Hans (Hyungsoo) Kim KT corp.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VoIP Dynamic Resource Allocation in IP DiffServ Domain:
Advertisements

Network Resource Broker for IPTV in Cloud Computing Lei Liang, Dan He University of Surrey, UK OGF 27, G2C Workshop 15 Oct 2009 Banff,
International Telecommunication Union Workshop on End-to-End Quality of Service.What is it? How do we get it? Geneva, 1-3 October 2003 ITU-T Recs. Y.1541.
ITU-T Workshop on IP/Optical Chitose, 9-11 July 2002 Session Network Performance N eal Seitz, Chair SG 13/WP 4 IP Performance Specifications: Progress.
Standards for E2E QoS Delivery: Progress and Future Needs July 25, 2003 Al Morton.
International Telecommunication Union Workshop on Standardization in E-health Geneva, May 2003 Basic requiremenst to Quality of Service (IP centric)
22-23 June 2004TISPAN-3GPP Workshop - Sophia-Antipolis 1 TISPAN NGN Architecture Overview Richard Brennan pulver.com, WG2 Chair
ETSI Workshop on Quality Issues for IP Telephony 8-9 June 1999, Sophia Antipolis, France ETSI PROJECT TIPHON overview of QoS activities ETSI Workshop on.
AIMS Workshop Heidelberg, 9-11 March /20 A Telecom and IP Project from ETSI Gerald Meyer
A simulation-based comparative evaluation of transport protocols for SIP Authors: M.Lulling*, J.Vaughan Department of Computer science, University college.
10th Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems 1 A Comparative Evaluation of Internet Pricing Schemes: Smart Market and Dynamic Capacity Contracting.
IP Networking & MEDIACOM 2004 Workshop April 2001 Geneva End to End Quality of Service Control in H.323 Networks End to End Quality of Service.
DOCUMENT #:GSC15-GTSC-05 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:ITU-T AGENDA ITEM:4.1 NGN, Testing specification and Beyond Chaesub.
10/09/2015 NGN related Standardization Issues (Architecture and Protocol) Chae-Sub, LEE TTA 1GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:TTA TITLE:NGN for Global Generation (Architecture.
ITU Workshop on “Performance, Quality of Service and Quality of Experience of Emerging Networks and Services” (Athens, Greece 7-8 September 2015) E2E QoS.
IP Networking & MEDIACOM 2004 Workshop April 2001 Geneva Characterising End to End Quality of Service in TIPHON Systems Characterising End to End.
Wolfgang EffelsbergUniversity of Mannheim1 Differentiated Services for the Internet Wolfgang Effelsberg University of Mannheim September 2001.
Methods for providing Quality of Service in WLANs W.Burakowski, A. Beben, J.Sliwinski Institute of Telecommunications, Warsaw University of Technology,
Monitoring and Measurement System in EuQoS project dr Andrzej Beben Telecommunication Network Technology Group Warsaw University.
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
The 11th CJK NGN-WG Meeting 1 11 th CJK NGN-WG (CJK NGN Test-bed Activity Report) CJK NGN Test-bed Ad-hoc Group.
24/11/2015 NGN related standardization issues : End-to-end QoS Hyungsoo Kim KT 1GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:TTA TITLE:Additional Requirements for the standardization.
NETLMM Applicability Draft (Summary) 28 Sep
The 7th CJK NGN Working Group Meeting October 10 ~ 11, 2006, Tokyo, Japan Performance Objectives for performance testing on CJK NGN testbed Hyungsoo Kim.
Evaluation Scenarios of the CJK NGN Test-bed
CJK test-bed study based on MPM
Smart Grid Standard activities in Korea
Instructor Materials Chapter 6: Quality of Service
Chae-Sub LEE TTA Summary Report of 6th FG NGN Chae-Sub LEE TTA
A way forward for New question Distributed Service Network
AeroMACS QOS.
Inter domain signaling protocol
Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2009
Network Model for Evaluating Multimedia Transmission Performance Over Internet Protocol PN Will become TIA/EIA-921 Jack Douglass, Spirent Chair.
IEEE 802 OmniRAN Study Group: SDN Use Case
CJK NGN test-bed study Phase III&IV
Network Model for Evaluating Multimedia Transmission Performance Over Internet Protocol PN Will become TIA/EIA-921 Jack Douglass, Spirent Chair.
RSVP and Integrated Services in the Internet: A Tutorial
ATIS Cybersecurity DOCUMENT #: GSC13-GTSC6-12 FOR: Presentation
QOS Requirements for Real-Time Services over IP
Introduction to Networking
Proposal for the CJK NGN Test-bed Activity
NETLMM Applicability Draft (Summary)
EE 122: Network Applications
Chapter 25 Multimedia TCP/IP Protocol Suite
Chapter 8: Internet Operation
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 6: Quality of Service Connecting Networks.
Wireless ATM PRESENTED BY : NIPURBA KONAR.
IP Performance Specifications - Progress and Next Steps
CSE679: Multimedia and Networking
Taxonomy of network applications
ECE 4450:427/527 - Computer Networks Spring 2017
CIS679: MPEG-2 Review of MPEG-1 MPEG-2 Multimedia and networking.
Targets for the SG 13 Caracas Meeting
EE 122: Quality of Service and Resource Allocation
Presented by Dave McDysan
Lecture 6: TCP/IP Networking 1nd semester By: Adal ALashban.
Standardize QoS signaling protocols using Y.1541
High Interest Subject: NGN – End-to-End QoS
Quality of Service Architectures for Satellite Based Internet
QoS: Don’t VoIP without it!
From mobile TV applications to VTS PAR Scopes
Charles KIM TTA Collaboration Plan for CJK NGN Charles KIM TTA
Quality of Service for TDR Traffic
Interconnection Issues
QoS based pricing in IP Networks
Peter Brooks, Teolys (F) Bjørn Hestnes, Telenor R&D (N)
Hans, KIM TTA Release approach and CJK requirements Hans, KIM TTA
Hans (Hyungsoo) Kim KT corp.
Hans, KIM TTA Future of NGN Standards - FG NGN and SGs - Hans, KIM TTA
Presentation transcript:

Hans (Hyungsoo) Kim KT corp. hans9@kt.co.kr Implementation Scenario of QoS standard in Korea Hans (Hyungsoo) Kim KT corp. hans9@kt.co.kr

Contents Introduction Relative Standards How to be implemented Future collaboration among three countries

Introduction Standard bodies have developed QoS standards How to be implemented into real field ?

Relative Standards Focusing on FG NGN works, TR-NGN.QoS, TR-NGN.NHNperf., TR-e2eqos, TR-123qos, TR-ipaqos and TR-RACS are considered Regarding on Other standards, G.1000 & G.1010 (SG 12) Y.1540, Y.1541 & Y.1560 (SG 12)

Relative Standards – SG 12 Figure 2 / G.1000

Relative Standards – FG NGN Functional Architecture for RACS Application Functions RACF Transport Functions CPE NAAF Functions in other domains

Relative Standards – SG 12 Architecture for IP signaling Application & QoS Requirements Perceived Classes & Decisions Design/ Eng . Provisioning QoS Mech Reports ( SLAs ) Cnfg .Choices Feedback Monitoring User Terminal Equip Network Request ACK/REJ/Mod Result Network(s) UNI NNI

How to be implemented Here is the application requiring Guaranteed QoS How to identify ‘Application & QoS requirement’? How to be controlled through Service/Network Stratum? What kinds of further details should be requested ? Applications Service Stratum Transport Stratum NGN Configuration

Application & QoS requirements G.1010 (SG 12) Performance requirements for particular applications If new applications appear or different performance requirements are required, new performance requirements should be specified Medium Application Degree of symmetry Typical data rates Key performance parameters and target values One-way delay Delay variation Information loss Other Audio Voice messaging Primarily one-way  4-32 kb/s < 1 sec for playback < 2 sec for record < 1 msec < 3% High quality streaming audio Primarily one-way 16-128 kb/s < 10 sec < 1% Video Videophone Two-way 16-384 kb/s < 150 msec preferred <400 msec limit Lip-synch : < 80 msec

Application & QoS requirements Different value of applications for Providers Application Value level Low High VoIP Web-phone for free SIP phone for business purpose VoD Outside from the provider Supported by the provider P-to-P Flat-rate charging users Usage-based charging users Web-surfing News portal site Registration/booking site When user request Application itself : Don’t need to follow G.1010 !! When user request QoS itself : The burden of processing is too much !!

Application QoS classes AQC makes the engineering easier and more efficient !! Network QoS classes NQC 1 NQC 2 NQC 3 NQC 4 . Application QoS classes AQC 1 AQC 2 AQC 3 AQC 4 . Application Requirement VoIP by web-phone VoIP for stringent QoS (i.e. 80 ms, 0 Loss) QoS requirement Simplified QoS requirement for Network Engineering (i.e. Call Control, QoS control, Network Control, Traffic Engineering)

Performance Parameter Nature of Network Performance Objective Network QoS classes Y.1541 covers UNI-UNI for IP service In optical transmission, 100 ms delay is achieved in less than 4,000 Km Based on the distance and complexity of link, it should be modified Performance Parameter Nature of Network Performance Objective Class 0 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 IPTD Upper bound on the mean IPTD 100 ms 400 ms 1 s U IPDV Upper bound on the 1-10-3 quantile of IPTD minus the minimum IPTD 50 ms IPLR Upper bound on the packet loss probability 1*10-3 1*10-5 IPER Upper bound 1*10-4 1*10-6 Core Network Access Network TE/CPN User Network QoS Edge Application QoS UNI Added in Feb. of 2005

Performance Objectives Network QoS classes In Korea, the longest link is less than 600 km and has 8 routers End-to-end performance objectives are allocated as follows; Based on the above apportionment, more details are allocated as follows; Network QoS classes Performance Objectives IPTD IPDV IPLR QoS guaranteed class < 25 ms < 30 ms 10-6 Best efforts class Unspecified End-to-end Core Access IPTD < 25 ms < 7 ms < 9 ms IPDV < 30ms < 10 ms < 10ms IPLR < 10-6 < 2 x 10-7 < 4 x 10-7

Conclusion For the end-to-end QoS control, Application QoS Classes concept is useful to cooperate with Network QoS classes AQC is developing in TR-NGN.QoS of FG NGN WG3 Network QoS classes should be allocated / extended, based on the each country's and provider’s network (distance and complex)