Mechanical calculations of the CDS key elements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ann Van Lysebetten CO 2 cooling experience in the LHCb Vertex Locator Vertex 2007 Lake Placid 24/09/2007.
Advertisements

N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
R.Valbuena NBI March 2002 CNGS Decay Pipe Entrance Window Structural and Thermal Analysis A.Benechet, P.Cupial, R.Valbuena CERN-EST-ME.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Background to the current problem 1. As a result of the high stresses in the bobbin due to the magnet load, the bobbin end plate needs to be increased.
Felix Wamers, Technical Coordination Meeting, 12 th -13 th of May CERN-GSI Technical Coordination Meeting Felix Wamers, Yu Xiang,
Interface issues on Super-FRS magnets test at CERN
FNAL-SCRF 会議報告 1. Cryomodule, Plug-compatible Interface ( 大 内) 2. High Pressure Code, 5K Shield (Tom Peterson)
Neutrino Factory Mercury Vessel: Initial Cooling Calculations V. Graves Target Studies Nov 15, 2012.
Heat load study of cryomodule in STF
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac CM - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden J. Polinski.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac MBL/HBL - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden.
FNAL Meeting, July 2006 Basti, Bedeschi, Raffaelli, INFN-Pisa 1 ILC cryomodule mechanical work at INFN-Pisa  Ongoing work  Near term future  Manpower.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule Yun He MLC external review October 03, 2012.
The ESS Cryogenics System J. G. Weisend II, P. Arnold, J Fydrych, W. Hees, J. Jurns, A. Lundmark, X. T. Su, X.L. Wang June 2015.
Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
Cryogenic update before Fermilab meeting (and after the helium tank review) Coordination meeting 6 th May 2015 K. Brodzinski HiLumi-LHC-CC-Cryo-PPT-18_v1.
Date 2007/Oct./23 FNAL-GDE-Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface Definition (FNAL-GDE-Meeting) N. Ohuchi.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
Performance analysis of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the complete superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf.
Dimensions, pressures and temperatures of cryogenic circuits for the SPL U. Wagner TE-CRG.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac CDS Heat Loads Calculations Preliminary Design Review Meeting. 20 May ESS. Lund. Sweden.
S1 global: thermal analysis TILC09, April 19th, 2009 Serena Barbanotti Paolo Pierini.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Warm cryostat mechanical calculations A.Catinaccio PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN Page 1 CERN, May 27th 2015.
General overview of WU : Cryogenic Distribution for Elliptical Linac Jarosław Fydrych Cryodistribution Project Engineer Preliminary Design Review,
ME444 ENGINEERING PIPING SYSTEM DESIGN CHAPTER 11: STEAM PIPING SYSTEM (1)
Numerical modelling of cold helium safety discharges from the cryogenic distribution line Jonathan Persson MSc. Engineering Physics AD and ICS Retreat.
CMTF Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner May 6, Outline CMTF cryogenic system scope Goals Key functional requirements Conceptual layout Cryoplant Current.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
HL-LHC-UK Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 07/03/2016.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
Overview of the ESS Linac Cryogenic Distribution System
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
ESS | Helium Distribution | | Torsten Koettig Linac – Helium distribution 1.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac SV calculation approach Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden J.
Design Status of the Spoke Cryomodule for MYRRHA SLHIPP Louvain la Neuve 17-18/04/2013 Design Status of the Spoke Cryomodule for MYRRHA SLHIPP Louvain.
F LESEIGNEUR / G OLIVIER LUND January 9th, ESS HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE ESS CRYOMODULE STATUS MEETING HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE LUND JANUARY 9TH, 2013 Unité.
PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS BY CAESAR-II SOFTWARE
Pipe Integrity Check using Finite Element Analysis
Gersemi Cryostat Mechanical analysis
Design options for straight sections of the FCC cryolines
Dana Arenius LCLS-II 4.5K Cold Box Director’s Review November 16, 2016
2K Cold Box FDR Introduction
Status of the PANDA Magnet mechanics (yoke & cryostat)
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
PS Internal Dump - actuation system
IT-4189 Supply and installation of a cryogenic distribution system
2K CB Internal Piping Flexibility Analysis
Pawel Duda, Jaroslaw Polinski, Maciej Chorowski, Lauren Tavian*
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
Integrated Design: APEX-Solid Wall FW-Blanket
Cryostat design Mechanical design: Thermal screens: Specifications:
2K Cold Box Process Design
2K Cold Box Internal Piping Flexibility Analysis
Operation experience of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf of Cryogenics.
Members of project: Christian Brosch Andreas Maier Tamara Bubeck
ESS elliptical cryomodule
Jaroslaw Fydrych SHC Lead Engineer
Helium collector CFD analysis
Preliminary Pipe Stress Analysis of High Pressure, High Temperature Experimental Helium Cooling System (EHCL) Corresponding Author: Aditya Kumar verma.
Helium collector structural analysis
Design of the cryogenic system of the CBM magnet
ESS elliptical cryomodule
WP11: CDS-SL CDR Overview
Compound Normal & Shear Stresses
Work Unit AIK 11.2 CDR of the CDS-SL Mechanics
Source Spallation European (ESS)
Presentation transcript:

