Dipole diode lead resistance measurement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RRR Measurements in S23 during LS1 Emmanuele Ravaioli Daniel Rasmussen Scott Rowan Thanks to Z. Charifoulline, R. Denz, J. Steckert, H. Thiesen, A. Verweij.
Advertisements

10/11/2004EE 42 fall 2004 lecture 181 Lecture #18 Summary of ideal devices, amplifier examples Reminder: MIDTERM coming up one week from today (Monday.
ELECTRO THERMAL SIMULATIONS OF THE SHUNTED 13KA LHC INTERCONNECTIONS Daniel Molnar, Arjan Verweij and Erwin Bielert.
New HV test specification for the LHC N. Catalan for the EI section.
TE-MPE –TM, 16/05/2013, Mateusz Bednarek, TE/MPE-EE ELQA testing during and beyond LS1.
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project CSCM Mini Review Powering Implementation H. Thiesen 30 November 2011.
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
TE-MPE Workshop 14/12/2010, Manuel Dominguez, TE/MPE-EI 1 Stephen Pemberton, TE/MPE-EI RB Earth Spark Investigation Initial Report. S. Pemberton, G. D’Angelo.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
The diode lead resistance ‘issue’ A. Verweij, TE-MPE, CSCM workshop 7/10/2011 Contents:  Diode geometry  Measurements performed in the past  Measurements.
LHC diodes: Status report (for information)
Frequency Transfer Function Measurements during LS1 Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to Arjan Verweij, Zinur Charifoulline, Andrea Musso MPE-TM
Diodes qualification: Results and plans for LHC and spares MSC Technical Meeting on F. Savary, on behalf of the diode working group, with special.
1 CSCM-7TeV Powering Implementation and ELQA Third LHC Splice Review November 2012 M. Bajko, M. Bernardini, B. Bordini, k. Brodzinski, J. Casas-Cubillos,
CSCM type test: Diode Leads and Diodes Gerard Willering & Vincent Roger TE-MSC With thanks to Bernhard Auchmann, Zinour Charifoulline, Scott Rowan, Arjan.
C. Garion Presentation Outline  Overview of the inner triplet interconnections  Q1/Q2, Q2/Q3 interconnections  General view  Working conditions  Compensation.
Simulation of multipacting thresholds G. Iadarola and A. Romano on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, 8 September, 2015.
LHC Enhanced Quench Protection System Review 24 – 26 February 2009.
MPE activities within MP3 Arjan Verweij A. Verweij, MPE review, 2 June 2015 The questions: 1. Define the scope of work for your activity 2. Structure of.
MP3- MIC-C S1-2 A22R1- 19/08/2009 G.D’Angelo on behalf of Elqa team MP3 MIC-C test campaign in S1-2 Special guest: A22R1 (MB2413)  MIC-C in the ARC results.
LHC magnet protection diodes status and recommendations for LS1 October 10 th, 2012 F. Savary on behalf of the diode working group (TE-MSC and MPE Groups.
Third LHC Splice Review Geneva – 12 to 14 November 2012 Diodes Status F. Savary.
LHC Machine Status Report Mike Lamont for the LHC team Acknowledgements: Mirko Pojer, Matteo Solfaroli, Katy Foraz et al.
HWC with nQPS Splice Monitoring Zinur Charifoulline & Bob Flora Real Time (~10 sec) BUS Voltage Energy Extraction Trip 300 µV threshold on Un-bypassed.
TE/MPE-MS MPE-TM meeting 14/06/2012, Richard Mompo Updated ELQA test procedure Co-authors: Nuria Catalan Lasheras Mateusz Bednarek Giorgio D’Angelo Richard.
Main dipole circuit simulations Behavior and performance analysis PSpice models Simulation results Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele.
ABTEF Meeting, V. Namora Quality Assurance in the Superconducting Magnets and Circuits Consolidation (SMACC) project.
Daniel Molnar Diode simulations and measurements.
MPE Workshop for LS1 Summary of Global Activities Thanks to Speakers Arjan Verweij Hugues Thiesen Zinur Charifoulline Kajetan Fuchsberger.
MPE Workshop 14/12/2010 Analysis of the RB and RQF/D splice data recorded with nQPS - status and plans towards full automation Analysis of the RB and RQF/D.
The Large Hadron Collider The 19 th Sep 2008 incident [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] NIKHEF Seminar ( )
Quench behavior of the main dipole magnets in the LHC By Gerard Willering, TE-MSC On behalf of the MP3-CCC team Acknowledgements TE-MSC, MP3, BE-OP, TE-MPE,
CSCM Test description and Risk assessment  Goal  The typical and ultimate current cycle  Test sequence for type test and regular test  Risk assessment.
Cold Diode Project TE/MPE - TM
Coupled thermal-structural FEA of AS tooling for brazing of manifolds to disk stack R. Raatikainen, F. Rossi
Clock Signals: 555 Timer 555 Timer Digital Electronics TM
RB and RQ shunted BusBar current carrying capacities
Electrical insulation of magnet circuits in sector 7-8
MPP Result of the investigation in the orbit correctors faults.
LHC Enhanced Quench Protection System Review
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
Giorgio on behalf of ELQA team
Status of RB circuit modeling PSpice models Simulation results: nQPS & oQPS Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele Ravaioli TE-MPE-TM
Superconducting Circuits, a generic view
Giorgio on behalf of ELQA team
Acknowledgements: H.Milcent, R.Denz, R.Schmidt, M.Zerlauth
12 October 2009 RRB Plenary R.-D. Heuer
LHC Dipole Diode Insulation Consolidation Review (I) INTRODUCTION
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
MPE main activities planned for LS2
Recommissioning of sector 12 after a short warm-up during eYETS 2016/17 QBT, MP3 – May 2017 S. Le Naour.
Functional specification for the consolidated LHC dipole diode insulation system and consolidation strategy C. Scheuerlein on behalf of the LHC dipole.
Dipole circuit & diode functioning
Consolidation of the dipole diode insulation Technical aspects
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Re-Commissioning (IST) of Electrical Systems: QPS, EE & PIC
3 issues identified in review
TEST PLANS for HL LHC IT STRING
555 Timer 555 Timer Digital Electronics TM 1.2 Introduction to Analog
Using the code QP3 to calculate quench thresholds for the MB
Chapter 18 Objectives Interpret and construct circuit diagrams.
Andrzej Siemko (CERN) and Marco Zanetti (MIT)
555 Timer 555 Timer Digital Electronics TM 1.2 Introduction to Analog
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
Brief report of the hardware commissioning activities
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
Electrical measurements and diagnostics
Presentation transcript:

Dipole diode lead resistance measurement Introduction Where are we now? All data Highest resistances V-tap swaps detected NCs

Origin Quench propagation measurements Diode working group started Unexpected diode lead behaviour. Diode working group started MPE and MSC groups Comprehensive study, SM18 test stand, Weak points identified. Quadrupole connection plate consolidation All contacts measured when the diode container is open. Dipole diode leads remained unknown CSCM test may be not executed. Global dipole diode lead measurement at warm and at low current was developed.

What can be measured? V Only a sum of all 3 contacts and the copper bus can be measured!

Electrical diagram Diode branch assures a bypass of the magnet in case of quench Complete procedure available on EDMS: 1334252

What is measured? Components that have never seen current and thus have never been tested! T-junction, Copper flexible, 3 contacts per diode lead. CSCM cannot be substituted by this measurement. CSCM will qualify these components with high current. DLM cannot guarantee good performance at nominal conditions! V

Schematics of the set-up By moving from magnet to magnet we switch between MBA and MBB lines 3 people are required to move the system smoothly

Measurement Current is applied in steps of 30%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the maximum current value. For reversed mode the max current is 1.5 A. For forward mode the max current is 10 A. Plateau length is 10 s. Linear fit is calculated to get the final resistance value and cancel the offset.

If more than 15.5 μΩ is measured, the diode lead may be weak. Acceptance criteria Global diode lead measurement: 3 contacts together. The most critical is the half-moon contact Simulation => 450K if R = 14.5 μΩ, Details → Arjan Verweij and Zinur Charifoulline Remaining 2 contacts are unlikely to be below 0.5 μΩ. If more than 15.5 μΩ is measured, the diode lead may be weak. Diode container opening is needed!

Where are we now with the measurements? What are the results so far?

