Vertically-integrated CMOS Geiger-mode avalanche pixel sensors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New developments of Silicon Photomultipliers (for PET systems)
Advertisements

Preliminary simulation study of a Coincidence Avalanche Pixel Sensor Introduction The development and optimization of position sensitive detectors is of.
SiPM Interconnections to 3D electronics Jelena Ninkovic Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich, Germany SiMPs basics Why do we need 3D interconnections.
Ultra-Fast Silicon Detector 1 This report is a summary of what was shown at IEEE. Nicolo Cartiglia, INFN, Torino - UFSD - Timing Workshop CERN 2014 Nicolo.
Photon detection Visible or near-visible wavelengths
H.-G. Moser Max-Planck-Institut for Physics, Munich CALOR 06 Chicago June 5-9, 2006 Silicon Photomultiplier, a new device for low light level photon detection.
Outline: Motivation for a backside illuminated SiPM (BID-SiPM)
C. Piemonte 1 Development of SiPMs a FBK-irst C.Piemonte FBK – Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy
Detector development and physics studies in high energy physics experiments Shashikant Dugad Department of High Energy Physics Review, 3-9 Jan 2008.
Salvatore Tudisco The new generation of SPAD Single Photon Avalanche Diodes arrays I Workshop on Photon Detection - Perugia 2007 LNS LNS.
SiPM: Development and Applications
Silicon Photomultipliers
The mechanisms of photo-conversion in SiPM Elena Popova Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute Corsica meeting on fast timing April 29-30, 2013.
Light Calibration System (LCS) Temperature & Voltage Dependence Option 2: Optical system Option 2: LED driver Calibration of the Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Experimental set-up for on the bench tests Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE/Photonis Multi-Channel.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group May 29 – Jun 4 DESY Introduction.
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
R. Pani Department of Experimental Medicine and Pathology University of Rome La Sapienza-Italy. Flat Panel PMT: advances in position sensitive photodetection.
1 SiPM studies: Highlighting current equipment and immediate plans Lee BLM Quasar working group.
10 th Pisa Meeting on Advanced Detectors, Isola d’Elba, May 2006 Development of the first prototypes of Silicon Photomultiplier at ITC-irst N. Dinu, R.
28 June 2007G. Pauletta: ALCPG Tests of IRST SiPMs G. Pauletta Univ. & I.N.F.N. Udine Outline 1.IRST SiPMs : baseline characteristics 2.first application.
Silicon Photo Multipliers as readout for the NA62 CEDAR Detector Silicon Photo Multipliers as readout for the NA62 CEDAR Detector The NA62 Collaboration.
Prospects to Use Silicon Photomultipliers for the Astroparticle Physics Experiments EUSO and MAGIC A. Nepomuk Otte Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München.
FBK 3D CMS pixel sensors preliminary lab measurements E. Alagoz 1, A. Krzywda 1, D. Bortoletto 1, I. Shipsey 1, G. Bolla 1, and G. F. Dalla Betta 2, M.
The VSiPMT: A new Generation of Photons Detectors G. Barbarino 1,2, F. C. T. Barbato 1,2, R. de Asmundis 2, G. De Rosa 1,2, F. Di Capua 1, P. Migliozzi.
Status of NEWCHOD E.Guschin (INR), S.Kholodenko (IHEP), Yu.Kudenko (INR), I.Mannelli (Pisa), O.Mineev (INR), V.Obraztsov (IHEP), V.Semenov(IHEP), V.Sugonyaev.
Study of Geiger Avalanche Photo Diode applications to pixel tracking detectors Barcelona Main Goal The use of std CMOS tech. APD's in Geiger mode (that.
Silicon Photomultiplier Development at GRAPES-3 K.C.Ravindran T.I.F.R, OOTY WAPP 2010 Worshop On behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
TCT measurements with strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko Mikuž 1,2, Marko.
Fondazione Bruno Kessler Centre for Materials and Microsystems.
FARICH status E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
25 um pitch 100 um pitch 50 um pitch 25 um pitch Individual SPADs 1 mm APD Nominal “standard” Devices: 25 um pitch ~50% fill factor AR coated > 20% DE?
Performance of 1600-pixel MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jan. 30(Tue.) Korea-Japan Joint Shinshu Univ. Takashi Maeda ( Univ. of Tsukuba)
TCT measurements of HV-CMOS test structures irradiated with neutrons I. Mandić 1, G. Kramberger 1, V. Cindro 1, A. Gorišek 1, B. Hiti 1, M. Mikuž 1,2,
1 /28 LePIX – Front End Electronic conference – Bergamo 25 May 2011 – Piero Giubilato LePIX – monolithic detectors in advanced CMOS Collection electrode.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
IFR Detector R&D status
Introduction to the physics of the SiPM
10-12 April 2013, INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
Performance of LYSO and CeBr3 crystals readout by SiPM
Progress report on SiPM development and its applications
Matteo VIGNETTI *a (WP2 ESR PhD Student)
Radiation-Hardened, Single-Photon Imagers
APiX Development of an Avalanche Pixel Sensor
Laser and alpha particle characterization of floating-base BJT detector. Vladyslav Tyzhnevyia, Giovanni Batignanib, Luciano Bosisioc,Gian-Franco Dalla.
Characterization and modelling of signal dynamics in 3D-DDTC detectors
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
First production of Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors at FBK
Evidence for direct detection of ionizing particles in SiPMs
Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics
EUDET JRA3, Activity Obninsk State University
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Focusing Aerogel RICH with SiPM Photodetectors
A 3D deep n-well CMOS MAPS for the ILC vertex detector
SiPM+NINO as a detection system for CEDAR
(Status in) Silicon Photomultiplier developments
New Study for SiPMs Performance in High Electric Field Environment
Next generation 3D digital SiPM for precise timing resolution
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
SiPM Readout ASIC LAPP Contribution
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
R&D of MPPC for T2K experiment
Silicon pixel detectors and electronics for hybrid photon detectors
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
New bi-dimensional SPAD arrays for Time Resolved Single Photon Imaging
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