Mechanical calculations of the CDS key elements Janusz Skrzypacz Jarosław Poliński Maciej Chorowski Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden

CDS Aim of the project CTL CDL (75 m) 21 High Beta Linac – 174 m 9 Medium Beta Linac – 75 m

Codes and standards EN 13480

Thermal properties were taken from CryoComp software Materials Process pipes and their elements: 1.4306 (EN 10216-5:2004 ); Vacuum jacket and their elements: 1.4301 (EN 10216-5:2004 ); Thermal shield: aluminum 6060 T4 (EN 755-2); Sliding supports of the process pipes: G10 Thermal properties were taken from CryoComp software

Pipe parameters EN 10220 EN 13480 e/Do Type of process line Pipe description Size PS [bar] Tn [K] Do [mm] emin [mm] e [mm] e/Do Main cold process lines MC - He supply line DN65 6 4,5 76,1 0,159 2.6 0.03 MB - VLP line CDS DN200 3 219,1 0,458 2,9 0.013 MB - VLP line CTL DN250 273 0,570 0.011 ME - TS supply line DN50 25 40 60,3 0,521 2.3 0.033 MF - TS return line 50 Branch cold process lines BC - He supply branch line DN10 17,1 0,036 2 0.117 BB - VLP branch line 0,126 BE - TS supply branch line DN8 13,7 0,118 0.146 BF - TS return branch line Side cold process lines SC1 - He supply side line 1 SC 2- He supply side line 2 SB - VLP side line SE - TS supply side line SF1 - TS return side line1 SF2 - TS return side line 2   Vacuum Shield DN550 1.5 293 559 0.292 EN 13480

Assumptions of Process Pipe Model Calculations in accordance with EN 13480; Each process pipe was analysed separately;   The pipe model encompasses only three CDL modules and all CTL line; The jumper connection was created only in one CDL module;.  

Parameters of calculations Flexible elements - Bellows Support distances for process pipes and vacuum shield Order Pipe DN PS [bar] L1max [mm] L2max [mm] Lgmax [mm] 1 DN 8 25 32 112 1100 2 DN 10 6 40 140 2100 3 DN 50 200 700 6800 4 3300 5 DN 65 260 910 8000 DN 200 800 2800 18000 7 DN 250 1000 3500 19000 8 DN600 1.5 2200 7700 >20000 Metal bellows parameters – WITZENMANN catalog DN PN Type 2dn [mm] W [kg] A [mm2] ca [N/mm] [Nm/deg] cl 50 25 ARN25.0050.032.0 32 2 4500 216 2.8 159 65 6 ARN06.0065.072.0 72 3,5 6820 111 2.2 39 125 ARN06.0125.063.0 63 3.6 18600 81 4.2 349 200 ARN06.0200.090.0 90 9.1 43000 151 18 529 250 ARN06.0250.096.0 96 12.2 66300 161 30 995 600 2.5 ARN02.0600.076.0 76 23 319200 205 182 11569

