Centerline Unification through AZGEO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graphic Data Clean-Up Issues. Graphic Data Clean-up Very Important if you plan to use existing CAD or GIS data from another agency, department, or private.
Advertisements

| imodules.com RE Adapter for Encompass (v2.0) Encompass and The Raiser's Edge® Integrated Data Solution CONFIDENTIAL.
ARCHITECTURE ● ENGINEERING ● COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AVIATION | CIVIL | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | DATA SYSTEMS | ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING |
RE Adapter for Encompass (v1.0)‏ Encompass and The Raiser's Edge® Integrated Data Solution.
Conflation with JCS Automated and Human-Assisted Conflation Using the JCS Conflation Suite Presented at GeoTec 2003 Vancouver, BC Martin Davis, Technical.
Mastering ArcGIS Basic Editing in ArcMap
Chapter 11 Basic Editing in ArcMap. Objectives Understanding the basic editing process Using snapping to ensure topological integrity of features Adding.
Introduction to the Digital BAS 1. Overview What is the MAF/TIGER Database? What is included in the Digital BAS package? What is the difference between.
ESRM 250 & CFR 520: Introduction to GIS © Phil Hurvitz, KEEP THIS TEXT BOX this slide includes some ESRI fonts. when you save this presentation,
Smoothing Linework June 2012, Planetary Mappers Meeting.
@2007 Austin Troy Lecture 4: An Introduction to the Vector Data Model and Map Layout Techniques Introduction to GIS By Brian Voigt University of Vermont.
@2007 Austin Troy Lecture 4: An Introduction to the Vector Data Model and Map Layout Techniques Introduction to GIS By Brian Voigt University of Vermont.
Advanced Editing: Rules-Based Topology in ArcEditor.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Data Alignment and Management in ArcMap Lisa Stanners, Sean Jones.
Esri UC2013. Technical Workshop. Technical Workshop 2013 Esri International User Conference July 8–12, 2013 | San Diego, California Editing in ArcMap:
NR 422: Topology Jim Graham Fall 2010 See: odatabase-topology.pdf.
Parcel Data Models for the Geodatabase
Preparing Data for Analysis and Analyzing Spatial Data/ Geoprocessing Class 11 GISG 110.
Understanding Topology for Soil Survey
Feasibility Study of Integrating WVDOT LRS Centerline With Statewide Addressing And Mapping Data.
North Carolina’s New Statewide Road Centerline Data Sarah Wray, GISP, CGCIOTim Sheldon, GISP Spatial Data ManagerBusiness Analyst Engineering Transportation.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Esri Roads and Highways: Integrating and Developing LRS Business Systems Tom Hill.
ArcGIS Data Reviewer: An Introduction
Data Storage and Editing (17/MAY/2010) Dr. Ahmad BinTouq URL:
Topology in the Geodatabase – an Introduction
Map overlays & Geoprocessing Learn about spatial analysis functions overlays, clipping & buffering Use overlays to analyze multiple spatial criteria Understand.
Linear Referencing Dynamic Segmentation and Caltrans’ Implementation.
Advanced Editing: Rules-Based Topology in ArcEditor
LBR & WS LAB 1: INTRODUCTION TO GIS.
An Overview of the Chester County Local Linear Referencing System (LRS)
Migrating Data into the Parcel Fabric in ArcMap
Topology Relationships between features: Supposed to prevent:
Case Study: Franklin County, Ohio Location Based Response System (LBRS) Project Presented by: Transmap ® Corporation Ohio GIS Conference 2009.
Jessica D. Perkins GIS Programmer Analyst 2 Geospatial Transportation Information Section Program Planning & Administration Division of Highways West Virginia.
Esri UC2013. Technical Workshop. Topology in the Geodatabase: An Introduction Colin Zwicker Erik Hoel ESRI Super Secret Topology Laboratory, May 2013.
Data Alignment and Management in ArcMap
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Editing in ArcMap: An Introduction Lisa Stanners, Phil Sanchez.
Chapter 7- Basic editing Digitize new features from a paper map or scanned map. Construct new features from survey descriptions. Map areas or objects based.
Data Storage & Editing GEOG370 Instructor: Christine Erlien.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Migrating Data To The Parcel Fabric Christine Leslie Amir Bar-Maor.
TUGIS March 15, 2016 Next Generation 911 Data Management TUGIS 2016.
ADOT Enterprise LRS Integration for the Agency Mark Flahan, GISP, Patrick Whiteford, GISP AGIC 2014.
Key Terms Attribute join Target table Join table Spatial join.
Chapter 13 Editing and Topology.
Migrating Data to the Parcel Fabric Solution
Confident Data Integration and QC with FME
ArcGIS Workflow Manager: Advanced Workflows and Concepts
Physical Structure of GDB
Esri Roads and Highways: An Introduction to Roadway Reporter
INTRODUCTION TO GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
Presentation by James Meyer, GISP September 22, 2016
Parcel Fabric and the Local Government Model
ArcGIS Topology Shapefiles, Coverages, Geodatabases
ADOT’s Right Of Way Data Collection
Shankar Chandrasekaran
Pima County Parcel Fabric - Tips for Staging and Loading Parcels
Topology in the Geodatabase: An Introduction Colin Zwicker Erik Hoel
GIS Lecture: Geoprocessing
Automating and Validating Edits
Using CAD Parcel data with the Local Government Solution
Esri Roads and Highways: Data Loading
Esri Highway Data Maintenance Solutions: An Introduction
Esri Roads and Highways for Server: Event Editing on the Web
Kimberly Sparks, GISP and Evan O’Keefe
ArcCatalog and Geodatabases
Esri Production Mapping: An Introduction
Esri Roads and Highways An Introduction
Reduced Datasets from Roadway Information Database (RID)
Executive Sponsor: Tom Church, Cabinet Secretary
Presentation transcript:

