Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Libertarianism and the Philosophers Lecture 4
Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
KANTIAN ETHICS IN FIVE EASY (?) STEPS. Sandel’s Classification of Normative Ethical Theories 1.Core concept: maximizing happiness – Utilitarianism (morality,
Government – Chapter 1.3 Lecture
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
Ethics and ethical systems 12 January
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Ethical Theories High-level account of how questions about morality should be addressed. Similar to engineering models? V=IR: a tool to solve many engineering.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Deontological ethics. What is the point of departure? Each human beings should be treated as an end. Certain acts (lying, breaking promises, killing...)
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.
Kant’s Deontological Ethics. The Plan  What is Deontology?  Good Wills and Right Actions  The Categorical Imperative  Examples and Applications.
CRITICAL QUESTION How should the bounty of a society be distributed?
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics.
AP/SOSC 2340/ o Intermediate Business & Society Lecture 4: Libertarianism.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Justice Paradox of Justice Small volcanic island has two villages, “South Town” (Pop 300) and “North Village” (Pop 500). Threat of devastating volcanic.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
Ideas about Justice Three big themes Virtue Ethics Utilitarianism
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 3 30 January 2008.
ETHICALETHICALETHICALETHICAL PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES.
Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law.
Egalitarian Liberalism: Justice in the Modern State
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
Lecture 13 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
EECS 690 January 27, Deontology Typically, when anyone talks about Deontology, they mean to talk about Immanuel Kant. Kant is THE deontologist.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
How to Argue for Moral Premise Using Mills, Kant and Rawls to help your arguments.
Justice Retribution distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live.
Justice. What is justice? It seems we develop a sense of fairness from an early age and most people would agree with Plato that the only life worth living.
What is the right thing to do?
Ethics Topic 3.
Political theory and law
Chapter 2 Discussion: Ethical Principles in Business
Morality and Ethics.
Moral Principles Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D.
Deontological tradition
Political theory and law
universalizability & reversibility
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Noddy’s Guide to Kant.
LD Debate (yay!).
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Theory of Health Care Ethics
Theories of justice.
Capitalism vs. Socialism
MODULE 3 By: Chris Martinez.
Theories of Justice Retributive Justice – How should those who break the law be punished? Distributive Justice – How should society distribute it’s resources?
The Liberal Tradition.
Basic Concepts of Democracy
Theories of Ethics.
Chapter – explore the extent to which governments should encourage economic equality 3.5 – examine the extent to which the practices of political.
TC chapter 9– TCing about moral issues
Chapter – explore the extent to which governments should encourage economic equality 3.5 – examine the extent to which the practices of political.
Chapter – explore the extent to which governments should encourage economic equality 3.5 – examine the extent to which the practices of political.
Liberalism John Rawls.
Ethical concepts and ethical theories Topic 3
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Presentation transcript:

Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of justice and mercy.” ― Wendell Berry Retribution

The Liberal Tradition Progressives Libertarians Key value – Freedom as equality of opportunity and quality of living Want a welfare state that makes sure no one falls below a certain basic standard of living Favor a progressive tax system in which the wealthy pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes Libertarians Key value – Freedom as personal liberty to do as one pleases Want a minimal government with power limited to courts, police, and military Oppose any income tax, except, perhaps, a minimal flat tax for the minimal government

Two Views of Freedom Libertarians Progressives Freedom = being left alone to do what I want (negative freedom) Progressives Freedom = having the obstacles that keep me from living fully removed (Positive Freedom)

Do we own ourselves? Immanuel Kant b. 1724 d. 1804 Lived in Prussia (now Germany) all of his life Founder of the moral system known as deontology 4

Categorical Imperative “Act so that you treat humanity [persons], whether in your person or that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.” Translation: It is always wrong to treat a person as if they were nothing more than a thing; always wrong to treat them like an object

Respecting Persons Person – df. 'a rational being' To be a rational being one must posses (a) self- awareness, (b) be able to make complex free choices, and (c) have a concept of right and wrong 6

Kant Vs. The Libertarians Libertarianism – We each own ourselves and may do whatever we like with ourselves. Self- ownership is the foundation of morals Kant – We don’t own ourselves. We are not our own property. Respect for the dignity of ourselves and others is the foundation of morals

Nozick's argument for Libertarianism It is my money! I EARNED it! I DESERVE it! Meritocracy – the view that those who do well in society earned it, and that those who do poorly deserve it.

Rawls' argument for Progressivism A Theory of Justice (1971) “against Meritocracy ” The amount of money you make is largely a result of dumb luck, in two ways 1) what talents you are born with, and 2) supply an demand How much you earn does NOT depend on what you morally deserve

A Fair Race?

The Original Position The Veil of Ignorance

We Would not choose 1. Communism 2. Utilitarianism

Two Principles of Justice 1. The Principle of Equal Liberty 2. The Difference Principle Wins if they conflict