Parameters of calculations Flexible elements – Metal Hoses Applied parameters of metal hoses – WITZENMANN calaog DN PN Type W [kg] rN [mm] ca [N/mm] [Nm/deg]  cl [N/mm]  50 25 RS331S12 1.67 320 1e5/500 9 145 65 6 2.88 460 6.6 540 200 RS430S12 520 60 2200 250 620 90 2500

Geometry of the process pipe model Interface to SPOKE modules Node of the interface

Geometry of the process pipe model Interface to Cryomodule Node of the interface

Geometry of the process pipe model Interface to ColdBox Node of the interface

Process Pipes - results of calculations Criteria of stress acceptance LC1 - The summary of the calculations (operating conditions) No Parameter VLP He supply TS supply TS return 1 DN [mm] 200/250 65 50 2 Design pressure PS [bar] 6 25 3 Temperature [K] 4.5 40 4 Fluid density [kg/m3] 135 Max. sustained stress s1 [MPa] 15.51 10.21 43.3 43.27 7 Max. expansion stress s3 [MPa] 128 86.69 67.84 67.03 8 Max. s4 (s1+s3) [MPa] 134.4 89.32 76.48 75.67 9 Max bellows movement [mm] 24.7 24.2 24.5 fh = min (fc; f) = 143.3 [MPa] fa = U(1.25fc + 0.25fh)Eh/Ec = 197.7 [MPa] fh+a = fh+fa = 341 [MPa] LC2 - The summary of the calculation (pressure test conditions) No Parameter VLP He supply TS supply TS return 1 DN [mm] 200/250 65 50 2 Test pressure PT [bar] 8.58 35.75 3 Temperature [K] 300.5 4 Fluid density [kg/m3] 1.25 6 Max. sustained stress s1 [MPa] 24.19 15.92 61.97 61.66 7 Max. expansion stress s3 [MPa] 8 Max. s4 (s1+s3) [MPa] fh = 0.95Rp1.0 = 204.2 [MPa]

Process Pipes - results of calculations Maximal loads acting on the fixed support of the process pipes LC 1 operating conditions Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] Mx [Nm] My [Nm] Mz [Nm] 2153 VLP -1796 37498 -505 -194 817 He supp. -251 2025 -108 -42 116 TS supp. -206 6980 -96 97 TS return -203 7028 95 LC 2 pressure test conditions Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] Mx [Nm] My [Nm] Mz [Nm] 2153 VLP 56896 -1367 -565 He supp. 5825 -173 -72 TS supp. 15981 -134 -60 TS return 15893

Process Pipes - results of calculations Loads acting on process pipes interfaces – operating conditions Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] 3120 VLP 2990 He supp. 3058 TS supp. 3081 TS return 3043 Interface to ColdBox Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] 265 VLP 153 45 He supp. 55 15 TS supp. 30 8 TS return 29 7 Interface to CM Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] 40 VLP 25731 54 He supp. 1694 34 TS supp. 6535 -30 TS return Interface to spoke module

Process Pipes - results of calculations Loads acting on process pipes interfaces – pressure test conditions Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] 3120 VLP -333 He supp. -41 TS supp. -33 TS return Interface to ColdBox Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] 40 VLP 36894 -365 He supp. 5833 -35 TS supp. 15873 -16 TS return Interface to spoke module

Process Pipes - results of calculations Sustained stress s1 [MPa] for VLP – operating conditions

Process Pipes - results of calculations Expansion stress s3 [MPa] for VLP – operating conditions