Vertically-integrated CMOS Geiger-mode avalanche pixel sensors L. Pancheri, P. Brogi, G. Collazuol, G.-F. Dalla Betta, A. Ficorella, P.S. Marrocchesi, F. Morsani, L. Ratti, A. Savoy-Navarro University of Trento & TIFPA University of Siena & INFN Pisa University of Padova & INFN Padova University of Pavia & INFN Pavia Laboratoire APC, University Paris-Diderot/CNRS Paris 14th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors (IPRD16) Siena, Italy, October 3-6, 2016

APiX2 project “Development of an Avalanche Pixel Sensor for tracking applications” Funded by INFN – CSN5 Project coordinator: Pier Simone Marrocchesi, INFN Pisa and University of Siena Partners: TIFPA and University of Trento, INFN Pavia and University Pavia, INFN Padova and University of Padova, Laboratoire APC, Université Paris-Diderot/CNRS

Outline Introduction Sensor architecture Experimental results Summary and future perspectives

APiX particle detector concept Quenching Particle detection Discriminators Coincidence detector Dark counts Two Geiger-mode avalanche detectors (SPADs) in coincidence: DCR = DCR1 DCR2 2DT In-pixel coincidence: not feasible in SiPM optimized process (Hamamatsu, FBK, SensL …) Integrated electronics is needed: CMOS process V. Saveliev, US Patent. 8,269,181, 2012 N. D’Ascenzo et al., JINST 2014

Avalanche detectors – cross section Standard 150nm CMOS process – no modifications Avalanche diodes in deep nwell: isolated from substrate Type 1: Shallow step junction Active thickness ~ 1μm Type2: Deep graded junction Active thickness ~ 1.5μm L. Pancheri et al., J. Selected Topics Quantum Electron, 2014

Single-photon timing resolution Measured on 10-μm devices, with blue laser (470nm), 70ps FWHM Type 1: 60ps FWHM Type 2: 170ps FWHM

Proof-of-concept demonstrator 2-layer pixel cross section: Electronic readout on both layers Metal shielding from optical cross-talk Vertical interconnection by bump bonding

Pixel architecture Pixel enable/disable Pulse shortening: reduces the rate of accidental coincidence Programmable pulse width: 750ps, 1.5ns, 10ns

Pixel architecture: storage In-pixel 1-bit memory Output register for fast data output

Sensor floorplan Wire bonding pads on chip 2: pre-integration test. Bottom chip Top chip Wire bonding pads on chip 2: pre-integration test. Final assembly Top chip Bottom chip