Diode lead measurements Current situation Diode lead measurements 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3

Data from all sectors Note: logarithmic vertical scale! Diode lead contact resistances from sectors: 1-2, 2-3, partly 3-4, 5-6, 6-7, 7-8 and 8-1 1856 diode leads 15.5 µΩ (threshold set by the Diode Working Group) Represented is the sum of 3 contact resistances.

Highest resistances - all sectors Location MTF_ID Diode lead Contact resistance [Ω] A15L8 HCLBARB000-IN003058 Anode 210.0 µ Cathode 89.8 µ C14L6 HCLBBRA000-IN003341 41.6 µ C30R5 HCLBARB000-IN003320 34.4 µ B32R5 HCLBBRA000-IN003315 & Anode 23.1 µ C34R2 HCLBALB000-IN001394 19.1 μ A18L8 HCLBBRD000-IN003012 18.9 µ A21R7 HCLBBRA000-IN003014 16.6 µ B26R2 HCLBBLA000-IN003126 16.1 μ

A15L8 Diode container opened on Tuesday, 25.02.2014 Photo by Ludovic Grand-Clement

90 μΩ 210 μΩ A15L8 - zoom Washers are not as specified by the design! Photo by Ludovic Grand-Clement

A15L8 – number 3058 High resistance located in the half-moons… Possible consequences? If this magnet quenches at Inom → Half-moon burn-out, → Magnet takes back the current, → Magnet burn-out, → Open circuit… like in September 2008… We are lucky that this magnet has not quenched… … and that this measurement was introduced – we have detected it! Otherwise only CSCM could detect it (if carried out) Large delay for: Warm-up, Repair the diode assembly, Redo all tests, Cool-down, Repeat CSCM.

All low resistance diode leads Note: Linear vertical scale 5 diode leads are higher! Narrow distribution of diode leads, Mean value at about 3 μΩ.

Summary of NCs Bad V-tap (no continuity) V-tap swaps EDMS 1347363 V-tap swaps EDMS 1347357 EDMS 1347364 EDMS 1352457 EDMS 1352459 EDMS 1352460 EDMS 1352461 EDMS 1352462 EDMS 1352463 Diode lead contact resistance above 15.5 μΩ EDMS 1347322 EDMS 1347329 EDMS 1347330 EDMS 1347331 EDMS 1347332 EDMS 1347333 EDMS 1358362 EDMS 1358676

Summary of NCs Bad V-tap (no continuity) V-tap swaps EDMS 1347363 V-tap swaps EDMS 1347357: Problem solved, NC CLOSED with warnings EDMS 1347364 EDMS 1352457: Problem solved, NC CLOSED with warnings EDMS 1352459: Problem solved, NC CLOSED with warnings EDMS 1352460 EDMS 1352461: Problem solved, NC CLOSED with warnings EDMS 1352462 EDMS 1352463 Diode lead contact resistance above 15.5 μΩ EDMS 1347322 EDMS 1347329: Diode stack exchanged, NC CLOSED EDMS 1347330: Diode stack exchanged, NC CLOSED EDMS 1347331: Diode stack exchanged, NC CLOSED EDMS 1347332 EDMS 1347333 EDMS 1358362 EDMS 1358676

Summary 1-2, 2-3, 5-6, 6-7, 7-8 and 8-1 are done! 8 diode stacks where the contact resistances exceed the threshold of 15.5 μΩ, One diode stack with extremely high half-moon resistances: 210 μΩ and 90 μΩ Discovered several V-tap swaps that are very difficult to detect, For each case an NCR was opened, and is followed-up, This measurement will help to interpret the result of the warm bus-bar measurement carried out before opening the machine.

Thank you for your attention!

Back-up slides…

Other observed outliers T_BB_Anode Expected distribution EE212 and EE213 V-tap swap Not yet understood 7 V-tap swaps, 7 more cases for other measurements where outliers are observed, no explanation so far, Local diagnostics needed.

Types of faults observed EE012 swapped with EE014 in A34L8 Swapped I-tap and V-tap, More local diagnostics needed, Already noticed by Reiner: logbook entry Removed from interlock since 23/02/2010, QPS compensations did not work for this magnet. Courtesy of Zinur Charifoulline