Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Using FLUKA to study Radiation Fields in ERL Components Jason E. Andrews, University of Washington Vaclav Kostroun, Mentor.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Detector Design Issues:  Interaction Region David Asner/LLNL Linear Collider Retreat, Santa Cruz, June 27-29,
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Dec 11, 2008S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. Muon Collider Design Workshop.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Beam Background Simulations for HL-LHC at IR1 Regina Kwee-Hinzmann, R.Bruce, A.Lechner, N.V.Shetty, L.S.Esposito, F.Cerutti, G.Bregliozzi, R.Kersevan,
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
LHCf Report Takashi SAKO for the LHCf Collaboration 18-Dec-2009 CERN Main Auditorium.
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
L. Keller 3/18/02 Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung and Coulomb Scattering in the NLC Beam Delivery System Conditions for Calculation: 1. Program is DECAY TURTLE.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
Feb 7, 2006S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. LEMC Workshop.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
Doses and bunch by bunch fluctuations in BeamCal at the ILC Eliza Teodorescu FCAL Collaboration Meeting June 29-30, 2009, DESY-Zeuthen, Germany.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Plans for Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to 1 GRaD Doses SLAC Testbeam Workshop March
Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
Maria Person Gulda , Uriel Nauenberg, Gleb Oleinik,
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
T. Markiewicz / SLAC MAP at SLAC Working Meeting 2 July 2014
GLD IR optimization and background study
Hit density at scoring planes at r=10, 30, and 50 cm.
Background Simulations at Fermilab
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump Siva Darbha Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama (SLAC)

Extraction Line and Water Dump The IP has a direct line-of-sight from the beam dump. Neutrons and photons produced at cos ~ -1 will reach the IP, and no shielding is possible. What is the IP flux? FLUKA was used for neutrons. FLUKA and EGS5 were used for photons. y (cm) 20 cm H2O e- Concrete Collimator r 14.5 cm Tungsten collimator Concrete Tunnel z (cm)

Brute force simulation takes forever Neutrons coming out of the dump: 0.016 n’s / 250 GeV e- 3.2108 n’s / BX 1.31020 n’s / year Solid angle of the smallest aperture: 10-9 If we want ~10 n’s reaching the IP, we need 1010 n’s at the dump and 61011 250 GeV e-. 250 GeV e- full simulation takes ~10 sec. Use FLUKA’s biasing techniques Calculate the IP fluence averaging over 2 m radius. 300 m

Particle Biasing Three types of biasing were used: Leading particle biasing simulating a full EM shower requires long CPU time to save time, take only the most energetic secondary and adjust the particle weight applied to e+,e-, and γ’s < 2.5 GeV Photonuclear interaction length #n produced proportional to lσ σ was increased by a factor of 50 ‘weight’ associated with each n produced from this was decreased by a factor of 50 to compensate γ A → n + X (σ, l)

Particle Biasing (continued) Splitting/Russian roulette Dump divided into 10 regions Each region given a factor of 2 larger importance As e+, e-, or γ crosses a boundary, their number is increased or decreased on average by the ratio of importances on either side of the boundary ‘weight’ is adjusted accordingly x (cm) e- … 8 4 2 1 z (cm)

Computation Time 6000 incident e- n total ‘weight’ n total number Run # Type of Bias CPU time At z=300m At z=0* 1 None 23 h 35 min 82 2 LPB 1 h 36 min 102.9 87 3 Interaction length 6 h 46 min 103.4 0.78 5008 49 4 Splitting/RR 6 h 22 min 96.4 1.09 16619 117 * IP scoring plane with 20 m radius

Neutron Fluence at IP n’s/cm2/year at IP (z=0) Mean (10 runs) RMS No tunnel or collimator 4.81010 0.91010 Tunnel and Collimator 2.11010 1.31010 1010 n/cm2 at the VXD would cause displacement damage to CCD Si detectors However, not all neutrons that reach the IP will hit the inner detector

SiD Vertex Detector x (cm) C quadrupole n 2.11010 n’s/cm2/y C’ Be 7 mrad n 2.11010 n’s/cm2/y 3.0 cm C’ Be Si VXD W BeamCal VXD Layer 1 fluence (one beam): 1.01010 n’s/cm2/y w/o BeamCal 2.4108 n’s/cm2/y w BeamCal z (cm)

1 MeV Neutron Equivalent Fluence However, the amount of displacement damage done to CCD Si detector by neutrons is a function of neutron energy When relative damage to Si is considered, normalized to 1 MeV, the fluence is: 5.3108 n/cm2/year When e+ beam is considered also, value is doubled to 1.1109 n/cm2/year A value of 1010 n/cm2 would damage the CCD Si detector by this measure 1 MeV T. M. Flanders and M. H. Sparks, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 103, 265, 1989.

Is the neutron fluence gone up? NLC day estimation Radial distribution at IP Neutron fluence at IP: 4.61010 n’s/cm2/y (same) Neutrons at VXD layer 1@1.2 cm: 2108 n’s/cm2/y (two dumps) This fluence was smaller due to the smaller aperture. 1-MeV equivalent fluence was never calculated.

Neutrons from Pairs DID 1.7109 6.8108 No DID 1.5109 5.9108 Neutron energy spectrum ILC 500 GeV Nominal n’s/cm2/year 1-MeV eq. fluence, n’s/cm2/y DID 1.7109 6.8108 No DID 1.5109 5.9108 Anti-DID 1.0109 4.1108 1 MeV 1-MeV equivalent neutron fluence from Pairs comes down.

Detector Shield Pacman is a good shield. But Pacman has 1 m hole. # neutrons into this hole is 1.31015 n’s/ year. Need additional shield. Pacman Tauchi

Photons from the dump Photons coming out of the dump: 2.0 photons / 250 GeV e- Energy spectrum Photon fluence at the IP: Photons/cm2/BX at IP (z=0) (one dump) No tunnel or collimator 30. Tunnel and Collimator 13. Photons from the dump are negligible compared to photons from the pairs.

Conclusions 1-MeV neutron equivalent fluence from the beam dump is estimated to be 1.1109 n’s/cm2/year at the SiD VXD detector. Including the pair neutrons, the total 1-MeV neutron equivalent fluence is 2109 n’s/cm2/year. Photon backscattering from the dump is negligible.