Pixel array 16 x 48 pixel array Pixel size: 50μm x 75μm Splittings in detector type and area Bump bonding pad 30μm x 30μm 35μm x 35μm 40μm x 40μm 43μm x 45μm Pixels with different detector area (unshielded) Pixels with shielded detectors

Sensor micrographs Bottom chip Top chip

Bottom chip - Micrographs Shielded Unshielded

Bottom chip - Micrographs

Breakdown voltage uniformity Measurements on 5 sample chips x 2 types x 196 devices per chip Very good uniformity on-chip (s < 20mV) Large difference (1V) between different chips for type 1

Dark Count Rate Distribution VEX = 3.3V VEX = 3.3V Cumulative distribution, combined measurements on 3 chips 600 devices for largest size, 72 for smaller ones Median DCR = 2.2kHz for largest cell size of both types

Crosstalk characterization Crosstalk coefficient CRm = DCRe ∙ DCRd ∙ 2∆T + K ∙ ( DCRe + DCRd ) Emitter (fixed) Detector (scan) Crosstalk map – Type 1, 25µm thickness

Crosstalk vs substrate thickness

Vertically-integrated assembly Dark Count Rate vs. coincidence time DT DCRCOINC = DCR1 x DCR2 x 2DT T = 20°C DT = 1.5ns DT = 10ns DT = 0.75ns DCRCOINC = 27 counts/s mm2

b-source measurements 90Sr β source – 37kBq at 2mm distance from sensor VEX = 2V T = 5°C Dt = 0.75ns ~ 2x10-3 counts/pixel s Count rate ~0.5 counts/s mm2

Summary Strengths: Can be thinned to a few microns: low material budget Timing resolution Low power consumption Weaknesses: Radiation tolerance Geometric efficiency: surface device guard ring and electronics Opportunities: Progress in SPAD production and 3D integration technologies: many major foundries active Threats: - Cost and accessibility of 3D integration processes

Future work Current prototype: Design of new prototype: Test beam at CERN just finished: analysis of test beam results on-going Radiation hardness Design of new prototype: Larger array Improved fill factor Optimized timing Optimized power consumption

Thank you

Additional slides

Geiger-mode avalanche detectors a.k.a. Single-Photon Avalanche Diodes (SPADs), Silicon Photomultipliers 1 primary generated electron-hole pair: very large current pulse ~105 - 106 electrons Vout VBIAS > VBD SPAD Vout RQ time events

Experimental results - summary Characterization of single-layer sensors: Core supply current (at 1.8V): 8mA Breakdown voltage uniformity Dark count rate distribution Cross-talk Timing resolution Characterization of vertically integrated sensors Coincidence Dark Count Rate Measurements with 90Sr β source Test beam with protons at CERN (data analysis in due course)

Coincidence detection 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Count rate in coincidence between two pixels in the same column Normalized rate: 𝐶 𝑅 𝑀𝑒𝑎𝑠 2∙𝐶 𝑅 1 ∙𝐶 𝑅 2 ∙∆𝑇 Cross-talk Cross-talk

Photo-Detection Efficiency Type 1: p+/nwell Type 2: pwell/niso Shallower junction: better NUV – Blue efficiency Wider depletion region: Better red-IR efficiency L. Pancheri et al., J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electron, 2015

DCR temperature dependence Devices with 43μm x 45μm active area, but different DCR Measurements from -30°C to 50°C with 10°C steps Overvoltage: VOV = 3.3V

Breakdown probability (Pb) IR light: uniform generation, Pb measured for a single photoelectron Particles generate N primary electrons: PbN = 1 – (1-Pb)N Example: single electron  Pb = 30% 10 electrons  Pb10 = 97% L. Pancheri et al., J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electron, 2015

VBD extraction method VREF VBD extraction from I-V curves: not possible VBD extracted from the dark count rate vs. voltage curve L. Pancheri et al., Proc. IEEE ICMTS, 2014

Dark Count Rate vs. bias Active area: 43μm x 45μm

Effect of crosstalk in DCR distribution Thickness 280 µm Thickness 50 µm Median DCR increase of 70% for 280µm sample and 400% for 50µm sample

Timing resolution IR laser (780nm) 50ps FWHM Diffuser Sensor VEX = 1V 208ps FWHM Diffuser Sensor Coincidence output Timing histogram between laser trigger and sensor coincidence output N.B. Design not optimized for timing 2 pixels enabled