Centerline Unification through AZGEO AGIC 2016 Track: Address NG 9-1-1 Applications Thursday, Sept 22nd 2016, 3:30pm Joe Breyer, Ryan Blum Works Consulting

What We’ll Cover: Supply Chain Workflow / History What’s on the AZGEO app Six of the topologic issues found with centerline files for use in LRS building. How they are currently found / exposed back to the database owner. The future of the quality assurance procedures on AZGEO utilizing 1integrate rules engine from 1spatial. Points, Lines, polygons are all supported. Any feature class essentially become an LRM – so long as it has feature that cross the inventory routes. Inventory routes could be rails or rivers in addition to roads.

The History of The Centerline Unification supply chain: ADOT launched “Centerline Unification” project in 2012 Toward satisfaction of the federal “All Roads” initiative Using ADOT’s centerlines for State Highways Using E-911 systems as 15 local centerline providers 1 cross-state tribal centerline – no addresses (Navajo Nation) 21 (20 others + Gila River) in-State tribal centerlines – no addresses 3 months of integration work (per source) – now < 4 hours each Local gov’ts have been good partners in providing data… ….and responding to ADOT-driven editing “requests” (through AZGEO) Points, Lines, polygons are all supported. Any feature class essentially become an LRM – so long as it has feature that cross the inventory routes. Inventory routes could be rails or rivers in addition to roads.

website HTTP://AZGEO.AZ.GOV

Statewide gis data supply chain

Benefits to all involved Ship ADOT a Report of Changes Mine Address (and other) Attributes into LRS events 15 sources edge-matched and unified Benefits to all involved Ship ADOT a Report of Changes Editing occurs in One Agency per Road Make Roads Meet at Boundaries The Supply Chain County Transmits Data thru AZGEO Use ArcMap, unpack, provide feedback Check & Eliminate Bifurcations Ship Locals a Report of Changes Compare This Submittal to Last Auto-detected issues sent to owner Assemble Statewide from 15 sources Points, Lines, polygons are all supported. Any feature class essentially become an LRM – so long as it has feature that cross the inventory routes. Inventory routes could be rails or rivers in addition to roads.

THE PRODUCT: Statewide complete centerline file endowed with address attributes for E-911 and NG 9-1-1 Statewide Linear Referencing for ADOT and the COG/MPOs

Benefits from the Statewide GIS Mapping Supply Chain Linear Referencing System Regional, State, National Layers Quality Assurance/Control Edge-matching through Demarks Conflated & Condensed Output Minimize Resource Requirements Addresses and Attributes as Events Metrics on GIS Responsiveness Offsite Copy

CURRENT Centerline Quality Checks (Lrs data reviewer) Concept of the LRS data reviewer has been around since early 2000’s as we saw the efforts in upgrading county centerlines into Arizona’s centerline file. Began to materialize as a formal process when offering LRS based solutions for regional government agencies Truly evolved into repeatable documented process during Arizona’s centerline unification efforts.

What to Do? Utilize rich sources of local centerline/roadway data for use within larger geographic applications? Each local agency has different database design (schema) Each local agency commonly has specific area of focus (collection methods, rules, etc.)

Topological Data Issues Dangles (& Overshoots) overlaps Non-Linear Segments Centerline not correctly or not enough precision used when collecting/digitizing. Centerlines overlap each other due to negligent collection techniques or due to design. Centerlines contain arcs or curved segments. Stacked vertices Z-CUTBACKS BIFURCATIONS Duplicate vertices created at intersection points due to editing or created during gps data collection. Incorrect vertices placement due inaccurate editing techniques or created during gps data collection. Bifurcated routes created due to inaccurate centerline naming or due to inadequate description of roadway specifics.

Dangles (& Overshoots)

Dangles (& Overshoots) The issue: Dangles create inaccurate route networking and location naming as well as erratic ESRI comparison tool results. THE SOLUTION: Use ESRI data reviewer to flag dangles within a centerline for owner fix…or if needed, fix using ESRI supplied solutions. THE RESULT: More exact centerline allows for more exact solutions. AND ULTIMATELY: Instances of dangles and overshoots dramatically reduced.

Stacked vertices THE ISSUE: stacked vertices (two vertices with the same x,y location consecutively within the same line) can create erratic ESRI comparison tool results due to invalid geometry. THE SOLUTION: use ESRI data reviewer to flag these locations within a centerline for owner fix. THE RESULT: centerline data that facilitates comparison across versions. AND ULTIMATELY: more accurate centerlines.

