“Are You Ready for WIOA?”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
Advertisements

Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Steven Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2014.
TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING: THE BASICS Steven Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Grants Management Test for Institutions of Higher Education and Nonprofit Organizations Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMNI CIRCULAR KEY AREA #1: TIME AND EFFORT STEVEN SPILLAN, ESQ. MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN.
PRESENTED BY MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. NEVADA AEFLA DIRECTORS A DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL ISSUES NOVEMBER 28, 2012 HYATT PLACE.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC The Effort Required for Compensating Employees Tiffany R Winters, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The Impact of OMB Circulars (Super or Otherwise) on Federal Programs Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Michael Brustein, Esq. Brette Kaplan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2011.
GRANTS MANAGEMENT TEST FOR STATE AND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein.
1. 1. OIG Audit 2. A-133 Audit 3. Federal Monitoring 4. State (Pass Through) Monitoring 2.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Timeliness, Indirect Costs and Other Requirements Under Part 75 Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Brette Kaplan WurzburgSteven Spillan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015 An Overview of the New AEFLA.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Effort Takes Time and Documentation MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC SPRING FORUM 2015.
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management Requirements Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
IDEA EQUITABLE SERVICES: SERVING PARENTALLY PLACED PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein &
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Schoolwide Funding Consolidation Panel Panelists: Nancy Konitzer, Arizona Department of Education, Rebecca Vogler, Cincinnati Public Schools and Jose Figueroa,
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Wurzburg Steven Spillan Fall Forum 2015
Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum
Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
IMPLEMENTING WIOA PROGRAMS WITHOUT FEDERAL REGULATIONS MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. ERIN AUERBACH, ESQ. BRUSTEIN &
Perkins V Where We Are and What to Expect Michael Brustein Steven Spillan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum.
Title IV of the HEA Regulatory Developments and Emerging Issues
Shift to Greater Flexibility Under Federal Grants
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Regional Forum October 2016
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)
WIOA Section 166 – Indian and Native American Program
Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies
GEPA Appeal: Who? What? When? Why? Where?
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FEDERAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION
Allowability, Time & Effort Under the New EDGAR
How to Draft & Update Compliant Policies & Procedures
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © All rights reserved.
Federal Grants Management Test
Understanding Supplement Not Supplant Under ESSA, IDEA, and Perkins
Perkins: Monitoring Findings and Fiscal Issues
WIOA: Fiscal & Legal Issues
Indirect Costs, Cost Allocation, and Resource Sharing
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
WIOA One-Stop Infrastructure Funding UPDATE
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
Audits under the New EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance
“The Georgia and Maine Stories” Impact on Recent Judicial Precedent on Federal Grants Management Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie Graham,
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
WIOA: What We Learned in Year 1
The Impact of Deregulation on Compliance
The Office for Civil Rights Under New Administration
Policies & Procedures A How-To Guide Bonnie Graham, Esq.
To Accountability…and Beyond
10 Biggest Changes Under the Every Student Succeeds Act
Perkins V Michael Brustein, Esq. Megan Passafaro, Esq.
Using Data For cost allocation
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
Steven Spillan, Esq. 21st Century Programs Please visit Please visit
The DATA Act, FERPA, and Other Data Requirements
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
A Tutorial on Grants Management Rules Under EDGAR
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective
Eligible Agency Administration and Accountability Branch
Presentation transcript:

“Are You Ready for WIOA?” Education: The New Federalism! Spring Forum 2017 May 10-12, 2017 “Are You Ready for WIOA?” Michael L. Brustein, Esq. mbrustein@bruman.com Steven Spillan, Esq. sspillan@bruman.com www.bruman.com

WIOA

Important Dates Signed into Law July 2014 Effective Date: July 1, 2015 – gap year Unified/Combined State Plans Due: April 1, 2016 April 16, 2015: Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) 1/22/16: Final regs must be published Final Regs Posted August 19, 2016 New Accountability Provisions Effective: July 1, 2016 Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Important Dates Many provisions delayed until 7/1/17 Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Memorandum of Understanding Section 212(c) Local boards negotiate MOU with every one- stop partner. MOUs are reviewed every three years. MOUs describe: Services provided Referral methods Funding of shared services and infrastructure costs Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Infrastructure Costs What are they? Nonpersonnel costs that are necessary for general operation Section 121(h)(4) What went wrong with WIA? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Infrastructure Costs Local option – Section 121(h)(1)(A) Methods agreed upon by Local Board, chief elected officials, and one-stop partners Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Infrastructure Costs State option – Section 121(h)(2) Automatic if no agreement under local option Governor will determine amount (no more than 3% for Workforce and Wagner-Peyser programs and 1.5% of total grant amount for most other partner programs) from each partner program Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

State Option: Funding Sources WIOA Title I Programs: May be paid using program funds, administrative funds, or both. Other One-Stop Partner Programs: Limited to the program’s administrative funds, as appropriate. Adult Education Program: Must be paid from the funds that are available for local administration; and May be paid from funds made available by the State or non-federal resources that are cash, in-kind, or third-party contributions. Perkins: May be paid from funds available for local administration of postsecondary level programs and activities to eligible recipients or consortia of eligible recipients; and Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

The Federal Agency Trifecta: UGG/EDGAR  New Rules on Admin/Indirect ED/OCFO  Erroneous Guidance on Pass Through Indirect Responsibility DOL/ETA  180° turn on Infrastructure Cost Calculation Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

How do State “Pass-through” Agencies navigate this morass How do State “Pass-through” Agencies navigate this morass? With difficulty Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Step one: Local funding Mechanism Section 361.720 (a) “may” include Perkins local admin Allowable (UGG) Proportionate use (UGG) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Step two: What if no proportionate use? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Step three: No consensus on local option triggers state option Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Step four: Section 361.738 (c)(2) limits Governor authority for Infrastructure costs to 1.5% of GAN Infrastructure contribution must come from Section 132 p/s funds available to p/s institutions for admin Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Step five: How does Governor cap the amount at 1.5% State must aggregate admin contributions under local option (not easy) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

But the Rules on Admin Costs Have Changed BIG TIME!!!! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Admin and clerical salaries must be recovered as indirect unless adequately documented and approved in budget 2 CFR 200.413 (c) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

If restricted indirect rate exceeds 5%, no recovery of excess amount. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

34 CFR 76.561 (b) Pass-through negotiates rates – North Carolina was provided erroneous advice COFAR  State cannot force subs to charge admin as direct Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

DOL/ETA & OCTAE  One Stop partners MUST support career services 678.430 (Career services = Intensive Services under WIA) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service.  This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct.  Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney- client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.  You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2017. All rights reserved.