East Bay Community Energy Local Development Business Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United Nations Statistics Division/DESA
Advertisements

ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
PV Market Trends and Technical Details. All of US has Suitable Solar Resource for Large Scale PV Deployment.
På väg mot en elförsörjning baserad på enbart förnybar el i Sverige En studie om behov av reglerkraft och överföringskapacitet Version 4.0 Lennart Söder.
Hawaii: 2020 Presented by Alex Waegel for Team Cake B.
CPUC CSI Workshop CPUC CSI Stakeholder Workshop San Francisco, CA February 15, 2012.
New Drug Capacity Calculator Instruction Manual An Excel-based tool for estimating the resource required to deliver newly approved chemotherapy drugs.
Financial Model.
Thermoflow, Inc. TOPS stands for Thermoflow’s Optimization System and is a general purpose optimizer for use with Thermoflow’s core programs. TOPS runs.
Capacity Valuation.
SMALL UTILITY-SCALE RESOURCES (DISTRIBUTED GENERATION) 1.
United Nations Statistics Division Two main approaches to calculate the IIP.
IPCC Synthesis Report Part IV Costs of mitigation measures Jayant Sathaye.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
MicroFIT webinar – Update on consultation process - DRAFT July 29, 2010.
LEVELIZED COST OF ENERGY. Summary Levelized costs are calculated as a proxy for the PPA price between a third-party developer and a utility LCOEs amortize.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
September 9, 2003 Lee Jay Fingersh National Renewable Energy Laboratory Overview of Wind-H 2 Configuration & Control Model (WindSTORM)
Identify Sensitive Variables © Dale R. Geiger
Fremont County – Green Spring 2012 Research Team: Jacob Tolman, Justin Andersen, Thresia Mouritsen, Joseph Huckbody, John Beck Feasibility Study.
Long Term Study Task Force Update to ETWG ERCOT Long-Term Study: Scenarios, New Software, and Emerging Technology Assumptions January 27, 2012.
Wind Engineering Module 6.1: Cost and Weight Models Lakshmi N. Sankar 1.
Some Thoughts on Our Energy Future(s) ~In Pictures~ NW Energy Coalition NW Clean & Affordable Energy Conference Comments of Ron Binz Public Policy Consulting.
ECE 7800: Renewable Energy Systems Topic 12: Economic Analysis of Renewable Energy Systems Spring 2010 © Pritpal Singh, 2010.
Cost Behavior Analysis
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12 Financial and Cost- Volume-Profit Models.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Economies of Scale
Group 4B: Bergold, Kajander, Leppä, Niemeläinen, Pesonen.
ESD.70J Engineering Economy Module - Session 01 ESD.70J Engineering Economy Fall 2009 Session Zero Michel-Alexandre Cardin – Prof. Richard.
An Overview of the Technology and Economics of Offshore Wind Farms
1 Modeling Distributed Generation Adoption using Electric Rate Feedback Loops USAEE Austin, TX – November 2012 Mark Chew, Matt Heling, Colin Kerrigan,
1  Power plant costs are key factors in energy market policy decisions Key assumptions in the EIA NEMS model Input factors to all energy economic models.
Battery Storage Systems: A Backward Induction Approach with Multiple Daily Discharging Opportunities Joohyun Cho Andrew Kleit The Pennsylvania State University.
1 11. PROFITABILITY EVALUATION OF NEW POWER PLANT ALTERNATIVES Asko Vuorinen.
15ELP044: Energy System Investment and Risk Management Unit 2B: Energy Economics and Markets Paul Rowley 1, Simon Watson 1 and Andy Williams 2 1 CREST.
Energy System Investment and Risk Management Unit 2: Energy Economics and Markets Connect Seminar, 3 rd March 2016, 18:30GMT.
DG Projections in the Western Interconnection March 15, 2016 Zach Ming, Consultant Nick Schlag, Managing Consultant Arne Olson, Partner.
Update Value of Solar for Austin Energy Tom Hoff President, Research and Consulting November 21, 2011.
Access Investment Model (AIM)
Kenya’s INDC: Actions in the Energy Sector
Energy Planning and Implementation: Energy Scenario Planning Tool Overview 07 February 2017.
Modeling DER in Transmission Planning CAISO Experience
Prospects for Solar Energy in the UK Kathryn Greatorex 24th February 2005 I have been studying the possible contributions of solar energy.
“Other” Cost Estimates
Lecture 4: Energy systems and energy technologies – Focus on economical aspects UNIK4820/9820 UNIK: 08/ Arne Lind.
Contents Introduction Focus area Wind scenarios
James L. Plummer, President, Climate Economics Foundation
Matthew Wittenstein Electricity Analyst, International Energy Agency
ME 312 PPE POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
A comparison of biomass energy with other renewables
East Bay Community Energy Local Development Business Plan
East Bay Community Energy Local Development Business Plan
East Bay Community Energy Local Development Business Plan
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Lecture 15 Economic Dispatch Tom Overbye and Ross Baldick 1.
HOMER.
Andreas Belderbos Erik Delarue Kris Kessels William D’haeseleer
Constructive Cost Model
CSP Grid Value of Energy Storage and LCOE Implications 26 August 2013
New Drug Capacity Calculator
Security of supply - deriving a winter energy standard using the DOASA model EPOC Winter Workshop September 2018.
Offshore Wind Energy Model
Opportunities for Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage for Electric Utilities
Case No UT PNM Workshop Comments
THE STUDY OF SOLAR-WIND HYBRID SYSTEM PH301 RENEWABLE ENERGY
Islands & Renewable Energy
Some reflections on How to measure Employment impacts of energy projects at Partner country level: tools & methods, gaps & challenges Dr. Steffen Erdle,
Introduction Purpose To describe the features and capabilities of two new coin cell supercapacitor series from CDE. Objectives Explain advantages of supercapacitors.
Presentation transcript:

East Bay Community Energy Local Development Business Plan Task 1 LCOE (for grid-side DER) Overview Webinar November 30, 2017 Thomas Yurysta, Optony LDBP Project Team: Special Advisors: Betony Jones & Gary Calderon

LCOE Analysis - Overview Purpose Show current costs for the DG technologies most readily available in Alameda County Format and Content Costs expressed in levelized cost of energy (“LCOE”) LCOE is the net present value of all energy procured from a resource over a fixed period of time LCOE tool is an excel spreadsheet User has ability to adjust resource mix and see affect on overall portfolio LCOE User can also adjust inputs to derive new LCOEs The tool also shows potential capacities and energy output of each technology This is a necessity in order to provide an overall weighted portfolio LCOE However, the capacity numbers should be taken with a grain of salt. The primary purpose of this tool is not to estimate countywide capacity of different DG technologies, so broad assumptions were made in deriving these numbers

LCOE Analysis - Approach Methodology Cost For solar, since data is widely available, cost estimates derived ground-up using known pricing for individual components For other technologies, cost estimates derived from industry reports and supplemented with vendor quotes and empirical data Cost broken down by initial capital cost, annual fixed costs, and annual variable costs Capacity Factor and Energy Output Solar and wind are highly dependent on location and system configuration, so production estimates were modeled For other resources that are not constrained by resource availability, production estimates were based on typical runtimes for the plant type (e.g. typical biofuel plants have capacity factors of 80%) LCOE LCOE is a simple summation once cost and energy output numbers are known The LCOE calculation is done on a separate tab of the spreadsheet. NREL’s online LCOE calculator was used to validate.

LCOE Analysis - Approach Notes and Limitations Energy generation is a long term investment with large upfront costs. As such, LCOE is highly sensitive to both financing costs and discount rate. A discount rate of 6% was used for this analysis. The concept of LCOE is less intuitive for storage technologies, since energy is being time shifted rather than created. For flywheels, which are often used for grid regulation, both charging and discharging cycles are included in the energy side of the LCOE calculation For all other storage technologies, only the discharge cycles are included LCOE is best used as a cost comparison between energy generation technologies

LCOE Analysis - Results Findings Solar LCOEs range from $0.10/kWh to $0.156/kWh Lowest for large ground mounts in the sunnier eastern side of the County Highest for smaller roof mounts along the Bay Solar has by far the greatest potential, so overall portfolio LCOE driven by solar Large scale wind has the best LCOE at $0.084/kWh This is for turbines in the northeast corner of the County where wind speed is highest For other DG technologies, LCOE varies greatly Biofuels driven by fuel source and plant capacity factor Storage and fuel cells driven by runtime Comparison to Lazard’s LCOE Analysis Our numbers generally fall within the bounds of Lazard ranges. Exceptions: Our wind LCOE is higher. Lazard report assumes capacity factor of 30-35%, but highest available in Alameda County is 29%. Our solar LCOE for large ground mounts is higher. Lazard assumes higher insolation than is available in Alameda County (main factor) and larger sizing of 10 MW (minor factor)

LCOE Tool – Main Table Shows all inputs and resulting LCOE for each technology. The green rows show cumulative totals.

Toggle resources on/off here Totals in this row update to reflect selected resource mix LCOE of total portfolio $0.129/kWh over 20 years

Measured solar potential higher than shown here Potential capacities for biofuels, fuel cells, and storage are placeholders, represent typical plant sizes T&D losses for storage technologies represent round- trip conversion efficiencies Variable costs are mostly fuel, some O&M related to plant runtime

LCOE Tool – Calculator Tab Allows the user to select a DG technology from a dropdown list (yellow cells) and adjust any of the input associated with that technology (grey cells) to see the effect on LCOE. User can also adjust the analysis period or discount rate.

The deadline for submitting comments is: Thank you The Draft EBCE LDBP Task 1 (Grid-side DER) LCOE Report is posted for public review and comment at: http://ebce.org/local-development-business-plan/ The deadline for submitting comments is: December 8, 2017 LDBP Project Team: Special Advisors: Betony Jones & Gary Calderon