requests sent out (by NRI) to laboratories and industry in Europe, during a period of 28 Sept. – 9 Oct. - DESY, CEA-Saclay, LAL-Orsay, INFN-LASA, INFN-Frascati, CERN, STFC Daresbury - RI, E-Zanon, BN, Thales, Alsyom, (AL) Soon: Requests to be sent out to Lab. and Ind., in the US, during an expected period of 9 – 13 Nov. - SLAC, Fermilab, Jlab - AES. ROARK, CPI, (ATI-WC)

Appointment Request an example sent out Dear *** This is Michio Kitamura of Nomura Research Institute, which last year sent a team of experts and researchers  to your organization to conduct interviews concerning the ILC. Our findings have now been written up into a report (a summary of which is currently being translated into English), and I would like to thank you once more for your kind assistance in our research. Our research on the ILC continues this year, though on different topics from last year, and so I would like to formally request permission for our research team to visit you again to interview representatives of your organization. NRI has been commissioned by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan to carry out a survey and analysis of the technical feasibility of the International Linear Collider (ILC) project and technical challenges posed by construction of particle accelerators for the ILC, and work on this study is now underway. The study consists of the following three main elements: A survey of the technical feasibility of construction of accelerators for the ILC A survey of the technical issues that will need to be surmounted in order to mass produce the components required by the ILC’s accelerators A survey of ways to reduce the cost of construction of the ILC’s accelerators As part of this study, we plan to visit and interview leading research institutes and companies producing accelerators or related products in Europe and USA. The aim of our visit to *** is to obtain up-to-date information, expert opinion, suggestions, and other insights that contribute to the above three elements of our study. Below please find a list of topics that we intend to cover in the interview, our desired schedule for the appointment, and contact information. I hope this request does not inconvenience you greatly, and would deeply appreciate your cooperation and assistance in making the necessary arrangements. Kind regards, Michio Kitamura, Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. (NRI)