New concept of the vacuum jacket model

Vacuum Jacket - results of calculations LC 1 - The summary of the calculation – operating conditions Criteria of stress acceptance No Parameter Outer Jacket 1 DN [mm] 300/550 2 Design pressure PS [bar] -1 3 Temperature [K] 300.5 4 Continuous load [kg/m] 30 6 Max. sustained stress s1 [MPa] 14.34 7 Max. expansion stress s3 [MPa] 8 Max. s4 (s1+s3) [MPa] 9 Max bellows movement [mm] 0.5 fh = min (fc; f) = 153.3 [MPa] LC 2 - The summary of the calculation – failure conditions No Parameter Outer Jacket 1 DN [mm] 300/550 2 Design pressure PS [bar] 1.5 3 Temperature [K] 173 4 Continuous load kg/m 30 6 Max. sustained stress s1 [MPa] 11.96 7 Max. expansion stress s3 [MPa] 100.2 8 Max. s4 (s1+s3) [MPa] 104.1 9 Max bellows movement [mm] 19.2 fh = min (fc; f) = 153.3 [MPa] fa = U(1.25fc + 0.25fh)Eh/Ec = 212.3 [MPa] fh+a = fh+fa = 365.6 [MPa]

Vacuum Jacket - results of calculations Loads acting on process pipes interfaces – operating conditions Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] 10 31826 1010 161 1426 206 3120 1553 Maximal loads acting on the fixed support of the vacuum jacket

Vacuum Jacket - results of calculations Sustained stress s1 [MPa] for vacuum jacket – operating conditions

Vacuum Jacket - results of calculations Loads acting on process pipes interfaces – failure conditions Node Fx [N] Fy [N] Fz [N] 10 46477 1022 161 20940 1007 3120 7131 Maximal loads acting on the fixed support of the vacuum jacket

Vacuum Jacket - results of calculations Stress distrybution for vacuum jacket – failure conditions Sustained stress s1 [MPa] Expansion stress s3 [MPa]

Vacuum Jacket model verification

Vacuum Jacket model verification

Internal Fixed Support Calculations

Internal Fixed Support Calculations

Internal Fixed Support Calculations

Internal Fixed Support Calculations LC1 – thermal calculations; LC2 – normal operating conditions; the forces and the moments values were taken for the most loaded supports: CTL – node 2153, CDL – node 410 (Table 10) and thermal load. LC3 – normal operating conditions with pure mechanical loads; the forces and the moments values were taken for the most loaded supports: CTL – node 2153, CDL – node 410 (Table 10). LC4 – pressure test conditions; the values of the forces and the moments were taken for the most loaded supports – CTL – node 2153, CDL – node 410 (Table 13).

Internal Fixed Support Calculations LC 1 – thermal calculations  CTL VLP He supply TS supply TS return Heat [W] 1.22 0.3 0.1 22.5  CDL VLP He supply TS supply TS return Heat [W] 0.77 0.36 0.13 22.2

Internal Fixed Support Calculations LC 2 – operating conditions

Internal Fixed Support Calculations LC 3 – Mechanical loads only

Internal Fixed Support Calculations LC 4 – Pressure Test Conditions

Valve Box Vacuum Barrier Calculations

Valve Box Vacuum Barrier Calculations

Valve Box Vacuum Barrier Calculations LC 1 – thermal calculations   VLP He supply TS supply TS return Heat [W] 0.1546 0.045 0.0383 0.136

Valve Box Vacuum Barrier Calculations LC 2 – operating conditions

Valve Box Vacuum Barrier Calculations LC 3 – Mechanical loads only

Valve Box Vacuum Barrier Calculations LC 4 – failure conditions

Valve Box Vacuum Barrier Calculations LC 4 – failure conditions

Valve Box Vacuum Barrier Calculations LC 4 – failure conditions

Sliding support calculations

Sliding support calculations

Sliding support calculations

Sliding support calculations LC 1 – thermal calculations

Sliding support calculations LC 2 – only mechanical loads

Sliding support calculations LC 3 – operating conditions

Sliding support calculations LC 3 – operating conditions