Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

PM&E Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Prepared by BMCalub.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Nine steps of a good project planning
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Adult Education Programmes Module 1 © 2013 PRIA International Academy | Appreciation Courses Monitoring and Evaluation for.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Cross-cutting Issues And other things your project document must include.
Course on Data Analysis and Interpretation P Presented by B. Unmar Sponsored by GGSU PART 2 Date: 5 July
Framework for Monitoring Learning & Evaluation
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
Monitoring and Evaluation
SJI Impact Assessment 2014 Based on Impact Assessment for Development Agencies – Learning to Value Change (Chris Roche, Oxfam, digital file 2010)
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
2.4.1 Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 4. organizational structure for M&E.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Procurement Development Programs
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
Project monitoring and evaluation
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 5. Review of the organizational strategy.
Workshop to develop theories of change
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Evaluation Plan Akm Alamgir, PhD June 30, 2017.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
April 2011.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Postharvest Training Projects
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Describe result frameworks
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Good practice in preparing an application
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
Monitoring and Evaluating FGM/C abandonment programs
Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation
Monitoring and evaluation Part 1 Lecture 10. Appraisal Vs Evaluation  Appraisal is before an activity takes place  Evaluation after the activity has.
Monitoring and Evaluation in Communication Management
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Project intervention logic
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs

Learning objectives By the end of this session, participants will be able to Present why it is important to identify the information needs of managers and stakeholders when designing an M&E system. Discuss how to identify information needs of stakeholders and managers in their organisation. Explain what information needs managers and stakeholders of an intervention may have.

Identifying the information needs In order to decide what information the M&E system has to deliver it is important to understand the information needs of managers and stakeholders. Ask questions: What do you need to know about the intervention in order to manage it well? What do you need to know to about the intervention to learn for the future?

Identifying the information needs Identify information needs from the reports they require or need to prepare. Present them with a list of potential or possible information needs to choose from. Identify questions that managers and stakeholders may ask or will be asked by others, for which they need an answer.

Identifying the information needs Once identified, plan the detailed M&E arrangements for the interventions further: define indicators and decide what data needs to be collected and how. Information needs change over time and may need to be re-assessed at regular intervals. Check the validity and usefulness of the defined indicators during implementation of the intervention.

Information needs Two categories of information needs: Information on achievement of objectives Information regarding the context of objectives

Information on achievement of objectives Information that relates directly or indirectly to assessing the achievement of the different levels of objectives. Activities and outputs: operational information; whether activities have been done and whether outputs have been produced. Purpose: overall achievement of the intervention over its lifetime, including the short term changes for the target group. Goal: long term changes or development changes for the target group or the contribution of the intervention to these changes.

Information on achievement of objectives Consider ‘basic’ information needs during indicator definition. Defining high quality indicators makes it possible to collect the data and generate the information that is needed to assess the level of achievement of objectives Allows managers and stakeholders to make decisions on corrective actions, if necessary.

Information on achievement of objectives Example Indicator: ‘By 2009 agricultural production of coffee, tea and cassava for farmers in Lowland Region has increased’ provides important information on what the program has achieved in the region.

Information on achievement of objectives Examples of questions that managers or stakeholders may ask by level of objective: Input How much money did we spend? How much did it cost? What physical resources did we use? How much staff time did we spend implementing? Activity What have we done? When did we do it? Who did it? Output What tangible products have we delivered as a result of the activities? When did we deliver the results? To whom did we deliver? Purpose/Outcome What have we done/achieved when intervention ends? What are the short or medium term changes in target region or for target population? What has been achieved as a result of the outputs? Goal/Impact What is the long term development change that the intervention has achieved? What change has the intervention brought about in the region in the last 5 years?

Information regarding the context of objectives Objectives are complex and may not be summarised or explained by one or two indicators. Information on indicators will only provide a partial view and can only represent a simplified indication of the complex situation of an intervention. Qualitative and quantitative information may not explain why, if and how this can be attributed to the intervention. Why there was success or failure or what has been learned from the intervention for future interventions.

Information regarding the context of objectives managers and stakeholders may need information that provides additional information on context and background of intervention information to understand and interpret the indicators better information that explains what is happening; how it is happening; and why it is happening

Information regarding the context of objectives Information beyond the ‘basic’ information needs may relate to: environment of intervention: political, social, economical cross cutting issues related to the intervention: gender, HIV/AIDS, natural environment unexpected results: outputs, outcomes and impact partnerships and networking in the intervention risks to intervention technical aspects

Information regarding the context of objectives Specific information to assess the value and quality of an intervention: relevance effectiveness efficiency impact, and sustainability

Examples of information needs Examples of specific information needs of managers and stakeholders of a NARS organisation: Human Resource Department on implementation of activities, work plan of intervention’s staff members for performance assessment. Finance Manager on use of finances disbursed to the intervention. Program Leader on tangible outputs produced by intervention. Extension Agent on beneficiaries of intervention: types, characterisation. Donor on representation of women among beneficiaries and solutions benefitting women. CEO on the mitigation of risks that may prevent the NARS organisation to achieve its goal. Project Leader on project outcomes and sustainability of project outcomes. Department of Agriculture on regions targeted by intervention.

Information needs – checklist Seek the information needs of different stakeholders with them. Do not consider only project management information needs. Be sure to include information that can help you answer the five core evaluation questions: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. Include information that can help you understand how well the project is dealing with cross-cutting issues. Remember to include information for each level of the objective hierarchy. Include enough operational information to know if you are making optimal use of resources and that operations are good quality. Seek information that can help you not only to check targets but, especially, to explain progress. Why something is happening or why not? Look out for the unintended. Last but not least, stick to the "less-is-more" principle. Regularly revise your list of information needs to filter out the information that does not seem to be critical. Source: adapted from IFAD 2002 Thank you!.