Overlaps THE ISSUE: overlapping centerlines can create erratic ESRI comparison tool results. Overlapping centerlines can be valid. THE SOLUTION: use ESRI Data Reviewer to flag overlaps within a centerline for owner review. If valid ask owners to indicate which is higher order road. (If needed) group overlapping centerlines to be able to analyze accurately. THE RESULT: removal of all errant overlaps and firm understanding of valid ones. AND ULTIMATELY: more accurate centerlines network.

Z-cutbacks The issue: Z-cutbacks create inaccurate route lengths and hinder accurate analysis. THE SOLUTION: Use ESRi Data Reviewer to flag z-cutbacks within a centerline network for owner fix. THE RESULT: Centerline data that can be used for accurate length analysis. AND ULTIMATELY: More accurate centerlines network.

Non-Linear Line Segments THE ISSUE: Non-linear line segments cannot be used within ESRI Roads and Highways. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network using the esri densify tool. THE RESULT: centerlines can be used within ESRI Roads and Highways extensions.

Non-Linear Line Segments THE ISSUE: Non-linear line segments cannot be used within ESRI Roads and Highways. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network using the ESRI densify tool. THE RESULT: Centerlines can be used within ESRI Roads and Highways extensions. NON-LINEAR SEGMENTS

Non-Linear Line Segments THE ISSUE: Non-linear line segments cannot be used within ESRI Roads and Highways. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network using the ESRI densify tool. THE RESULT: centerlines can be used within ESRI Roads and Highways extension. NOW ALL LINEAR SEGMENTS

the lrs Problem – BIFURcations THE ISSUE: Bifurcations create routing issues, which Lead to ambiguous events due to non-unique measures. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network automatically within the LRS data reviewer process. THE RESULT: Topologically correct routes. AND ULTIMATELY: AUTOMATION Is unnecessary through response to feedback reporting.

the lrs Problem – BIFURcations The issue: Bifurcations create routing issues, which lead to ambiguous events due to non-unique measures. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network automatically within the LRS data reviewer process. THE RESULT: Topologically correct routes. AND ULTIMATELY: AUTOMATION is unnecessary through response to feedback reporting.

the lrs Problem – BIFURcations The issue: Bifurcations create routing issues, which lead to ambiguous events due to non-unique measures. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network automatically within the LRS data reviewer process. THE RESULT: Topologically correct routes. AND ULTIMATELY: AUTOMATION is unnecessary through response to feedback reporting.

the lrs Problem – Bifurcations THE ISSUE: Bifurcations create routing issues, which lead to ambiguous events due to non-unique measures. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network automatically within the LRS data reviewer process. THE RESULT: Topologically correct routes. AND ULTIMATELY: AUTOMATION is unnecessary through response to feedback reporting.

the lrs Problem – BIFURcations THE ISSUE: Bifurcations create routing issues, which lead to ambiguous events due to non-unique measures. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network automatically within the LRS data reviewer process. THE RESULT: Topologically correct routes. AND ULTIMATELY: AUTOMATION is unnecessary through response to feedback reporting.

the lrs Problem – BIFURcations THE ISSUE: Bifurcations create routing issues, which lead to ambiguous events due to non-unique measures. THE SOLUTION: They can be removed from a centerline network automatically within the LRS data reviewer process. THE RESULT: Topologically correct routes. AND ULTIMATELY: AUTOMATION Is unnecessary through response to feedback reporting.

Other Data issues found Variance SOURCES DATA DIFFERENT Fields containing same data have different names across local data providers. Fields contain more than one data item – need to parse different data items into specific fields, (Also QAQC results) to accurately collect data (road name & pave type). Full Road names were parsed between many fields - Many different fields needed concatenation to create single source field. Full road networks were parsed between many feature classes - Multiple feature classes needed concatenation to create single source road network. Some local agencies have more than one master centerline/roadway file – had to run process to compare different files to create one source file for road network. Road networks are using different projections – need to re-project incoming roadway files so as to have all incoming files using same projection. Road network files contain more than roadways – need to remove non-roads from data (RR). Data not complete – blank names, etc. need to be filled in before can be used in road networks. Data has errors – need to run QAQC to clean up simple issues before using road networks (double blanks, no shapes, 0 shape length, non-standard characters). Roadway network issues – overlapping centerlines, bad snaps, gaps, etc.

Future Centerline Quality Checks (1integrate by 1spatial) Server solution which is contained completely within the AZGEO server infrastructure. Allows for direct interaction by the data owners. Prepares for full automation of Centerline Quality Checks.

AZGEO Website (azgeo.az.gov)

AZGEO Website (azgeo.az.gov) Click on the “Arizona GeoData Supply Chain App”

AZGEO Website (azgeo.az.gov) Click on the “Validate Your Data” button.

1integrate for Server

Questions? Joe Breyer, PE, GISP Works Consulting Email: jbreyer@gisworks.com Phone: 480.813.0570 x301 Ryan Blum Works Consulting Email: rblum@gisworks.com Phone: 480.813.0570 x303